欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (10): 1518-1526.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2017.01518

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

新疆早熟陆地棉品种更替产量提高过程中冠层结构特征的演变

杨延龙1,肖飞2,徐守振1,王宇轩1,左文庆1,梁福斌1,张旺锋1,*   

  1. 1石河子大学农学院 / 新疆生产建设兵团绿洲生态农业重点实验室, 新疆石河子 832003；2石河子大学生命科学学院, 新疆石河子832003
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-17 修回日期:2017-05-09 出版日期:2017-10-12 网络出版日期:2017-05-22
  • 通讯作者: 张旺锋, E-mail: zhwf_agr@shzu.edu.cn, Tel: 0993-2057326
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(U1203283)资助。

Development of Cotton Canopy Structure Characteristics of Cotton Varieties Grown in Different Decades in Northern Xinjiang

YANG Yan-Long1,XIAO-Fei2,XU Shou-Zhen1,WANG Yu-Xuan1,ZUOWen-Qing1,LIANG Fu-Bin1,ZHANG Wang-Feng1,*   

  1. 1 College of Agriculture, Shihezi University / Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology Agriculture of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Shihezi 832003, China; 2College of Life Science, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China
  • Received:2017-01-17 Revised:2017-05-09 Published:2017-10-12 Published online:2017-05-22
  • Contact: 张旺锋, E-mail: zhwf_agr@shzu.edu.cn, Tel: 0993-2057326
  • Supported by:

    This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1203283).

RichHTML

PDF

533

被引次数

1

摘要：

选用新疆近30年不同年代(1990s、2000s、2010s)早熟陆地棉(Gossypium hirsutum L.)大面积主栽品种，在膜下滴灌栽培条件下，测定其冠层开度、叶倾角、冠层光分布等指标，明确品种更替及产量提高过程中棉花冠层结构的变化特征，为棉花新品种选育及栽培管理提供依据。结果表明，在棉花品种更替及产量提高过程中，不同年代品种生育期相差不大，2010s品种生育期相对较长；盛铃期至吐絮期，2010s的主栽品种冠层开度相对较适宜，光吸收率比1990s和2000s的品种平均高1.06%和5.95%，且生育后期冠层开度、冠层光吸收率均能维持较高水平。2010s品种干物质积累量比1990s和2000s的品种平均高11.51%和15.59%，各器官干物质积累量也呈现增加的趋势。随品种更替叶倾角变化趋势不明显，但不同品种之间差异较大，叶倾角与叶片面积呈负相关。因此，随着棉花品种更替，目前推广品种生育中后期具有适宜的叶面积指数和冠层开度，光吸收率维持在90%左右，总干物质积累量较大是其冠层结构和光合物质生产的重要特征。

关键词: 陆地棉, 早熟品种, 品种更替, 冠层结构, 产量, 新疆

Abstract:

Widespread cultivated early maturing upland cotton varieties bred in Xinjiang in different decades (1990s, 2000s and 2010s) were used as experimental materials under mulching drip irrigation conditions. Canopy openness, mean foliage titled angle and canopy light distribution at different growing stages were measured to analyze cotton canopy structural characteristics, which provides a theoretical basis for breeding new cotton varieties and optimizing cultivation management. In the cotton varieties replacement process with yield increase, there was no significant difference in growth stage among different decades, and the growth stage of varieties grown in 2010s was relatively long. In the growth period from full boll stage to boll opening stage, the canopy openness was more reasonable and the light absorption rate was higher for the varieties in 2010s than in 1990s and 2000s; in the late growth period, the canopy openness and canopy light absorption rate for the varieties in 2010s were averagely 1.06% to 5.94% higher than those in 1990s and 2000s. Furthermore, dry matter accumulation of varieties in 2010s was averagely 11.51% to 15.59% higher than that in 1990s and 2000s, with an increasing trend in various organs. There was a consistent changing trend in leaf inclination angle for different varieties, but with a great difference among varieties and closely relating to leaf size. Therefore, with cotton varieties replacing, the appropriate leaf area index and canopy openness at the middle and later stages of cotton growth have been up to about 90% of light absorption now and got more dry matter accumulation, resulting in increased yield.

Key words: Upland cotton, Early maturing variety, Variety renew, Canopy structure, Yield, Xinjiang

[1]毛树春, 李亚兵, 冯璐, 孔庆平, 孙景生. 新疆棉花生产发展问题研究. 农业展望, 2014, (11): 43–51 Mao S C, Li Y B, Feng L, Kong Q P, Sun J S. Study on the development of xinjiang cotton production. Agric Outlook, 2014, (11): 43–51 (in Chinese with English abstract) [2]中国农业科学院棉花研究所. 中国棉花栽培学. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2013. pp 884–889 Cotton Research Institute. Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Cotton Farming in China. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, 2013. pp 884–889 (in Chinese) [3]Bennett O L, Ashley D A, Doss B D, Scarsbrook C E. Influence of topping and side pruning on cotton yield and other characteristics. Agron J, 1965, 57: 25–27 [4]Jost P H, Cothren J T. Growth and yield comparisons of cotton planted in conventional and ultra-narrow row spacing. Crop Sci, 2000, 40: 430–435 [5]Dai J L, Dong H Z. Intensive cotton farming technologies in China: Achievements, challenges and countermeasures. Field Crops Res, 2014, 155: 99–110 [6]Wells R, Meredith W R. Comparative growth of obsolete and modern cotton cultivars. III. Relationship of yield to observed growth characteristics. Crop Sci, 1984, 24: 868–872 [7]姜保功, 孔繁玲, 张群远, 姜茹琴, 何鉴星, 张欣雪. 棉花产量组分的改良对产量的影响. 棉花学报, 2000, 12: 258–260 Jiang B G, Kong F L, Zhang Q Y, Jiang R Q, He J X, Zhang X X. Effects of improvements of cotton yield components. Acta Gossyp Sin, 2000, 12: 258–260 (in Chinese with English abstract) [8]张德贵, 孔繁玲, 张群远, 刘文欣, 杨付新, 许乃银, 廖琴, 邹奎. 建国以来我国长江流域棉区棉花品种的遗传改良: I. 产量及产量组分性状的改良. 作物学报, 2003, 29: 208–215 Zhang D G, Kong F L, Zhang Q Y, Liu W X, Yang F X, Xu N Y, Liao Q, Z K. Genetic Improvement of cotton varieties in the Yangtze valley in china since1950s: I. improvement on yield and yield components. Acta Agron Sin, 2003, 29: 208–215 (in Chinese with English abstract) [9]孙杰, 褚贵新, 张文辉, 金文虹. 新疆特早熟棉区棉花品种主要性状演变趋势研究. 中国棉花, 1999, 26(7): 14–16 Sun J, Chu G X, Zhang W H, Jin W H. Study on main characteristics evolution trend of Xinjiang cotton varieties in special early-maturing cotton region. Chin Cotton, 1999, 26(7): 14–16 (in Chinese) [10]褚贵新, 孙杰, 李予霞, 金文宏. 新疆特早熟棉区50年来棉花品种演替过程中氮素吸收和运转分配差异的研究. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 1999, 3: 9–14 Chu G X, Sun J, Li Y X, Jin W H. Studies on the difference of nitrogen absorption, transportation and distribution of cotton varieties evolvement in North Xinjiang. J Shihezi Univ (Nat Sci), 1999, 3: 9–14 (in Chinese with English abstract) [11]褚贵新, 孙杰, 刁明, 苏子友, 刘涛, 沈其荣. 北疆特早熟棉区棉花品种更替过程中棉铃发育特性的研究. 棉花学报, 2002, 14: 17–21 Chu G X, Sun J, Diao M, Su Z Y, Liu T, Shen Q R. Study on Characteristics of Cotton Boll Development among Cotton Varieties from Different Eras in Northern Xinjiang. Cotton Sci, 2002, 14: 17–21 (in Chinese with English abstract) [12]相吉山, 谢宗铭, 田琴, 董永梅, 李有忠, 司爱君. 北疆棉花“新陆早”系列品种主要性状分析.