作物学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11): 1767-1776.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.01767
• 研究简报 • 上一篇
许俊伟,孟天瑶,荆培培,张洪程*,李超,戴其根,魏海燕,郭保卫
XU Jun-Wei,MENG Tian-Yao,JING Pei-Pei,ZHANG Hong-Cheng,LI Chao,DAI Qi-Gen,WEI Hai-Yan,GUO Bao-Wei
摘要:
以籼粳杂交稻品种甬优2640、甬优1640,杂交籼稻品种丰两优香1号、新两优6380为材料,设置6个密度(A: 31.7 cm × 30.0 cm、B: 22.2 cm × 30.0 cm、C: 17.1 cm × 30.0 cm、D: 13.9 cm × 30.0 cm、E: 11.7 cm × 30.0 cm、F: 10.6 cm × 30.0 cm),比较研究不同机插密度对不同类型水稻抗倒伏能力的影响。两年试验结果表明,产量随密度的增加呈先升后降的趋势,籼粳杂交稻和杂交籼稻均以13.9 cm × 30.0 cm处理产量最高。密度对两种类型水稻影响也不完全一致,籼粳杂交稻在C~E密度下产量均高于10.5 t hm-2,且未发生倒伏或倒伏较少,能获得高产稳产;杂交籼稻只有在D密度下产量高于10.0 t hm-2,表观倒伏率较高,较难稳产。随着密度的增加,2个类型品种茎秆的倒伏指数逐渐增大,茎粗、单位节间干重、茎壁厚度都呈下降趋势。随着灌浆时间的增加,籼粳杂交稻倒伏指数先升高后降低,高峰值出现在抽穗后30 d,茎壁厚度、节间充实度、单茎茎鞘重先降低后升高,抽穗后30 d达最低值。杂交籼稻倒伏指数一直升高,茎壁厚度一直下降,节间充实度先下降,抽穗后30 d后略有下降或回升但不明显,单茎茎鞘重先降低后升高,抽穗后30 d最低,抽穗后30 d前后是发生倒伏的敏感时期。
[1]张忠旭, 陈温福, 杨振玉, 华泽田, 高日玲, 高勇, 赵迎春. 水稻抗倒伏能力与茎秆物理性状的关系及其对产量的影响. 沈阳农业大学学报, 1999, 30(2): 81–85Zhang Z X, Chen W F, Yang Z Y, Hua Z T, Gao R L, Gao Y, Zhao Y C. Effect of lodging resistance on yield and its relationship with stalk physical characteristics. J Shenyang Agric Univ, 1999, 30(2): 81–85 (in Chinese with English abstract)[2]Yang S R, Chen W F, Zhang B L. Trends in breeding rice for ideotype. Chin J Rice Sci, 1988, 2(3): 1–5[3]李诚, 吴俊, 庄文, 邓启云. 水稻高产育种与形态改良. 杂交水稻, 2013, 28(3): 1–5Li C, Wu J, Zhuang W, Deng Q Y. Research progress in rice breeding for high yield through improvement of plant type. Hybrid Rice, 2013, 28(3): 1–5 (in Chinese with English abstract)[4]黄艳玲, 石英尧, 申广勒, 石扬娟, 王维刚, 陈多璞. 水稻茎秆性状与抗倒伏及产量因子的关系. 中国农学通报, 2008, 24(4): 203–206Huang Y L, Shi Y Y, Shen G L, Shi Y J, Wang W G, Chen D P. Study on the relationship between rice lodging resistance and culm traits & the yield factors. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2008, 24(4): 203–206 (in Chinese with English abstract)[5]杨艳华, 朱镇, 张亚东, 陈涛, 赵庆勇, 周丽慧, 姚姝, 张颖慧, 董少玲, 王才林. 不同水稻品种(系)抗倒伏能力与茎秆形态性状的关系. 江苏农业学报, 2011, 27: 231–235 Yang Y H, Zhu Z, Zhang Y D, Chen T, Zhao Q Y, Zhou L H, Yao Z, Zhang Y H, Dong S L, Wang C L. Relationship between lodging resistance and stem morphological traits in different rice varieties (lines). Jiangsu J Agric Sci, 2011, 27: 231–235 (in Chinese with English abstract)[6]李国辉, 钟旭华, 田卡, 黄农荣, 潘俊峰, 何庭蕙. 施氮对水稻茎秆抗倒伏能力的影响及其形态和力学机理. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46: 1323–1334Li G H, Zhong X H, Tian K, Huang N R, Pan J F, He T H. Effect of nitrogen application on stem lodging resistance of rice and its morphological and mechanical mechanisms. Sci Agric Sin, 2013, 46: 1323–1334 (in Chinese with English abstract)[7]申广勒, 石英尧, 黄艳玲, 石扬娟, 王维刚, 张从合, 陈多璞. 水稻抗倒伏特性及其与茎秆性状的相关性研究. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(12): 58–62Shen G L, Shi Y Y, Huang Y L, Shi Y J, Wang W G, Zhang C H, Chen D P. Study on rice lodging resistance character and correlation between the culm traits and lodging resistance traits. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2007, 23(12): 58–62 (in Chinese with English abstract)[8]李红娇, 张喜娟, 李伟娟, 徐正进. 超高产粳稻品种抗倒伏性的初步研究. 北方水稻, 2008, 38(2): 22–27Li H J, Zhang X J, Li W J, Xu Z J. Initial research on lodging resistance in super high-yielding japonica rice cultivars. North Rice, 2008, 38(2): 22–27 (in Chinese with English abstract)[9]李杰, 张洪程, 龚金龙, 常勇, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕. 不同种植方式对超级稻植株抗倒伏能力的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44: 2234–2243Li J, Zhang H C, Gong J L, Chang Y, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y. Effects of different planting methods on the culm lodging resistance of super rice. Sci Agric Sin, 2011, 44: 2234–2243 (in Chinese with English abstract)[10]董丹, 陈书强, 刘柏林, 王嘉宇, 徐正进. 直立穗型基因对水稻抗倒伏能力的影响. 江西农业大学学报, 2009, 31: 202–207Dong D, Chen S Q, Liu B L, Wang J Y, Xu Z J. Effects of erect panicle gene on lodging resistance of rice. Acta Agric Univ Jiangxiensis, 2009, 31: 202–207 (in Chinese with English abstract)[11]李红娇, 张喜娟, 李伟娟, 徐正进, 徐海. 不同穗型粳稻品种抗倒伏性的比较. 中国水稻科学, 2009, 23: 191–196Li H J, Zhang X J, Li W J, Xu Z J, Xu H. Lodging resistance in japonica rice varieties with different panicle types. Chin J Rice Sci, 2009, 23: 191–196 (in Chinese with English abstract)[12]张喜娟, 李红娇, 李伟娟, 徐正进, 陈温福, 张文忠, 王嘉宇. 北方直立穗型粳稻抗倒性的研究. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42: 2305–2313Zhang X J, Li H J, Li W J, Xu Z J, Chen W F, Zhang W Z, Wang J Y. The lodging resistance of erect panicle japonica rice in northern China. Sci Agric Sin, 2009, 42: 2305–2313 (in Chinese with English abstract)[13]刘立军, 袁莉民, 王志琴, 徐国伟, 陈云. 旱种水稻倒伏生理原因分析与对策的初步研究. 中国水稻科学, 2002, 16: 225–230Liu L J, Yuan L M, Wang Z Q, Xu G W, Chen Y. Preliminary studies on physiological reason and countermeasure of lodging in dry-cultivated rice. Chin J Rice Sci, 2002, 16: 225–230 (in Chinese with English abstract)[14]马荣荣, 许德海, 王晓燕, 禹盛苗, 金千瑜, 欧阳由男, 朱练峰. 籼粳亚种间杂交稻甬优6号超高产株型特征与竞争优势分析. 中国水稻科学, 2007, 21: 281–286Ma R R, Xu D H, Wang X Y, Yu S M, Jin Q Y, Ou-Yang Y N, Zhu L F. Heterosis on plant morpholoty of Yongyou6, an indica japonica iner subspecific super high yielding hybrid rice. Chin J Rice Sci, 2007, 21: 281–286 (in Chinese with English abstract) [15]姜元华, 张洪程, 韦还和, 赵 可, 许俊伟, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 郭保卫. 亚种间杂交稻不同冠层叶形组合产量差异及其形成机理. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47: 2313–2325 Jiang Y H, Zhang H C, Wei H H, Zhao K, Xu J W, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Guo B W. Difference of yield and its formation mechanism of indica-japonica inter-subspecific hybrid rice with different canopy leaf types. Sci Agric Sin, 2014, 47: 2313–2325 (in Chinese with English abstract)[16]胡雅杰, 邢志鹏, 龚金龙, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 李德剑, 沙安勤, 周有炎, 刘国林, 陆秀军, 刘国涛, 朱嘉炜. 适宜机插株行距提高不同穗型粳稻产量. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(14): 33–44Hu Y J, Xing Z P, Gong J L, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Li D J, Sha A Q, Zhou Y Y, Liu G L, Lu X J, Liu G T, Zhu J W. Suitable spacing in and between rows of plants by machinery improves yield of different panicle type japonica rices. Trans CSAE, 2013, 29(14): 33–44 (in Chinese with English abstract)[17]朱德峰, 陈惠哲. 水稻机插秧发展与粮食安全. 中国稻米, 2009, (6): 4–7Zhu D F, Chen H Z. The development of mechanical transplanting rice and food security. China Rice, 2009, (6): 4–7 (in Chinese)[18]许圣君. 水稻机插秧技术优势及存在问题与对策. 安徽农学通报, 2011, 17(9): 194–196Xu S J. The technical advantages of mechanical transplanting rice and its existing problems and countermeasures. Anhui Agric Sci Bull, 2011, 17(9): 194–196 (in Chinese)[19]孙永健, 陈宇, 孙园园, 徐徽, 许远明, 刘树金, 马均. 不同施氮量和栽插密度下三角形强化栽培杂交稻抗倒伏性与群体质量的关系. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26: 189–196Sun Y J, Chen Y, Sun Y Y, Xu H, Xu Y M, Liu S J, Ma J. Relationship between culm lodging resistance and population quality of hybrids under triangle-planted system of rice intensification at different nitrogen application rates and planting densities. Chin J Rice Sci, 2012, 26: 189–196 (in Chinese with English abstract)[20]郭玉华, 朱四光, 张龙步, 都华. 不同栽培条件对水稻茎秆材料学特性的影响. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2003, 34(1): 4–7Guo Y H, Zhu S G, Zhang L B, Du H. Influence on the material characteristics of rice culms in different cultivation conditions. J Shenyang Agric Univ, 2003, 34(1): 4–7 (in Chinese with English abstract)[21]Seko H, Samoto K, Suzuki K. Lodging of rice plant in relation to several different cultural conditions (II). Jpn J Crop Sci, 1959, 27: 173–176 (in Japanese)[22]郭玉华, 朱四光, 张龙步. 不同栽培条件对水稻茎秆生化成分的影响. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2003, 34(2): 89–91Guo Y H, Zhu S G, Zhang L B. Influence of different cultivation conditions on biochemistry components of rice culms. J Shenyang Agric Univ, 2003, 34(2): 89–91 (in Chinese with English abstract)[23]杨世民, 谢力, 郑顺林, 李静, 袁继超. 氮肥水平和栽插密度对杂交稻茎秆理化特性与抗倒伏性的影响. 作物学报, 2009, 35: 93–103Yang S M, Xie L, Zheng S L, Li J, Yuan J C. Effects of nitrogen rate and transplanting density on physical and chemical characteristics and lodging resistance of culms in hybrid rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2009, 35: 93–103 (in Chinese with English abstract)[24]石扬娟. 施肥方式和栽插密度对水稻抗倒伏性状影响研究. 安徽农业大学硕士学位论文, 安徽合肥, 2008. p 45Shi Y J. Studies on Traits Correalating to Loding Resistance under the Different Fertilization Manner and Planting Density in Rice. MS Thesis of Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China, 2008. p 45 (in Chinese with English abstract)[25]吴春赞, 叶定池, 林华, 倪日群, 赖联赛, 林辉. 栽插密度对水稻产量及品质的影响. 中国农学通报, 2005, 21(9): 190–191Wu C Z, Ye D C, Lin H, Ni R Q, Lai L S, Lin H. Effects of transplanting density on rice yield and its quality. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2005, 21(9): 190–191 (inChinese with English abstract)[26]朱聪聪, 张洪程, 郭保卫, 曹利强, 江峰, 葛梦婕, 花劲, 宋云生, 周兴涛, 霍中洋, 许轲, 戴其根, 魏海燕, 朱大伟. 钵苗机插密度对不同类型水稻产量及光合物质生产特性的影响. 作物学报, 2014, 40: 122–133Zhu C C, Zhang H C, Guo B W, Cao L Q, Jiang F, Ge M J, Hua J, Song Y S, Zhou X T, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Dai Q G, Wei H Y, Zhu D W. Effect of planting density on yield and photosynthate production characteristics in different types of rice with bowl mechanical-transplanting method. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40: 122–133 (in Chinese with English abstract)[27]艾治勇. 超级杂交稻形态及生理特性与抗倒性关系的研究. 湖南农业大学硕士学位论文, 湖南长沙, 2006. p 20Ai Z Y. Study on Relationship between Morphological and Physiological Traits and Lodging Resistance in Super Hybrid Rice (Oryza satival L.). MAS Thesis of Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China, 2006. p 20 (in Chinese with English abstract)[28] 张丰转. 粳稻抗倒指标的动态变化及栽培调控研究. 东北农业大学硕士学位论文, 哈尔滨, 2010. pp 24–29Zhang F Z. The Dynamic Changes of Lodging-resistance Index and Its Cultural Control in Japonica. MAS Thesis of Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 2010. pp 24–29 (in Chinese with English abstract)[29]凌启鸿, 张洪程, 苏祖芳, 凌励. 稻作新理论——水稻叶龄模式. 北京: 科学出版社, 1994. p 71Ling Q H, Zhang H C, Su Z F, Ling L. New Theory of Rice—The Model of Rice Leaf Age. Beijing: Science Press, 1994. p 71 (in Chinese)[30]林贤青, 王雅芬, 朱德峰, 罗玉坤. 水稻茎鞘非结构性碳水化合物与穗部性状关系的研究. 中国水稻科学, 2001, 15: 155–157Lin X Q, Wang Y F, Zhu D F, Luo Y K. The non-structural carbohydrate of the stem and sheath in relation to the panicle characteristics in rice. Chin J Rice Sci, 2001, 15: 155–157 (in Chinese with English abstract)[31]刘树金. 栽培地点和密度对不同类型品种水稻形态特征与群体质量影响. 四川农业大学硕士学位论文, 四川雅安, 2010. pp 25–26Liu S J. Effects of Transplanting Location and Density on the Morphological and Population Quality of Different Types of Rice. MS Thesis of Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an, China, 2010. pp 25–26 (in Chinese with English abstract)[32]姜元华, 张洪程, 赵可, 许俊伟, 韦还和, 王文婷, 孟天瑶, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 郭保卫. 机插条件下籼粳杂交稻茎秆的抗倒性评价及成因分析. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(19): 19–29Jiang Y H, Zhang H C, Zhao K, Xu J W, Wei H H, Wang W T, Meng T Y, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Guo B W. Evaluation and cause analysis of rice-stem lodging resistance for mechanical transplanted indica-japonica hybrid rice. Trans CSAE, 2014, 30(19): 19–29 (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450. |
[2] | 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462. |
[3] | 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475. |
[4] | 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487. |
[5] | 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515. |
[6] | 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545. |
[7] | 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297. |
[8] | 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247. |
[9] | 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016. |
[10] | 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951. |
[11] | 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961. |
[12] | 杜浩, 程玉汉, 李泰, 侯智红, 黎永力, 南海洋, 董利东, 刘宝辉, 程群. 利用Ln位点进行分子设计提高大豆单荚粒数[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 565-571. |
[13] | 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666. |
[14] | 袁嘉琦, 刘艳阳, 许轲, 李国辉, 陈天晔, 周虎毅, 郭保卫, 霍中洋, 戴其根, 张洪程. 氮密处理提高迟播栽粳稻资源利用和产量[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 667-681. |
[15] | 丁红, 徐扬, 张冠初, 秦斐斐, 戴良香, 张智猛. 不同生育期干旱与氮肥施用对花生氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 695-703. |
|