欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (03): 423-429.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

灌浆期高温对两种品质类型小麦品种籽粒淀粉合成关键酶活性的影响

赵辉;戴廷波;荆奇;姜东;曹卫星;陆玮;田孝威   

  1. 南京农业大学农业部作物生长调控重点开放实验室,江苏南京210095
  • 收稿日期:2005-02-25 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-03-12 网络出版日期:2006-03-12
  • 通讯作者: 曹卫星

Effects of High Temperature during Grain Filling on Key Enzymes Involved in Starch Synthesis in Two Wheat Cultivars with Different Quality Types

ZHAO Hui;DAI Ting-Bo;JING Qi;JIANG Dong;CAO Wei-Xing;LU Wei and TIAN Xiao-Wei   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Growth Regulation,Ministry of Agriculture,Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2005-02-25 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-03-12 Published online:2006-03-12
  • Contact: CAO Wei-Xing

摘要:

以徐州26(高蛋白含量)和扬麦9号(低蛋白含量)2个不同品质类型小麦品种为材料,利用人工气候室模拟小麦花后高温条件,研究了灌浆期高温对籽粒淀粉积累及淀粉合成关键酶活性的影响。结果表明,与适温处理(20℃)相比,高温(28℃)显著降低了籽粒中总淀粉及支链淀粉的含量,而对直链淀粉含量的影响较小,导致支/直链淀粉的比例显著降低。高温提高了灌浆初期小麦籽粒中蔗糖合成酶(SS)和结合态淀粉合成酶(GBSS)活性,但明显降低了灌浆后期SS、GBSS和可溶性淀粉合成酶(SSS)活性。品种间相比,灌浆初期高温处理提高了扬麦9号籽粒GBSS活性,但显著降低了徐州26籽粒SSS活性,说明高温抑制2种类型小麦籽粒淀粉合成的酶学机制不同。此外,不同昼夜温差处理(8℃和12℃)间比较发现,高温下两品种籽粒淀粉含量没有明显差异,适温下两品种淀粉含量以温差较大的处理含量较高。灌浆中后期,高温下SS活性随温差增大而升高,SSS和GBSS则以温差小的处理较高;适温下3种关键酶活性均以温差大的处理为高。总之,灌浆期温度较温差对小麦籽粒淀粉合成的影响大。

关键词: 小麦, 高温, 淀粉, 淀粉合成酶, 蔗糖合成酶

Abstract:

High temperature is a key factor during wheat grain filling affecting grain yield and quality in main production areas of China, but the physiological mechanism of quality formation related to high temperature stress remains unclear. The experiments were carried out in growth chambers to investigate the effects of high temperature conditions during grain filling on the formation of total starch, amylopectin and amylose, and the activities related to starch synthesis using two wheat cultivars including Yangmai 9 with low grain protein content and Xuzhou 26 with high grain protein content. Four day/night temperature regimes of 34℃/22℃, 32℃/24℃, 26℃/14℃ and 24℃/16℃ from 7 days after anthesis until maturity were established, which included two daily average temperatures 28℃ and 20℃, and two day-night temperature differences 12℃and 8℃. The results showed that the contents of total starch and amylopectin were markedly reduced, but amylose content was slightly affected (Fig.1, Fig.2, Fig.3 and Table 1), and the ratio of amylopectin to amylose was reduced significantly in higher temperature treatments. During the early period of grain filling, the activities of key enzymes such as sucrose synthase (SS) and granule-bound starch synthase (GBSS) were enhanced, but the activities of SS, GBSS and soluble starch synthase (SSS) during the late period of grain filling were decreased in high temperature treatments (Fig.4, 6, 7). GBSS activity was increased in Yangmai 9, and SSS activity was decreased in Xuzhou26 during early period of grain filling under high temperatures (Fig. 6,7), indicating the different enzymology mechanism in two wheat cultivars. In addition, under high temperatures, grain starch content was similar between two treatments with day-night temperature differences in two wheat cultivars. Under optimum temperatures, grain starch content was higher in the treatment of 26℃/14℃(Fig. 1). Moreover, under high temperatures, SS activity was higher in the treatment of 34℃/22℃ during the middle and late period of grain filling, whereas the activities of SSS and GBSS were higher under 32℃/24℃ (Fig. 4, 6, 7). Under optimum temperatures, the activities of three key enzymes were higher in the treatment with higher day-night temperature difference (26℃/14℃). The above results indicated that starch synthesis was affected more by temperature levels than by day-night temperature differences.

Key words: Wheat, High temperature, Starch, Starch synthase, Sucrose synthase

中图分类号: 

  • S512
[1] 胡文静, 李东升, 裔新, 张春梅, 张勇. 小麦穗部性状和株高的QTL定位及育种标记开发和验证[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1346-1356.
[2] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[3] 郭星宇, 刘朋召, 王瑞, 王小利, 李军. 旱地冬小麦产量、氮肥利用率及土壤氮素平衡对降水年型与施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1262-1272.
[4] 付美玉, 熊宏春, 周春云, 郭会君, 谢永盾, 赵林姝, 古佳玉, 赵世荣, 丁玉萍, 徐延浩, 刘录祥. 小麦矮秆突变体je0098的遗传分析与其矮秆基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 580-589.
[5] 冯健超, 许倍铭, 江薛丽, 胡海洲, 马英, 王晨阳, 王永华, 马冬云. 小麦籽粒不同层次酚类物质与抗氧化活性差异及氮肥调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 704-715.
[6] 刘运景, 郑飞娜, 张秀, 初金鹏, 于海涛, 代兴龙, 贺明荣. 宽幅播种对强筋小麦籽粒产量、品质和氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 716-725.
[7] 马红勃, 刘东涛, 冯国华, 王静, 朱雪成, 张会云, 刘静, 刘立伟, 易媛. 黄淮麦区Fhb1基因的育种应用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 747-758.
[8] 王洋洋, 贺利, 任德超, 段剑钊, 胡新, 刘万代, 郭天财, 王永华, 冯伟. 基于主成分-聚类分析的不同水分冬小麦晚霜冻害评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 448-462.
[9] 陈新宜, 宋宇航, 张孟寒, 李小艳, 李华, 汪月霞, 齐学礼. 干旱对不同品种小麦幼苗的生理生化胁迫以及外源5-氨基乙酰丙酸的缓解作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 478-487.
[10] 徐龙龙, 殷文, 胡发龙, 范虹, 樊志龙, 赵财, 于爱忠, 柴强. 水氮减量对地膜玉米免耕轮作小麦主要光合生理参数的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 437-447.
[11] 马博闻, 李庆, 蔡剑, 周琴, 黄梅, 戴廷波, 王笑, 姜东. 花前渍水锻炼调控花后小麦耐渍性的生理机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 151-164.
[12] 荐红举, 尚丽娜, 金中辉, 丁艺, 李燕, 王季春, 胡柏耿, Vadim Khassanov, 吕典秋. 马铃薯PIF家族成员鉴定及其对高温胁迫的响应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 86-98.
[13] 孟颖, 邢蕾蕾, 曹晓红, 郭光艳, 柴建芳, 秘彩莉. 小麦Ta4CL1基因的克隆及其在促进转基因拟南芥生长和木质素沉积中的功能[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 63-75.
[14] 韦一昊, 于美琴, 张晓娇, 王露露, 张志勇, 马新明, 李会强, 王小纯. 小麦谷氨酰胺合成酶基因可变剪接分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 40-47.
[15] 李玲红, 张哲, 陈永明, 尤明山, 倪中福, 邢界文. 普通小麦颖壳蜡质缺失突变体glossy1的转录组分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 48-62.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!