新疆农业科学, 2010, 47: 1535–1540 Xiang J S, Xie Z M, Tian Q, Dong Y M, Li Y Z, Si A J. Analysis on the main characters of “Xinluzao” series cotton cultivars in northern Xinjiang. Xinjiang Agr Sci, 2010, 47: 1535–1540(in Chinese with English abstract) [13]Brodrick, R., Bange, M. P., Milroy, S. P., & Hammer, G. L. Physiological determinants of high yielding ultra-narrow row cotton: canopy development and radiation use efficiency. Field Crops Res, 2013, 148: 86–94 [14]Maddonni G A, Otegui M E, Cirilo A G. Plant population density, row spacing and hybrid effects on maize canopy architecture and light attenuation. Field Crops Res, 2001, 71: 183–193 [15]NIInemets ü. A review of light interception in plant stands from leaf to canopy in different plant functional types and in species with varying shade tolerance. Ecol Res, 2010, 25: 693–714 [16]Kaggwa-AsIImwe R, Andrade-Sanchez P, Wang G. Plant architecture influences growth and yield response of upland cotton to population density. Field Crops Res, 2013, 145: 52–59 [17]Gu S, Evers J B, Zhang, L., Mao L, Vos J, Li Z, Using functional–structural plant modeling to explore the response of cotton to mepiquat chloride application and plant population density. In: 7th International Conference on Functional-Structural Plant Models (FSPM2013), Saariselk?, Finland, 8–15 June 2013 [18]Yao H S, Zhang Y L, Yi X P, Zhang X J, Zhang W F. Cotton responds to different plant population densities by adjusting specific leaf area to optimize canopy photosynthetic use efficiency of light and nitrogen. Field Crops Res, 2016, 188: 10–16 [19]张旺锋, 王振林, 余松烈, 李少昆, 房建, 童文崧. 种植密度对新疆高产棉花群体光合作用、冠层结构及产量形成的影响. 植物生态学报, 2004, 28: 164–171 Zhang W F, Wang Z L, Yu S L, Li S K, Fang J, Tong W S. Effect of planting density on canopy photosynthesis, canopy structure and yield formation of high-yield cotton in Xinjiang, China. Acta Phytoecol Sin, 2004, 28: 164–171 (in Chinese with English abstract) [20]杜明伟, 罗宏海, 张亚黎, 姚炎帝, 张旺锋, 夏东利, 马丽, 朱波. 新疆超高产杂交棉的光合生产特征研究. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42: 1952–1962 Du M W, Luo H H, Zhang Y L, Yao Y D, Zhang W F, Xia D L, Ma L, Zhu B. Photosynthesis characteristics of super-high-yield hybrid cotton in Xinjiang. Sci Agric Sin, 2009, 42: 1952–1962 (in Chinese with English abstract) [21]冯国艺, 姚炎帝, 罗宏海, 张亚黎, 杜明伟, 张旺锋, 夏冬利, 董恒义. 新疆超高产棉花冠层光分布特征及其与群体光合生产的关系. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23: 1286–1294 Feng G Y, Yao Y D, Luo H H, Zhang Y L, Du M W, Zhang W F, Xia D L, Dong H Y. Canopy light distribution and its correlation with photosynthetic production in super-high yielding cotton fields of Xinjiang. Northwest China. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2012, 23: 1286–1294 (in Chinese with English abstract) [22]杜明伟, 冯国艺, 姚炎帝, 罗宏海, 张亚黎, 夏东利, 张旺锋. 杂交棉标杂A1和石杂2号超高产冠层特性及其与群体光合生产的关系. 作物学报, 2009, 35: 1068–1077 Du M W, Feng G Y, Yao Y D, Luo H H, Zhang Y L, Xia D L, Zhang W F. Canopy characteristics and its correlation with photosynthesis of super high-yielding hybrid cotton Biaoza A1 and Shiza 2. Acta Agron Sin, 2009, 35: 1068–1077 (in Chinese with English abstract) [23]Malone S, Herbert D A, Holshouser D L. Evaluation of the LAI-2000 plant canopy analyzer to estimate leaf area in manually defoliated soybean. Agron J, 2002, 94: 1012–1019 [24]高亮之, 李林. 