欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (11): 1735-1745.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.94022

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于多重表型分析的准确评价高粱抗旱性方法的建立

张笑笑1,2,潘映红3,任富莉2,蒲伟军2,王道平3,李玉斌2,陆平3,李桂英3,*(),朱莉2,*()   

  1. 1 西南科技大学, 四川绵阳 621000
    2 中国农业科学院生物技术研究所, 北京 100081
    3 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所, 北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-14 接受日期:2019-05-12 出版日期:2019-11-12 网络出版日期:2019-06-04
  • 通讯作者: 李桂英,朱莉
  • 作者简介:E-mail: 1826437817@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    本研究由中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(Y2017PT25);国家自然科学基金项目(31471558);国家重点研发项目(2018YFD1000702);国际原子能机构协调研究项目(D23031)

Establishment of an accurate evaluation method for drought resistance based on multilevel phenotype analysis in sorghum

ZHANG Xiao-Xiao1,2,PAN Ying-Hong3,REN Fu-Li2,PU Wei-Jun2,WANG Dao-Ping3,LI Yu-Bin2,LU Ping3,LI Gui-Ying3,*(),ZHU Li2,*()   

  1. 1 Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621000, Sichuan, China
    2 Institute of Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
    3 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2019-02-14 Accepted:2019-05-12 Published:2019-11-12 Published online:2019-06-04
  • Contact: Gui-Ying LI,Li ZHU
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Non-profit Scientific Institution(Y2017PT25);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(31471558);the National Key R&D Program of China(2018YFD1000702);the IAEA Coordinated Research Project(D23031)

RichHTML

6

PDF

368

摘要：

干旱是制约农业生产的重要非生物胁迫之一, 因此作物抗旱性研究具有重要理论和应用价值。本研究对73份高粱材料萌发期和苗期的抗旱性进行了初筛, 从中选择15份抗旱材料和6份敏感材料, 通过室内和田间试验, 获得干旱胁迫下幼苗的株高、叶长、叶宽等形态特征以及超氧化物歧化酶、丙二醛、过氧化物酶等生理生化指标的响应数据, 并对高粱的抗旱性做进一步的验证, 最终确定抗旱型材料1份, 中等抗旱型材料1份, 干旱敏感型材料2份。本研究建立了一套基于多重表型分析的高粱抗旱性研究新方法, 即综合运用多种数据分析方法(包括隶属函数法、主成分分析法、聚类分析法), 结合不同生长环境(田间试验和室内试验)和不同生育期(萌发期和苗期)高粱响应干旱胁迫的多种表型数据(形态特征、生理生化指标), 通过多重比较高粱抗旱性评价结果的一致性, 旨在系统、高效、准确地判定高粱的抗旱性, 为高粱抗旱机制的研究和抗旱新品种的选育提供技术支撑。

关键词: 多重表型分析, 高粱, 抗旱性, 萌发期, 苗期

Abstract:

Drought is one of the important abiotic stresses that restrict agricultural production. Research on drought resistance of crops is of significance in both theoretical and practical aspects. In this study, 73 sorghum accessions were preliminarily evaluated for drought resistance at the germination and seedling stages under simulated drought environment with PEG-6000. Among them, 21 accessions including 15 tolerant and 6 susceptible, were screened to measure the morphological characteristics such as plant height, leaf length and leaf width, and physiological and biochemical indicators such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, malondialdehyde (MDA) content, and peroxidase (POD) activity. Finally, one accession was identified with high drought resistance, one accession was moderate drought resistance and two accessions with drought-sensitivity. A new evaluation method for sorghum drought resistance was established based on the multilevel phenotypic analysis, in which the data from subordinate function method, principal component analysis and clustering analysis were comprehensively applied, and combined with various phenotypic data (morphological, physiological and biochemical indicators) at different growth stages (germination and seedling stages) in different growth environments (field test and laboratory test). This method can be used to systematically, efficiently and accurately identify the drought resistance of sorghum based on the consistency of evaluation results by multiple comparison analysis, which is useful in the research on drought resistance mechanism and sorghum breeding for drought resistance.

Key words: multilevel phenotypic analysis, sorghum, drought resistance, germination stage, seedling stage

图1

多重表型分析方法概要"

表1

73份高粱材料信息"

编号
Number		 名称
Name		 编号
Number		 名称
Name
D01 Club.S D38 SEM-20-4
D02 IS-8377 D39 SEM-20-5
D03 5933 D40 SEM-28-4
D04 M81-E D41 SEM-30-1
D05 SEM-2-4 D42 SEM-31-4
D06 灯笼红(忻州) Denglonghong (Xinzhou) D43 SEM-32-1
D07 黑暴糯高粱(广南) Heibaonuogaoliang (Guangnan) D44 SEM-32-2
D08 Bird proof kafer #-662 D45 SEM-32-4
D09 矮脚糯(平利) Aijiaonuo (Pingli) D46 SEM-32-5
D10 糯高粱(宁夏) Nuogaoliang (Ningxia) D47 SEM-32-9
D11 糯高粱(柞水) Nuogaoliang (Zuoshui) D48 SEM-32-4
D12 CLUBHEAD-3 D49 SEM-32-5
D13 甜131 Tian 131 D50 SEM-32-9
编号
Number		 名称
Name		 编号
Number		 名称
Name
D14 千斤锤(沁水) Qianjinchui (Qinshui) D51 SEM-38-4
D15 甜选29 Tianxuan 29 D52 SEM-38-7
D16 甜选37 Tianxuan 37 D53 SEM-42-1
D17 甜选129 Tianxuan 129 D54 SEM-44-2
D18 Icsv 219 D55 SEM-54-1
D19 木浦在来种Mupuzailaizhong D56 SEM-54-5
D20 IS-9180 D57 SEM-21-8
D21 10048 D58 SEM-24-6
D22 AIRI-2 D59 SEM-24-7
D23 东北农信糯Dongbeinongxinnuo D60 SEM-30-3
D24 河北糯杂5号Heibeinuoza 5 D61 SEM-49-2
D25 河北糯杂6号Hebeinuoza 6 D62 SEM-49-4
D26 红茅糯2号Hongmaonuo 2 D63 SEM-51-11
D27 山东莱阳糯Shandonglaiyangnuo D64 SEM-53-4
D28 原15B Yuan 15B D65 SEM-53-5
D29 耘糯Yunnuo D66 SEM-53-7
D30 上海甜Shanghaitian D67 SEM-53-10
D31 软高粱(定襄) Ruangaoliang (Dingxiang) D68 SEM-57-4
D32 米高粱(清涧) Migaoliang (Qingjian) D69 SEM-56-8
D33 CP16-1481 D70 SEM-62-5
D34 SEM-8-4 D71 SEM-66-2
D35 SEM-16-10 D72 科甜5号Ketian 5
D36 SEM-17-3 D73 SEM-42-4
D37 SEM-20-2

图2

不同高粱材料萌发期的抗旱指标隶属函数值及苗期萎蔫指数等级 RGP: 相对发芽势; RGR: 相对发芽率; DGRI: 萌发抗旱指数; ASFV: 平均隶属函数值; 1-WI: 1-苗期萎蔫指数等级赋值。"

表2

21份高粱材料基于隶属函数法的苗期抗旱性综合评价"

材料编号
Accession number		 田间抗旱性排序
Field drought
resistance ranking		 室内抗旱性排序
Laboratory drought resistance ranking		 材料编号
Accession number		 田间抗旱性排序
Field drought
resistance ranking		 室内抗旱性排序
Laboratory drought resistance ranking
D11 1 1 D51 11 16
D16 2 3 D40 13 5
D05 3 15 D04 14 18
D37 4 4 D62 15 6
D41 5 19 D24 16 14
D43 6 17 D60 17 11
D18 7 8 D42 18 10
D19 8 7 D22 19 2
D49 9 20 D53 20 21
D14 10 9 D65 21 13
D10 11 12

图3

21份高粱材料基于主成分分析法的苗期抗旱性综合评价 A: 21份高粱材料田间抗旱性综合得分; B: 21份高粱材料室内抗旱性综合得分。"

图4

21份高粱材料基于聚类分析法的苗期抗旱性评价 A: 21份高粱材料田间抗旱性聚类分析结果; B: 21份高粱材料室内抗旱性聚类分析结果。"

图5

不同高粱抗旱性多重表型分析结果的差异度比较 A: 不同分析方法和不同生长环境的多重表型分析结果的差异度比较; B: 不同生长环境下高粱抗旱性多重表型分析结果的差异度比较。a: 田间试验条件下隶属函数法与主成分分析法分析结果之间的比较; b: 室内试验条件下隶属函数法与主成分分析法结果之间比较; c: 田间与室内试验主成分分析法结果比较; d: 田间与室内试验隶属函数法结果比较; e: 田间试验隶属函数法与室内试验主成分分析法结果之间比较。其中实线(0.5和1.0)作为c和d差异值的参考线, 用以评估不同生长环境同一分析方法多重表型分析结果的差异度; 虚线(1.20和1.75)和实线(1.5)作为e差异值的参考线, 用以评估田间试验隶属函数与室内试验主成分分析结果的差异度。"

[1] Spindel J E, Dahlberg J, Colgan M, Holingsworth J, Sievert J, Staggenborg S, Hutmacher R, Jansson C, Vogel J P . Association mapping by aerial drone reveals 213 genetic associations for Sorghum bicolor biomass traits under drought. BMC Genomics, 2018,19:679. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-5055-5.
[2] Solomon A D, Hussein S, Mark L, Fentahum M . The impact of drought on sorghum production, and farmer’s varietal and trait preferences, in the north eastern Ethiopia: implications for breeding. Acta Agric Scand, Section B — Soil Plant Sci, 2018,68:424-436.
[3] Sakhi S, Shehzad, Rehman S, Okuno K . Mapping QTL’s underlying drought stress at developmental stages of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) by association analysis. Euphytica, 2013,193:433-450.
[4] Reddy B V S, Ramaiah B, Kumar A A, Reddy P S . Evaluation of sorghum genotypes for stay-green trait and grain yield. SAT Agric Res, 2007,3:1-4.
[5] Badigannavar A, Teme N, Oliveira A C D, Li G Y, Vaksmann M, Viana V E, Ganapathi T R, Sarsu F . Physiological, genetic and molecular basis of drought resiliencein sorghum [Sorghum bicolor(L.) Moench]. Ind J Plant Physiol, 2018,23:670-688.
[6] 张树林, 刘玉玲, 田丽, 宋卓恒, 郭瑞林, 彭仁海 . 不同小麦新品系萌发期抗旱性的筛选与鉴定. 分子植物育种, 2018,16:7138-7147.
Zhang S L, Liu Y L, Tian L, Song Z H, Guo R L, Peng R H . Screening and identification of drought resistance of different new wheat lines during germination period. Mol Plant Breed, 2018,16:7138-7147 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7] 郭效龙, 宋希云, 裴玉贺, 郭新梅 . 玉米自交系萌发期和苗期抗旱性指标的筛选. 植物生理学报, 2018,54:1719-1726.
Guo X L, Song X Y, Pei Y H, Guo X M . Screening of drought resistance indexes of maize inbred lines. Plant Physiol J, 2018,54:1719-1726 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[8] 温蕊, 侯建华, 张艳芳, 吕品, 马宇 . 干旱胁迫对向日葵种子萌发的影响及其抗旱性鉴定. 干旱农业地区研究, 2018,36(2):192-197.
Wen R, Hou J H, Zhang Y H, Lyu P, Ma Y . Effect of drought stress on seed germination of sunflower on and identification of drought resistance of main variety. Agric Res Arid Areas, 2018,36(2):192-197 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[9] 陈冰嬬, 徐宁, 李淑杰, 李继洪, 侯佳明, 李伟, 石贵山, 檀辉, 高士杰, 王鼐 . 高粱亲本系萌发期抗旱性鉴定. 中国农业大学学报, 2018,23(8):17-29.
Chen B X, Xu N, Li S J, Li J H, Hou J M, Li W, Shi G S, Tan H, Gao S J, Wang N . Identification of the drought resistance of sorghum parental lines at germination stage. J China Agric Univ, 2018,23(8):17-29 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[10] 吴奇, 周宇飞, 高悦, 张姣, 陈冰嬬, 许文娟, 黄瑞冬 . 不同高粱品种萌发期抗旱性筛选与鉴定. 作物学报, 2016,42:1233-1246.
