作物学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (02): 259-275.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.00259
殷桂香,张磊*,佘茂云*
YIN Gui-Xiang,ZHANG Lei*,SHE Mao-Yun
摘要:
植物TRK-HKT家族基因广泛介导植物Na+/K+运输,参与植物耐逆境胁迫调控。本研究以6个大豆钾利用效率差异品种为材料,利用in silico技术克隆到4个大豆TRK-HKT家族成员(GmHKT1;1、GmHKT1;2、GmHKT1;3和GmHKT1;4)。采用qRT-PCR技术解析这些基因在低钾及逆境胁迫下的表达机制。结果表明,GmHKT1;2在大豆幼苗根中对低钾胁迫的响应明显高于其他3个基因,且钾高效大豆品种这种响应更明显;同时GmHKT1;2对不同逆境胁迫(低温、干旱、高盐和ABA)也有较强的响应。蛋白结构分析表明,仅GmHKT1;2具有4个MPM结构域,4个保守的氨基酸残基空间上形成一个“漏斗样”结构,充当K+/Na+转运通道,通过邻近的ATP结合结构域,为K+/Na+转运提供能量。基因结构分析显示,这些基因均含3个外显子和2个内含子,不同基因间的第一个外显子和内含子片段大小差异显著,导致各基因的基因组DNA (gDNA)大小各异。启动子分析揭示,大豆TRK-HKT家族成员包含参与种子功能定位和各种激素及逆境胁迫应激反应的重要顺式作用元件;进化上该家族基因位于第一进化分支,含保守的Ser–Gly–Gly–Gly基序。
| [1]Wang Y, Wu W H. Plant sensing and signaling in response to K+-deficiency. Mol Plant, 2010, 3: 280–287[2]Ashley M K, Grant M, Grabov A. Plant responses to potassium deficiencies: a role for potassium transport proteins. J Exp Bot, 2006, 57: 425–436[3]Epstein E, Rains D W, Elzam O E. Resolution of dual mechanisms of potassium absorption by barley roots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1963, 49: 684–692[4]Fairbairn D J, Liu W, Schachtman D P, Gomez-Gallego S, Day S R, Teasdale R D. Characterization of two distinct HKT1-like potassium transporters from Eucalyptus camaldulensis. Plant Mol Biol, 2000, 43: 515–525[5]Uozumi N, Kim E J, Rubio F, Yamaguchi T, Muto S, Tsuboi A, Bakker E P, Nakamura T, Schroeder J I. The Arabidopsis HKT1 gene homolog mediates inward Na+ currents in Xenopus laevis oocytes and Na+ uptake in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Plant Physiol, 2000, 122: 1249–1259[6]Berthomieu P, Conéjéro G, Nublat A, Brackenbury W J, Lambert C, Savio C, Uozumi N, Oiki S, Yamada K, Cellier F, Gosti F, Simonneau T, Essah P A, Tester M, Véry A A, Sentenac H, Casse F. Functional analysis of AtHKT1 in Arabidopsis shows that Na+ recirculation by the phloem is crucial for salt tolerance. EMBO J, 2003, 22: 2004–2014[7]Rubio F, Schwarz M, Gassmann W, Schroeder J I. Genetic selection of mutations in the high affinity K+ transporter HKT1 that define functions of a loop site for reduced Na+ permeability and increased Na+ tolerance. J Biol Chem, 1999, 274: 6839–6847[8]Ren Z H, Gao J P, Li L G, Cai X L, Huang W, Chao D Y, Zhu M Z, Wang Z Y, Luan S, Lin H X. A rice quantitative trait locus for salt tolerance encodes a sodium transporter. Nature Gen, 2005, 37: 1141–1146[9]Wang T B, Gassmann W, Rubio F, Schroeder J I, Glass D M. Rapid up-regulation of HKT1, a high-affinity potassium transporter gene, in roots of barley and wheat following withdrawal of potassium. Plant Physiol, 1998, 118: 651–659[10]Chen H, He H, Yu D. Overexpression of a novel soybean gene modulating Na+ and K+ transport enhances salt tolerance in transgenic tobacco plants. Physiol Plant, 2011, 141: 11–18[11]Chen H T, Chen X, Gu H P, Wu B Y, Zhang H M, Yuan X X, Cui X Y. GmHKT1;4, a novel soybean gene regulating Na+/K+ ratio in roots enhances salt tolerance in transgenic plants. Plant Growth Regul, 2014, 73: 299–308[12]Anderson J A, Huprikar S S, Kochian L V, Lucas W J, Gaber R F. Functional expression of a probable Arabidopsis thaliana potassium channel in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1992, 89: 3736–3740[13]Schachtman D P, Schroeder J I. Structure and transport mechanism of a high-affinity potassium uptake transporter from higher plants. Nature, 1994, 370: 655–658[14]Gassmann W, Rubio F, Schroeder J I. Alkali cation selectivity of the wheat root high-affinity potassium transporter HKT1. Plant J, 1996, 10: 869–882[15]Rubio F, Gassmann W, Schroeder J I. Sodium-driven potassium uptake by the plant potassium transporter HKT1 and mutations conferring salt tolerance. Science, 1995, 270: 1660–1663[16]Aleman F, Nieves-Cordones M, Nieves-Cordones M, Martinez V, Rubio F. Root K(+) acquisition in plants: the Arabidopsis thaliana model. Plant Cell Physiol, 2011, 52: 1603–1612[17]Kato Y, Sakaguchi M, Mori Y, Saito K, Nakamura T, Bakker E P, Sato Y, Goshima S, Uozumi N. Evidence in support of a four transmembrane-pore-transmembrane topology model for the Arabidopsis thaliana Na+/K+ translocating AtHKT1 protein, a member of the superfamily of K+ transporters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2001, 98: 6488–6493[18]Durell S R, Hao Y, Nakamura T, Bakker E P, Guy H R. Evolutionary relationship between K+ channels and symporters. Biophys J, 1999, 77: 775–788[19]M?ser P, Hosoo Y, Goshima S, Horie T, Eckelman B, Yamada K, Yoshida K, Bakker E P, Shinmyo A, Oiki S, Schroeder J I, Uozumi N. Glycine residues in potassium channel-like selectivity filters determine potassium selectivity in four-loop-per-subunit HKT transporters from plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2002, 99: 6428–6433[20]Wang Y, Wu W H. Potassium transport and signaling in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2013, 64: 451–476[21]Véry A A, Sentenac H. Molecular mechanisms and regulation of K+ transport in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2003, 54: 575–603[22]Waters S, Gilliham M, Hrmova M. Plant high-affinity potassium (HKT) transporters involved in salinity tolerance: structural insights to probe differences in ion selectivity. Int J Mol Sci, 2013, 14: 7660–7680[23]Kader M A, Lindberg S. Uptake of sodium in protoplasts of salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant cultivars of rice, Oryza sativa L. determined by the fluorescent dye SBFI. J Exp Bot, 2005, 56: 3149–3158[24]Tester M, Davenport R. Na+ tolerance and Na+ transport in higher plants. Ann Bot (Lond.), 2003, 91: 503–527[25]M?ser P, Eckelman B, Vaidyanathan R, Horie T, Fairbairn D J, Kubo M, Yamagami M, Yamaguchi K, Nishimura M, Uozumi N, Robertson W, Sussman M R, Schroeder J I. Altered shoot/root Na+ distribution and bifurcating salt sensitivity in Arabidopsis by genetic disruption ofthe Na+ transporter AtHKT1. FEBS Lett, 2002, 531: 157–161[26]Rus A, Lee B H, Mu?oz-Mayor A, Sharkhuu A, Miura K, Zhu J K, Bressan R A, Hasegawa PM. AtHKT1 facilitates Na+ homeostasis and K+ nutrition in planta. Plant Physiol, 2004, 136: 2500–2511[27]Sunarpi, Horie T, Motoda J, Kubo M, Yang H, Yoda K, Horie R, Chan W Y, Leung H Y, Hattori K, Konomi M, Osumi M, Yamagami M, Schroeder J I, Uozumi N. Enhanced salt tolerance mediated by AtHKT1 transporter-induced Na+ unloading from xylem parenchyma cells. Plant J, 2005, 44: 928–938[28]Horie T, Costa A, Kim T H, Han M J, Horie R, Leung H Y, Miyao A, Hirochika H, An G, Schroeder J I. Rice OsHKT2;1 transporter mediates large Na+ influx component into K+-starved roots for growth. EMBO J, 2007, 26: 3003–3014[29]Zhu J K, Liu J, Xiong L. Genetic analysis of salt tolerance in Arabidopsis: evidence for a critical role of potassium nutrition. Plant Cell, 1998, 10: 1181–1191[30]Alemán F, Nieves-Cordones M, Martínez V, Rubio F. Potassium/sodium steady-state homeostasis in Thellungiella halophila and Arabidopsis thaliana under long-term salinity conditions. Plant Sci, 2009, 176: 768–774[31]Zhu J K. Cell signaling under salt, water and cold stresses. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2001, 4: 401–406[32]唐劲驰, 曹敏建, 祝子平, 闫洪奎, 刘绍鹏. 不同基因型大豆对低钾的耐性极限及缺钾症状研究简报. 大豆科学, 2001, 20: 295–297Tang J C, Cao M J, Zhu Z P, Yan H K, Liu S P. Resistence limit and symptom of different genotypes of soybean to low potassium. Soybean Sci, 2001, 20: 295–297 (in Chinese with English abstract)[33]权月伟, 李喜焕, 常文锁, 张彩英. 大豆耐低钾种质资源筛选研究. 华北农学报, 2011, 26(增刊): 51–55Quan Y W, Li X H, Chang W S, Zhang C Y. Screening of low potassium tolerant soybean (Glycine max) varieties from Hebei soybean-growing-areas. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2011, 26 (suppl): 51–55 (in Chinese with English abstract)[34]王伟, 曹敏建, 綦左莹, 何萍, 许海涛. 不同大豆品种对钾素吸收和利用效率差异的比较研究. 大豆科学, 2007, 26: 561–564Wang W, Cao M J, Qi Z Y, He P, Xu H T. Comparison of potassium absorb and use efficiency in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) varieties. Soybean Sci, 2007, 26: 561–564 (in Chinese with English abstract)[35]Damien Platten J, Cotsaftis O, Berthomieu P, Bohnert H, Davenport R J, Fairbairn D J, Horie T, Leigh R A, Lin H X, Luan S, M?ser P, Pantoja O, Rodríguez-Navarro A, Schachtman D P, Schroeder J I, Sentenac H, Uozumi N, Véry A, Zhu J K, Dennis E S, Tester M. Nomenclature for HKT transporters, key determinants of plant salinity tolerance. Trends Plant Sci, 2006, 11: 372–374[36]Kato N, Akai M, Zulkifli L, Matsuda N, Kato Y, Goshima S, Hazama A, Yamagami M, Guy H R, Uozumi N. Role of positively charged amino acids in the M2(D) transmembrane helix of Ktr/Trk/HKT type cation transporters. Channels, 2007, 1: 161–171[37]Cao Y, Jin X, Huang H, Derebe M G, Levin E J, Kabaleeswaran V, Pan Y, Punta M, Love J, Weng J, Quick M, Ye S, Kloss B, Bruni R, Martinez-Hackert E, Hendrickson W A, Rost B, Javitch J A, Rajashankar K R, Jiang Y, Zhou M. Crystal structure of a potassium ion transporter, TrkH. Nature, 2011, 471: 336–340[38]Ardie S W, Xie L N, Takahashi R, Liu S K, Takano T. Cloning of a high-affinity K+ transporter gene PutHKT2;1 from Puccinellia tenuiflora and its functional comparison with OsHKT2;1 from rice in yeast and Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot, 2009, 60: 3491–3502[39]Munns R, James R A, Xu B, Athman A, Conn S J, Jordans C, Byrt C S, Hare R A, Tyerman S D, Tester M, Plett D, Gilliham M. Wheat grain yield on saline soils is improved by an ancestral Na+ transporter gene. Nature Biotech, 2012, 30: 360–366[40]Ali Z, Park H C, Ali A, Oh D H, Aman R, Kropornicka A, Hong H, Choi W, Chung W S, Kim W Y, Bressan R A, Bohnert H J, Lee S Y, Yun D J. TsHKT1;2, a HKT1 homolog from the extremophile Arabidopsis relative Thellungiella salsuginea, shows K+ specificity in the presence of NaCl. Plant Physiol, 2012, 158: 1463–1474[41]Asins M J, Villalta I, Aly M M, Olías R, álvarez De Morales P, Huertas R, Li J, Jaime-Pérez N, Haro R, Raga V, Carbonell E A, Belver A. Two closely linked tomato HKT coding genes are positional candidates for the major tomato QTL involved in Na+/K+ homeostasis. Plant Cell Environ, 2013, 36: 1171–1191[42]Almeida P, de Boer G J, de Boer A H. Differences in shoot Na+ accumulation