秸秆还田后少耕对小麦/玉米间作系统中种间竞争和互补的影响

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.00633

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

保护性耕作具有提高作物水分利用效率、减少能耗等优点，但能否将该技术集成应用于间作套种，尚需理论研究和具体实验依据。本研究通过2011和2012年度的田间定位试验，探讨不同耕作和秸秆还田方式对小麦间作玉米作物群体竞争、互补作用及产量的影响。试验设3种秸秆还田处理，分别是小麦带25 cm高茬收割立茬免耕(NTSS)、小麦带25 cm高茬等量秸秆覆盖免耕(NTS)及小麦带高茬等量秸秆还田翻压(TIS)，以传统耕作(CT)为对照。秸秆还田后少耕间作，土地当量比高于传统耕作间作，且大于1，说明少耕小麦秸秆还田有利于提高间作优势；少耕秸秆还田降低了共生期小麦相对于玉米的竞争力，以NTS处理对小麦竞争力的影响最大。与CT相比，NTSS、NTS和TIS的小麦全生育期相对竞争力分别降低37%~54%、109%~141%和22%~24%；与单作玉米相比，NTSS、NTS、TIS和CT处理间作玉米的相对生长率分别高54%~59%、66%~71%、61%~63%和71%~78%，其中小麦秸秆还田间作处理中NTS更有利于发挥玉米的恢复效应。间作条件下，3种秸秆还田处理的产量较对照高6%~10% (2011年度)和4%~12% (2012年度)，其中NTS增产显著。总体来看，间作群体籽粒产量与小麦相对于玉米全生育期的平均竞争力呈二次相关关系，当该竞争力在0.24~0.27时利于获得间作高产。本研究表明，秸秆还田配合少耕是调控种间竞争力的可行途径，其中小麦等量秸秆(小麦留茬25 cm)还田覆盖是优化小麦玉米竞争力的最理想耕作措施。

关键词: 关键词, 间作, 秸秆还田, 竞争力, 相对拥挤指数, 产量

Abstract:

Conservation tillage has the advantages of enhancing water use efficiency and reducing water/energy consumption simultaneously in common cropping systems. However, this technique has not been well studied and practiced in intercropping system. A field experiment was conducted in 2011 and 2012 growing seasons to investigate the effects of different straw returning ways on crop yields, and interspecific competitiveness and complementation in wheat/maize intercropping system. Three wheat straw returning treatments were designed, which were no-tillage with 25 cm straw standing (NTSS), no-tillage with 25 cm straw covering (NTS), and tillage with 25 cm straw incorporation (TIS). Conventional tillage (CT) was used as the control. In the intercropping system, the land use efficiency (LER) of reduced tillage treatments under straw returning condition increased compared with that of CT, showing the intercropping superiority (LER>1). Simultaneously, the competitiveness of wheat with maize in the whole wheat growing duration decreased in treatments NTSS, NTS and TIS by 37–54%, 108–141%, and 22–24%, respectively. Compared with monocropping maize, intercropping maize had higher rates of relative growth with the increased percentages of 54–59% in NTSS, 66–71% in NTS, 61–63% in TIS and 71–78% in CT. Clearly, NTS showed the most effect on maize growth after wheat harvest. In the intercropping system, the total yields of both crops were 6–10% (2011) and 4–12% (2012) higher in the straw returning treatments than in CT. NTS exhibited the most significant effect on enhancing yield. A quadratic relationship was observed between the total yield of intercropping system and the competitivenessof wheatversus maize, and high yields of both crops were obtained when the competitiveness ranged from 0.24 to 0.27. Our results showed that straw returning in combination with reduced tillage is feasible to regulate the interspecific competitiveness in wheat/maize intercropping system, and NTS treatment is recommended.

Key words: Intercropping, Strawreturning, Competitiveness, Relative crowding coefficient, Yield

殷文，赵财，于爱忠，柴强，胡发龙，冯福学. 秸秆还田后少耕对小麦/玉米间作系统中种间竞争和互补的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(04): 633-641.

IN Wen**, ZHAO Cai**,YU Ai-Zhong, CHAI Qiang*, HU Fa-Long,FENG Fu-Xue. Effect of Straw Returning and Reduced Tillage on Interspecific Competition and Complementation in Wheat/Maize Intercropping System[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2015, 41(04): 633-641.

参考文献

[1]Firbank LG, Watkinson AR. On the effects of plant competition: from monocultures to mixtures. In: Grace J B, Tilman D. Perspectives on Plant Competition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1990.pp 165–192

[2]Takim FO. Advantages of maize-cowpea intercropping over sole cropping through competition indices.J Agric Biodiversity Res, 2012,1:53–59

[3]Vandermeer JH. The Ecology of Intercropping.New York: Cambridge University Press,1989

[4]Li L, Sun J H, Zhang F S, Li X L,Yang S C, Rengel Z. Wheat/maize or wheat/soybean strip intercropping: I. Yield advantage and interspecific interactions on nutrients. Field Crops Res,2001,71: 123–137

[5]Tsay JS, Fukai S, Wilson GL. Effects of relative sowing time of soybean on growth and yield of cassava in cassava /soybean intercropping. Field Crops Res, 1988, 19: 227–239

[6]Woldeamlaki A, Bastiaans L, Struik PC. Competition and niche differentiation in barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) mixtures under rainfed conditions in the Central Highlands of Eritrea. Netherlands J Agric Sci, 2001,49: 95–112

