作物学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (09): 1686-1694.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.01686
卢昆丽,尹燕枰,王振林*,李勇,彭佃亮,杨卫兵,崔正勇,杨东清,江文文
LU Kun-Li,YIN Yan-Ping,WANG Zhen-Lin*,LI Yong,PENG Dian-Liang,YANG Wei-Bing,CUI Zheng-Yong,YANG Dong-Qing,JIANG Wen-Wen
摘要:
为明确氮肥施用模式对小麦茎秆木质素合成与积累及抗倒伏能力的影响,2011—2012和2012—2013生长季,选用济麦22 (抗倒伏)和山农16 (不抗倒伏)品种,分析不同生育期追施氮肥处理的茎秆木质素含量和木质素合成相关酶活性,及其与抗倒伏指数和产量的关系。各处理总施氮量为240 kg hm−2,其中80 kg hm−2播前基施,其余氮肥按4种模式追施,分别是起身期和孕穗期各一半(N1)、拔节期全施(N2)、拔节期和开花期各一半(N3)和孕穗期全施(N4)。与N2和N3处理相比,N1和N4处理的茎秆木质素含量高,茎秆抗折力大,茎秆抗倒能力强。各处理对木质素合成关键酶活性有显著影响,其中N1的苯丙氨酸解氨酶(PAL)、酪氨酸解氨酶(TAL)和过氧化物酶(POD)活性较高;N2处理第2节间形成后0~7 d时PAL、TAL和POD活性显著高于其他处理,但第2节间形成后21 d时迅速下降;N3处理第2节间形成后0~21 d时PAL、TAL和POD活性低,但开花期(21 d)追氮延缓了3种酶活性的降低;N4处理显著提高了第2节间形成14 d后的酶活性。在乳熟期和蜡熟期,两品种的基部茎秆抗折力和抗倒伏指数均以N1和N4处理显著优于其他处理,并且N1和N4处理的籽粒产量也显著高于其他处理。试验结果表明,孕穗期追肥的N1和N4处理有助于提高茎秆中PAL、TAL、POD活性及木质素含量,提高小麦茎秆的机械强度及抗倒伏能力,降低小麦倒伏面积和倒伏程度。
| [1]罗茂春, 田翠婷, 李晓娟, 林金星. 水稻茎秆形态结构特征和化学成分与抗倒伏关系综述. 西北植物学报, 2007, 27: 2346–2353Luo M C, Tian C T, Li X J, Lin J X. Relationship between morpho-anatomical traits together with chemical components and lodging resistance of stem in rice. Acta Bot. Bor-Occid.Sin, 2007, 27: 2346–2353 (in Chinese with English abstract)[2]杨世民, 谢力, 郑顺林, 李静, 袁继超. 氮肥水平和栽插密度对杂交稻茎秆理化特性与抗倒伏性的影响. 作物学报, 2009, 35: 93–103Yang S M, Xie L, Zheng S L, Li J, Yuan J C. Effects of nitrogen rate and transplanting density on physical and chemical characteristics and lodging resistance of culms in hybrid rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2009, 35: 93–103 (in Chinese with English abstract)[3]井长勤, 周忠, 张永. 氮肥运筹对小麦倒伏影响的研究. 徐州师范大学学报, 2003, 21(4): 46–49Jing C Q, Zhou Z, Zhang Y. Effects of Nitrogenous fertilizer application lodging on winter wheat. J Xuzhou Normal Univ, 2003, 21(4): 46–49 (in Chinese)[4]张睿, 黄历. 小麦生产中倒伏原因分析及解决对策. 陕西农业科学, 2001, (5): 39Zhang R, Huang L. Analysis of lodging cause and counter measures in wheat production. Shaanxi J Agric Sci, 2001, (5): 39 (in Chinese)[5]Zahour A, Rasmusson D C, Gallagher L W. Effects of semi-dwarf stature, head number, and kernel number on grain yield in barley in morocco. Crop Sci, 1987, 27: 161–165[6]Wiersma D W, Oplinger E S, Guy S O. Environment and cultivar effects on winter wheat response to ethephon plant growth regulator. Agron J, 1986, 78: 761–764[7]肖世和, 张秀英, 闫长生, 张文祥, 海林, 郭慧君. 小麦茎秆强度的鉴定方法研究. 中国农业科学, 2002, 35: 7–11 Xiao S H, Zhang X Y, Yan C S, Zhang W X, Hai L, Guo H J. Determination of resistance to lodging by stem strength in wheat. Sci Agri Sin, 2002, 35: 7–11 (in Chinese with English abstract )[8]李金才, 尹钧, 魏凤珍. 播种密度对冬小麦茎秆形态特征和抗倒指数的影响. 作物学报, 2005, 31: 662–666Li J C, Yin J, Wei F Z. Effects of planting density on characters of culm and culm lodging resistant index in winter wheat. Acta Agron Sin, 2005, 31: 662–666 (in Chinese with English abstract)[9]魏凤珍, 李金才, 王成雨, 屈会娟, 沈学善. 氮肥运筹模式对小麦茎秆抗倒性能的影响. 作物学报, 2008, 34: 1080–1085Wei F Z, Li J C, Wang C Y, Qu H J, Shen X S. Effects of nitrogenous fertilizer application model on culm lodging resistance in winter wheat. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34: 1080–1085 (in Chinese with English abstract)[10]Turner S R, Somerville C R. Collapsed xylem phenotype of Arabidopsis identifies mutants deficient in cellulose deposition in the secondary cell wall. Plant Cell, 1997, 9: 689–701[11]Lewis N G, Yamamoto E. Lignin: occurrence, biogenesis and biodegradation. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 1990, 41: 455–496[12]Welton F A. Lodging in oats and wheat. Bot Gazatte, 1928, 85: 121[13]Tripathi S C, Sayre K D, Kaul J N. Growth and morphology of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) culms and their association with lodging: effects of genotypes, N levels and ethephon. Field Crops Res, 2003, 84: 271–290[14]陈晓光, 史春余, 尹燕枰, 王振林, 石玉华, 彭佃亮, 倪英丽, 蔡铁. 小麦茎秆木质素代谢及其与抗倒性的关系. 作物学报, 2011, 37: 1616–1622Chen X G, Shi C Y, Yin Y P, Wang Z L, Shi Y H, Peng D L, Ni Y L, Cai T. Relationship between lignin metabolism and lodging resistance in Wheat. Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37: 1616–1622 (in Chinese with English abstract)[15]董琦, 王爱萍, 梁素明. 小麦基部茎节形态结构特征与抗倒性的研究. 山西农业大学学报, 2003, 23: 188–191Dong Q, Wang A P, Liang S M. Study on the architectural characteristics of wheat stalks. J Shanxi Agric Univ, 2003, 23: 188–191 (in Chinese with English abstract)[16]马跃芳, 金晓平, 龚辉. 大麦倒伏原因的初步研究. 作物研究, 1990, 4(4): 22–25Ma Y F, Jin X P, Gong H. Preliminary study of barley lodging. Crop Res, 1990, 4(4): 22–25 (in Chinese)[17]徐本生. 施用氮肥与小麦倒伏的关系. 土壤, 1961, (8): 53–54 Xu B S. The relationship between nitrogen application and wheat lodging. Soils, 1961, (8): 53–54 (in Chinese)[18]李友军, 傅国占, 王绍中, 郭天财. 高产地小麦前氮后移施肥技术. 作物杂志, 1997, (3): 15–16Li Y J, Fu G Z, Wang S Z, Guo T C. Nitrogenous fertilizer retroposition technology in high yielding fields. Crops, 1997, (3): 15–16 (in Chinese)[19]陈晓光, 石玉华, 王成雨, 尹燕枰, 宁堂原, 史春余, 李勇, 王振林. 氮肥和多效唑对小麦茎秆木质素合成的影响及其与抗倒性的关系. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44: 3529–3536Chen X G, Shi Y H, Wang C Y, Yin Y P, Ning T Y, Shi C Y, Li Y, Wang Z L. Effects of nitrogen and PP333 application on the lignin synthesis of stem in relation to lodging resistance of Wheat. Sci Agric Sin, 2011, 44: 3529–3536 (in Chinese with English abstract)[20]Zadoks J C, Chang T T, Konzak C F. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res, 1974, 14: 415–421[21]Bhaskara Reddy M V, Arul J, Angers P, Couture L. Chitosan treatment of wheat seeds induces resistance to Fusarium graminearum and improves seed quality. J Agric Food Chem, 1999, 47: 1208-1216[22]张志良, 瞿伟. 植物生理学实验指导. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2003. pp 277–278Zhang Z L, Qu W. Experimental Guide for Plant Physiology. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2003. pp 277–278 (in Chinese)[23]Kofalvi S A, Nassuth A. Influence of wheat streak mosaic virus infection on phenylpropanoid metabolism and the accumulation of phenolics and lignin in wheat. Physiol Mol Plant P, 1995, 47: 365–377[24]Klapheck S, Zimmer I, Cosse H. Scavenging of hydrogen peroxide in the endosperm of ricinus communis by ascorbate peroxidase. Plant Cell Physiol, 1990, 31: 1005–1013[25]石海燕, 张玉星. 木质素生物合成途径中关键酶基因的分子特征. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(5): 288–291Shi H Y, Zhang Y X. Molecular characterization of key enzyme genes related to the pathway of lignin biosynthesis. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2011, 27(5): 288–291 (in Chinese with English abstract) [26]Ookawa T, Ishihara K V. Difference of the cell wall components affecting the ding stress of the culm in relating to the lodging resistance in paddy rice. Jpn J Crop Sci, 1993, 62: 378–384[27]Strivastava L M. Histochemical studies on lignin. Methods Enzymol, 1996, 49: 173–183[28]Kokubo A, Sakurai N, Kuraishi S, Takeda K. Culm brittleness of barley (Hordeum vulgar L.) mutants is caused by smaller number of cellulose molecules in cell wall. Plant Physiol, 1991, 97: 509–514[29]Updegraff D M. Semimicro determination of cellulose in biological materials. Anal Biochem, 1969, 32: 420–424[30]解新明, 赵燕慧, 霍松, 陈慧. 象草不同品种木质素合成关键酶活性的动态变化. 草地学报, 2010, 18: 523–527Xie X M, Zhao Y H, Huo S, Chen H. Dynamic changes of Enzyme activities related to lignin biosynthesis for elephant grass cultivars. Acta Agrestia Sin, 2010, 18: 523–527 (in Chinese with English abstract)[31]Sewalt V J H, Ni W, Blount J W, Jung H G, Masoud S A, Howles P A, Lamb C, Dixon R A. Reduced lignin content and altered lignin composition in transgenic tobacco down-regulated in expression of L-phenylalanine ammonialyase or cinnamate 4-hydroxylase. Plant Physiol, 1997, 115: 41–50[32]刘晓燕, 金继运, 何萍, 高伟, 李文娟. 氯化钾对玉米木质素代谢的影响及其与茎腐病抗性的关系. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40: 2780–2787Liu X Y, Jin J Y, He P, Gao W, Li W J. Effect of potassium chloride on lignin metabolism and its relation to resistance of corn to stalk rot. Sci Agric Sin, 2007, 40: 2780–2787 (in Chinese with English abstract)[33]王群瑛, 胡昌浩. 玉米茎秆抗倒特性的解剖研究. 作物学报, 1991, 17: 70–75Wang Q Y, Hu C H. Studies on the anatomical structures of the stalks of maize with different resistance to lodging. Acta Agron Sin, 1991, 17: 70–75 (in Chinese)[34]薛应钰, 师桂英, 徐秉良, 陈荣贤. 美洲南瓜(Cucurbita pepo)种皮发育形态观察及其相关酶活性测定. 草业学报, 2011, 20(2): 23–30Xue Y Y, Shi G Y, Xu B L, Chen R X. Morphological observations on episperm development and related enzyme activity determination in Cucurbita pepo. Acta Pratac Sin, 2011, 20(2): 23–30 (in Chinese)[35]王晨阳, 朱云集, 夏国军, 宋家永, 李九星, 王永华, 罗毅. 氮肥后移对超高产小麦产量及生理特性的影响. 作物学报, 1998, 24: 978–983Wang C Y, Zhu Y J, Xia G J, Song J Y, Li J X, Wang Y H, Luo Y. Influence of Nitrogen retroposition on wheat yield and physiological characteristics. Acta Agron Sin, 1998, 24: 978–983 (in Chinese) |
| [1] | 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603. |
| [2] | 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681. |
| [3] | 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846. |
| [4] | 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875. |
| [5] | 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617. |
| [6] | 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858. |
| [7] | 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816. |
| [8] | 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727. |
| [9] | 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325. |
| [10] | 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521. |
| [11] | 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486. |
| [12] | 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572. |
| [13] | 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417. |
| [14] | 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535. |
| [15] | 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372. |
|
||