Wu Q, Zhou Y F, Gao Y, Zhang J, Chen B X, Xu W J, Huang R D . Screening and identification for drought resistance during germination in sorghum cultivars. Acta Agron Sin, 2016,42:1233-1246 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11] 刘方明, 高玉山, 孙云云, 窦金刚, 刘慧涛, 王立春 . 高粱抗旱性鉴定研究进展. 东北农业科学, 2016,41(3):5-7.
Liu F M, Gao Y S, Sun Y Y, Dou J G, Liu H T, Wang L C . Advances of researches on identification of drought resistance of sorghum. J Northeast Agric Sci, 2016,41(3):5-7 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12] Azarinasrabad A, Mousavinik S M, Galavi M, Begeshti S A, Sirousmehr A . Evaluation of water stress on yield, its components and some physiological traits at different growth stages in grain sorghum genotypes. Notulae Sci Biol, 2016,8:204-210.
[13] Tambussia E A, Bartolia C G, Beltranoa J, Guiameta J J, Araus J L . Oxidative damage to thylakoid proteins in water-stressed leaves of wheat (Triticum aestivum). Physiol Plant, 2000,108:398-404.
[14] Apel K, Hirt H . Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2004,55:373-399.
[15] Choudhury S, Panda P, Sahoo L, Panda S K . Reactive oxygen species signaling in plants under abiotic stress. Plant Signal Behavior, 2013,8:1559-2324.
[16] 孙欢欢, 韩兆雪, 谭登峰, 张小燕 . 新培育玉米自交系苗期生理生化指标与其抗旱性综合评价. 干旱农业地区研究, 2016,34(5):9-14.
Sun H H, Han Z X, Tan D F, Zhang X Y . Comprehensive evaluation of physiological and biochemical indexes and drought resistance of new maize inbred lines during seedling stage. Agric Res Arid Areas, 2016,34(5):9-14 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17] Lee D, Chung P J, Jeong J S, Jang G, Bang S W, Jung H, Kim Y S, Ha S, Choi Y D, Kim J . The rice OsNAC6 transcription factor orchestrates multiple molecular mechanisms involving root structural adaptions and nicotianamine biosynthesis for drought tolerance. Plant Biotechnol J, 2016,15:754-764.
[18] 毛浩田, 陈梦莹, 吴楠, 刘海悦, 刘玉林, 张怀渝, 陈洋尔 . 干旱胁迫对不同倍性小麦和八倍体小黑麦苗期光合能力与抗氧化系统的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2018,38:1246-1254.
Mao H T, Chen M Y, Wu N, Liu H Y, Liu Y L, Zhang H Y, Chen Y E . Effects of drought stress on photosynthetic capacity and antioxidant system in wheat with different ploidy levels and octoploid triticale at seedling stage. J Triticeae Crops, 2018,38:1246-1254 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[19] 骆建霞, 黄榆婷, 曾丽蓉, 李钊, 赵嘉菱, 郭冰鑫 . PEG模拟干旱胁迫对4种海棠幼苗生理特性的影响. 天津农学院学报, 2016,23(3):1-5.
Luo J X, Huang Y T, Zeng L Y, Li Z, Zhao J L, Guo B X . Effects of PEG simulated drought stress on physiological characters of four crabapple seedlings. J Tianjin Agric Univ, 2016,23(3):1-5 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] 王艺陶, 周宇飞, 李丰先, 依兵, 白薇, 闫彤, 许文娟, 高明超, 黄瑞冬 . 基于主成分和SOM聚类分析的高粱品种萌发期抗旱性鉴定与分类. 作物学报, 2014,40:110-121.
Wang Y T, Zhou Y F, Li F X, Yi B, Bai W, Yan T, Xu W J, Gao M C, Huang R D . Identification and classification of sorghum cultivars for drought resistance during germination stage based on principal components analysis and self organizing map cluster analysis. Acta Agron Sin, 2014,40:110-121 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21] 孙海博, 任瑞芬, 郭芳, 尹大芳, 杨秀云 . 干旱胁迫下美国薄荷幼苗形态与生理特性研究. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018,38(4):65-73.
Sun H B, Ren R F, Guo F, Yin D F, Yang X Y . Research on morphological and physiological responses of Monarda didyma seedlings to drought stress. J Shanxi Agric Univ (Nat Sci Edn), 2018,38(4):65-73 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[22] Mulima E, Sibiya J, Musvosvi C, Nhamucho E . Identification of important morphological traits in Mozambican sorghum [Sorghum bicolor(L.) Moench] germplasm using multivariate analysis. Afr J Agric Res, 2018,13:1796-1810.
[23] Derese S A, Shimelis H, Mwadzingeni L, Laing M . Agro- morphological characterisation and selection of sorghum landraces. Acta Agric Scand, Section B — Soil Plant Sci, 2018,68:585-595.
[24] 汪灿, 周棱波, 张国兵, 徐燕, 张立异, 高旭, 高杰, 姜讷, 邵明波 . 酒用糯高粱资源成株期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选. 中国农业科学, 2017,50:1388-1402.
Wang C, Zhou L B, Zhang G B, Xu Y, Zhang L Y, Gao X, Jiang N, Shao M B . Drought resistance identification and drought resistance indices screening of liquor-making waxy sorghum resources at adult plant stage. Sci Agric Sin, 2017,50:1388-1402 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[25] Tufail A, Arfan M, Gurmani A R, Khan A, Bano A . Salcylic acid induced salinity tolerance in maize (Zea mays). Pak J Bot, 2013,45:75-82.
[26] 王兰芬, 武晶, 景蕊莲, 程须珍, 王述民 . 绿豆种质资源苗期抗旱性鉴定. 作物学报, 2015,41:145-153.
Wang L F, Wu J, Jing R L, Cheng X Z, Wang S M . Drought resistance identification of mungbean germplasm resources at seedlings stage. Acta Agron Sin, 2015,41:145-153 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[27] 路文静, 李奕松 . 植物生理学实验教程(第2版). 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2017. pp 132-135.
Lu W J, Li Y S. Plant Physiology Experiment Course (2nd edn). Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2017. pp 132-135(in Chinese).
[28] 王顺才, 邹养军, 马锋旺 . 干旱胁迫对3种苹果属植物叶片解剖结构、微形态特征及叶绿体超微结构的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2014,32(3):15-23.
Wang S C, Zou Y J, Ma F W . Influence of drought stress on leaf anatomical structure and micro-morphiology traits and chloroplast ultrastructure of three Malus species. Agric Res Arid Areas, 2014,32(3):15-23 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[29] Chu G, Chen T T, Wang Z Q, Yang J C, Zhan J H . Morphological and physiological traits of roots and their relationships with water productivity in water-saving and drought-resistant rice. Field Crops Res, 2014,162:108-119.
[30] 张嘉楠, 昌小平, 郝晨阳, 刘桂茹, 景蕊莲 . 北方冬麦区小麦抗旱种质资源遗传多样性分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2010,11:253-259.
Zhang J N, Chang X P, Hao C Y, Liu G R, Jing R L . Genetic diversity of common wheat germplasm resources with drought resistance in Northern China. J Plant Genet Resour, 2010,11:253-259 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[31] Govindasamy V, George P, Aher L, Ramesh S V, Thangasamy A, Anandan S, Raina S K, Kumar M, Rane J, Annapurna J, Annapura K, Minhas P . Comparative conventional and phenomics approaches to assess symbiotic effectiveness of Bradyrhizobia strains in soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) to drought. Sci Rep, 2017,7:6958. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06441-3.
