欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (06): 1093-1101.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.01093

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

小麦玉米周年生产中耕作对夏玉米产量及抗倒伏能力的影响

李霞,张吉旺*,任佰朝,范霞,董树亭,刘鹏,赵斌   

  1. 作物生物学国家重点实验室 / 山东农业大学农学院,山东泰安271018
  • 收稿日期:2013-11-25 修回日期:2014-03-04 出版日期:2014-06-12 网络出版日期:2014-04-08
  • 通讯作者: 张吉旺, E-mail: jwzhang@sdau.edu.cn, Tel: 0538-8245838
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由山东省现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(SDAIT-01-022-05),国家粮食丰产科技工程项目(2011BAD16B09),国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201203100)和山东省玉米育种与栽培技术企业重点实验室开放课题资助。

Yield and Lodging Resistance of Summer Maize under Different Winter Wheat-Summer Maize Tillage Systems

LI Xia,ZHANG Ji-Wang*,REN Bai-Zhao,FAN Xia,DONG Shu-Ting,LIU Peng,ZHAO Bin   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology / Agronomy College of Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China
  • Received:2013-11-25 Revised:2014-03-04 Published:2014-06-12 Published online:2014-04-08
  • Contact: 张吉旺, E-mail: jwzhang@sdau.edu.cn, Tel: 0538-8245838

摘要:

针对黄淮海平原冬小麦夏玉米周年生产的特点,将冬小麦夏玉米播前耕作统筹结合,以期为冬小麦夏玉米周年生产体系耕作方式的改良提供依据。以郑单958为验材,设冬小麦播前旋耕夏玉米播前免耕(RN)、冬小麦播前翻耕夏玉米播前免耕(MN)、冬小麦播前翻耕夏玉米播前旋耕(MR) 3个处理,探讨冬小麦夏玉米周年生产条件下不同耕作方式对夏玉米抗倒伏能力及产量的影响。2年研究结果表明,MR处理夏玉米的株高、穗位高增加,MN与MR处理的地上第3茎节变粗,MN处理的地上第3节间茎粗系数最大。MR与MN处理间抽雄期的基部茎节穿刺强度无显著差异,但较RN均显著增强,茎秆皮层厚度和维管束密度及维管束鞘面积较RN也显著增大,茎秆伤流速率较RN分别提高60.60%和46.70%,茎秆质量显著提高。此外,MN与MR的根重和根冠比较RN显著提高,地上节根根条数与干重也显著提高。MN与MR较RN处理分别增产26.33%与39.21%。冬小麦播前翻耕可显著提高夏玉米产量及抗倒伏能力。

关键词: 夏玉米, 小麦玉米周年耕作, 茎秆形态与结构, 倒伏, 产量

Abstract:

The objective of his study was to explore the effects of different tillage systems in winter wheat-summer maize cropping on yield and lodging resistance of summer maize. Maize hybrid Zhengdan958 was used as experimental material. Three tillage treatments were designed, including rotary tillage before winter wheat seeding and no-tillage before maize seeding (RN), moldboard tillage before winter wheat seeding and no-tillage before maize seeding (MN), and moldboard tillage before winter wheat seeding and rotary tillage before maize seeding (MR). The results showed that plant height and ear height were higher in MR than in RN, the third internode diameter of MN and MR was greater than that of RN, and the ratio of length to diameter in MN was the lowest and the stem diameter coefficients of MN was the highest. Rind penetrometer resistance of summer maize enhanced at the tasselling stage (VT) and reduced at the milk stage (R3) in the treatment of moldboard tillage before winter wheat seeding, density of the vascular and area of the vascular bundle were increased, and bleeding sap in stalk increased under MR and MN. Bleeding sap of stalks under MR and MN was 60.62% and 46.70% greater than under RN respectively. Root and shoot dry matter, the ratio of root and shoot dry matter, and brace root numbers of summer maize in MN and MR were higher than these in RN. Grain yield of MR and MN was 26.33% and 39.21% greater than that of RN, respectively. In conclusion, moldboard tillage before winter wheat seeding has good effects on yield and lodging-resistant capability in summer maize.

Key words: Summer maize, Tillage systems, Stalk quality, Lodging, Grain yield

[1]韩宾, 孔凡磊, 张海林, 陈阜. 耕作方式转变对小麦/玉米两熟农田土壤固碳能力的影响. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21: 91–98



Han B, Kun F L, Zhang H L, Chen F. Effects of tillage conversion on carbon sequestration capability of farmland soil doubled cropped with wheat and corn. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2010, 21: 91-98 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[2]Zuber M S, GroganC O. A new technique for measuring stalk strength in corn. Crop Sci, 1961, 1: 378–380



穆春华, 孟昭东, 张发军, 汪黎明, 李文才, 孙琦, 丁照华. 玉米常用自交系茎节抗折强度分析. 玉米科学, 2009, 17(2): 34-37



[3]Mu C H, Meng S D, Zhang F J, Wang L M, Li W C, Sun Q, Ding Z H. Stem section flexural strength analysis about maize inbred lines. J Maize Sci, 2009, 17(2): 34–37 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[4]Sasal M C, Andriulo A E, Taboada M A. Soil porosity characteristics and water movement under zero tillage in silty soils in Argentinian Pampas. Soil Till Res, 2006, 87: 9–18



[5]Xu D, Mermoud A. Topsoil properties as affected by tillage practices in North China. Soil Till Res, 2001, 60: 11–19



[6]Motavalli P P, Stevens W E, Hartwig G. Remediation of subsoil compaction and compaction effects on corn N availability by deep tillage and application of poultry manure in a sandy-textured soil. Soil Till Res, 2003, 71: 121–131



[7]王立新, 郭强, 苏青. 玉米抗倒性与茎秆显微结构的关系. 植物学通报, 1990, 7(8): 34–36



Wang L X, Guo Q, Su Q. The relative correlation between the anti-lodging property and the microstructure in corn. Chin Bull Bot, 1990, 7(8): 34–36 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[8]贾志森, 白永新. 玉米自交系抗倒伏鉴定研究. 作物品种资源, 1992, (3): 30–33



Jia Z S, Bai Y X. Research about maize inbred line lodging resistance appraisal. Crop Genet Resour, 1992, (3): 30–33 (in Chinese)



[9]王群瑛, 胡昌浩. 玉米茎秆抗倒特性的解剖研究. 作物学报, 1991, 17: 70–77



Wang Q Y, Hu C H. Anatomic study of corn stalks down resistance characteristics. Acta Agron Sin, 1991, 17: 70–77 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[10]Martin S A, Darrah L L, Hibbard B E. Divergent selection for rind penetrometer resistance and its effects on European corn borer damage and stalk traits in corn. Crop Sci, 2004, 44: 711–717



[11]丰光, 刘志芳, 李妍妍, 邢锦丰, 黄长玲. 玉米茎秆耐穿刺强度的倒伏遗传研究. 作物学报, 2009, 35: 2133–2138



Feng G, Liu Z F, Li Y Y, Xing J F, Huang C L. Genetic research about maize stem lodging of durable thorn strength. Acta Agron Sin, 2009, 35: 2133–2138 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[12]勾玲, 黄建军, 孙锐, 丁在松, 董志强, 赵明. 玉米不同耐密植品种茎秆穿刺强度的变化特征. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(11): 156–161



Gou L, Huang J J, Sun R, Ding Z S, Dong Z Q, Zhao M. Variation characteristic of stalk penetration strength of maize with different density-tolerance varieties. Trans CSAE, 2010, 26(11): 156–161 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[13]张洪生, 赵明, 吴沛波, 翟延举, 姜雯. 种植密度对玉米茎秆和穗部性状的影响. 玉米科学, 2009, 17(5): 130–133



Zhang H S, Zhao M, Wu P B, Zhai Y J, Jiang W. Effects of planting density on corn stalks and panicle traits . J Maize Sci, 2009, 17(5): 130–133 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[14]刘明, 齐华, 张卫建, 张振平, 李雪霏, 宋振伟, 于吉琳, 吴亚男. 深松方式与施氮量对玉米茎秆解剖结构及倒伏的影响. 玉米科学, 2013, 21(1): 57–63



Liu M, Qi H, Zhang W J, Zhang Z P, Li X F, Song Z W, Yu J L, Wu Y N. Effects of deep loosening and nitrogen application on anatomical structures of stalk and logging in maize. J Maize Sci, 2013, 21(1): 57–63 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[15]沈学善, 李金才, 屈会娟, 魏凤珍, 张一, 武文明. 砂姜黑土区小麦玉米秸秆全量还田对玉米抗倒性能的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44: 2005–2012



