欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11): 1820-1831.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.01820

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国部分玉米自交系遗传关系和遗传结构解析

吴承来,张倩倩,董炳雪,张春庆*   

  1. 山东农业大学农学院 / 国家作物生物学重点实验室,山东泰安 271018
  • 收稿日期:2010-02-03 修回日期:2010-06-29 出版日期:2010-11-12 网络出版日期:2010-08-30
  • 作者简介:张春庆, E-mail: cqzhang@sdau.edu.cn, Tel: 05388242682
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由山东省自然科学基金项目(Y2007D52)和山东省良种工程项目(鲁农良种字[2008]6号)资助。

Analysis of Genetic Structure and Genetic Relationships of Partial Maize Inbred Lines in China

WU Cheng-Lai,ZHANG Qian-Qian,DONG Bing-Xue,ZHANG Chun-Qing*   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology / College of Agriculture, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China
  • Received:2010-02-03 Revised:2010-06-29 Published:2010-11-12 Published online:2010-08-30
  • About author:ZHANG Chun-Qing, E-mail: cqzhang@sdau.edu.cn, Tel: 05388242682

摘要: 玉米自交系遗传关系和遗传结构的解析,对自交系类群划分和杂交组配具有重要的指导意义。本文选用玉米基因组的112个SSR标记对我国97个玉米自交系进行遗传关系和遗传结构分析,并评价了遗传距离聚类和模型聚类方法在玉米自交系遗传关系研究中的应用价值。结果表明,模型聚类方法更适于玉米自交系的遗传关系研究。解析自交系的遗传基础发现,各类群中均有大量自交系含有其他类群的遗传成分。根据模型聚类结果,97个自交系被划分为PB、Reid、塘四平头和旅大红骨4个类群。Reid群与旅大红骨群的遗传关系最近,与塘四平头群遗传关系最远。为了实现杂种优势模式的简化,4个类群可被简化为3大种质类群[A(旅大红骨群与Reid群)、B(PB群)、C(塘四平头群)],或2大种质类群[A(旅大红骨群、Reid群、PB群)、B(塘四平头群)]。研究结果为自交系的改良和利用及杂种优势模式确定提供了理论基础。

关键词: 玉米, 自交系, 微卫星标记, 遗传关系, 遗传结构

Abstract: Knowledge about the population structure and relationships within and among maize inbred lines was important to improvement and utilization of maize inbred line. Distance-based cluster and model-based cluster methods were used to analyze the genetic structure and relationship of 97 maize inbred lines used in China with 112 microsatellite (simple sequence repeat, SSR) markers, evenly distributed over 10 chromosomes. Results showed that model-based cluster method was more suitable for maize inbred line clustering than distance-based cluster method, because the former could define the group of inbred lines more effectively than the latter. All inbred lines were grouped into four groups by model-based cluster method: Reid, Lüda red cob (LRC), PB and Tangsipingtou (SPT). According to the result of genetic structure component (Q-value), numerous inbred lines in each group were overlapped in genetic component with the other groups. Reid group kept minimum Nei’s genetic distance with LRC group, had most distant genetic relationship with SPT group. The results of genetic relationships among groups indicated that the four groups could be simplified into three (A: Reid, LRC; B: PB; C: SPT) or two (A: Reid, LRC, PB; B: SPT) potential heterotic groups. The defined population and the genetic component analysis of inbred lines provided the basis for improving the efficiency of hybrid breeding.

