欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (02): 276-285.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.00276

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

品种混种控制小麦白粉病及其对小麦产量和蛋白质含量的影响

姜延涛,许韬,段霞瑜*,周益林   

  1. 中国农业科学院植物保护研究所 / 国家病虫害生物学实验室, 北京 100193
  • 收稿日期:2014-04-22 修回日期:2014-09-30 出版日期:2015-02-12 网络出版日期:2014-12-30
  • 通讯作者: 段霞瑜, E-mail: xyduan@ippcaas.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2011CB100403) 资助。

Effect of Variety Mixure Planting on Powdery Mildew Controlling as Well as Yield and Protein Contents in Common Wheat

JIANG Yan-Tao,XU Tao,DUAN Xia-Yu*,ZHOU Yi-Lin   

  1. State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests / Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
  • Received:2014-04-22 Revised:2014-09-30 Published:2015-02-12 Published online:2014-12-30
  • Contact: 段霞瑜, E-mail: xyduan@ippcaas.cn

摘要:

研究品种混种对控制小麦白粉病的效果以及对产量及蛋白质的影响, 可为利用品种多样性持续控制白粉病提供理论依据及技术支持。2011—2012和2012—2013年度选用抗病性不同、遗传背景有较大差异的8个小麦生产品种, 按每个组合3~8个品种进行田间混种, 人工接种白粉菌混合菌株, 比较品种混种对小麦白粉病的病害流行曲线下面积以及小麦产量、粗蛋白含量和千粒重的影响。结果表明, 混种组分品种的数量对防效有影响, 其中以4个品种混种的防病效果最好, 但当品种数达到7个及以上时, 混种也显示出较好的控病效果。2011—2012年度混种组合中有防效的占42.4%, 相对防效为1.2%~26.8%, 约50%的混种组合表现增产, 增产幅度为0.2%~14.6%;2012—2013年度有防治效果的组合占75.0%, 相对防效1.8%~45.4%, 约71%的混种组合表现增产, 增产范围为0.9%~16.6%。供试品种中周麦18总体表现最好, 并且与其他品种混种后对控制小麦白粉病、增加产量和粗蛋白含量均有正向效应。不同混种组分品种间存在互作, 其互作对病害控制及产量均有影响。

关键词: 小麦白粉病, 品种混种, 病害流行曲线下面积, 产量, 蛋白质含量

Abstract:

The knowledge of variety mixture planting in the field on the effects of powdery mildew disease and wheat yield and quality will facilitate the utilization of variety diversity to control wheat diseases. In the 2011–2012 and 2012–2013 growing seasons, we selected eight commercial wheat varieties with large differences in genetic background and disease resistance to test the feasible pattern of variety mixture in the field. In each mixture pattern containing one (control), three, four, five, six, seven, and eight varieties, wheat plants were exposed to mixed powdery mildew isolates. The area under disease progress curve, plot yield, thousand-grain weight and crude protein content in grain were measured. For disease control, four-variety mixture pattern had the best efficacy. However, the mixture patterns with seven or more varieties exhibited also good efficacy. In the 2011–2012 growing season, 42.4% of the mixture patterns were effective with relative efficacy ranging from 1.2% to 26.8%. Meanwhile, 50.0% of the mixture patterns had the effect of yield increase (0.2–14.6%) compared with the control. In the 2012–2013 growing season, 75.0% of the mixture patterns were effective with the efficacy ranging from 1.8% to 45.4% and 71.4% of the mixture patterns resulted in increased yield (0.9–16.6%). Zhoumai 18 was the best component in mixtures having good control against powdery mildew and positive effects on grain yield and protein content. Interactions among the mixture components were also observed, and such interaction had impacts on powdery mildew controlling and wheat yield.

Key words: Wheat powdery mildew, Variety mixture, AUDPC, Yield, Protein contents

[1]邵振润, 刘万才. 我国小麦白粉病的发生现状与治理对策. 中国农学通报, 1996, 12(6):21–23

Shao Z R, Liu W C. Occurrence and management countermeasure of wheat powdery mildew in China. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 1996, 12(6): 21–23 (in Chinese)

[2]张海泉. 小麦抗白粉病分子育种研究进展. 中国生态农业学报, 2008, 16: 1060–1066

Zhang H Q. Research advances in molecular breeding of powdery mildew resistance of wheat. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2008, 16: 1060–1066 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[3]刘金元, 刘大钧. 小麦白粉病抗性基因研究进展. 植物病理学报, 2000, 30: 289–295

Liu J Y, Liu D J. Progress of the study on wheat powdery mildew resistance genes. Acta Phytopathol Sin, 2000, 30: 289–295 (in Chinese)

[4]段霞瑜. 欧洲小麦白粉菌的毒性监测和抗病基因的利用. 植物保护, 1994, 20(3): 36–38

Duan X Y. Toxicity monitoring of European wheat powdery mildew andutilization of resistant gene. Plant Prot, 1994, 20(3): 36–38 (in Chinese)

[5]Zhu Y, Chen H, Fan J, Wang Y, Li Y, Chen J, Fan J X, Yang S, Hu L, Leung H. Genetic diversity and disease control in rice. Nature, 2000, 406: 718–722

[6]杨昌寿, 孙茂林. 对利用多样化抗性防治小麦条锈病的作用的评价. 西南农业学报, 1989, 2(2): 53–56

Yang C S, Sun M L. Evaluation of wheat stripe rust control by resistance diversity. Southwest China J Agric Sci, 1989, 2(2): 53–56 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[7]曹克强, 曾士迈. 小麦混合品种对条锈及白粉病的群体抗病性研究. 植物病理学报, 1994, 24: 21–25