[7]张海林,高旺盛,陈阜,朱文珊.保护性耕作研究现状、发展趋势及对策.中国农业大学学报,2005,10(1):16–20

Zhang HL, Gao WS, Chen F, Zhu WS. Prospects and present situation of conservation tillage. J China Agric Univ, 2005, 10(1): 16–20(in Chinese with English abstract)

[8]Sun H Y, Shao L W, Liu X W, Miao W F, Chen S Y, Zhang X Y. Determination of water consumption and the water-saving potential of three mulching methods in a jujube orchard. Eur J Agron, 2012, 43: 87–95

[9]Monneveux P, Quillerou E, Sanchez1 C, Lopez-Cesati J. Effect of zero tillage and residues conservation on continuous maize cropping in a subtropical environment. Plant Soil, 2006, 279: 95–105

[10]Al-Kaisi MM, Yin X. Tillage and crop residue effects on soil carbon and carbon dioxide emission in corn-soybean rotation. J Environ Qual, 2005, 34:437–445

[11]Mariela F, Claudia H, Jorge E, Fernando DL, Armando G, Luc D, Nele V, Bram G. Conservation agriculture, increased organic carbon in the top-soil macro-aggregates and reduced soil CO2 emissions. Plant Soil, 2012, 355:183–193

[12]Cahill JF. Fertilization effects on interaction between above- and below-ground competition in an old field.Ecology, 1999, 80: 466–480

[13]Dhima KV, Lithourgidis AS, Vasilakoglou IB,Dordas CA. Competition indices of common vetch and cereal intercrops in two seeding ratio. Field Crops Res, 2007, 100: 249–256

[14]Willey R W. Intercropping its importance and research needs: I. Competition and yield advantage. Field Crops Abstr, 1979, 32: 1–10

[15]Li L, Sun J H, Zhang F S, Li X L,Rengel Z, Yang S C. Wheat/maize or wheat/soybean strip intercropping: II. Recovery or compensation of maize and soybean after wheat harvesting. Field Crops Res, 2001, 71: 173–181

[16]Zhang F S, Li L. Using competitive and facilitative interactions in intercropping systems enhances crop productivity and nutrient-use efficiency.Plant Soil, 2003, 248: 305–312

[17]Midmore MD, Roca J, BerriosID. Potato (Solanum spp.) in the hot tropics: IV. Intercropping with maize and the influence of shade on potato microenvironment and crop growth. Field Crops Res, 1988,18: 145–157

[18]樊志龙,陶志强,柴强,于爱忠,黄鹏.少耕秸秆覆盖对小麦间作玉米产量和水分利用的影响.灌溉排水学报,2012,31(1):109–112

Fan ZL, Tao ZQ, Chai Q, Yu AZ, Huang P. Yield and water use efficiency of wheat corn intercropping with reduced tillage and wheat straw mulching. J Irrig Drainage, 2012,31(1):109–112(in Chinese with English abstract)

[19]Gao Z Q,Yin J.Effects of tillage and mulch methods on soil moisture in wheat fields of Loess Plateau,China. Pedosphere,1999,9:161–168

[20]Domzal H,Slowinska-Jurkiewica A.Effects of tillage and weather conditions on structure and physical properties of soil and yield of winter wheat.Soil Till Res,1987,10:225–241

[21]冯福学,黄高宝,于爱忠,柴强,陶明,李杰.不同保护性耕作措施对武威绿洲灌区冬小麦水分利用的影响.应用生态学报,2009,20:1060–1065

Feng F X, Huang G B, Yu A Z, Chai Q, Tao M, Li J. Effects of different conservation tillage measures on winter wheat water use in Wuwei oasis irrigated area. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2009, 20: 1060–1065(in Chinese with English abstract)

[22]卜玉山, 苗果园, 邵海林, 王建程. 对地膜和秸秆覆盖玉米生长发育与产量的分析. 作物学报, 2006,32: 1090–1093

Bu Y S, Miao G Y, Shao H L, Wang J C. Analysis of growth and development and yield of corn mulched with plastic film and straw.Acta Agron Sin, 2006,32: 1090–1093 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[23]王喜庆, 李生秀, 高亚军. 地膜覆盖对旱地春玉米生理生态和产量的影响.作物学报, 1998, 24: 348–353

Wang X Q, Li S X, Gao Y J. Effect of plastic film mulching on ecophysiology and yield of the spring maize on the arid land. Acta Agron Sin, 1998, 24: 348–353 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[24]齐万海,柴强.不同隔根方式下间作小麦玉米的竞争力及产量响应.中国生态农业学报,2010,18:31–34

Qi W H, Chai Q. Yield response to wheat/maize competitiveness in wheat/maize intercropping system under different root partition patterns. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2010, 18: 31–34(in Chinese with English abstract)

相关文章 15

[1]	王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2]	王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[3]	颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[4]	杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5]	陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6]	李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[7]	石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[8]	闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[9]	柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[10]	李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[11]	王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[12]	闫宇婷, 宋秋来, 闫超, 刘爽, 张宇辉, 田静芬, 邓钰璇, 马春梅. 连作秸秆还田下玉米氮素积累与氮肥替代效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 962-974.
[13]	杜浩, 程玉汉, 李泰, 侯智红, 黎永力, 南海洋, 董利东, 刘宝辉, 程群. 利用Ln位点进行分子设计提高大豆单荚粒数[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
[14]	陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
[15]	袁嘉琦, 刘艳阳, 许轲, 李国辉, 陈天晔, 周虎毅, 郭保卫, 霍中洋, 戴其根, 张洪程. 氮密处理提高迟播栽粳稻资源利用和产量[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 667-681.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed