作物学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (08): 1459-1469.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.01459
孙敏,温斐斐,高志强*,任爱霞,邓妍,赵维峰,赵红梅
SUN Min,WEN Fei-Fei,GAO Zhi-Qiang*,REN Ai-Xia,DENG Yan,ZHAO Wei-Feng,ZHAO Hong-Mei,YANG Zhen-Ping,MIAO Guo-Yuan
摘要:
为明确旱地小麦通过休闲期耕作实现蓄水增产的技术途径, 2009—2012年连续3个小麦生长季, 在山西闻喜县进行了休闲期深翻、深松或无耕作的田间试验, 以明确不同耕作措施对土壤水分变化、小麦产量形成的影响。结果表明, 深翻和深松处理播种期0~300 cm土壤蓄水量增加, 枯水年增加63~91 mm, 平水年增加41~70 mm, 丰水年增加54~74 mm, 尤其在枯水年和丰水年生育后期蓄水效果仍显著, 休闲期土壤蓄水效率显著提高, 枯水年提高147%~205%。深翻和深松处理在枯水年和丰水年可促进小麦生育后期吸收300 cm土层土壤水分, 使产量和产量构成因素显著提高, 尤其在枯水年产量提高34%~45%。在平水年, 穗数、穗粒数和产量显著提高, 且在平水年和丰水年深翻和深松处理对产量构成因素中的穗数影响最大。深翻和深松处理后降水生产效率和水分利用效率显著提高。不同降水年型休闲期耕作条件下, 穗数与播种至拔节期120~180 cm、拔节至开花期60~120 cm土层土壤贮水减少量关系密切, 穗粒数与播种至拔节期60~120 cm土层关系密切, 产量与拔节至开花期60~120 cm、开花至成熟期 120~180 cm土层关系密切。总之, 在本研究条件下, 旱地小麦休闲期深翻或深松耕作有利于蓄积休闲期降水, 改善底墒, 尤其枯水年的效果更为明显; 有利于增加土壤水分, 促进小麦向深层吸收土壤水分, 优化产量构成, 实现增产。在枯水年和平水年, 以休闲期深翻效果较好, 在丰水年以休闲期深松效果较好。
| [1]Bhatt R, Khera K L. Effect of tillage and mode of straw mulch application on soil erosion in the simultaneous tract of Punjab, Soil Till Res, 2006, 88: 107–115[2]Riley HCF, Bleken M A, Abrahamsen S. Effects of alternative tillage systems on soil quality and yield of spring cereals on salty clay loam and sandy loam soils in the cool, wet climate of central Norway. Soil Till Res, 2005, 80: 79–93 [3]张树清, 孙大鹏. 甘肃省旱作土壤蓄水保墒培肥综合技术. 干旱地区农业研究, 1998, 16(3): 11–14Zhang S Q, Sun D P. Comprehensive techniques of soil moisture retention and fertility betterment on dryland in Gansu. Agric Res Arid Areas, 1998, 16(3): 11–14 (in Chinese with English abstract)[4]赵秉强, 李凤超, 薛坚, 李增嘉. 不同耕法对冬小麦根系生长发育的影响. 作物学报, 1997, 23: 287–296Zhao B Q, Li F C, Xue J, Li Z J. Effect of different tillage methods on root growth of winter wheat. Acta Agron Sin, 1997, 23: 287–296 (in Chinese with English abstract)[5]褚鹏飞, 于振文, 王东, 张永丽, 石玉. 耕作方式对小麦开花后旗叶水势与叶绿素荧光参数日变化和水分利用效率的影响. 作物学报, 2012, 38: 1051–1061Chu P F, Yu Z W, Wang D, Zhang Y L, Shi Y. Effect of tillage mode on diurnal variations of water potential and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of flag leaf after anthesis and water use efficiency in wheat. Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38: 1051–1061 (in Chinese with English abstract)[6]秦红灵, 高旺盛, 马月存, 马丽, 尹春梅. 两年免耕后深松对土壤水分的影响. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41: 78–85Qin H L, Gao W S, Ma Y C, Ma L, Yin C M. Effects of subsoiling on soil moisture under no tillage 2 years later. Sci Agric Sin, 2008, 41: 78–85 (in Chinese with English abstract)[7]白一茹, 邵明安. 黄土高原雨养区坡面土壤蓄水量时间稳定性. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(7): 45–50Bai Y R, Shao M A. Temporal stability of soil water storage on slope in rain fed region of Loess Plateau. Trans CSAE, 2011, 27(7): 45–50 (in Chinese with English abstract)[8]刘爽, 武雪萍, 吴会军, 梁二, 蔡典雄. 休闲期不同耕作方式对洛阳冬小麦农田土壤水分的影响. 中国农业气象, 2007, 28: 292–295Liu S, Wu X P, Wu H J, Liang E, Cai D X. Influence of different tillage practices during summer fallow on soil moisture in winter wheat field in Luoyang. Chin J Agrometeorol, 2007, 28: 292–295 (in Chinese with English abstract)[9]Wang X B, Cai D X, Hoogmoed W B, Oenema O, Perdok U D. Developments in conservation tillage in rained regions of North China. Soil Tillage Res, 2007, 93: 239–250[10]毛红玲, 李军, 贾志宽, 王蕾. 旱作麦田保护性耕作蓄水保墒和增产增收效应. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(8): 44–51Mao H L, Li J, Jia Z K, Wang L. Soil water conservation effect, yield and income increments of conservation tillage measures on dryland wheat field. Trans CSAE, 2010, 26(8): 44–51 (in Chinese with English abstract)[11]张北赢, 徐学选, 刘文兆, 陈天林. 黄土丘陵沟壑区不同降水年型下土壤水分动态. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19: 1234–1240Zhang B Y, Xu X X, Liu W Z, Chen T L. Dynamic changes of soil moisture in loess hilly and gully region under effects of different yearly precipitation patterns. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2008, 19: 1234–1240 (in Chinese with English abstract)[12]侯贤清, 王维, 韩清芳, 贾志宽, 严波, 李永平, 苏秦. 夏闲期轮耕对小麦田土壤水分及产量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2001, 292: 2524–2533Hou X Q, Wang W, Han Q F, Jia Z K, Yan B, Li Y P, Su Q. Effects of rotational tillage during summer fallow on wheat field soil water regime and grain yield. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2001, 292: 2524–2533 (in Chinese with English abstract)[13]侯贤清, 韩清芳, 贾志宽, 李永平, 杨宝平. 半干旱区夏闲期不同耕作方式对土壤水分及小麦水分利用效率的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2009, 27(5): 52–58Hou X Q, Han Q F, Jia Z K, Li Y P, Yang B P. Effects of different tillage practices in summer fallow period on soil water and crop water use efficiency in semi-arid areas. Agric Res Arid Areas, 2009, 27(5): 52–58 (in Chinese with English abstract)[14]付增光, 杜世平, 廖允成. 渭北旱地小麦留茬深松膜侧沟播耕作技术体系研究. 干旱地区农业研究, 2003, 21(2): 13–17Fu Z G, Du S P, Liao Y C. Studies on tillage system of stubble mulching and subsoiling and furrow sowing on side of film mulch for dryland winter wheat in Weibei Plateau. Agric Res Arid Areas, 2003, 21(2): 13-17 (in Chinese with English abstract)[15]Baumhardt R L, Jones O R. Residue management and tillage effects on soil-water storage and grain yield of dryland wheat and sorghum for a clay loam in Texas. Soil & Till Res, 2002, 68: 71–82[16]王红光, 于振文, 张永丽, 石玉, 王东. 耕作方式对旱地小麦耗水特性和干物质积累的影响. 作物学报, 2012, 38: 675–682Wang H G, Yu Z W, Zhang Y L, Shi Y, Wang D. Effects of tillage regimes on water consumption and dry matter accumulation in dryland wheat. Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38: 675–682 (in Chinese with English abstract)[17]Lampurlanes J, Angas P, Cantero Martinez C. Root growth, soil water content and yield of barley under different tillage systems on two soils in semiarid conditions. Field Crops Res, 2001, 69: 27–40[18]Fitter A H. Plant Root Growth: an Ecological Perspective. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1991. pp 229–243[19]Pearson G J, Mann I G, Zhang Z. Changes in root growth within successive wheat crops in a cropping cycle using minimum and conventional tillage. Field Crops Res, 1991, 28: 117–133[20]王永华, 王玉杰, 冯伟.两种气候年型下不同栽培模式对冬小麦根系时空分布及产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45: 2826–2837Wang Y H, Wang Y J, Feng W. Effects of different cultivation patterns on the spatial temporal distribution characteristics of roots and grain yield of winter wheat in two climatic years. Sci Agric Sin, 2012, 45: 2826–2837 (in Chinese with English abstract)[21]肖继兵, 孙占祥, 杨久廷, 张玉龙, 郑家明, 刘洋.半干旱区中耕深松对土壤水分和作物产量的影响. 土壤通报, 2011, 42: 709–714Xiao J B, Sun Z Y, Yang J T, Zhang Y L, Zheng J M, Liu Y. Effects of subsoiling on soil moisture and crop yield cultivation in semi arid region. Chin J Soil Sci, 2011, 42: 709–714 (in Chinese with English abstract)[22]王法宏, 王旭清, 任德昌, 于振文, 余松烈. 土壤深松对小麦根系活性的垂直分布及旗叶衰老的影响. 核农学报, 2003, 17: 56–61Wang F H, Wang X Q, Ren D C, Yu Z W, Yu S L. Effect of soil deep tillage on root activity and vertical distribution. Acta Agric Nucl Sin, 2003, 17: 56–61 (in Chinese with English abstract |
| [1] | 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846. |
| [2] | 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816. |
| [3] | 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486. |
| [4] | 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325. |
| [5] | 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535. |
| [6] | 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372. |
| [7] | 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572. |
| [8] | 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521. |
| [9] | 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500. |
| [10] | 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290. |
| [11] | 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560. |
| [12] | 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547. |
| [13] | 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180. |
| [14] | 崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235. |
| [15] | 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165. |
|
||