欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (10): 1910-1915.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.01910

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    

控释氮肥对棉花纤维品质、产量与氮肥利用效率的影响

李学刚1,2,宋宪亮1,孙学振1,*,陈二影1,张美玲1,赵庆龙1   

  1. LI Xue-Gang1,2, SONG Xian-Liang1, SUN Xue-Zhen1,*, CHEN Er-Ying1, ZHANG Mei-Ling1,ZHAO Qing-Long1
  • 收稿日期:2011-03-16 修回日期:2011-06-25 出版日期:2011-10-12 网络出版日期:2011-07-28
  • 通讯作者: 孙学振, E-mail: sunxz@sdau.edu.cn, Tel: 0538-8242487
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家“十二五”科技支撑计划(2011BAD11B01, 2011BAD11B02), 国家引进国际先进农业科学技术计划(948计划)(2006-G60), 山东省农业重大应用技术创新项目(2009, 2010)和山东省农业良种工程重大课题(2008LZ03, 2009LZ03, 2010LZ005-01)资助。

Effects of Controlled-release N Fertilizer on Fiber Quality, Yield and N Use Efficiency

1 作物生物学国家重点实验室 / 山东农业大学农学院,山东泰安271018;2 滨州市农业局,山东滨州 256600   

  1. 1 Agronomy College, Shandong Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Crop Biology of China, Tai’an 271018, China; 2 Agriculture Bureau of Binzhou, Binzhou 256600, China
  • Received:2011-03-16 Revised:2011-06-25 Published:2011-10-12 Published online:2011-07-28
  • Contact: 孙学振, E-mail: sunxz@sdau.edu.cn, Tel: 0538-8242487

摘要: 设计100%树脂包膜尿素基施、50%普通尿素+50%树脂包膜尿素基施和棉花专用肥基施3种控释氮肥处理,以100%普通尿素为对照,研究等氮条件下,不同控释氮肥处理对棉花(鲁棉研28)不同开花期棉铃纤维品质、产量及氮肥利用效率的影响。结果表明,与对照相比,100%树脂包膜尿素处理7月下旬棉铃纤维比强度和8月中、下旬棉铃纤维马克隆值显著增大,7月下旬棉铃纤维成熟度显著增加,籽棉产量和皮棉产量分别增加6.2%和6.4%,偏生产力和农学效率均达极显著差异;棉花控释专用肥处理棉花生育中、后期棉纤维长度、比强度和马克隆值显著增大,成熟度显著增加,籽棉产量和皮棉产量分别增加5.0%和4.3%,偏生产力和农学效率达显著或极显著差异;而50%普通尿素+50%树脂包膜尿素处理仅7月下旬棉铃纤维比强度和8月中旬棉铃纤维马克隆值显著增大,8月中旬棉铃纤维成熟度显著增加。上述结果表明,100%树脂包膜尿素处理增产效果最显著,氮肥利用效率最高,而棉花专用肥处理纤维品质较优。

关键词: 棉花, 控释氮肥, 开花期, 纤维品质, 氮肥利用效率

Abstract: e seed cotton yield and lint cotton yield of 100% PCU treatment were increased by 6.2% and 6.4%, and those of PFPN and AEN were significantly enhanced. For 100% CRBBF treatment, fiber length was increased on 21 to 31 Aug., fiber strength was enhanced on 21 to 31 July and 21 to 31 Aug., fiber micronaire was augmented on 1 to 31 Aug., and fiber maturity was improved on 1 to 20 Aug.. The seed cotton yield and lint cotton yield of CRBBF treatment were increased by 5.0% and 4.3%, respectively, and those of PFPN and AEN were also significantly enhanced. For 50% PU+50% PCU treatment, fiber strength was enhanced on 21 to 31 July, micronaire was augmented on 11 to 20 Aug., fiber maturity was improved on 11 to 20 Aug. But there were no obvious differences on yield and nitrogen use efficiency between 50% PU+50% PCU treatment and CK2. In conclusion, 100% PCU treatment has the most obvious effect on yield and nitrogen use efficiency, while 100% CRBBF treatment could be better to improve fiber quality.

Key words: Cotton, Controlled release nitrogen fertilizer, Blooming date, Fiber quality, Nitrogen use efficiency

[1]Bradow J M, Davidonis G H. Quantitation of fiber quality and the cotton production-processing interface: a physiologist’s perspective. J Cotton Sci, 2000, 4: 34?64
[2]Bauer P J, Roof M E. Nitrogen, aldicarb, and cover crop effects on cotton yield and fiber properties. Agron J, 2004, 96: 369?376
[3]Ma F-Y(马富裕), Cao W-X(曹卫星), Li S-K(李少昆), Zhu Y(朱艳), Zhou Z-G(周治国), Zheng Z(郑重), Yang J-R(杨建荣). Quantitative analysis on the relationship between cotton fiber quality and meteorological factors. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2005, 16(11): 2102?2107 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]Shan S-H(单世华), Shi P(施培), Sun X-Z(孙学振), Zhou Z-G(周治国), Bian D-C(边栋材). Effect of anthesis date and fruiting branches on cotton fiber quality and super-molecular structure. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2002, 35(2): 163?168 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]Sun H-C(孙红春), Li C-D(李存东), Zhou Y-Z(周彦珍). Effects of different levels of nitrogen on physiological characteristics of function leaf and plant traits and yield components of cotton. Hebei Agric Univ (河北农业大学学报), 2005, 6(11): 9?14 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]Yuan Y-L(袁有禄), Zhang T-Z(张天真), Guo W-Z(郭旺珍), Pan J-J(潘家驹), Kohel R J, Xiong Z-W(熊宗伟), Tang S-R(唐淑荣). Genetic stability of fiber qualities in upland cotton. Cotton Sci (棉花学报), 2002, 14(2): 67?70 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7]Yang Z-B(杨志彬), Chen B-L(陈兵林), Zhou Z-G(周治国). Spatial and temporal variability of available nutrient in cotton field at flower and boll stage and its effect on lint yield and fiber quality. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2008, 34(8): 1393?1402 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]Sawan Z M, Mahmoud M H, Momtaz O A. Influence of nitrogen fertilization and foliar application of plant growth retardants and zinc on quantitative and qualitative properties of Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L. var. Giza 75). J Agric Food Chem, 1997, 45: 3331?3336
[9]Read J J, Reddy K R, Jenkins J N. Yield and fiber quality of upland cotton as influenced by nitrogen and potassium nutrition. Eur J Agron, 2006, 24: 282?290
[10]Ma R-H(马溶慧), Xu N-Y(许乃银), Zhang C-X(张传喜), Li W-F(李文峰), Feng Y(冯营), Qu L(屈磊), Wang Y-H(王友华), Zhou Z-G(周治国). Physiological mechanism of sucrose metabolism in cotton fiber and fiber strength regulated by nitrogen. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2008, 34(12): 2143?2151 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]Xue X-P(薛晓萍), Zhou Z-G(周治国), Zhang L-J(张丽娟), Wang Y-L(王以琳), Guo W-Q(郭文琦), Chen B-L(陈兵林). Development and application of critical nitrogen concentration dilution model for cotton after flowering. Acta Ecol Sin (生态学报), 2006, 26(6): 1781?1791(in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]Zhang Y(张炎), Hou X-L(侯秀玲), Wang X-J(王晓静), Li P(李磐). Effect of optimized nitrogen management on sea island cotton yield and fiber quality under plastic mulch by drip irrigation. Acta Agric Boreali-occident Sin (西北农业学报), 2006, 15(4): 122?125 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]Zhang W-F(张旺锋), Wang Z-L(王振林), Yu S-L(余松烈), Li S-K(李少昆), Cao L-P(曹连莆), Wang D-W(王登伟). Effect of nitrogen on canopy photosynthesis and yield formation in high-yielding cotton of Xinjiang. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2002, 28(6): 789?796 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]Shu H-M(束红梅), Chen B-L(陈兵林), Wang Y-H(王友华), Hu H-B(胡宏标), Zhang W-J(张文静), Zhou Z-G(周治国). Genotypic differences in cellulose accumulation of cotton fiber and its relationship with fiber strength. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(6): 921?926 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]Xue X-P(薛晓萍), Chen B-L(陈兵林), Guo W-Q(郭文琦), Zhou Z-G(周治国), Zhang L-J(张丽娟), Wang Y-L(王以琳). Dynamic quantitative model of critical nitrogen demand of cotton. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2006, 17(12): 2363?2370 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]Blaise D, Singh J V, Bonde A N, Tekale K U, Mayee C D. Effects of farmyard manure and fertilizers on yield, fibre quality and nutrient balance of rainfed cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Bioresour Technol, 2005, 96: 345?349
[17]Fageria N K, Baligar V C. Methodology for evaluation of low land rice genotypes for nitrogen use efficiency. J Plant Nutr, 2003, 26: 1315?1333
[18]Fan X-L(樊小林), Liao Z-W(廖宗文). Increasing fertilizer use efficiency by means of controlled release fertilizer (CRF) production according to theory and techniques of balanced fertilization. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 1998, 4(3): 219?223
[19]Li L-L(李伶俐), Ma Z-B(马宗斌), Lin T-B(林同保), Fang W-P(房卫平), Xie D-Y(谢德意). Effects of controlled release of N fertilizer on cotton yield. Chin J Eco-Agric (中国生态农业学报), 2007, 15(3): 45?47 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]Li X-G(李学刚), Song X-L(宋宪亮), Sun X-Z(孙学振), Chen E-Y(陈二影), Zhang M-L(张美玲), Zhao Q-L(赵庆龙). Effects of controlled release of N fertilizer on cotton leaves photosynthetic characteristics and yield. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2010, 10(3): 146?152 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]Sun Q-S(孙强生), Zhang M(张民), Su Q-H(苏秋红), Kong D-X(孔东星), Sun L-L(孙玲丽). Effects of controlled release compound fertilizers on growth of potted cotton. J Soil Water Conserv (水土保持学报), 2006, 20(6): 133?136 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 周静远, 孔祥强, 张艳军, 李雪源, 张冬梅, 董合忠. 基于种子萌发出苗过程中弯钩建成和下胚轴生长的棉花出苗壮苗机制与技术[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1051-1058.
[2] 孙思敏, 韩贝, 陈林, 孙伟男, 张献龙, 杨细燕. 棉花苗期根系分型及根系性状的关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1081-1090.
[3] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[4] 郑曙峰, 刘小玲, 王维, 徐道青, 阚画春, 陈敏, 李淑英. 论两熟制棉花绿色化轻简化机械化栽培[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 541-552.
[5] 袁嘉琦, 刘艳阳, 许轲, 李国辉, 陈天晔, 周虎毅, 郭保卫, 霍中洋, 戴其根, 张洪程. 氮密处理提高迟播栽粳稻资源利用和产量[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 667-681.
[6] 张艳波, 王袁, 冯甘雨, 段慧蓉, 刘海英. 棉籽油分和3种主要脂肪酸含量QTL分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 380-395.
[7] 张特, 王蜜蜂, 赵强. 滴施缩节胺与氮肥对棉花生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 396-409.
[8] 赵文青, 徐文正, 杨锍琰, 刘玉, 周治国, 王友华. 棉花叶片响应高温的差异与夜间淀粉降解密切相关[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1680-1689.
[9] 岳丹丹, 韩贝, Abid Ullah, 张献龙, 杨细燕. 干旱条件下棉花根际真菌多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1806-1815.
[10] 曾紫君, 曾钰, 闫磊, 程锦, 姜存仓. 低硼及高硼胁迫对棉花幼苗生长与脯氨酸代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1616-1623.
[11] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 徐浩聪, 朱铁忠, 吴汉, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 控释氮肥运筹对钵苗摆栽籼粳杂交稻甬优1540产量及氮肥利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(7): 1372-1382.
[12] 马欢欢, 方启迪, 丁元昊, 池华斌, 张献龙, 闵玲. 棉花GhMADS7基因正调控棉花花瓣发育[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(5): 814-826.
[13] 许乃银, 赵素琴, 张芳, 付小琼, 杨晓妮, 乔银桃, 孙世贤. 基于GYT双标图对西北内陆棉区国审棉花品种的分类评价[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 660-671.
[14] 周冠彤, 雷建峰, 代培红, 刘超, 李月, 刘晓东. 棉花CRISPR/Cas9基因编辑有效sgRNA高效筛选体系的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(3): 427-437.
[15] 卢合全, 唐薇, 罗振, 孔祥强, 李振怀, 徐士振, 辛承松. 商品有机肥替代部分化肥对连作棉田土壤养分、棉花生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2511-2521.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!