玉米杂交种先玉335及其亲本种子萌发过程中胚芽蛋白质组学分析

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.01689

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以培养84 h种子的胚芽(包括胚芽鞘)为试验材料, 对优良玉米杂交种先玉335与其亲本自交系的蛋白质组学差异进行了分析。结果表明, 在杂交种先玉335中共检测到560个蛋白点, 在亲本PH6WC和PH4CV分别检测到507个和508个蛋白点, 而且先玉335胚芽及胚芽鞘中81%的蛋白点表现非加性累积模式, 其中 288个蛋白点表现为超高亲的上调表达, 仅15个蛋白点表现超低亲的下调表达, 因此推测非加性蛋白的累积可能是杂交种先玉335胚芽萌发过程中胚芽及胚芽鞘杂种优势产生的主要原因。用于质谱分析的13个差异极显著蛋白主要涉及代谢途径、蛋白折叠、胁迫响应、细胞骨架和细胞解毒5种类型。

关键词: 玉米, 胚芽(胚芽鞘), 杂种优势, 蛋白质组学分析

Abstract: The plumule (including coleoptile) of seed cultured for 84 h was used as materials to analyze the proteomic difference between the elite hybrid Pioneer 335 and its parental lines by mean of 2-D electrophoresis method. The results showed that 560 protein spots were identified in Pioneer 335, 507 and 508 protein spots parental lines in its PH6WC and PH4CV, respectively. And in Pioneer 335, 81% protein spots exhibited nonadditive expression model. Out of them, 288 showed up-regulation with over high parent expression model. While only 15 showed down-regulation with over low parent expression model. Thus the accumulation of nonadditive expression protein might be the key factor resulting in heterosis at the tested development at stage in Pioneer 335 at least in this study. Notably, 13 significantly different protein spots between the hybrid and its parents were involved in metabolic pathway, protein folding, stress response, cytoskeleton and cell detoxification.

Key words: Maize, Plumule (including cleotiple), Heterosis, Proteomic analysis

进茜宁, 付志远, 丁冬, 刘宗华, 李卫华, 汤继华. 玉米杂交种先玉335及其亲本种子萌发过程中胚芽蛋白质组学分析[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(09): 1689-1694.

JIN Qian-Ning, FU Zhi-Yuan, DING Dong, LIU Zong-Hua, LI Wei-Hua, SHANG Ji-Hua. Proteomic Analysis of Plumule in Seed Germination for an Elite Hybrid of Pioneer 335 and Its Parental Lines in Maize[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37(09): 1689-1694.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.01689

