欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (03): 415-422.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同供肥条件下水分分配对旱地玉米产量的影响

高亚军;李生秀;田霄鸿;李世清;王朝辉;杜建军   

  1. 西北农林科技大学资源环境学院,陕西杨凌 712100
  • 收稿日期:2004-10-08 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-03-12 网络出版日期:2006-03-12
  • 通讯作者: 高亚军

Effects of Water Supply Levels in Different Growth Stages on Maize Yield under Different Fertilizer Levels

GAO Ya-Jun; LI Sheng-Xiu; TIAN Xiao-Hong; LI Shi-Qing; WANG Zhao-Hui and DU Jian-Jun   

  1. Resource and Environments College, Northwest A & F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi
  • Received:2004-10-08 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-03-12 Published online:2006-03-12
  • Contact: GAO Ya-Jun

摘要:

以盆栽试验和田间试验研究了不同供肥条件下不同生育期水分状况对玉米产量的影响。结果表明,任何生育期的土壤干旱胁迫均会导致玉米减产,肥料供应充足时减产幅度较小;干旱胁迫越严重,肥料的这一作用越显著。无论正常供肥还是低肥,玉米对抽雄期土壤水分最敏感,防止这一时期干旱胁迫对保证玉米产量具有重要意义。拔节期是旱地玉米有限灌溉的另一个关键时期,水分的增产潜力很大,低肥时增加拔节期土壤水分供应效果更显著。玉米苗期并不耐旱,尤其是低肥时苗期干旱显著影响玉米的籽粒产量。在相对含水量45%~90%范围内,玉米产量随土壤含水量的增加而增加,但增加幅度与肥料供应和生育期有关。玉米获得最高产量的土壤水分条件与肥料供应密切相关,与正常供肥相比,低肥时所需土壤含水量较低。玉米增产的肥效大于水效,产量随肥料投入的增加显著提高,水分胁迫条件下增加肥料供应同样具有增产作用。肥料供应不足时水分的增产作用会受到限制。在现有的水资源条件下,提高肥料供应水平是旱地玉米增产的主要途径。

关键词: 水分的优化分配, 旱地, 玉米, 肥料, 产量

Abstract:

Maize growth and yield are sensitive to soil water. However, the effects are related to maize growth stages. Fertilizers supply may influence the effect of soil water in different growth stage on maize yield, but few report focus on it.
The pot experiment and field experiment were conducted in the southern Loess Plateau. The purpose was to investigate effects of water supply levels in different growth stages on maize yield under different fertilizer levels. The pot experiment concerned soil water content in seedling stage, internode elongation stage, tasselling stage, filling stage and fertilizer levels. Soil water content included five levels (45%, 60%, 75%, 90% and 105% of field capacity) while fertilizer included normal fertilizer level (NL: 0.4 g N·kg-1 dry soil+ 0.2 g P2O5·kg-1 dry soil) and low fertilizer level (LL: 0.2 g N·kg-1 dry soil+ 0 g P2O5·kg-1 dry soil). The field experiment concerned irrigation in seedling stage (X1), internode elongation stage (X2), tasselling stage (X3), filling stage (X4) and N fertilizer rates (X5). Irrigation water included five levels (0, 25, 50, 75 and 100 mm), and N fertilizer application also included five levels (0, 112.5, 225, 337.5 and 450 N kg/ha).
Maize yield of LL was significantly less than that of NL whatever soil water content was. Maize yield of NL was increased continuously with the increase of soil water content in the range of 45%–105%. However, the yield of LL was increased with the increase of soil water content and reduced when soil water content was more than 90% in seedling stage, tasselling stage and filling stage. In internode elongation stage, the yield both of LL and NL were increased continuously with the increase of soil water content in the range of 45%–105%. In all the stages, maize yields under soil water content of 45% or 60% were lower, compared with that of 75% (control). The yield reduction of NL was less than that of LL. Yield of the treatment with soil water content 45% and 60% in tasselling stage was less than that in other stages whatever fertilizer was, and that in seedling stage was more than that in tasselling stage but less than that in other stages.
Maize biomass of LL was significantly less than that of NL despite of soil water content. In all stages, biomass of LL and NL were increased continuously with the increase of soil water content in the range of 45%–105%. For LL and NL, the biomass of the treatment with soil water content of 45% and 60% in tasselling stage was less than that in other stages, and that in internode elongation stage was more than that in tasselling stage but less than that in other stages. Biomass of LL and NL was greater under soil water content of 90% and 105% than that of control in all stages.
Two regression models were set up according to data of the field experiment, describing the relationship of maize yield (Ygrain) or biomass (Ybiomass) and irrigation water in seedling stage (X1), internode elongation stage (X2), tasselling stage (X3), filling stage (X4) and N rate (X5).
Ygrain =12473.4+278.6X2+585.4 X5-427.4X4X5;
Ybiomass = 24321.8 + 224.2X2 + 315.2X3 + 1346.3X5-280.1X12-468.3X22-198.2X32-232.7X42-437.0X1X2
238.6X2X3-601.9X4X5
The results indicated that soil drought in all stages of maize growth resulted in the reduction of maize yield. However, the yield reduction was decreased by sufficient fertilizer supply, especially under severe drought. Maize yield was quite sensitive to water in tasselling stage, whatever fertilizers were applied. So it was very important for maize to avoid water stress during growing period. Internode elongation stage was another key stage sensitive to soil water in dryland. The increase of soil water content in the stage had more significant effect on maize yield when fertilizer was shortage. Drought in seedling stage also caused significant decrease of maize grain yield, especially when fertilizer was not sufficient. Maize yield was increased with the increase of relatively soil water content in the range of 45% to 90%, but which was changed by fertilizer supply and different stages of maize growth. The increase of maize yield was contributed more by fertilizer than by water. The effect of water on maize yield was also limited when fertilizer was shortage. In the present situation, more fertilizer supply is the main way to increase crop yield in the Loess Plateau.

Key words: Optimization of water supply, Dryland, Maize, Fertilizer, Yield

中图分类号: 

  • S513
[1] 肖颖妮, 于永涛, 谢利华, 祁喜涛, 李春艳, 文天祥, 李高科, 胡建广. 基于SNP标记揭示中国鲜食玉米品种的遗传多样性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1301-1311.
[2] 崔连花, 詹为民, 杨陆浩, 王少瓷, 马文奇, 姜良良, 张艳培, 杨建平, 杨青华. 2个玉米ZmCOP1基因的克隆及其转录丰度对不同光质处理的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1312-1324.
[3] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[4] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[5] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[6] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[7] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[8] 徐田军, 张勇, 赵久然, 王荣焕, 吕天放, 刘月娥, 蔡万涛, 刘宏伟, 陈传永, 王元东. 宜机收籽粒玉米品种冠层结构、光合及灌浆脱水特性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1526-1536.
[9] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[10] 郭星宇, 刘朋召, 王瑞, 王小利, 李军. 旱地冬小麦产量、氮肥利用率及土壤氮素平衡对降水年型与施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1262-1272.
[11] 单露英, 李俊, 李亮, 张丽, 王颢潜, 高佳琪, 吴刚, 武玉花, 张秀杰. 转基因玉米NK603基体标准物质研制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1059-1070.
[12] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[13] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[14] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[15] 许静, 高景阳, 李程成, 宋云霞, 董朝沛, 王昭, 李云梦, 栾一凡, 陈甲法, 周子键, 吴建宇. 过表达ZmCIPKHT基因增强植物耐热性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 851-859.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!