欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (03): 423-429.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

灌浆期高温对两种品质类型小麦品种籽粒淀粉合成关键酶活性的影响

赵辉;戴廷波;荆奇;姜东;曹卫星;陆玮;田孝威   

  1. 南京农业大学农业部作物生长调控重点开放实验室,江苏南京210095
  • 收稿日期:2005-02-25 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-03-12 网络出版日期:2006-03-12
  • 通讯作者: 曹卫星

Effects of High Temperature during Grain Filling on Key Enzymes Involved in Starch Synthesis in Two Wheat Cultivars with Different Quality Types

ZHAO Hui;DAI Ting-Bo;JING Qi;JIANG Dong;CAO Wei-Xing;LU Wei and TIAN Xiao-Wei   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Growth Regulation,Ministry of Agriculture,Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2005-02-25 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-03-12 Published online:2006-03-12
  • Contact: CAO Wei-Xing

摘要:

以徐州26(高蛋白含量)和扬麦9号(低蛋白含量)2个不同品质类型小麦品种为材料,利用人工气候室模拟小麦花后高温条件,研究了灌浆期高温对籽粒淀粉积累及淀粉合成关键酶活性的影响。结果表明,与适温处理(20℃)相比,高温(28℃)显著降低了籽粒中总淀粉及支链淀粉的含量,而对直链淀粉含量的影响较小,导致支/直链淀粉的比例显著降低。高温提高了灌浆初期小麦籽粒中蔗糖合成酶(SS)和结合态淀粉合成酶(GBSS)活性,但明显降低了灌浆后期SS、GBSS和可溶性淀粉合成酶(SSS)活性。品种间相比,灌浆初期高温处理提高了扬麦9号籽粒GBSS活性,但显著降低了徐州26籽粒SSS活性,说明高温抑制2种类型小麦籽粒淀粉合成的酶学机制不同。此外,不同昼夜温差处理(8℃和12℃)间比较发现,高温下两品种籽粒淀粉含量没有明显差异,适温下两品种淀粉含量以温差较大的处理含量较高。灌浆中后期,高温下SS活性随温差增大而升高,SSS和GBSS则以温差小的处理较高;适温下3种关键酶活性均以温差大的处理为高。总之,灌浆期温度较温差对小麦籽粒淀粉合成的影响大。

关键词: 小麦, 高温, 淀粉, 淀粉合成酶, 蔗糖合成酶

Abstract:

High temperature is a key factor during wheat grain filling affecting grain yield and quality in main production areas of China, but the physiological mechanism of quality formation related to high temperature stress remains unclear. The experiments were carried out in growth chambers to investigate the effects of high temperature conditions during grain filling on the formation of total starch, amylopectin and amylose, and the activities related to starch synthesis using two wheat cultivars including Yangmai 9 with low grain protein content and Xuzhou 26 with high grain protein content. Four day/night temperature regimes of 34℃/22℃, 32℃/24℃, 26℃/14℃ and 24℃/16℃ from 7 days after anthesis until maturity were established, which included two daily average temperatures 28℃ and 20℃, and two day-night temperature differences 12℃and 8℃. The results showed that the contents of total starch and amylopectin were markedly reduced, but amylose content was slightly affected (Fig.1, Fig.2, Fig.3 and Table 1), and the ratio of amylopectin to amylose was reduced significantly in higher temperature treatments. During the early period of grain filling, the activities of key enzymes such as sucrose synthase (SS) and granule-bound starch synthase (GBSS) were enhanced, but the activities of SS, GBSS and soluble starch synthase (SSS) during the late period of grain filling were decreased in high temperature treatments (Fig.4, 6, 7). GBSS activity was increased in Yangmai 9, and SSS activity was decreased in Xuzhou26 during early period of grain filling under high temperatures (Fig. 6,7), indicating the different enzymology mechanism in two wheat cultivars. In addition, under high temperatures, grain starch content was similar between two treatments with day-night temperature differences in two wheat cultivars. Under optimum temperatures, grain starch content was higher in the treatment of 26℃/14℃(Fig. 1). Moreover, under high temperatures, SS activity was higher in the treatment of 34℃/22℃ during the middle and late period of grain filling, whereas the activities of SSS and GBSS were higher under 32℃/24℃ (Fig. 4, 6, 7). Under optimum temperatures, the activities of three key enzymes were higher in the treatment with higher day-night temperature difference (26℃/14℃). The above results indicated that starch synthesis was affected more by temperature levels than by day-night temperature differences.

Key words: Wheat, High temperature, Starch, Starch synthase, Sucrose synthase

中图分类号: 

  • S512
[1] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[3] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[4] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[5] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[6] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[7] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[10] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[11] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[12] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[13] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[14] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[15] 李新浩, 邢梦柯, 周梓惠, 李思烨, 任昊, 王洪章, 赖华江. 外源褪黑素通过协调光反应与暗反应增强玉米苗期的耐热性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 839-856.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!