https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/Y2011/V37/I09/1689

参考文献

[1]Dai J-R(戴景瑞). The breeding targets and development strategies of maize in China. J Agric Sci & Technol (中国农业科技导报), 2004, 6(suppl-1): 13–16 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]Lawrence C J, Walbot V. Translational genomics for bioenergy production from fuelstock grasses: maize as the model species. Plant Cell, 2007, 19: 2091–2094
[3]Moose S P, Dudley J W, Rocheford T R. Maize selection passes the century mark: a unique resource for 21st century genomics. Trends Plant Sci, 2004, 9: 358–364
[4]Biswas J K, Isiam M S, Yasmeen R, Pervin S, Kabir M S, Alam S. Relative contribution of the coleoptiles and the first leaf length to seedling establishment of rice (Oryza sativa L.) as affected by anaerobic seedling in two different soils. Pakistan J Biol Sci, 2002, 5: 413–415
[5]Trachsel S, Messmer R, Stamp P, Ruta N, Hund A. QTLs for early vigor of tropical maize. Mol Breed, 2010, 25: 91–103
[6]Woltz J, TeKrony D M, Egli D B. Corn seed germination and vigor following freezing during seed development. Crop Sci, 2006, 46: 1526–1535
[7]Finch-Savage W E, Rowse H R, Dent K C. Development of combined inhibition and hydrothermal threshold models to simulate maize (Zea mays L.) and chickpea (Cucer aruetubym) seed germination in variable environments. New Phytologist, 2005, 165: 825–838
[8]Hochholdinger F, Guo L, Schnable P S. Lateral roots affect the proteome of the primary root of maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Mol Biol, 2004, 56: 397–412
[9]Hochholdinger F, Woll K, Guo L, Schnable P S. The accumulation of abundant soluble proteins changes early in the development of the primary roots of maize (Zea mays L.). Proteomics, 2005, 18: 4885–4893
[10]Liu Y, Lamkemeyer T, Jakob A, Mi G, Zhang F, Nordheim A, Hochholdinger F. Comparative proteome analyses of maize (Zea mays L.) primary roots prior to lateral root initiation reveal differential protein expression in the lateral root initiation mutant rum1. Proteomics, 2006, 6: 4300–4308
[11]Dembinsky D, Woll K, Saleem M, Liu Y, Fu Y, Borsuk A L, Lamkemeyer T, Fladerer C, Madlung J, Barbazuk B, Nordheim A, Nettleton D, Schnable S P, Hochholdinger F. Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of pericycle cells of the maize (Zea mays L.) primary root. Plant Physiol, 2007, 145: 575–588
[12]Hoecker N, Lamkemeyer T, Sarholz B, Paschold A, Fladerer C, Madlung J, Wurster K, Stahl M, Piepho H P, Nordheim A, Hochholdinger F. Analysis of nonadditive protein accumulation in young primary roots of a maize (Zea mays L.) F1-hybrid compared to its parental inbred lines. Proteomics, 2008, 8: 3882–3894
[13]Markelz N H, Costich D E, Brutnell T P. Photomorphogenic responses in maize seedling development. Plant Physiol, 2003, 133: 1–14
[14]Yu J-J(喻娟娟), Dai S-J(戴绍军). Research advances in plant proteomics. Chin Bull Bot (植物学报), 2009, 44: 410–425 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]Göerg A, Obermaier C, Boguth G, Harder A, Scheibe B, Wildgruber R, Weiss W. The current state of two-dimensional electrophoresis with immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis, 2000, 21: 1037–1053
[16]Hochholdinger F, Sauer M, Dembinsky D, Hoecker N, Muthreich N, Saleem M, Liu Y. Proteomic dissection of plant development. Proteomics, 2006, 6: 4076–4083
[17]Song X, Ni Z F, Yao Y Y, Xie C J, Li Z X, Wu H Y, Zhang Y H, Sun Q X. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) root proteome and differentially expressed root proteins between hybrid and parents. Proteomics, 2007, 7:3538–3557
[18]Fu Z-J(付忠军), Ding D(丁冬), Jin X-N(进茜宁), Wang C-C(王长城), Li Y-L(李永亮), Tang J-H(汤继华). Optimization of two-dimensional electrophoresis for proteome of maize silk. Plant Physiol Commun (植物生理学通讯), 2009, 45(12): 1215–1220 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]Hoecker N, Keller B, Muthreich N, Chollet D, Descombes P, Piepho H P, Hochholdinger F. Comparison of maize (Zea mays L.) F1-hybrid and parental inbred line primary root transcriptomes suggests organ-specific patterns of nonadditive gene expression and conserved expression trends. Genetics, 2008, 179: 1275–1283
[20]Auger D L,Gray A D,Ream T S, Kato A, Coe E H, Birchler J A. Nonadditive gene expression in diploid and triploid hybrids of maize. Genetics, 2005, 169: 389–397
