夏大豆群体内植株分布对干物质积累分配及产量的影响

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.01722

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

试验于2007—2008年进行, 在相同密度下,设置5种处理，即行距×株距分别为A：18 cm×18 cm，B：27 cm×12 cm，C：36 cm×9 cm，D：45 cm×7.2 cm，E：54 cm×6 cm，研究其对干物质积累分配及产量的影响。结果表明，A、B处理叶面积指数分别高出E处理30%、25%，差异显著；A、B处理干物质总量分别高于E处理20%、19%，差异显著，C、D、E处理间无显著差异；A、B、C处理分枝豆荚重量和总豆荚重量显著高于E处理，D、E间无显著差异；A、B处理产量分别高于E处理11%、10%，差异显著，C、D、E处理间无显著差异。植株分布均匀性变差使群体内部对资源的利用产生激烈竞争，降低了群体叶面积指数，从而使干物质积累量以及分配比例减少，最终导致产量下降。因此，在确定的种植密度下较均匀的植株分布能够使光合产物积累分配合理，形成较高经济产量。由于A、B处理间无显著差异，而B处理方便于实际生产过程中的栽培管理，所以，本文推荐B处理为大田生产的最优群体。

关键词: 群体, 夏大豆, 干物质, 产量

Abstract:

The experiment was carried out in 2007–2008. The five plant distribution patterns under the same plant density were A: 18 cm×18 cm, B: 27 cm×12 cm, C: 36 cm×9 cm, D: 45 cm×7.2 cm, E: 54 cm×6 cm in row spacing (cm) ×plant spacing (cm), respectively. The results showed that the average leaf area index in A and B treatments was 30% and 25% significantly higher than that in E treatment respectively in the whole growing period access two years. Compared with in E treatment the dry matter accumulation in A and B treatments was increased significantly by 30%, 19% at the whole growing stage in two years, respectively, C, D, and E treatments had no significant difference between each other. The number of pods and pods per branch in A, B, and C treatments were significantly higher than these in E treatment at the whole growing stage in two years, respectively, while there was no significant difference between D and E treatments. A and B treatments were 11%, 10% significantly higher than E treatment in average yield in the two years, respectively, while there was no significant difference between C, D, and E treatments. The leaf area index (LAI) decreased with the increase of row spacing that caused fierce competition for resources, and thus the reduction in dry matter accumulation and distribution, and eventually led the yield to decline. These results indicate that summer soybean population with relatively uniform plant distribution leads to rational dry matter distribution, and higher yield. A and B treatments had no significant difference but B treatment was better for cultivation and management in the actual production process, suggesting that B treatment is the best plant distribution for a population.

Key words: Plant distribution, Summer soybean, Dry matter, Yield

齐林，杨国敏，周勋波，陈雨海，高会军，刘岩. 夏大豆群体内植株分布对干物质积累分配及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2009, 35(9): 1722-1728.

QI Lin,YANG Guo-Min,ZHOU Xun-Bo,CHEN Yu-Hai,GAO Hui-Jun,LIU Yan. Effect of Plant Distrbution in Population on Dry Matter Accumulation,Pantitioning and Yield in Summer Soybean[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2009, 35(9): 1722-1728.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.01722

https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/Y2009/V35/I9/1722

参考文献

[1] Liu X-B(刘晓冰), Jin J(金剑), Wang G-H(王光华), Herbert S J, Hashemi A M. Influences of row-spacing on competing limited resources in soybean. Soybean Sci(大豆科学), 2004, 23(8): 215-221 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] Liu X-B(刘晓冰), Jin J(金剑), Wang G-H(王光华), Zhang Q-Y(张秋英), Herbert S J. Eco-Physiological characters of high yielding population in soybean. Chin J Oil Crop Sci (中国油料作物学报), 2003, 25(3): 109-112 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] Zhao S-J (赵双进), Zhang M-C(张孟臣), Yang C-Y(杨春燕), Wang W-X(王文秀). Effect of culture factors on growth and yield of soybean: I. Effect of sowing date, density, space in row and plant space on yield. Chin J Oil Crop Sci (中国油料作物学报), 2002, 24(12): 29-32 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4] Ethredge W J, Ashley D A, Woodruff J M. Row spacing and plant population effect on yield components of soybean. Agron J, 1989, 81: 947-951
[5] Jin J(金剑), Liu X-B(刘晓冰), Wang G-H(王光华), Herber S J. A comparative study on physiological characteristics during reproductive growth stage in different yielding types and maturities of soybean. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2004, 30(12): 1225-1231(in Chinese with English abstract)
[6] Wang X-M(王晓梅), Cui C(崔冲), Fang Z(房正), Zhao Q-L(赵庆丽). The effect of different densities on population structure in soybean. Jilin Agric Sci (吉林农业科学), 1996, 4: 39-42(in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] Zhang J-X(章建新), Zhai Y-L(翟云龙), Xue L-H(薛丽华). Effect of plant density on growth tendency, dry matter accumulation and distribution in high yield spring soybean. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2006, 25(1): 1-5 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] Gou L(勾玲), Hong J-J(黄建军), Zhang B(张宾), Li T(李涛), Sun Y(孙锐), Zhao M(赵明). Effects of population density on stalk lodging resistant mechanism and agronomic characteristics of maize. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(10): 1688-1695 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] Song Q-J(宋启建), Wu T-X(吴天侠), Qiu J-X(邱家驯), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒). Effect of soybean population and space on yield and other agronomic traits of different types of variety. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 1995, 14(1): 40-46(in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] Zhang W(张伟), Zhang H-J(张惠君), Wang H-Y(王海英), Xie F-T(谢甫绨), Chen Z-W(陈振武). Effects of spacing and planting densities on agonomic traits and yield in high-oil soybeans. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2006, 3(5): 283-287 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] Liu Z-T(刘忠堂). Study on technology for high yield of solid-seeded soybean. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2002, 21(2): 117-122 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] Zhou X-B(周勋波), Sun S-J(孙淑娟), Chen Y-H(陈雨海), Yang G-M(杨国敏), Yang R-G(杨荣光). Effect of plant-row spacings on solar utilization, dry matter weight and yield in summer soybean. Chin J Oil Crop Sci (中国油料作物学报), 2008, 30(3): 322-326 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[13] Norsworthy J K,Shipe E R. Effect of row spacing and soybean genotype on main stem and branch yield. Agron J, 2005, 97: 919-923
[14] Holshouser David L, Whittaker J P Plant population and row-spacing effects on early soybean production systems in the Mid-Atlantic USA. Agron J, 2002, 94: 603-611
[15] Li S-X(李生秀), Wei J-J(魏建军), Liu J-G(刘建国), Gao Z-J(高振江). Effects of planting with narrow line and proper density on canopy structure light penetration of soy bean. Xinjiang Agric Sci (新疆农业科学),2005, 42(6): 412-414(in Chinese with English abstract)
[16] Dong Z(董钻). Soybean Yield Physiology. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1999. pp 135-137(in Chinese with English abstract)

[17] Zhang X-Z(张宪政). Crop Physiology Research Method(作物生理研究法). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1999. pp 37-47 (in Chinese)
[18] Zhao Z-Y(赵增煜). General Experimental Methods of Agricultural Sciences (常用农业科学试验法). Beijing: Agriculture Press, 1986(in Chinese)
[19] Tang Q-Y(唐启义), Feng M-G(冯明光). Utility Statistics Analysis and Data Processing System (实用统计分析及其DPS数据处理系统). Beijing: Science Press, 2002. pp 333-339, 367-373 (in Chinese)

[20] Han B-J(韩秉进). Effects of improving space factors on growth and yield of soybean. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2006, 32(7): 1097-1100 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21] Zhang Y-S(张银锁), Yu Z-R(宇振荣), Driessen P M. Experimental study of assimilate production, partitioning and translocation among plant organs in summer maize (Zea mays) under various environmental and management conditions. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2002, 28(1): 104-109 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22] Rajcan J, Tollenaar M. Effect of source-sink ratio on dry matter accumulation and leaf senescence of maize. Can J Plant Sci, 1982, 62: 855-860
[23] Jones R J, Simmons S R. Effect of altered source-sink ratio on growth of maize kernels. Crop Sci, 1983, 23: 129-134
[24] Liu K-L(刘克礼), Liu J-H(刘景辉). A study on the regularity of accumulation, distribution and translocation of dry matter in spring maize. J Inner Mongolia Institute Agric Anim Husbandry (内蒙古农牧学院学报), 1994, 15(1): 1-10(in Chinese with English abstract)

相关文章 15

[1]	胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2]	马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3]	张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[4]	张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5]	张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[6]	王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[7]	赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[8]	郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[9]	张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[10]	闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[11]	刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[12]	王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[13]	蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[14]	崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
[15]	杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed