欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (03): 415-422.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同供肥条件下水分分配对旱地玉米产量的影响

高亚军;李生秀;田霄鸿;李世清;王朝辉;杜建军   

  1. 西北农林科技大学资源环境学院,陕西杨凌 712100
  • 收稿日期:2004-10-08 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-03-12 网络出版日期:2006-03-12
  • 通讯作者: 高亚军

Effects of Water Supply Levels in Different Growth Stages on Maize Yield under Different Fertilizer Levels

GAO Ya-Jun; LI Sheng-Xiu; TIAN Xiao-Hong; LI Shi-Qing; WANG Zhao-Hui and DU Jian-Jun   

  1. Resource and Environments College, Northwest A & F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi
  • Received:2004-10-08 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-03-12 Published online:2006-03-12
  • Contact: GAO Ya-Jun

摘要:

以盆栽试验和田间试验研究了不同供肥条件下不同生育期水分状况对玉米产量的影响。结果表明,任何生育期的土壤干旱胁迫均会导致玉米减产,肥料供应充足时减产幅度较小;干旱胁迫越严重,肥料的这一作用越显著。无论正常供肥还是低肥,玉米对抽雄期土壤水分最敏感,防止这一时期干旱胁迫对保证玉米产量具有重要意义。拔节期是旱地玉米有限灌溉的另一个关键时期,水分的增产潜力很大,低肥时增加拔节期土壤水分供应效果更显著。玉米苗期并不耐旱,尤其是低肥时苗期干旱显著影响玉米的籽粒产量。在相对含水量45%~90%范围内,玉米产量随土壤含水量的增加而增加,但增加幅度与肥料供应和生育期有关。玉米获得最高产量的土壤水分条件与肥料供应密切相关,与正常供肥相比,低肥时所需土壤含水量较低。玉米增产的肥效大于水效,产量随肥料投入的增加显著提高,水分胁迫条件下增加肥料供应同样具有增产作用。肥料供应不足时水分的增产作用会受到限制。在现有的水资源条件下,提高肥料供应水平是旱地玉米增产的主要途径。

关键词: 水分的优化分配, 旱地, 玉米, 肥料, 产量

Abstract:

Maize growth and yield are sensitive to soil water. However, the effects are related to maize growth stages. Fertilizers supply may influence the effect of soil water in different growth stage on maize yield, but few report focus on it.
The pot experiment and field experiment were conducted in the southern Loess Plateau. The purpose was to investigate effects of water supply levels in different growth stages on maize yield under different fertilizer levels. The pot experiment concerned soil water content in seedling stage, internode elongation stage, tasselling stage, filling stage and fertilizer levels. Soil water content included five levels (45%, 60%, 75%, 90% and 105% of field capacity) while fertilizer included normal fertilizer level (NL: 0.4 g N·kg-1 dry soil+ 0.2 g P2O5·kg-1 dry soil) and low fertilizer level (LL: 0.2 g N·kg-1 dry soil+ 0 g P2O5·kg-1 dry soil). The field experiment concerned irrigation in seedling stage (X1), internode elongation stage (X2), tasselling stage (X3), filling stage (X4) and N fertilizer rates (X5). Irrigation water included five levels (0, 25, 50, 75 and 100 mm), and N fertilizer application also included five levels (0, 112.5, 225, 337.5 and 450 N kg/ha).
Maize yield of LL was significantly less than that of NL whatever soil water content was. Maize yield of NL was increased continuously with the increase of soil water content in the range of 45%–105%. However, the yield of LL was increased with the increase of soil water content and reduced when soil water content was more than 90% in seedling stage, tasselling stage and filling stage. In internode elongation stage, the yield both of LL and NL were increased continuously with the increase of soil water content in the range of 45%–105%. In all the stages, maize yields under soil water content of 45% or 60% were lower, compared with that of 75% (control). The yield reduction of NL was less than that of LL. Yield of the treatment with soil water content 45% and 60% in tasselling stage was less than that in other stages whatever fertilizer was, and that in seedling stage was more than that in tasselling stage but less than that in other stages.
Maize biomass of LL was significantly less than that of NL despite of soil water content. In all stages, biomass of LL and NL were increased continuously with the increase of soil water content in the range of 45%–105%. For LL and NL, the biomass of the treatment with soil water content of 45% and 60% in tasselling stage was less than that in other stages, and that in internode elongation stage was more than that in tasselling stage but less than that in other stages. Biomass of LL and NL was greater under soil water content of 90% and 105% than that of control in all stages.
Two regression models were set up according to data of the field experiment, describing the relationship of maize yield (Ygrain) or biomass (Ybiomass) and irrigation water in seedling stage (X1), internode elongation stage (X2), tasselling stage (X3), filling stage (X4) and N rate (X5).
Ygrain =12473.4+278.6X2+585.4 X5-427.4X4X5;
Ybiomass = 24321.8 + 224.2X2 + 315.2X3 + 1346.3X5-280.1X12-468.3X22-198.2X32-232.7X42-437.0X1X2-
238.6X2X3-601.9X4X5
The results indicated that soil drought in all stages of maize growth resulted in the reduction of maize yield. However, the yield reduction was decreased by sufficient fertilizer supply, especially under severe drought. Maize yield was quite sensitive to water in tasselling stage, whatever fertilizers were applied. So it was very important for maize to avoid water stress during growing period. Internode elongation stage was another key stage sensitive to soil water in dryland. The increase of soil water content in the stage had more significant effect on maize yield when fertilizer was shortage. Drought in seedling stage also caused significant decrease of maize grain yield, especially when fertilizer was not sufficient. Maize yield was increased with the increase of relatively soil water content in the range of 45% to 90%, but which was changed by fertilizer supply and different stages of maize growth. The increase of maize yield was contributed more by fertilizer than by water. The effect of water on maize yield was also limited when fertilizer was shortage. In the present situation, more fertilizer supply is the main way to increase crop yield in the Loess Plateau.

Key words: Optimization of water supply, Dryland, Maize, Fertilizer, Yield

中图分类号: 

  • S513
[1] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[4] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[5] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[6] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[7] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[8] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[9] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[10] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[11] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[12] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[13] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[14] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[15] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!