[21]Ma J, Morrow D J, Fernandes J, Walbot V. Comparative profiling of the sense and antisense transcriptome of maize lines. Genome Biol, 2006, 7: R22
[22]Jahnke K, Sarholz B, Thiemann A, Kühr V, Gutiérrez-Marcos J F, Geiger H H, Piepho H P, Scholten S. Heterosis in early seed development: a comparative study of F1 embryo and endosperm tissues 6 days after fertilization. Theor Appl Genet, 2010, 120: 389–400
[23]Swanson-Wagner R A, DeCook R, Jia Y, Bancroft T, Ji T, Zhao X F, Nettleton D, Schnable P S. Paternal dominance of trans-eQTL influences gene expression patterns in maize hybrids. Science, 2009, 326: 1118–1120
[24]Lippman Z B, Zamir D. Heterosis: revisiting the magic. Trends Genet, 2006, 23: 80–86
[25]Swanson-Wagner R A, Jia Y, Decook R, Borsuk L A, Nettleton D, Schnable P S. All possible modes of gene action are observed in a global comparison of gene expression in a maize F1 hybrid and its inbred parents. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2006, 103: 6805–6810
[26]Stupar R M, Springer N M. Cis-transcriptional variation in maize inbred lines B73 and Mo17 lead to additive expression patterns in the F1 hybrid. Genetics, 2006, 173: 2199–2210
[27]Schiene-Fischer C, Yu C. Receptor accessory folding helper enzymes: the functional role of peptidyl prolyl cis/trans isomerases. FEBS Lett, 2001, 495: 1–6
[28]Mittler R, Vanderauwera S, Gollery M, Van Breusegem F. Reactive oxygen gene network of plants. Trends Plant Sci, 2004, 9: 490–498
[29]Freire A P, Ferreira A, Gomes R, Cordeiro C. Anti-glycation defences in yeast. Biochem Soc Trans, 2003, 31: 1409–1412
[30]Dive D, Gratepanche S, Yera H, Bécuwe P, Daher W, Delplace P, Odberg-Ferragut C, Capron M, Khalife J. Superoxide dismutase in Plasmodium: a current survey. Redox Rep, 2003, 8: 265–267
[31]Rodríguez-Manzaneque M T R, Ros J, Cabiscol E, Sorribas A, Herrero E. Grx5 glutaredoxin plays a central role in protection against protein oxidative damage in xaccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol, 1999, 19: 8180–8190
[32]Ross J A, Kasum C M. Dietary flavonoids: bioavailability, metabolic effects, and safety. Annu Rev Nutr, 2002, 22: 19–34
[33]Xie D Y, Jackson L A, Cooper J D, Ferreira D, Paiva N L. Molecular and biochemical analysis of two cDNA clones encoding dihydro?avonol 4-reductase from Medicago truncatula. Plant Phyiol, 2004, 134: 979–994
[34]Thornalley P J. Glyoxalase I-structure, function and a critical role in the enzymatic defence against glycation. Biochem Soc Trans, 2003, 31: 1343–1348
[35]Kittur F S, Lalgondar M, Yu H Y, Bevan D R, Esen A. Maize β-glucosidase-aggregating factor is a polyspecific jacalin-related chimeric lectin, and its lectin domain is responsible for β-glucosidase aggregation. J Biol Chem, 2007, 282: 7299–7311
[36]Iacovache I, van der Goot F G, Pernot L. Pore formation: an ancient yet complex form of attack. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2008, 1778: 1611–1623
[37]Tweten R K. Cholesterol-dependent cytolysins, a family of versatile pore-forming toxins. Infect Immun, 2005, 73: 6199–6209

相关文章 15

[1]	刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2]	梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[3]	孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[4]	张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5]	杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[6]	张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[7]	杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[8]	韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[9]	蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[10]	田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[11]	杨亚莉, 徐明睿, 马越飞, 海艺蕊, 刘凯栋, 刘万茂, 孙颖. 玉米根尖及整根响应缺铁的转录组比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1006-1021.
[12]	张超, 郭欢, 李忠玲, 岳淑宁, 赵娜. 基于BSA-seq技术定位玉米籽粒花青素关联基因[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 780-789.
[13]	郭向阳, 涂亮, 王栋, 刘鹏飞, 王安贵, 易强, 任洪, 李刚, 祝云芳, 吴迅, 蒋喻林, 田丰, 陈泽辉. 热带Suwan种质在我国玉米种质改良中的创新与利用[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 655-664.
[14]	马亮, 马璐, 张舒钰, 章慧敏, 王仁明, 宋旭东, 张振良, 冒宇翔, 陆虎华, 陈国清, 郝德荣, 周广飞. 玉米苞叶数目转录组分析及候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 790-801.
[15]	孟成, 王哲. 玉米ZmPFK基因家族全基因组鉴定及响应胁迫表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 764-779.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed