欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (04): 717-724.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00717

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

生态条件及栽培方式对稻米RVA谱特性及蛋白质含量的影响

邓飞1，王丽1，叶德成2，任万军1,*，杨文钰1,*   

  1. 1四川农业大学，四川温江611130；2仁寿县农业局，四川仁寿620500
  • 收稿日期:2011-08-01 修回日期:2011-12-15 出版日期:2012-04-12 网络出版日期:2012-01-04
  • 通讯作者: 任万军, E-mail: rwjun@126.com; 杨文钰, E-mail: wenyu.yang@263.net
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家粮食丰产科技工程项目(2011BAD16B05)和四川农业大学青年基金项目资助。

Effects of Ecological Conditions and Cultivation Methods on Rice Starch RVA Profile Characteristics and Protein Content

DENG Fei1,WANG Li1,YE De-Cheng2,REN Wan-Jun1,,YANG Wen-Yu1,*   

  1. 1 Sichuan Agricultural University, Wenjiang 611130, China; 2 Renshou Bureau of Agriculture, Renshou 620500, China
  • Received:2011-08-01 Revised:2011-12-15 Published:2012-04-12 Published online:2012-01-04
  • Contact: 任万军, E-mail: rwjun@126.com; 杨文钰, E-mail: wenyu.yang@263.net

PDF

1343

被引次数

31

摘要： 为明确稻米淀粉及蛋白质品质与生态条件、栽培方式及其互作的关系，采用随机区组多点试验设计，研究了秧龄和移栽方式对四川不同生态条件下稻米淀粉RVA谱特性和蛋白质含量的影响。结果表明，生态条件、栽培方式及两者互作效应均对稻米淀粉RVA谱特征值有极显著影响。海拔高度与峰值黏度、回复值和糊化温度显著负相关；随灌浆结实期日均温度和日照时数降低，峰值黏度、热浆黏度和冷胶黏度均显著降低。秧龄和移栽方式的改变，均导致淀粉RVA谱特性的变化。秧龄不同，除糊化温度外，峰值黏度、热浆黏度和冷胶黏度等7项RVA谱特征值间存在明显差异，且峰值黏度和冷胶黏度均随秧龄的减小而降低。移栽方式不同，淀粉RVA谱特性也存在差异，单苗优化定抛处理的峰值黏度、热浆黏度和冷胶黏度均低于双苗手插处理。除糊化温度外，峰值黏度等7项特征值的互作效应均达极显著水平。通过变异系数可看出，生态条件和栽培方式对崩解值的影响最大，消减值次之，对峰值时间和糊化温度的影响最小。此外，籽粒蛋白质含量同样受生态条件影响，其与海拔高度呈显著正相关，与灌浆结实期日均温度和日照时数呈负相关关系。

关键词: 水稻, 生态条件, 栽培方式, 淀粉RVA谱, 蛋白质含量

Abstract: In order to clarify the relations of ecological conditions, cultivation methods and their interactions with rice starch and protein qualities, the authors systematically studied the effects of cultivation methods on rice strach RVA profile and protein content under different ecological conditions by using rice varieties II You 498 as material. The result showed that all of the ecological conditions, cultivation methods and interactions of them had a significant effect on the RVA profile of rice starch. With the raising of altitude and the reducing of average temperature and sunshine hours in 30 days after heading, the peak viscosity, hot paste viscosity and cool paste viscosity of RVA depressed significantly. It was found that both of seedling age and transplanting methods caused RVA profile changes. The peak viscosity and cool paste viscosity of long seedling age were higher than those of short seedling age. Meanwhile, the peak viscosity, hot paste viscosity and cool paste viscosity of the optimized-broadcasting rice treatment were lower than those of the double seedlings hand-transplanted treatment. Because of the interaction of ecological condition and cultivation method, all of the seven eigenvalue were strongly influenced, but pasting temperature. In addition, it was easy to discover that breakdown viscosity and setback viscosity were affected higher than peak time and pasting temperature, according to the coefficient of variation. Besides, all of the latitude, light and temperature conditions affected protein content seriously. In conclusion, in order to get a better cooking and eating quality and rice yield under different ecological conditions, an appropriate cultivation method must be chosen.

Key words: Rice, Ecological condition, Cultivation method, RVA profile, Protein content

[1]American Association of Cereal Chemists. Approved methods for the AACC, 10th ed. Method 61-02 (determination of the pasting properties of rice with rapid visco analyzer). St. Paul, MN: AACC, 2000

[2]Bao J-S(包劲松). Accurate measurement of pasting temperature of rice flour by a Rapid Visco-Analyser. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2007, 21(5): 543–546 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[3]Jin Z-X(金正勋), Jiang W-Z(姜文洙), Chin J-H(晋重玄), Koh H-J(高熙棕). Analysis on the combining ability of taste meter value and starch RVA properties in Indica rice. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2004, 30(12): 1210–1214 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[4]Shu Q-Y(舒庆尧), Wu D-X(吴殿星), Xia Y-W(夏英武), Gao M-W(高明尉). Relationship between RVA profile character and eating quality in Oryza sativa L. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1998, 31(3): 25–29 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[5]Jia L(贾良), Ding X-Y(丁雪云), Wang P-R(王平荣),Deng X-Z(邓晓建). Rice RVA profile characteristics and correlation with the physical/chemical quality. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2008, 34(5): 790–794 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[6]Sui J-M(隋炯明), Li X(李欣), Yan S(严松), Yan C-J(严长杰), Zhang R(张蓉), Tang S-Z(汤述翥), Lu J-F(陆驹飞), Chen Z-X(陈宗祥), Gu M-H(顾铭洪). Studies on the rice RVA profile characteristics and its correlation with the quality. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2005, 38(4): 657–663 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[7]Zhu M-S(朱满山), Gu M-H(顾铭洪), Tang X-Z(汤述翥). Correlation analysis of starch RVA profiles and cooking physical-chemical indices of different cultivars (lines) and DH populations in japonica rice. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(3): 411–418 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[8]Zhu J-H(朱振华), Jin J-Y(金基永), Yuan P-R(袁平荣), Zhao G-Z(赵国珍), Su Z-X(苏振喜), Shi R(世荣), Zhou Q(邹茜), Yang S-Z(杨世准), Dai L-Y(戴陆园). Effects of different ecological conditions on grain quality and RVA profile of Japonica rice from Yunnan of China and Korea. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2009, 20(12): 2949–2956 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[9]Zhang Y-S(张永生), Jiang L(江玲), Liu X(刘喜), Liu S-J(刘世家), Chen L-M(陈亮明), Zhai H-Q(翟虎渠), Wan J-M(万建民). Analysis of QTLs for starch RVA profile properties in the superior rice cultivar Koshihikari. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2010, 24(2): 137–144 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[10]He X-P(贺晓鹏), Zhu C-L(朱昌兰), Liu L-L(刘玲珑), Wang F(王方), Fu J-R(傅军如), Jiang L(江玲), Zhang W-W(张文伟), Liu Y-B(刘宜柏), Wan J-M(万建民). Difference of amylopectin structure among various rice genotypes differing in grain qualities and its relation to starch physicochemical properties. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(2): 276–284 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[11]Wang F(王丰), Cheng F-M(程方民), Zhong L-J(钟连进), Sun Z-X(孙宗修). Difference of RVA profile among different early Indica rice varieties and effect of temperature at grain filling stage on it. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2003, 17(4): 328–332 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[12]Yuan J-C(袁继超), Ding Z-Y(丁志勇), Cai G-Z(蔡光泽), Yang S-M(杨世民), Zhu Q-S(朱庆生), Yang J-C(杨建昌). The factors influencing RVA profile of rice starch and their changes with altitudes in Panxi region. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2005, 31(12): 1611–1619 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[13]Wu W(吴伟), Cheng W-D(程旺大), Xu J-L(徐建良). Effects of light intensity on grain amylose content and starch RVA profile characteristics of early Indica rice during grain-filling stage. Acta Agric Zhejiang (浙江农业学报), 2006, 18(3): 141–145 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[14]Xie L-H(谢黎虹), Yang S-H(杨仕华), Chen N(陈能), Duan B-W(段彬伍), Zhu Z-W(朱智伟), Liao X-Y(廖西元). Cooked rice texture and starch RVA properties for indica rice under different ecological conditions. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2006, 32(10): 1479–1484 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[15]Bao J-S(包劲松), Xia Y-W(夏英武). Genetic effects and genotype×environment interactions for the starch RVA profiles in indica rice. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2001, 34(2): 123–127 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[16]Chen L-G(陈留根), Zhang Y-F(张岳芳), Wang Z-C(王子臣), Xie J-K(谢建康), Ye L-L(叶卢亮). Effects of nitrogen application rate on rice quality and starch RVA profile parameters of mechanical transplanting super japonica rice. Chin Agric Sci Bull (中国农学通报), 2010, 26(16): 139–143 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[17]Wan L-J(万靓军), Huo Z-Y(霍中洋), Gong Z-K(龚振恺), Zhang H-C(张洪程), Lin Z-C(林忠成), Dai Q-G(戴其根), Xu K(许轲). Effect of nitrogen application on main quality and RVA profile characters of hybrid rice. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2006, 32(10): 1491–1497 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[18]Zhang X(张欣), Shi L-L(施利利), Liu X-Y(刘晓宇), Ding D-L(丁得亮), Wang S-W(王松文), Cui J(崔晶). Effect of different fertilizer treatments on rice yield, grain quality and protein fraction content. Chin Agric Sci Bull (中国农学通报), 2010, 26(4): 104–108 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[19]Cai Y-X(蔡一霞), Wang W(王维), Zhang Z-J(张祖建), Xia G-H(夏广宏), Zhang H-X(张洪熙), Yang J-C(杨建昌), Zhu Q-S(朱庆森). Comparative studies on cooking quality and RVA profile of several rice varieties under water- and dry-cultivation. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2003, 29(4): 508–513 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[20]Liu Y-Y(刘艳阳), Zhang C-H(张洪程), Dai Q-G(戴其根), Huo Z-Y(霍中洋), Xu K(许轲). Effects of nitrogen application on RVA profile characters under different soil fertility levels. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2006, 20(5): 529–534 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[21]Dong W-J(董文军), Tian Y-L(田云录), Zhang B(张彬), Chen J(陈金), Zhang W-J(张卫建). Effects of asymmetric warming on grain quality and related key enzymes activities for japonica rice (Nanjing 44) under FATI facility. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2011, 37(5): 832–841 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[22]Xie L-H(谢黎虹), Ye D-C(叶定池), Chen N(陈能), Duan B-W(段彬伍), Zhu Z-W(朱智伟). Effect of sowing date and plant density on starch RVA and texture properties in rice “Zhongzheyou 1”. Acta Agric Jiangxi (江西农业学报), 2007, 19(10): 1–4 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[23]Ye D-C(叶定池), Xie L-H(谢黎虹), Chen N(陈能), Duan B-W(段彬伍), Xu X(徐霞), Zhu Z-W(朱智伟). Effect of different sowing and harvest periods on RVA viscosity characters of rice vareity Feng-Liang-You 1. Acta Agric Jiangxi (江西农业学报), 2007, 19(3): 179–183 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[24]Ren W-J(任万军), Yang W-Y(杨文钰), Xu J-W(徐精文), Fan G-Q(樊高琼), Ma Z-H(马周华). Effect of low light on grains growth and quality in rice. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2003, 29(5): 785–790 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[25]Zhang Y-J(张亚洁), Xie L-H(杨连新), Li J-X(李俊贤), Zhai C-Q(翟超群), Su Z-F(苏祖芳), Yang J-C(杨建昌). Effects of soil moisture on quality characters and RVA profile parameters of upland rice. J Yangzhou Univ (Agric Life Sci) (扬州大学学报•农业与生命科学版), 2004, 25(4): 7–11 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[26]Cai Y-X(蔡一霞), Zhu Q-S(朱庆森), Xu W(徐伟), Wang W(王维), Yang J-C(杨建昌), Zhang Z-J(张祖建), Lang Y-Z(郎有忠). Effects of water stress on the main characters of superior and inferior grains quality and the properties of RVA profile during grain-filling stage. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2004, 30(3): 241–247 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 田甜, 陈丽娟, 何华勤. 基于Meta-QTL和RNA-seq的整合分析挖掘水稻抗稻瘟病候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1372-1388.
[2] 郑崇珂, 周冠华, 牛淑琳, 和亚男, 孙伟, 谢先芝. 水稻早衰突变体esl-H5的表型鉴定与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1389-1400.
[3] 周文期, 强晓霞, 王森, 江静雯, 卫万荣. 水稻OsLPL2/PIR基因抗旱耐盐机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1401-1415.
[4] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[5] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[6] 杨建昌, 李超卿, 江贻. 稻米氨基酸含量和组分及其调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1037-1050.
[7] 杨德卫, 王勋, 郑星星, 项信权, 崔海涛, 李生平, 唐定中. OsSAMS1在水稻稻瘟病抗性中的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1119-1128.
[8] 朱峥, 王田幸子, 陈悦, 刘玉晴, 燕高伟, 徐珊, 马金姣, 窦世娟, 李莉云, 刘国振. 水稻转录因子WRKY68在Xa21介导的抗白叶枯病反应中发挥正调控作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1129-1140.
[9] 王小雷, 李炜星, 欧阳林娟, 徐杰, 陈小荣, 边建民, 胡丽芳, 彭小松, 贺晓鹏, 傅军如, 周大虎, 贺浩华, 孙晓棠, 朱昌兰. 基于染色体片段置换系群体检测水稻株型性状QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1141-1151.
[10] 王泽, 周钦阳, 刘聪, 穆悦, 郭威, 丁艳锋, 二宫正士. 基于无人机和地面图像的田间水稻冠层参数估测与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1248-1261.
[11] 陈悦, 孙明哲, 贾博为, 冷月, 孙晓丽. 水稻AP2/ERF转录因子参与逆境胁迫应答的分子机制研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 781-790.
[12] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[13] 巫燕飞, 胡琴, 周棋, 杜雪竹, 盛锋. 水稻延伸因子复合体家族基因鉴定及非生物胁迫诱导表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 644-655.
[14] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
[15] 王琰, 陈志雄, 姜大刚, 张灿奎, 查满荣. 增强叶片氮素输出对水稻分蘖和碳代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 739-746.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2