Shen X S, Li Q C, Qu H J, Wei F Z, Zhang Y, Wu W M. Effects of wheat and maize straw returned to the field on lodging resistance of maize in lime concretion black soil region. Sci Agric Sin, 2011, 44: 2005–2012 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[16]崔海岩, 靳立斌, 李波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 董树亭, 刘鹏. 遮阴对夏玉米茎秆形态结构和倒伏的影响. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45: 3497–3505



Cui H Y, Jin L B, Li B, Zhang J W, Zhao B, Dong S T, Liu P. Effects of shading on morphology, structure and lodging of summer maize in field. Sci Agric Sin, 2012, 45: 3497–3505 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[17]何启平, 董树亭, 高荣岐. 不同类型玉米品种果穗维管束的比较研究. 作物学报, 2007, 33: 1187–1196



He Q P, Dong S T, Gao R Q. Comparison of ear vascular bundles in different maize cultivars. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33: 1187–1196 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[18]李波, 张吉旺, 崔海岩, 靳立斌, 董树亭, 刘鹏, 赵斌. 施钾量对高产夏玉米抗倒伏能力的影响. 作物学报, 2012, 38: 2093–2099



Li B, Zhang J W, Cui H Y, Jin L B, Dong S T, Liu P, Zhao B. Effects of potassium application rate on stem lodging resistance of summer maize under high yield conditions. Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38: 2093–2099 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[19]勾玲, 黄建军, 张宾, 李涛, 孙悦, 赵明. 群体密度对玉米茎秆抗倒力学和农艺性状影响. 作物学报, 2007, 33: 1688–1695



Gou L, Huang J J, Zhang B, Li T, Sun R, Zhao M. Effects of population density on stalk lodging resistant mechanism and agronomic characteristics of maize. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33: 1688–1695 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[20]Wang X B, Wu H J, Dai K, Zhang D C, Feng Z H, Zhao Q S, Wu X P, Jin K, Cai D X, Oenema O, Hoogmoed W B. Tillage and crop residue effects on rainfed wheat and maize production in Northern China. Field Crops Res, 2011, 5569: 1–11



[21]Kang M S, Din A K, Zhang Y D, Magari R. Combining ability for rind puncture resistance in maize. Crop Sci, 1999, 39: 368–371



[22]孙世贤, 戴俊英, 顾慰连. 氮磷钾肥对玉米倒伏及其产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 1989, 22(3): 28–33



Sun S X, Dai J Y, Gu W L. Effects of nitrogen, phosphate and potash fertilizers on lodging and yield in maize. Sci Agric Sin, 1989, 22(3): 28–33 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[23]史忠强, 江晓东, 王芸, 宁堂原, 韩宾, 李增嘉. 少免耕对夏玉米灌浆过程和产量的影响. 山东农业科学, 2007, (1): 51-52



Shi Z Q, Jiang X D, Wang Y, Ning T Y, Han B, Li Z J. Effects of minimum and no-tillage on seed filling and yield of summer maize. Shandong Agric Sci, 2007, (1): 51–52 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[24]李明德, 刘琼峰, 吴海勇, 汤睿. 不同耕作方式对红壤旱地土壤理化性状及玉米产量的影响. 生态环境学报, 2009, 18: 1522–1526



Li M D, Liu Q F, Wu L Y, Tang R. Effects of different tillages on soil property and yield of maize. Ecol Environ Sci, 2009, 18: 1522–1526 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[25]梁金凤, 齐庆振, 贾小红, 宫少俊, 黄元仿. 不同耕作方式对土壤性质与玉米生长的影响研究. 生态环境学报, 2010, 19: 945–950



Liang J F, Qi Q Z, Jia X H, Gong S J, Huang Y F. Effects of different tillages on soil property and corn growth. Ecol Environ Sci, 2010, 19: 945–950 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[3] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[4] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[7] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[8] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[9] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[10] 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[11] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[12] 杜浩, 程玉汉, 李泰, 侯智红, 黎永力, 南海洋, 董利东, 刘宝辉, 程群. 利用Ln位点进行分子设计提高大豆单荚粒数[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
[13] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
[14] 袁嘉琦, 刘艳阳, 许轲, 李国辉, 陈天晔, 周虎毅, 郭保卫, 霍中洋, 戴其根, 张洪程. 氮密处理提高迟播栽粳稻资源利用和产量[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 667-681.
[15] 丁红, 徐扬, 张冠初, 秦斐斐, 戴良香, 张智猛. 不同生育期干旱与氮肥施用对花生氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 695-703.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!