欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (10): 1518-1526.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2017.01518

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

新疆早熟陆地棉品种更替产量提高过程中冠层结构特征的演变

杨延龙1,肖飞2,徐守振1,王宇轩1,左文庆1,梁福斌1,张旺锋1,*   

  1. 1石河子大学农学院 / 新疆生产建设兵团绿洲生态农业重点实验室, 新疆石河子 832003；2石河子大学生命科学学院, 新疆石河子832003
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-17 修回日期:2017-05-09 出版日期:2017-10-12 网络出版日期:2017-05-22
  • 通讯作者: 张旺锋, E-mail: zhwf_agr@shzu.edu.cn, Tel: 0993-2057326
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(U1203283)资助。

Development of Cotton Canopy Structure Characteristics of Cotton Varieties Grown in Different Decades in Northern Xinjiang

YANG Yan-Long1,XIAO-Fei2,XU Shou-Zhen1,WANG Yu-Xuan1,ZUOWen-Qing1,LIANG Fu-Bin1,ZHANG Wang-Feng1,*   

  1. 1 College of Agriculture, Shihezi University / Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology Agriculture of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Shihezi 832003, China; 2College of Life Science, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China
  • Received:2017-01-17 Revised:2017-05-09 Published:2017-10-12 Published online:2017-05-22
  • Contact: 张旺锋, E-mail: zhwf_agr@shzu.edu.cn, Tel: 0993-2057326
  • Supported by:

    This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1203283).

RichHTML

PDF

304

被引次数

1

摘要：

选用新疆近30年不同年代(1990s、2000s、2010s)早熟陆地棉(Gossypium hirsutum L.)大面积主栽品种，在膜下滴灌栽培条件下，测定其冠层开度、叶倾角、冠层光分布等指标，明确品种更替及产量提高过程中棉花冠层结构的变化特征，为棉花新品种选育及栽培管理提供依据。结果表明，在棉花品种更替及产量提高过程中，不同年代品种生育期相差不大，2010s品种生育期相对较长；盛铃期至吐絮期，2010s的主栽品种冠层开度相对较适宜，光吸收率比1990s和2000s的品种平均高1.06%和5.95%，且生育后期冠层开度、冠层光吸收率均能维持较高水平。2010s品种干物质积累量比1990s和2000s的品种平均高11.51%和15.59%，各器官干物质积累量也呈现增加的趋势。随品种更替叶倾角变化趋势不明显，但不同品种之间差异较大，叶倾角与叶片面积呈负相关。因此，随着棉花品种更替，目前推广品种生育中后期具有适宜的叶面积指数和冠层开度，光吸收率维持在90%左右，总干物质积累量较大是其冠层结构和光合物质生产的重要特征。

关键词: 陆地棉, 早熟品种, 品种更替, 冠层结构, 产量, 新疆

Abstract:

Widespread cultivated early maturing upland cotton varieties bred in Xinjiang in different decades (1990s, 2000s and 2010s) were used as experimental materials under mulching drip irrigation conditions. Canopy openness, mean foliage titled angle and canopy light distribution at different growing stages were measured to analyze cotton canopy structural characteristics, which provides a theoretical basis for breeding new cotton varieties and optimizing cultivation management. In the cotton varieties replacement process with yield increase, there was no significant difference in growth stage among different decades, and the growth stage of varieties grown in 2010s was relatively long. In the growth period from full boll stage to boll opening stage, the canopy openness was more reasonable and the light absorption rate was higher for the varieties in 2010s than in 1990s and 2000s; in the late growth period, the canopy openness and canopy light absorption rate for the varieties in 2010s were averagely 1.06% to 5.94% higher than those in 1990s and 2000s. Furthermore, dry matter accumulation of varieties in 2010s was averagely 11.51% to 15.59% higher than that in 1990s and 2000s, with an increasing trend in various organs. There was a consistent changing trend in leaf inclination angle for different varieties, but with a great difference among varieties and closely relating to leaf size. Therefore, with cotton varieties replacing, the appropriate leaf area index and canopy openness at the middle and later stages of cotton growth have been up to about 90% of light absorption now and got more dry matter accumulation, resulting in increased yield.

Key words: Upland cotton, Early maturing variety, Variety renew, Canopy structure, Yield, Xinjiang

[1]毛树春, 李亚兵, 冯璐, 孔庆平, 孙景生. 新疆棉花生产发展问题研究. 农业展望, 2014, (11): 43–51 Mao S C, Li Y B, Feng L, Kong Q P, Sun J S. Study on the development of xinjiang cotton production. Agric Outlook, 2014, (11): 43–51 (in Chinese with English abstract) [2]中国农业科学院棉花研究所. 中国棉花栽培学. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2013. pp 884–889 Cotton Research Institute. Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Cotton Farming in China. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, 2013. pp 884–889 (in Chinese) [3]Bennett O L, Ashley D A, Doss B D, Scarsbrook C E. Influence of topping and side pruning on cotton yield and other characteristics. Agron J, 1965, 57: 25–27 [4]Jost P H, Cothren J T. Growth and yield comparisons of cotton planted in conventional and ultra-narrow row spacing. Crop Sci, 2000, 40: 430–435 [5]Dai J L, Dong H Z. Intensive cotton farming technologies in China: Achievements, challenges and countermeasures. Field Crops Res, 2014, 155: 99–110 [6]Wells R, Meredith W R. Comparative growth of obsolete and modern cotton cultivars. III. Relationship of yield to observed growth characteristics. Crop Sci, 1984, 24: 868–872 [7]姜保功, 孔繁玲, 张群远, 姜茹琴, 何鉴星, 张欣雪. 棉花产量组分的改良对产量的影响. 棉花学报, 2000, 12: 258–260 Jiang B G, Kong F L, Zhang Q Y, Jiang R Q, He J X, Zhang X X. Effects of improvements of cotton yield components. Acta Gossyp Sin, 2000, 12: 258–260 (in Chinese with English abstract) [8]张德贵, 孔繁玲, 张群远, 刘文欣, 杨付新, 许乃银, 廖琴, 邹奎. 建国以来我国长江流域棉区棉花品种的遗传改良: I. 产量及产量组分性状的改良. 作物学报, 2003, 29: 208–215 Zhang D G, Kong F L, Zhang Q Y, Liu W X, Yang F X, Xu N Y, Liao Q, Z K. Genetic Improvement of cotton varieties in the Yangtze valley in china since1950s: I. improvement on yield and yield components. Acta Agron Sin, 2003, 29: 208–215 (in Chinese with English abstract) [9]孙杰, 褚贵新, 张文辉, 金文虹. 新疆特早熟棉区棉花品种主要性状演变趋势研究. 中国棉花, 1999, 26(7): 14–16 Sun J, Chu G X, Zhang W H, Jin W H. Study on main characteristics evolution trend of Xinjiang cotton varieties in special early-maturing cotton region. Chin Cotton, 1999, 26(7): 14–16 (in Chinese) [10]褚贵新, 孙杰, 李予霞, 金文宏. 新疆特早熟棉区50年来棉花品种演替过程中氮素吸收和运转分配差异的研究. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 1999, 3: 9–14 Chu G X, Sun J, Li Y X, Jin W H. Studies on the difference of nitrogen absorption, transportation and distribution of cotton varieties evolvement in North Xinjiang. J Shihezi Univ (Nat Sci), 1999, 3: 9–14 (in Chinese with English abstract) [11]褚贵新, 孙杰, 刁明, 苏子友, 刘涛, 沈其荣. 北疆特早熟棉区棉花品种更替过程中棉铃发育特性的研究. 棉花学报, 2002, 14: 17–21 Chu G X, Sun J, Diao M, Su Z Y, Liu T, Shen Q R. Study on Characteristics of Cotton Boll Development among Cotton Varieties from Different Eras in Northern Xinjiang. Cotton Sci, 2002, 14: 17–21 (in Chinese with English abstract) [12]相吉山, 谢宗铭, 田琴, 董永梅, 李有忠, 司爱君. 北疆棉花“新陆早”系列品种主要性状分析.新疆农业科学, 2010, 47: 1535–1540 Xiang J S, Xie Z M, Tian Q, Dong Y M, Li Y Z, Si A J. Analysis on the main characters of “Xinluzao” series cotton cultivars in northern Xinjiang. Xinjiang Agr Sci, 2010, 47: 1535–1540(in Chinese with English abstract) [13]Brodrick, R., Bange, M. P., Milroy, S. P., & Hammer, G. L. Physiological determinants of high yielding ultra-narrow row cotton: canopy development and radiation use efficiency. Field Crops Res, 2013, 148: 86–94 [14]Maddonni G A, Otegui M E, Cirilo A G. Plant population density, row spacing and hybrid effects on maize canopy architecture and light attenuation. Field Crops Res, 2001, 71: 183–193 [15]NIInemets ü. A review of light interception in plant stands from leaf to canopy in different plant functional types and in species with varying shade tolerance. Ecol Res, 2010, 25: 693–714 [16]Kaggwa-AsIImwe R, Andrade-Sanchez P, Wang G. Plant architecture influences growth and yield response of upland cotton to population density. Field Crops Res, 2013, 145: 52–59 [17]Gu S, Evers J B, Zhang, L., Mao L, Vos J, Li Z, Using functional–structural plant modeling to explore the response of cotton to mepiquat chloride application and plant population density. In: 7th International Conference on Functional-Structural Plant Models (FSPM2013), Saariselk?, Finland, 8–15 June 2013 [18]Yao H S, Zhang Y L, Yi X P, Zhang X J, Zhang W F. Cotton responds to different plant population densities by adjusting specific leaf area to optimize canopy photosynthetic use efficiency of light and nitrogen. Field Crops Res, 2016, 188: 10–16 [19]张旺锋, 王振林, 余松烈, 李少昆, 房建, 童文崧. 种植密度对新疆高产棉花群体光合作用、冠层结构及产量形成的影响. 植物生态学报, 2004, 28: 164–171 Zhang W F, Wang Z L, Yu S L, Li S K, Fang J, Tong W S. Effect of planting density on canopy photosynthesis, canopy structure and yield formation of high-yield cotton in Xinjiang, China. Acta Phytoecol Sin, 2004, 28: 164–171 (in Chinese with English abstract) [20]杜明伟, 罗宏海, 张亚黎, 姚炎帝, 张旺锋, 夏东利, 马丽, 朱波. 新疆超高产杂交棉的光合生产特征研究. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42: 1952–1962 Du M W, Luo H H, Zhang Y L, Yao Y D, Zhang W F, Xia D L, Ma L, Zhu B. Photosynthesis characteristics of super-high-yield hybrid cotton in Xinjiang. Sci Agric Sin, 2009, 42: 1952–1962 (in Chinese with English abstract) [21]冯国艺, 姚炎帝, 罗宏海, 张亚黎, 杜明伟, 张旺锋, 夏冬利, 董恒义. 新疆超高产棉花冠层光分布特征及其与群体光合生产的关系. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23: 1286–1294 Feng G Y, Yao Y D, Luo H H, Zhang Y L, Du M W, Zhang W F, Xia D L, Dong H Y. Canopy light distribution and its correlation with photosynthetic production in super-high yielding cotton fields of Xinjiang. Northwest China. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2012, 23: 1286–1294 (in Chinese with English abstract) [22]杜明伟, 冯国艺, 姚炎帝, 罗宏海, 张亚黎, 夏东利, 张旺锋. 杂交棉标杂A1和石杂2号超高产冠层特性及其与群体光合生产的关系. 作物学报, 2009, 35: 1068–1077 Du M W, Feng G Y, Yao Y D, Luo H H, Zhang Y L, Xia D L, Zhang W F. Canopy characteristics and its correlation with photosynthesis of super high-yielding hybrid cotton Biaoza A1 and Shiza 2. Acta Agron Sin, 2009, 35: 1068–1077 (in Chinese with English abstract) [23]Malone S, Herbert D A, Holshouser D L. Evaluation of the LAI-2000 plant canopy analyzer to estimate leaf area in manually defoliated soybean. Agron J, 2002, 94: 1012–1019 [24]高亮之, 李林. 水稻气象生态. 北京: 农业出版社, 1992. pp 121–123 Gao L Z, Li L. Rice Meteoric Ecology. Beijing: Agriculture Press, 1992. pp 121–123 (in Chinese) [25]裴炎, 邱晓, 刘明钊. 棉花冠层结构及光合作用研究. 作物学报, 1988, 14: 214–220 Pei Y, Qiu X, Liu M Z. Study on the structure and photosynthesis of cotton canopy. Acta Agron Sin, 1988, 14: 214–220 (in Chinese with English abstract) [26]Reta-Sánchez D G, Fowler J L. Canopy light environment and yield of narrow-row cotton as affected by canopy architecture. Agron J, 2002, 94: 1317–1323 [27]董合忠, 毛树春, 张旺锋, 陈德华. 棉花优化成铃栽培理论及其新发展. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47: 441–451 Dong H Z, Mao S C, Zhang W F, Chen D H. On boll-setting optimization theory for cotton cultivation and its new development. Sci Agric Sin, 2014, 47: 441–451 (in Chinese with English abstract) [28]Gent M P N. Canopy light interception, gas exchange, and biomass in reduced height isolines of winter wheat. Crop Sci, 1995, 35: 1636–1642 [29]Maddonni G A, Otegui M E. Leaf area, light interception, and crop development in maize. Field Crops Res, 1996, 48: 81–87 [30]潘学标, 王延琴, 崔秀稳, 邓绍华. 棉花群体结构与棉田光量子传递特性关系的研究. 作物学报, 2000, 26: 333–340 Pan X B, Wang Y Q, Cui X W, Deng S H. Studies on relationships between cotton population composition and transfer characteristic of PAR. Acta Agron Sin, 2000, 26: 333–340 (in Chinese with English abstract) [31]王春艳, 礒田昭弘, 王道龙, 李茂松, 阮明艳, 苏跃. 新疆石河子棉区高密条件下冠层结构和光分布特征. 棉花学报, 2006, 18: 223–227 Wang C Y, Isoda A, Wang D L, Li M S, Ruan M Y, Su Y. Canopy structure and radiation interception of cotton grown under high density condition in northern Xinjiang. Cotton Sci, 2006, 18: 223–227 (in Chinese with English abstract) [32]Zhi X Y, Han Y C, Mao S C, Wang G P, Feng L, Yang B F, Fan Z Y, Du W L, Lu J H, Li Y B. Light Spatial Distribution in the Canopy and Crop Development in Cotton. PLoS One, 2014, 9: e113409 [33]Watt M. S, Clinton P W, Whitehead D, Richardson B, Mason E G, Leckie A C. Above-ground biomass accumulation and nitrogen fixation of broom (Cytisus scoparius L.) growing with juvenile Pinus radiata on a dry land site. For Ecol Manage, 2003, 184: 93–104
[1] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[3] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[4] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6] 徐田军, 张勇, 赵久然, 王荣焕, 吕天放, 刘月娥, 蔡万涛, 刘宏伟, 陈传永, 王元东. 宜机收籽粒玉米品种冠层结构、光合及灌浆脱水特性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1526-1536.
[7] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[8] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[9] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[10] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[11] 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[12] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[13] 杜浩, 程玉汉, 李泰, 侯智红, 黎永力, 南海洋, 董利东, 刘宝辉, 程群. 利用Ln位点进行分子设计提高大豆单荚粒数[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
[14] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
[15] 袁嘉琦, 刘艳阳, 许轲, 李国辉, 陈天晔, 周虎毅, 郭保卫, 霍中洋, 戴其根, 张洪程. 氮密处理提高迟播栽粳稻资源利用和产量[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 667-681.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2