欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (02): 276-285.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.00276

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

品种混种控制小麦白粉病及其对小麦产量和蛋白质含量的影响

姜延涛,许韬,段霞瑜*,周益林   

  1. 中国农业科学院植物保护研究所 / 国家病虫害生物学实验室, 北京 100193
  • 收稿日期:2014-04-22 修回日期:2014-09-30 出版日期:2015-02-12 网络出版日期:2014-12-30
  • 通讯作者: 段霞瑜, E-mail: xyduan@ippcaas.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2011CB100403) 资助。

Effect of Variety Mixure Planting on Powdery Mildew Controlling as Well as Yield and Protein Contents in Common Wheat

JIANG Yan-Tao,XU Tao,DUAN Xia-Yu*,ZHOU Yi-Lin   

  1. State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests / Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
  • Received:2014-04-22 Revised:2014-09-30 Published:2015-02-12 Published online:2014-12-30
  • Contact: 段霞瑜, E-mail: xyduan@ippcaas.cn

摘要:

研究品种混种对控制小麦白粉病的效果以及对产量及蛋白质的影响, 可为利用品种多样性持续控制白粉病提供理论依据及技术支持。2011—2012和2012—2013年度选用抗病性不同、遗传背景有较大差异的8个小麦生产品种, 按每个组合3~8个品种进行田间混种, 人工接种白粉菌混合菌株, 比较品种混种对小麦白粉病的病害流行曲线下面积以及小麦产量、粗蛋白含量和千粒重的影响。结果表明, 混种组分品种的数量对防效有影响, 其中以4个品种混种的防病效果最好, 但当品种数达到7个及以上时, 混种也显示出较好的控病效果。2011—2012年度混种组合中有防效的占42.4%, 相对防效为1.2%~26.8%, 约50%的混种组合表现增产, 增产幅度为0.2%~14.6%;2012—2013年度有防治效果的组合占75.0%, 相对防效1.8%~45.4%, 约71%的混种组合表现增产, 增产范围为0.9%~16.6%。供试品种中周麦18总体表现最好, 并且与其他品种混种后对控制小麦白粉病、增加产量和粗蛋白含量均有正向效应。不同混种组分品种间存在互作, 其互作对病害控制及产量均有影响。

关键词: 小麦白粉病, 品种混种, 病害流行曲线下面积, 产量, 蛋白质含量

Abstract:

The knowledge of variety mixture planting in the field on the effects of powdery mildew disease and wheat yield and quality will facilitate the utilization of variety diversity to control wheat diseases. In the 2011–2012 and 2012–2013 growing seasons, we selected eight commercial wheat varieties with large differences in genetic background and disease resistance to test the feasible pattern of variety mixture in the field. In each mixture pattern containing one (control), three, four, five, six, seven, and eight varieties, wheat plants were exposed to mixed powdery mildew isolates. The area under disease progress curve, plot yield, thousand-grain weight and crude protein content in grain were measured. For disease control, four-variety mixture pattern had the best efficacy. However, the mixture patterns with seven or more varieties exhibited also good efficacy. In the 2011–2012 growing season, 42.4% of the mixture patterns were effective with relative efficacy ranging from 1.2% to 26.8%. Meanwhile, 50.0% of the mixture patterns had the effect of yield increase (0.2–14.6%) compared with the control. In the 2012–2013 growing season, 75.0% of the mixture patterns were effective with the efficacy ranging from 1.8% to 45.4% and 71.4% of the mixture patterns resulted in increased yield (0.9–16.6%). Zhoumai 18 was the best component in mixtures having good control against powdery mildew and positive effects on grain yield and protein content. Interactions among the mixture components were also observed, and such interaction had impacts on powdery mildew controlling and wheat yield.

Key words: Wheat powdery mildew, Variety mixture, AUDPC, Yield, Protein contents

[1]邵振润, 刘万才. 我国小麦白粉病的发生现状与治理对策. 中国农学通报, 1996, 12(6):21–23

Shao Z R, Liu W C. Occurrence and management countermeasure of wheat powdery mildew in China. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 1996, 12(6): 21–23 (in Chinese)

[2]张海泉. 小麦抗白粉病分子育种研究进展. 中国生态农业学报, 2008, 16: 1060–1066

Zhang H Q. Research advances in molecular breeding of powdery mildew resistance of wheat. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2008, 16: 1060–1066 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[3]刘金元, 刘大钧. 小麦白粉病抗性基因研究进展. 植物病理学报, 2000, 30: 289–295

Liu J Y, Liu D J. Progress of the study on wheat powdery mildew resistance genes. Acta Phytopathol Sin, 2000, 30: 289–295 (in Chinese)

[4]段霞瑜. 欧洲小麦白粉菌的毒性监测和抗病基因的利用. 植物保护, 1994, 20(3): 36–38

Duan X Y. Toxicity monitoring of European wheat powdery mildew andutilization of resistant gene. Plant Prot, 1994, 20(3): 36–38 (in Chinese)

[5]Zhu Y, Chen H, Fan J, Wang Y, Li Y, Chen J, Fan J X, Yang S, Hu L, Leung H. Genetic diversity and disease control in rice. Nature, 2000, 406: 718–722