水稻气象生态. 北京: 农业出版社, 1992. pp 121–123 Gao L Z, Li L. Rice Meteoric Ecology. Beijing: Agriculture Press, 1992. pp 121–123 (in Chinese) [25]裴炎, 邱晓, 刘明钊. 棉花冠层结构及光合作用研究. 作物学报, 1988, 14: 214–220 Pei Y, Qiu X, Liu M Z. Study on the structure and photosynthesis of cotton canopy. Acta Agron Sin, 1988, 14: 214–220 (in Chinese with English abstract) [26]Reta-Sánchez D G, Fowler J L. Canopy light environment and yield of narrow-row cotton as affected by canopy architecture. Agron J, 2002, 94: 1317–1323 [27]董合忠, 毛树春, 张旺锋, 陈德华. 棉花优化成铃栽培理论及其新发展. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47: 441–451 Dong H Z, Mao S C, Zhang W F, Chen D H. On boll-setting optimization theory for cotton cultivation and its new development. Sci Agric Sin, 2014, 47: 441–451 (in Chinese with English abstract) [28]Gent M P N. Canopy light interception, gas exchange, and biomass in reduced height isolines of winter wheat. Crop Sci, 1995, 35: 1636–1642 [29]Maddonni G A, Otegui M E. Leaf area, light interception, and crop development in maize. Field Crops Res, 1996, 48: 81–87 [30]潘学标, 王延琴, 崔秀稳, 邓绍华. 棉花群体结构与棉田光量子传递特性关系的研究. 作物学报, 2000, 26: 333–340 Pan X B, Wang Y Q, Cui X W, Deng S H. Studies on relationships between cotton population composition and transfer characteristic of PAR. Acta Agron Sin, 2000, 26: 333–340 (in Chinese with English abstract) [31]王春艳, 礒田昭弘, 王道龙, 李茂松, 阮明艳, 苏跃. 新疆石河子棉区高密条件下冠层结构和光分布特征. 棉花学报, 2006, 18: 223–227 Wang C Y, Isoda A, Wang D L, Li M S, Ruan M Y, Su Y. Canopy structure and radiation interception of cotton grown under high density condition in northern Xinjiang. Cotton Sci, 2006, 18: 223–227 (in Chinese with English abstract) [32]Zhi X Y, Han Y C, Mao S C, Wang G P, Feng L, Yang B F, Fan Z Y, Du W L, Lu J H, Li Y B. Light Spatial Distribution in the Canopy and Crop Development in Cotton. PLoS One, 2014, 9: e113409 [33]Watt M. S, Clinton P W, Whitehead D, Richardson B, Mason E G, Leckie A C. Above-ground biomass accumulation and nitrogen fixation of broom (Cytisus scoparius L.) growing with juvenile Pinus radiata on a dry land site. For Ecol Manage, 2003, 184: 93–104
[1] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] 彭佳泺, 李颖, 李丹丹, 杨军宁, 郭学峰, 张文姣, 俞晓雪, 周亚荣, 王振玉, 王彩香, 马雄风, 宿俊吉. 陆地棉I类LBD家族成员鉴定及GhLBD6调控开花期的功能和单倍型分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1682-1697.
[3] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[4] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[5] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[6] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[7] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[8] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[9] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[10] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[11] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[12] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[13] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[14] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[15] 崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2