between two tomato species are due to differences in ion affinity of HKT1;2. J Plant Physiol, 2014, 171: 438–447[43]Cotsaftis O, Plett D, Shirley N, Tester M, Hrmova M. A two-stage model of Na+ exclusion in rice explained by 3D modeling of HKT transporters and alternative splicing. PLoS One, 2012, 7: e39865[44]Lan W Z, Wang W, Wang S M, Li L G, Buchanan B B, Lin H X, Gao J P, Luan S. A rice high-affinity potassium transporter (HKT) conceals a calcium-permeable cation channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2010, 107: 7089–7094[45]Koltunow A M, Truettner J, Cox K H, Wallroth M, Goldberg R. Different temporal and spatial gene expression patterns occur during anther development. Plant Cell, 1990, 2: 1201–1224[46]Schauer A, Ranes M, Santamaria R, Guijarro J, Lawlor E, Mendez C, Chater K, Losick R. Visualizing gene expression in time and space in the filamentous bacterium Streptomyces coelicolor. Science, 1988, 240: 768–772[47]McGuire S E, Roman G, Davis R L. Gene expression systems in Drosophila: a synthesis of time and space. Trends Genet, 2004, 20: 384–391[48]Liang P, Acerboukh L, Pardee A B. Distribution and cloning of eukarytic mRNAs by means of differential display: refinements and optimization. Nucl Acids Res, 1993, 21: 3269–3275 |
| [1] | 金昱何, 王雪菲, 徐张一娃, 缪怡宁, 蒋云杰, 伊莹, 缪德麟, 朱静仪, 钟一帆, 陈铭亨, 方芳, 刘鹏. 外源激素对低温胁迫下大豆叶片叶绿素荧光参数及抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1817-1829. |
| [2] | 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756. |
| [3] | 姚术, 郭凯悦, 翟慧慧, 姚佳慧, 邓文琪, 闫玲, 黄驰, 高阳, 俞嫣然, 赵振邦, 李英慧, 王晓波, 李佳佳. 大豆苗期耐低铁综合评价及优异种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1373-1387. |
| [4] | 张晴, 杨昱, 郭茜, 岳霈尧, 殷丛丛, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 大豆GmARA6a的克隆及响应盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 480-493. |
| [5] | 贺红利, 张雨涵, 杨静, 程云清, 赵杨, 李星诺, 司洪亮, 张兴政, 杨向东. 大豆e1-as基因突变体的创制及生理分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2228-2239. |
| [6] | 王克晶, 李向华. 我国珍稀的大豆属多年生烟豆和短绒野大豆物种遗传资源濒危性评估分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2009-2019. |
| [7] | 孟然, 李赵嘉, 冯薇, 陈悦, 刘路平, 杨春燕, 鲁雪林, 王秀萍. 大豆不同生育时期耐盐性综合评价及耐盐种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 1991-2008. |
| [8] | 胡蒙, 沙丹, 张晟瑞, 谷勇哲, 张世碧, 李静, 孙君明, 邱丽娟, 李斌. 大豆分枝数QTL定位及候选基因筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1747-1756. |
| [9] | 王琼, 邹丹霞, 陈兴运, 张威, 张红梅, 刘晓庆, 贾倩茹, 魏利斌, 崔晓艳, 陈新, 王学军, 陈华涛. 大豆开花时间和成熟期性状全基因组关联分析与候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1558-1568. |
| [10] | 殷丛丛, 李睿琦, 岳霈尧, 李晨, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 基于闭合哑铃介导等温扩增可视化检测大豆花叶病毒SC15方法的建立及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1248-1260. |
| [11] | 许睿, 何妙华, 王昊, 李卫, 任杰, 夏志强. 基于空间转录组技术解析大豆种胚对X射线辐射的响应机制[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3121-3132. |
| [12] | 林洋, 史晓蕾, 陈强, 刘兵强, 杨庆, 于慧娟, 闫龙, 武小霞, 杨春燕. 大豆蛋白质脂肪及脂肪酸组分相关QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2899-2910. |
| [13] | 王浩辰, 王克晶, 韩娟, 李向华. 东南沿海短绒野大豆两种代表性生境自然种群的空间遗传结构特征:种群内取样策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2875-2885. |
| [14] | 李威, 朱玉鹏, 孙宾成, 温有祥, 吴宗声, 徐一帆, 宋雯雯, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥. 转基因大豆结合免耕平作实现东北地区大豆生产轻简化[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2738-2749. |
| [15] | 陈敏, 贾蓉, 张金传, 张辰煜, 褚俊聪, 姚伟, 葛军勇, 王星宇, 杨亚东, 曾昭海, 臧华栋. 半干旱区燕麦与豆科作物带状复合种植的产量优势及氮素利用特征研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2727-2737. |
|
||