欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (10): 1519-1524.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

人参不同生育期叶片光合作用变化的研究

徐克章; 张美善;武志海;张治安;陈展宇;李大勇   

  1. 吉林农业大学农学院, 吉林长春130118
  • 收稿日期:2005-10-21 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-10-12 网络出版日期:2006-10-12

Changes of Photosynthesis in Panax ginseng Leaves at Different Growth Stages

XU Ke-Zhang,ZHANG Mei-Shan,WU Zhi-Hai,ZHANG Zhi-An,CHEN Zhan-Yu,LI Da-Yong   

  1. Faculty of Agronomy, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, Jilin, China
  • Received:2005-10-21 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-10-12 Published online:2006-10-12

摘要:

田间栽培和植物生长室培养试验结果表明,净光合速率(Pn)在尚未形成生殖器官的一年生人参叶片完全展开后即达最大值,此后缓慢下降;2~6年生人参叶片完全展开后达第1个高峰,开花期略有下降,绿果期出现第2高峰,此后持续下降。去掉花蕾的人参植株叶片在对照植株的绿果期没有出现第2高峰,但在红果期和黄叶期净光合速率下降缓慢。弱光(10%透光荫棚)和适宜光(30%透光荫棚)下人参叶片绿果期后Pn下降缓慢,强光(50%透光荫棚)下下降较快,过早出现变黄早衰。强光和高温可使植株生育期缩短、叶片早衰、Pn快速下降,而弱光和低温使植株生育期延长,Pn下降时间推迟。叶片表观量子效率(AQY)、气孔导度(Gs)和蒸腾作用(Tr)自展叶期至绿果期变化不大,红果期和黄叶期持续下降。胞间CO2浓度(Ci)在展叶期至绿果期较低,红果期和黄叶期持续增加,说明生育后期Pn下降是由非气孔限制因子引起。叶片Pn与比叶重呈负相关,推测叶片光合产物的积累和消耗与Pn的生育期变化有关。绿果期Ci最低,同时水分利用效率(WUE)较高,是人参叶片光合作用对水分需求的关键时期。

关键词: 人参, 光合作用, 生育期变化, 表观量子产量, 水分利用效率

Abstract:

Panax ginseng is a famous special herb medicine. As a perennial shade-loving medicine crop, it will be harvested after growing at least 5–6 years. The net photosynthetic rate(Pn) is very low (2–4 µmol CO2·m-2·s-1) in leaves of Panax ginseng , which is an important limitation factor for production. In order to investigate the changes of the characteristics and the limitation factors of photosynthesis in Panax ginseng leaves at different growth stages, net photosynthetic rate (Pn) and related parameters in leaves of 1–6 years old Panax ginseng grown in the field and in phytotron were measured by infrared gas analyzer. The net photosynthetic rate reached the maximum , then decreased with leaf age in fully expanded leaves of one-year old Panax ginseng without forming reproductive organ. In leaves of 2–6 years old plant, the first peak of net photosynthetic rate appeared in the fully expanded leaves, then Pn had little decrease at flowering stages and reached the second peak at green fruit stage (fruit growing stage), at last persistently decreased at red fruit(ripe fruit) and yellowing leaf stages. For the experiment with removing flower bud, the second Pn peak did not appeared at green fruits, and Pn was higher in red fruits and yellowing leaf stages, as compared with control plants. The results showed that the changes of Pn are regulated by reproductive growth at different growth stages. Apparent quantum yield (AQY) did not show obvious changes from leaf fully expanded to green fruit stages, which the maximum AQY was observed in fully expanded leaves. AQY was decreased with the decrease of Pn after green fruit stage. The leaves grown under low light (10% of full light) and optimum light (30% of full light) were showed more slowly decrease of Pn than these under high light (50% of full light) after green fruit stage. The leaf senescence and the decrease of Pn were accelerated in each growth stage under high light and high temperature; conversely the senescence and the decrease of Pn were delayed in each growth stage under low light and low temperature. Stomatal conductance(Gs) and transpiration rate(Tr) had similar change trends to Pn at different growth stages. Intercellular CO2 concentration(Ci) was kept stable from leaf fully expanded to green fruit, and increased persistently after green fruit. The changes of Ci indicated that the decrease of photosynthesis was not caused by stomatal limitation at red fruit and yellowing leaf stages. There was negative correlation between Pn and specific leaf weight (SLW) from leaf fully expanded to red fruit. So, it can be deduced that changes of photosynthesis are related with accumulation and demand of photosynthate. There were higher WUE and lower Ci at green fruit then at other stages. The results indicate that water supply at green fruit stage is very important to improve the photosynthetic productivity.

Key words: Panax ginseng, Photosynthesis, Growth stages, Apparent quantum yield, Water use efficiency

中图分类号: 

  • S567
[1] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2] 叶凡, 李帅, 李思宇, 陈云, 窦超银, 刘立军. 不同节水灌溉方式对东北稻区水稻产量和群体质量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 895-907.
[3] 谢玮欣, 毛守发, 韦金贵, 侯思宇, 樊志龙, 殷文, 胡发龙, 南运有, 柴强. 干旱灌区绿肥还田对减量灌水春小麦水分利用的调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 514-526.
[4] 高园, 李霞, 魏少博, 田小海, 周文彬. 植物光合午休研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2253-2265.
[5] 樊友众, 王先领, 王宗铠, 王春云, 王天尧, 谢捷, 蒯婕, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 周广生. 秸秆还田耦合氮肥运筹对稻茬油菜光合性能及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2139-2151.
[6] 赵刚, 张建军, 党翼, 樊廷录, 王磊, 周刚, 王淑英, 李兴茂, 倪胜利, 米文博, 周旭姣, 程万莉, 李尚中. 黄土旱塬区秸秆覆盖量对不同降雨年型土壤水温效应和冬小麦产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1643-1653.
[7] 王东, 王森, 尚丽, 冯浩伟, 张永巧, 崔佳鸣, 李爽, 章佳聪, 车欢. 补灌对黄土高原半湿润区冬小麦产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1312-1325.
[8] 崔栋, 王同超, 杨松林, 任佰朝, 高英波, 于宁宁, 张吉旺. 灌溉方式和种植密度优化协同提高夏玉米产量和水分利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 3026-3037.
[9] 王永亮, 胥子航, 李申, 梁哲铭, 白炬, 杨治平. 不同覆盖措施对土壤水热状况及春玉米产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(5): 1312-1324.
[10] 亢秀丽, 马爱平, 靖华, 赵玉坤, 崔欢虎, 席吉龙, 黄学芳. 微喷限水灌溉对冬小麦产量及水氮利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(12): 3107-3117.
[11] 桑会哲, 王超, 樊志龙, 殷文, 范虹, 何蔚, 胡发龙, 柴强. 氮肥减施对青贮玉米豆科饲草间作系统水分利用特征的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(11): 2848-2859.
[12] 郭家鑫, 叶扬, 郭慧娟, 闵伟. 盐碱胁迫对棉花叶片蛋白质组的影响及差异性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(1): 219-236.
[13] 杨晓慧, 王碧胜, 孙筱璐, 侯靳锦, 徐梦杰, 王志军, 房全孝. 冬小麦对水分胁迫响应的模型模拟与节水滴灌制度优化[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(8): 2196-2209.
[14] 王玉珑, 于爱忠, 吕汉强, 吕奕彤, 苏向向, 王鹏飞, 柴健. 绿洲灌区麦后复种绿肥并还田对翌年玉米根系性状及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(5): 1350-1362.
[15] 王珍, 张晓莉, 刘淼, 姚梦楠, 孟晓静, 曲存民, 卢坤, 李加纳, 梁颖. 甘蓝型油菜BnMAPK1超量表达及中油821的转录差异表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(3): 856-868.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!