Cao K Q, Zeng S M. Resistance of hybrid varieties of wheat stripe rust and powdery mildew populations. Acta Phytopathol Sin, 1994, 24: 21–25 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[8]王秀娜, 段霞瑜, 周益林. 小麦品种多样性对白粉病及产量和蛋白质的影响. 植物病理学报, 2011, 41: 285–294

Wang X N, Duan X Y, Zhou Y L. Effect of wheat cultivar mixtures on powdery mildew, yield and grain protein content. Acta Phytopathol Sin, 2011, 41: 285–294 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[9]李宁. 寄主多样性条件下小麦白粉病发生及其病原菌群体遗传结构的研究. 中国农业科学院硕士学位论文, 北京, 2011

Li N. Occurrence of Wheat Powdery Mildew in Diversified Hosts and the Pathogen Population Genetic Structure. MS Thesis of Chinese Academy of Agriculteral Sciences, Beijing, China, 2011

[10]Dubin H, Wolfe M. Comparative behavior of three wheat cultivars and their mixture in India, Nepal and Pakistan. Field Crops Res, 1994, 39: 71–83

[11]Cox C, Garrett K, Bowden R. Cultivar mixtures for the simultaneous management of multiplediseases: tanspot and leaf rust of wheat. Phytopathology, 2004, 94: 961–969

[12]Mille B, Fraj M B, Monod H, De Vallavieille-Pope C. Assessing four-way mixtures of winter wheat cultivars from the performances of their two-way and individual components. Eur J Plant Pathol, 2006, 114: 163–173

[13]黄冲, 郭洁滨, 孙振宇, 马占鸿, 刘跃富, 陈伦开. 小麦品种混(间)种对小麦条锈病防治效果和产量影响研究. 植物保护, 2009, 35(3): 115–117

Huang C, Guo J B, Sun Z Y, Ma Z H, Liu Y F, Chen L K. Studies on the effects of cultivar mixtures or multiline cultivars on the wheat yellow rust and wheat yield under different pathogenesis conditions. Plant Prot, 2009, 35(3): 115–117 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[14]许韬. 混合种植控制小麦 白粉病及小麦白粉菌EST-SSRs引物开发. 中国农业科学院硕士学位论文, 北京, 2012. Pp 10–14

Xu T. Use of Cultivar Mixtures for Powdery Mildew Management in Wheat and Exploition of Wheat Powdery Mildew EST-SSRs. MS Thesis of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China, 2012. pp 10–14 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[15]盛宝钦, 段霞瑜. 对记载小麦成株白粉病“0~9级法”的改进. 北京农业科学, 1991, 9(1): 38–39

Sheng B Q, Duan X Y. Improvement of recording adult wheat powdery mildew level “0–9”. Beijing Agric Sci, 1991, 9(1): 38–39 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[16]Mundt C. Use of host genetic diversity to control cereal diseases: implications for rice blast. In: Zeigler R, Leong S, Teng P, eds. Rice Blast Disease. London: CAB International, 1994. pp 293–308

[17]Newton A, Ellis R, Hackett C, Guy D. The effect of component number on Rhynchosporium secalis infection and yield in mixtures of winter barley cultivars. Plant Pathol, 1997, 46: 930–938

[18]Mundt C. Probability of mutation to multiple virulence and durability of resistance gene pyramids. Phytopathology, 1990, 80: 221-223

[19]谭万忠. 小麦白粉病的发生和流行动态分析. 西南农业大学学报, 1991, 13: 477–480

Tan W Z. Analysis of the occurrence and epidemic dynamics of wheat powdery mildew. J Southwest Agric Univ, 1991, 13: 477–480 (in Chinese)

[20]Gao X, Wu M, Xu R, Wang X, Pan R, Kim H-J, Liao H. Root interactions in a maize+soybean intercropping system control soybean soil-borne disease, red crown rot. PLoS One, 9: e95031. DOI:10.1371+ journal.pone.0095031

[21]Cowger C, Mundt C. Effects of wheat cultivar mixtures on epidemic progression of Septoria tritici blotch and pathogenicity of Mycosphaerella graminicola. Phytopathology, 2002, 92: 617–623

[22]朱有勇, Leung H, 陈海如, 王云月, 汤克仁, 赵学谦, 周金玉, 涂建华, 李炎, 何霞红, 周江鸿, 孙雁, Mew T W. 利用抗病基因多样性持续控制水稻病害. 中国农业科学, 2004, 37: 832–839

Zhu Y Y, Leung H, Chen H R, Wang Y Y, Tang K R, Zhao X Q, Zhou J Y, Tu J H, Li Y, He X H, Zhou H H, Sun Y, Mew T W. Using resistance genes diversity for sustainable rice disease control. Agric Sci Sin, 2004, 37: 832–839 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[23]Li N, Jia S F, Wang X N, Duan X Y, Zhou Y L, Wang Z H, Lu G F. The effect of wheat mixtures on the powdery mildew disease and some yield components. J Integr Agric, 2012, 11: 611–620

[1] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[3] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[4] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[7] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[8] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[9] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[10] 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[11] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[12] 杜浩, 程玉汉, 李泰, 侯智红, 黎永力, 南海洋, 董利东, 刘宝辉, 程群. 利用Ln位点进行分子设计提高大豆单荚粒数[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
[13] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
[14] 袁嘉琦, 刘艳阳, 许轲, 李国辉, 陈天晔, 周虎毅, 郭保卫, 霍中洋, 戴其根, 张洪程. 氮密处理提高迟播栽粳稻资源利用和产量[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 667-681.
[15] 丁红, 徐扬, 张冠初, 秦斐斐, 戴良香, 张智猛. 不同生育期干旱与氮肥施用对花生氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 695-703.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!