欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (9): 1722-1728.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.01722

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

夏大豆群体内植株分布对干物质积累分配及产量的影响

齐林,杨国敏,周勋波,陈雨海*,高会军,刘岩   

  1. 山东农业大学农学院/作物生物学国家重点实验室,山东泰安271018
  • 收稿日期:2008-11-18 修回日期:2009-04-26 出版日期:2009-09-12 网络出版日期:2009-07-04
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2005CB121106)资助。

Effect of Plant Distrbution in Population on Dry Matter Accumulation,Pantitioning and Yield in Summer Soybean

QI Lin,YANG Guo-Min,ZHOU Xun-Bo,CHEN Yu-Hai*,GAO Hui-Jun,LIU Yan   

  1. Agronomy College of Shandong Agricultural University / State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Taian 271018, China
  • Received:2008-11-18 Revised:2009-04-26 Published:2009-09-12 Published online:2009-07-04

摘要:

试验于20072008年进行, 在相同密度下,设置5种处理,即行距×株距分别为A18 cm×18 cmB27 cm×12 cmC36 cm×9 cmD45 cm×7.2 cmE54 cm×6 cm,研究其对干物质积累分配及产量的影响。结果表明,AB处理叶面积指数分别高出E处理30%25%,差异显著;AB处理干物质总量分别高于E处理20%19%,差异显著,CDE处理间无显著差异;ABC处理分枝豆荚重量和总豆荚重量显著高于E处理,DE间无显著差异;AB处理产量分别高于E处理11%10%,差异显著,CDE处理间无显著差异。植株分布均匀性变差使群体内部对资源的利用产生激烈竞争,降低了群体叶面积指数,从而使干物质积累量以及分配比例减少,最终导致产量下降。因此,在确定的种植密度下较均匀的植株分布能够使光合产物积累分配合理,形成较高经济产量。由于AB处理间无显著差异,而B处理方便于实际生产过程中的栽培管理,所以,本文推荐B处理为大田生产的最优群体。

关键词: 群体, 夏大豆, 干物质, 产量

Abstract:

The experiment was carried out in 2007–2008. The five plant distribution patterns under the same plant density were A: 18 cm×18 cm, B: 27 cm×12 cm, C: 36 cm×9 cm, D: 45 cm×7.2 cm, E: 54 cm×6 cm in row spacing (cm) ×plant spacing (cm), respectively. The results showed that the average leaf area index in A and B treatments was 30% and 25% significantly higher than that in E treatment respectively in the whole growing period access two years. Compared with in E treatment the dry matter accumulation in A and B treatments was increased significantly by 30%, 19% at the whole growing stage in two years, respectively, C, D, and E treatments had no significant difference between each other. The number of pods and pods per branch in A, B, and C treatments were significantly higher than these in E treatment at the whole growing stage in two years, respectively, while there was no significant difference between D and E treatments. A and B treatments were 11%, 10% significantly higher than E treatment in average yield in the two years, respectively, while there was no significant difference between C, D, and E treatments. The leaf area index (LAI) decreased with the increase of row spacing that caused fierce competition for resources, and thus the reduction in dry matter accumulation and distribution, and eventually led the yield to decline. These results indicate that summer soybean population with relatively uniform plant distribution leads to rational dry matter distribution, and higher yield. A and B treatments had no significant difference but B treatment was better for cultivation and management in the actual production process, suggesting that B treatment is the best plant distribution for a population.

Key words: Plant distribution, Summer soybean, Dry matter, Yield

[1] Liu X-B(刘晓冰), Jin J(金剑), Wang G-H(王光华), Herbert S J, Hashemi A M. Influences of row-spacing on competing limited resources in soybean. Soybean Sci(大豆科学), 2004, 23(8): 215-221 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] Liu X-B(刘晓冰), Jin J(金剑), Wang G-H(王光华), Zhang Q-Y(张秋英), Herbert S J. Eco-Physiological characters of high yielding population in soybean. Chin J Oil Crop Sci (中国油料作物学报), 2003, 25(3): 109-112 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] Zhao S-J (赵双进), Zhang M-C(张孟臣), Yang C-Y(杨春燕), Wang W-X(王文秀). Effect of culture factors on growth and yield of soybean: I. Effect of sowing date, density, space in row and plant space on yield. Chin J Oil Crop Sci (中国油料作物学报), 2002, 24(12): 29-32 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4] Ethredge W J, Ashley D A, Woodruff J M. Row spacing and plant population effect on yield components of soybean. Agron J, 1989, 81: 947-951
[5] Jin J(金剑), Liu X-B(刘晓冰), Wang G-H(王光华), Herber S J. A comparative study on physiological characteristics during reproductive growth stage in different yielding types and maturities of soybean. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2004, 30(12): 1225-1231(in Chinese with English abstract)
[6] Wang X-M(王晓梅), Cui C(崔冲), Fang Z(房正), Zhao Q-L(赵庆丽). The effect of different densities on population structure in soybean. Jilin Agric Sci (吉林农业科学), 1996, 4: 39-42(in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] Zhang J-X(章建新), Zhai Y-L(翟云龙), Xue L-H(薛丽华). Effect of plant density on growth tendency, dry matter accumulation and distribution in high yield spring soybean. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2006, 25(1): 1-5 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] Gou L(勾玲), Hong J-J(黄建军), Zhang B(张宾), Li T(李涛), Sun Y(孙锐), Zhao M(赵明). Effects of population density on stalk lodging resistant mechanism and agronomic characteristics of maize. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(10): 1688-1695 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] Song Q-J(宋启建), Wu T-X(吴天侠), Qiu J-X(邱家驯), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒). Effect of soybean population and space on yield and other agronomic traits of different types of variety. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 1995, 14(1): 40-46(in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] Zhang W(张伟), Zhang H-J(张惠君), Wang H-Y(王海英), Xie F-T(谢甫绨), Chen Z-W(陈振武). Effects of spacing and planting densities on agonomic traits and yield in high-oil soybeans. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2006, 3(5): 283-287 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] Liu Z-T(刘忠堂). Study on technology for high yield of solid-seeded soybean. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2002, 21(2): 117-122 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] Zhou X-B(周勋波), Sun S-J(孙淑娟), Chen Y-H(陈雨海), Yang G-M(杨国敏), Yang R-G(杨荣光). Effect of plant-row spacings on solar utilization, dry matter weight and yield in summer soybean. Chin J Oil Crop Sci (中国油料作物学报), 2008, 30(3): 322-326 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[13] Norsworthy J K,Shipe E R. Effect of row spacing and soybean genotype on main stem and branch yield. Agron J, 2005, 97: 919-923
[14] Holshouser David L, Whittaker J P Plant population and row-spacing effects on early soybean production systems in the Mid-Atlantic USA. Agron J, 2002, 94: 603-611
[15] Li S-X(李生秀), Wei J-J(魏建军), Liu J-G(刘建国), Gao Z-J(高振江). Effects of planting with narrow line and proper density on canopy structure light penetration of soy bean. Xinjiang Agric Sci (新疆农业科学),2005, 42(6): 412-414(in Chinese with English abstract)
[16] Dong Z(董钻). Soybean Yield Physiology. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1999. pp 135-137(in Chinese with English abstract)

[17] Zhang X-Z(张宪政). Crop Physiology Research Method(作物生理研究法). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1999. pp 37-47 (in Chinese)
[18] Zhao Z-Y(赵增煜). General Experimental Methods of Agricultural Sciences (常用农业科学试验法). Beijing: Agriculture Press, 1986(in Chinese)
[19] Tang Q-Y(唐启义), Feng M-G(冯明光). Utility Statistics Analysis and Data Processing System (实用统计分析及其DPS数据处理系统). Beijing: Science Press, 2002. pp 333-339, 367-373 (in Chinese)

[20] Han B-J(韩秉进). Effects of improving space factors on growth and yield of soybean. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2006, 32(7): 1097-1100 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21] Zhang Y-S(张银锁), Yu Z-R(宇振荣), Driessen P M. Experimental study of assimilate production, partitioning and translocation among plant organs in summer maize (Zea mays) under various environmental and management conditions. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2002, 28(1): 104-109 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22] Rajcan J, Tollenaar M. Effect of source-sink ratio on dry matter accumulation and leaf senescence of maize. Can J Plant Sci, 1982, 62: 855-860
[23] Jones R J, Simmons S R. Effect of altered source-sink ratio on growth of maize kernels. Crop Sci, 1983, 23: 129-134
[24] Liu K-L(刘克礼), Liu J-H(刘景辉). A study on the regularity of accumulation, distribution and translocation of dry matter in spring maize. J Inner Mongolia Institute Agric Anim Husbandry (内蒙古农牧学院学报), 1994, 15(1): 1-10(in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 肖颖妮, 于永涛, 谢利华, 祁喜涛, 李春艳, 文天祥, 李高科, 胡建广. 基于SNP标记揭示中国鲜食玉米品种的遗传多样性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1301-1311.
[2] 王靖天, 张亚雯, 杜应雯, 任文龙, 李宏福, 孙文献, 葛超, 章元明. 数量性状主基因+多基因混合遗传分析R软件包SEA v2.0[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1416-1424.
[3] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[4] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[5] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[6] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[7] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[8] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[9] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[10] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[11] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[12] 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[13] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[14] 杜浩, 程玉汉, 李泰, 侯智红, 黎永力, 南海洋, 董利东, 刘宝辉, 程群. 利用Ln位点进行分子设计提高大豆单荚粒数[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
[15] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!