[32] Cheng Z, Dong K, Ge P, Bian Y, Dong L, Deng X, Li X H, Yan Y M . Identification of leaf proteins differentially accumulated between wheat cultivars distinct in their levels of drought tolerance. PLoS One, 2015,10:e0125302.
[33] Wen W, Araus J L, Shah T, Cairns J, Mahuku G, Marianne B, Torres J L, Ciro S, Yan J . Molecular characterization of a diverse maize inbred line collection and its potential utilization for stress tolerance improvement. Crop Sci, 2011,51:2569-2581.
[34] Upadhyaya H D . Variability for drought resistance related traits in the mini core collection of peanut. Crop Sci, 2005,45:1432-1440.
[35] 杨彬, 张一中, 周福平, 张海燕, 史红梅, 张桂香, 柳青山, 张晓娟, 范昕琦 . 高粱抗旱性鉴定方法及QTL定位研究进展. 植物遗传资源学报, 2019,20:496-507.
Yang B, Zhang Y Z, Zhou F P, Zhang H Y, Shi H M, Zhang G X, Liu Q S, Zhang X J, Fan X Q . Advances in experimental assays for drought tolerance and QTL mapping of drought resistance in sorghum. J Plant Genet Resour, 2019,20:496-507 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[36] Houle D, Govindaraju D R, Omholt S . Phenomics: the next challenge. Nat Rev Genetics, 2010,11:855-866.
[1] 王兴荣, 李玥, 张彦军, 李永生, 汪军成, 徐银萍, 祁旭升. 青稞种质资源成株期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1279-1287.
[2] 胡亮亮, 王素华, 王丽侠, 程须珍, 陈红霖. 绿豆种质资源苗期耐盐性鉴定及耐盐种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 367-379.
[3] 张海燕, 解备涛, 姜常松, 冯向阳, 张巧, 董顺旭, 汪宝卿, 张立明, 秦桢, 段文学. 不同抗旱性甘薯品种叶片生理性状差异及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 518-528.
[4] 赵佳佳, 乔玲, 武棒棒, 葛川, 乔麟轶, 张树伟, 闫素仙, 郑兴卫, 郑军. 山西省小麦苗期根系性状及抗旱特性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 714-727.
[5] 韩贝, 王旭文, 李保奇, 余渝, 田琴, 杨细燕. 陆地棉种质资源抗旱性状的关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(3): 438-450.
[6] 王媛, 王劲松, 董二伟, 武爱莲, 焦晓燕. 长期施用不同剂量氮肥对高粱产量、氮素利用特性和土壤硝态氮含量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(2): 342-350.
[7] 董二伟, 王劲松, 武爱莲, 王媛, 王立革, 韩雄, 郭珺, 焦晓燕. 行距和密度对高粱籽粒灌浆、淀粉及氮磷钾累积特征的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2459-2470.
[8] 王瑞莉,王刘艳,叶桑,郜欢欢,雷维,吴家怡,袁芳,孟丽姣,唐章林,李加纳,周清元,崔翠. 铝毒胁迫下甘蓝型油菜种子萌发期相关性状的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(6): 832-843.
[9] 张瑞栋,肖梦颖,徐晓雪,姜冰,邢艺凡,陈小飞,李邦,艾雪莹,周宇飞,黄瑞冬. 高粱种子对萌发温度的响应分析与耐低温萌发能力鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(6): 889-901.
[10] 宝力格,陆平,史梦莎,许月,刘敏轩. 中国高粱地方种质芽期苗期耐盐性筛选及鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(5): 734-744.
[11] 徐银萍, 潘永东, 刘强德, 姚元虎, 贾延春, 任诚, 火克仓, 陈文庆, 赵锋, 包奇军, 张华瑜. 大麦种质资源成株期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(3): 448-461.
[12] 刘谢香,常汝镇,关荣霞,邱丽娟. 大豆出苗期耐盐性鉴定方法建立及耐盐种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(01): 1-8.
[13] 郜欢欢,叶桑,王倩,王刘艳,王瑞莉,陈柳依,唐章林,李加纳,周清元,崔翠. 甘蓝型油菜种子萌发期耐铝毒特性综合评价及其种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(9): 1416-1430.
[14] 王瑞,凌亮,詹鹏杰,于纪珍,楚建强,平俊爱,张福耀. 控制高粱分蘖与主茎株高一致性的基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(6): 829-838.
[15] 崔翠,程闯,赵愉风,郜欢欢,王瑞莉,王刘艳,周清元. 52份豌豆种质萌发期耐铝毒性的综合评价与筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(5): 798-805.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2