[6]杨昌寿, 孙茂林. 对利用多样化抗性防治小麦条锈病的作用的评价. 西南农业学报, 1989, 2(2): 53–56

Yang C S, Sun M L. Evaluation of wheat stripe rust control by resistance diversity. Southwest China J Agric Sci, 1989, 2(2): 53–56 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[7]曹克强, 曾士迈. 小麦混合品种对条锈及白粉病的群体抗病性研究. 植物病理学报, 1994, 24: 21–25

Cao K Q, Zeng S M. Resistance of hybrid varieties of wheat stripe rust and powdery mildew populations. Acta Phytopathol Sin, 1994, 24: 21–25 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[8]王秀娜, 段霞瑜, 周益林. 小麦品种多样性对白粉病及产量和蛋白质的影响. 植物病理学报, 2011, 41: 285–294

Wang X N, Duan X Y, Zhou Y L. Effect of wheat cultivar mixtures on powdery mildew, yield and grain protein content. Acta Phytopathol Sin, 2011, 41: 285–294 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[9]李宁. 寄主多样性条件下小麦白粉病发生及其病原菌群体遗传结构的研究. 中国农业科学院硕士学位论文, 北京, 2011

Li N. Occurrence of Wheat Powdery Mildew in Diversified Hosts and the Pathogen Population Genetic Structure. MS Thesis of Chinese Academy of Agriculteral Sciences, Beijing, China, 2011

[10]Dubin H, Wolfe M. Comparative behavior of three wheat cultivars and their mixture in India, Nepal and Pakistan. Field Crops Res, 1994, 39: 71–83

[11]Cox C, Garrett K, Bowden R. Cultivar mixtures for the simultaneous management of multiplediseases: tanspot and leaf rust of wheat. Phytopathology, 2004, 94: 961–969

[12]Mille B, Fraj M B, Monod H, De Vallavieille-Pope C. Assessing four-way mixtures of winter wheat cultivars from the performances of their two-way and individual components. Eur J Plant Pathol, 2006, 114: 163–173

[13]黄冲, 郭洁滨, 孙振宇, 马占鸿, 刘跃富, 陈伦开. 小麦品种混(间)种对小麦条锈病防治效果和产量影响研究. 植物保护, 2009, 35(3): 115–117

Huang C, Guo J B, Sun Z Y, Ma Z H, Liu Y F, Chen L K. Studies on the effects of cultivar mixtures or multiline cultivars on the wheat yellow rust and wheat yield under different pathogenesis conditions. Plant Prot, 2009, 35(3): 115–117 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[14]许韬. 混合种植控制小麦 白粉病及小麦白粉菌EST-SSRs引物开发. 中国农业科学院硕士学位论文, 北京, 2012. Pp 10–14

Xu T. Use of Cultivar Mixtures for Powdery Mildew Management in Wheat and Exploition of Wheat Powdery Mildew EST-SSRs. MS Thesis of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China, 2012. pp 10–14 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[15]盛宝钦, 段霞瑜. 对记载小麦成株白粉病“0~9级法”的改进. 北京农业科学, 1991, 9(1): 38–39

Sheng B Q, Duan X Y. Improvement of recording adult wheat powdery mildew level “0–9”. Beijing Agric Sci, 1991, 9(1): 38–39 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[16]Mundt C. Use of host genetic diversity to control cereal diseases: implications for rice blast. In: Zeigler R, Leong S, Teng P, eds. Rice Blast Disease. London: CAB International, 1994. pp 293–308

[17]Newton A, Ellis R, Hackett C, Guy D. The effect of component number on Rhynchosporium secalis infection and yield in mixtures of winter barley cultivars. Plant Pathol, 1997, 46: 930–938

[18]Mundt C. Probability of mutation to multiple virulence and durability of resistance gene pyramids. Phytopathology, 1990, 80: 221-223

[19]谭万忠. 小麦白粉病的发生和流行动态分析. 西南农业大学学报, 1991, 13: 477–480

Tan W Z. Analysis of the occurrence and epidemic dynamics of wheat powdery mildew. J Southwest Agric Univ, 1991, 13: 477–480 (in Chinese)

[20]Gao X, Wu M, Xu R, Wang X, Pan R, Kim H-J, Liao H. Root interactions in a maize+soybean intercropping system control soybean soil-borne disease, red crown rot. PLoS One, 9: e95031. DOI:10.1371+ journal.pone.0095031

[21]Cowger C, Mundt C. Effects of wheat cultivar mixtures on epidemic progression of Septoria tritici blotch and pathogenicity of Mycosphaerella graminicola. Phytopathology, 2002, 92: 617–623

[22]朱有勇, Leung H, 陈海如, 王云月, 汤克仁, 赵学谦, 周金玉, 涂建华, 李炎, 何霞红, 周江鸿, 孙雁, Mew T W. 利用抗病基因多样性持续控制水稻病害. 中国农业科学, 2004, 37: 832–839

Zhu Y Y, Leung H, Chen H R, Wang Y Y, Tang K R, Zhao X Q, Zhou J Y, Tu J H, Li Y, He X H, Zhou H H, Sun Y, Mew T W. Using resistance genes diversity for sustainable rice disease control. Agric Sci Sin, 2004, 37: 832–839 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[23]Li N, Jia S F, Wang X N, Duan X Y, Zhou Y L, Wang Z H, Lu G F. The effect of wheat mixtures on the powdery mildew disease and some yield components. J Integr Agric, 2012, 11: 611–620

[1] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[6] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[7] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[10] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[11] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[12] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[13] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[14] 崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
[15] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!