Key words: Maize, Inbred line, SSR, Genetic relationship, Genetic structure

[1]Wu J-F(吴景锋). A review on the germplasm bases of the main corn hybrids in china. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1983, 16(2): 1-8 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]Zeng S-X(曾三省). The maize germplasm base of hybfids in china. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1990, 23(4): 1-9 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]Wang Y-B(王懿波), Wang Z-H(王振华), Wang Y-P(王永普), Zhang X(张新), Lu L-X(陆利行). Studies on the heterosis utilizing models of main maize germplasms in China. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1997, 30(4): 16-24 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]Wang Y-B(王懿波), Wang Z-H(王振华), Wang Y-P(王永普), Zhang X(张新), Lu L-X(陆利行). Division, utilization and the improvement of main germplasm heterosis of maize in China. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin (华北农学报), 1998, 13 (1): 74-80 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]Lan F-S(兰发盛), Teng Y-C(腾耀聪), Li D-B(李德宾), Zhang B(张彪), Tian S-J(田守均), Lu Q-Y(卢乔云). A preliminary study on heterotic groups among maize inbreds and it’s utilization. J Sichuan Agric Univ (四川农业大学学报), 1993, 11(1): 64-69 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]Chen Y-H(陈彦惠), Liu X-Z(刘新芝), Peng Z-B(彭泽斌), Zhang C-Z(张传贞), Gao S-L(高素玲), Chen Y-Q(陈秋元). Classification of heterosis populations and the construction of heterosis models for maize inbred lines. Acta Agric Univ Henanensis (河南农业大学学报), 1995, 29(4): 341-347 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]Li M-S(李明顺), Zhang S-H(张世煌), Li X-H(李新海), Pan G-T(潘光堂), Bai L(白丽), Peng Z-B(彭泽斌). Study on heterotic groups among maize inbred lines based on SCA. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2002, 35(6): 600-605 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]Smith J S C, Chin E C L, Shu H, Smith O S, Wall S J, Senior M L, Mitchell S E, Kresovich S, Ziegle J. An evaluation of the utility of SSR loci as molecular markers in maize (Zea mays L.): comparisons with data from RFLPS and pedigree. Theor Appl Genet, 1997, 95: 163-173
[9]Senior M L, Murphy J P, Goodman M M, Stuber C W. Utility of SSRs for determining genetic similarities and relationships in maize using an agarosegel system. Crop Sci, 1998, 38: 1088-1098
[10]Li X-H(李新海), Fu J-H(傅骏骅), Zhang S-H (张世煌), Yuan L-X(袁力行), Li M-S(李明顺). Genetic variation of inbred lines of maize detected by SSR markers. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2000, 33(2): 1-9 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]Li X-H(李新海), Yuan L-X(袁力行), Li X-H(李晓辉), Zhang S-H(张世煌), Li M-S(李明顺), Li W-H(李文华) . Heterotic grouping of 70 maize inbred lines by SSR markers. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2003, 36(6): 622-627 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]Li Y, Du J, Wang T, Shi Y, Song Y, Jia J. Genetic diversity and relationships among Chinese maize inbred lines revealed by SSR markers. Maydica, 2002, 47: 93-101
[13]Lu H, Bernardo R. Molecular marker diversity among current and historical maize inbreds. Theor Appl Genet, 2001, 103: 613-617
[14]Yuan L-X(袁力行), Fu J-H(傅骏骅), Warburton L M, Li X-H(李新海), Zhang S-H (张世煌), Khairallah M, Liu X-Z(刘新芝), Peng Z-B(彭泽斌), Li L-C(李连城). Comparison of genetic diversity in maize inbreds based on RFLP, SSR, AFLP and RAPD markers. Acta Genet Sin (遗传学报), 2000, 27(8): 725-733 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15]Yuan L-X(袁力行), Fu J-H(傅骏骅), Zhang S-H (张世煌), Liu X-Z(刘新芝), Peng Z-B(彭泽斌), Li X-H(李新海). Heterotic grouping of maize inbred lines using RFLP and SSR markers. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2001, 27(2): 149-156 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]Fan X-M (番兴明), Zhang S-H (张世煌), Tan J (谭静), Li M-S(李明顺), Li X-H(李新海). Heterotic grouping of quality protein maize inbreds divided by SSR Markers. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2003, 29(l): 105-110 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]Reif J C, Melchinger A E, Xia X C. Genetic distance based on simple sequence repeats and heterosis in tropical maize population. Crop Sci, 2003, 43: 1275-1282
[18]Rajab C, Abdolahadi H, Mohammad R G, Marilyn L W, Reza T A, Abolghasem M S. Use of SSR data to determine relationships and potential heterotic groupings within medium to late maturing Iranian maize inbred lines. Field Crops Res, 2006, 95: 212-222
[19]Enoki H, Sato H, Koinuma K. SSR analysis of genetic diversity among maize inbred lines adapted to cold regions of Japan. Theor Appl Genet, 2002, 104: 1270-1277
[20]Li L-H(李丽华), Wei X(魏昕), Pan G-T(潘光堂), Tang B-J(唐保军), Ding Y(丁勇), Zhao F-X(赵发欣). Genetic diversity analysis among new maize inbred lines revealed by SSR. J Maize Sci (玉米科学), 2009, 17(4): 24-28 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]Pritchard J K, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics, 2000, 155: 945-959
[22]Sun Y-W(孙友位), Li M-S(李明顺), Zhang D-G(张德贵), Xiao M-J(肖木辑), Zhang S-H (张世煌). Determine genetic diversity among 85 maize inbred lines using SSR markers. J Maize Sci (玉米科学), 2007, 15(6): 19-26 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]Xie C X, Warburton M, Li M S, Li X H, Xiao M J, Hao Z F, Zhao Q, Zhang S H. An analysis of population structure and linkage disequilibrium using multilocus data in 187 maize inbred lines. Mol Breed, 2008, 21: 407-418
[24]Saghai-Maroof M A, Soliman K, Jorgensen R A, Allard R W. Ribosomal DNA spacer length polymorphism in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1984, 81: 8014-8018
[25]Jochen C, Reif J C, Hamrit S, Heckenberger M, Schipprack W, Maurer H P, Bohn M, Melchinger A E. Genetic structure and diversity of European flint maize populations determined with SSR analyses of individuals and bulks. Theor Appl Genet, 2005, 111: 906-913
[26]Rohlf F J. NTSYS: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, Version 2.1. New York: State University of New York, 2000
[27]Pritchard J K, Wen W. Documentation for STRUCTURE Software: Version 2. 2003, http: //pritch.bsd.uchicago.edu
[28]Zhang J(张军), Zhao T-J(赵团结), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒). Analysis of genetic structure differentiation of released soybean cultivar population and specificity of subpopulations in China. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2009, 42(6): 1901-1910 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of cluster of individuals using the software structure: A simulation study. Mol Ecol, 2005, 14: 2611-2620
[30]Yeh F C, Yang R C. POPGENE Version 1. 31, available at http://www.ualberta.ca/fyeh/popgene, 1999
[31]Falush D, Wirth T, Linz B, Pritchard J K, Stephens M. Traces of human migrations in Helicobacter pylori populations. Science, 2003, 299: 1582-1585
[32]Chen H-J(陈红菊), Yue Y-S(岳永生), Fan X-Z(樊新忠), Zhang C-S(张传生), Du L-X(杜立新). A Comparative Study of Genetic Distance and Clustering Analysis among Shandong Indigenous Chicken Breeds. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica (畜牧兽医学报), 2004, 35(1): 33-36 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]Zong X-X(宗绪晓), Guan J-P(关建平), Gu J(顾竟), Wang H-F(王海飞), Ma Y(马钰). Differentiation on population structure and genetic diversity of pea core collections separately constituted from Chinese landraces and international genetic resources. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources (植物遗传资源学报), 2009, 10(3): 347-353 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34]Verónica V L, Poggio L, Confalonie V A. Microsatellite variation in maize landraces from Northwestern Argentina: genetic diversity, population structure and racial affiliations. Theor Appl Genet 2009, 119: 1053-1067
[35]Qin J(秦君), Li Y-H(李英慧), Liu Z-X(刘章雄), Luan W-J(栾维江), Yan Z(闫哲), Guan R-X(关荣霞), Zhang M-C(张孟臣), Chang R-Z(常汝镇), Li G-M(李广敏), Ma C-Y(马峙英), Qiu L-J(邱丽娟). Genetic structure and diversity of soybean germplasm in Heilongjiang, China. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2009, 35(2): 228-238 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[36]Zheng D-H(郑大浩), Li Y-R(李艳茹), Jin F-X(金锋学), Jiang J-J(蒋基建). Pedigree and germplasm base of inbreds of the Lancaster heterotic group of maize in China. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2002, 35(7): 750-757 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[37]Xiao M-J(肖木辑), Li M-S(李明顺), Sun Y-W(孙有位), Li X-H(李新海), Zhang S-H(张世煌). Genetic diversity revealed by SSR among maize inbred lines used predominantly in Liaoning province. J Maize Sci (玉米科学), 2006, 14(1): 33-36 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[38]Lei K-R(雷开荣), Wu H(吴红), Chen W-J(陈文俊), Lin Q(林清), Chen X(陈旭), Jiang Z-C(蒋志诚). Analysis of genetic structure of selected lines from temperate Zone×Tropical Zone maize by SSR marker. Chin Agric Sci Bull (中国农学通报), 2008, 24(12): 86-91 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[39]Li H-Y(李会勇), Wang L-F(王利锋), Tang B-J(唐保军), Cheng Z-Q(程泽强), Wang Z-H(王振华), Tie S-G(铁双贵). Research on the genetic structure and heterosis of Zhengdan958. J Maize Sci (玉米科学), 2009, 17(1): 28-31 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[40]Ding Z-H(丁照华), Wu H-F(吴洪飞), Liu Z-X(刘治先), Wang L-M(汪黎明), Meng Z-D(孟昭东), Yang F(杨菲), Zhang F-J(张发军). Germplasm analysis of main corn hybrids approved in Shandong Province. Shandong Agric Sci (山东农业科学), 2008, (6): 31-34 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[41]Li C-H(李春辉), Cai Z (才卓), Li F-R(李凤任), Lu Y-W(卢亚文), Liu Y-C (柳迎春). The effect of Tangsipingtou on maize breeding in Jilin province. J Maize Sci (玉米科学), 2008, 16(6): 11-14 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[42]Li D-H(李登海), Mao L-H(毛丽华), Yang J-S(杨今胜), Liu J-G(柳京国), Zhang Y-H(张永慧). Breeding process and utilization of excellent maize inbred line 478. J Laiyang Agric Coll (莱阳农学院学报), 2005, 22(3): 159-164 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[43]Zhang S-H(张世煌), Peng Z-B (彭泽斌), Li X-H(李新海). Heterosis and germplasm enhancement, improvement and development of maize. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2000, 33(suppl): 34-39 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[3] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[6] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[7] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[8] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[9] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[10] 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[11] 杨亚莉, 徐明睿, 马越飞, 海艺蕊, 刘凯栋, 刘万茂, 孙颖. 玉米根尖及整根响应缺铁的转录组比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1006-1021.
[12] 张超, 郭欢, 李忠玲, 岳淑宁, 赵娜. 基于BSA-seq技术定位玉米籽粒花青素关联基因[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 780-789.
[13] 郭向阳, 涂亮, 王栋, 刘鹏飞, 王安贵, 易强, 任洪, 李刚, 祝云芳, 吴迅, 蒋喻林, 田丰, 陈泽辉. 热带Suwan种质在我国玉米种质改良中的创新与利用[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 655-664.
[14] 马亮, 马璐, 张舒钰, 章慧敏, 王仁明, 宋旭东, 张振良, 冒宇翔, 陆虎华, 陈国清, 郝德荣, 周广飞. 玉米苞叶数目转录组分析及候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 790-801.
[15] 孟成, 王哲. 玉米ZmPFK基因家族全基因组鉴定及响应胁迫表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 764-779.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!