Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica，

Acta Agronomica Sinica ›› 2019, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 153-159.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.84059

• RESEARCH NOTES • Previous Articles    

Classification of potato cultivars by their nitrogen use efficiency

Dan-Dan HE,Li-Guo JIA,Yong-Lin QIN,Ming-Shou FAN()   

  1. College of Agronomy, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, Inner Mongolia, China
  • Received:2018-04-16 Accepted:2018-10-08 Online:2018-11-01 Published:2018-11-01
  • Contact: Ming-Shou FAN E-mail:fmswh@126.com
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the Inner Mongolia Major Special Project “Innovation of Resource Use Efficiency Improvement Technology during Seed Potato Propagation and Commercial Potato Production”, “Optimization of potato rotation system and its improvement and application in water and fertilizer management technology(KCBJ2018010);Innovative Research Team Project of Inner Mongolia “Innovative Team of Potato High Yield and High Efficiency“(NMGIRT-A1602)

RichHTML341

16

PDF

519

Abstract:

Nitrogen efficiency of seven potato varieties was evaluated under field conditions with or without nitrogen application. Basing on tuber yield, plant nitrogen absorption and utilization of different potato cultivars, we classified nitrogen use efficiencies of seven potato varieties into four types: double high efficiency (DH), low nitrogen and high efficiency (LNH), high nitrogen and high efficiency (HNH), and double low efficiency (DL). Furthermore, one representative variety from DH, LNH and DL types respectively was selected to analyze the mechanism on the difference in nitrogen use efficiency, showing that nitrogen use efficiency of DH type was significantly higher than that of the other two types; the nitrogen absorption efficiency of DH and LNH was higher than that of DL type. Under no nitrogen application condition, the dry matter accumulation of DH type was significantly higher than that of the other two types at whole growth stage, and the cumulative rate of nitrogen in DH and LNH was significantly higher than that in DL type at 0-50 days after emergence. The dry matter accumulation of DH potato was significantly higher than that of the other two cultivars when nitrogen applied. Compared with DL type, the yield increase of DH and LNH was mainly attributed to the higher accumulation of dry matter at the early stage of potato. The nitrogen accumulation rate of DH was significantly higher than that of DL and LNH types under nitrogen fertilizer application. The greater nitrogen and dry matter accumulation in DH cultivars benefit yield formation and increase of nitrogen use efficiency. The results could provide theoretical support for high nitrogen use efficiency variety screening and its utilization.

Key words: potato, nitrogen uptake efficiency, N nitrogen use efficiency

Table 1

Variation of tuber yield, dry weight and nitrogen utilization efficiency among seven potato cultivars"

参数
Parameter		 范围 Range 均值 Mean 方差分析 ANOVA
N- N+ N- N+ 品种Cultivar 氮水平
N level		 交互
G*N
地上部干物质量Shoot dry mass (g plant-1) 39.60-64.21 52.29-105.13 51.77 77.53 ** ** **
块茎干物质量Tuber dry mass (g plant-1) 80.69-216.21 132.18-258.02 157.56 207.88 ** ** **
地上部氮累积量Shoot N accumulation (g plant-1) 0.74-1.39 1.58-2.61 1.01 2.10 ** ** **
块茎氮累积量Tuber N accumulation (g plant-1) 0.55-2.16 1.31-3.66 1.41 3.06 ** ** **
产量Yield (t hm-2) 12.28-35.96 27.56-46.46 24.34 40.64 ** ** **
氮素吸收效率N uptake efficiency (%) — 48.28-96.10 — 85.10 ** — —
氮素利用效率N utilization efficiency (g g-1) 167.35-442.12 147.32-214.03 236.12 179.18 ** ** **
氮收获指数N harvest index (%) 39.07-68.59 44.19-68.19 56.97 58.54 ** ** **

Fig. 1

Yield of seven potato cultivars with different N use efficiencies I: Double high efficiency; II: Low nitrogen and high efficiency; III: Double low efficiency; IV: High nitrogen and high efficiency."

Table 2

Variation of nitrogen uptake and utilization efficiency in different potato cultivars"

处理
Treatment		 类型
Type		 品种
Cultivar		 产量
Yield
(t hm-2)		 氮素利用效率
N utilization
efficiency (g g-1)		 氮素吸收效率
N uptake
efficiency (%)
N- 双低效型Double low efficiency 麦肯1号 McCain 1 23.78 b 203.42 a —
低氮高效型Low nitrogen and high efficiency 夏波蒂 Sheopdy 37.68 a 224.32 a —
双高效型Double high efficiency 克新1号 Kexin 1 33.49 a 270.78 a —
N+ 双低效型Double low efficiency 麦肯1号 McCain 1 28.11 c 151.58 b 69.15 b
低氮高效型Low nitrogen and high efficiency 夏波蒂 Sheopdy 42.18 b 159.70 b 97.98 a
双高效型Double high efficiency 克新1号 Kexin 1 50.25 a 187.51 a 99.66 a

Table 3

Variation of dry matter accumulation in different potato cultivars with different N use efficiencies (g plant-1)"

处理
Treatment		 品种
Cultivar		 出苗天数 Days after emergence
20 d 35 d 50 d 65 d 80 d
N- 麦肯1号 McCain 1 17.35 a 34.03 c 85.68 c 212.30 c 203.38 c
夏波蒂 Sheopdy 14.91 b 55.55 b 197.31 b 343.82 a 327.09 b
克新1号 Kexin 1 16.40 a 61.16 a 223.23 a 308.69 b 347.34 a
N+ 麦肯1号 McCain 1 18.97 b 41.73 c 132.80 c 307.40 b 266.82 c
夏波蒂 Sheopdy 19.04 b 76.14 b 242.52 b 404.59 a 446.82 b
克新1号 Kexin 1 22.89 a 89.13 a 259.86 a 405.42 a 507.06 a

Table 4

Variation of dry matter accumulation rate in potato cultivars with different N use efficiencies (g plant-1 d-1)"

处理
Treatment		 品种
Cultivar		 出苗天数 Days after emergence
0-20 d 20-35 d 35-50 d 50-65 d 65-80 d
N- 麦肯1号 McCain 1 0.87 a 1.11 c 3.44 c 8.43 b -0.59 b
夏波蒂 Sheopdy 0.74 b 2.70 b 9.45 b 9.76 a -1.11 c
克新1号 Kexin 1 0.82 a 2.97 a 10.80 a 5.69 c 2.57 a
N+ 麦肯1号 McCain 1 0.95 b 1.51 c 6.07 c 11.64 a -2.70 c
夏波蒂 Sheopdy 0.95 b 3.80 b 11.09 b 10.80 b 2.81 b
克新1号 Kexin 1 1.14 a 4.40 a 11.38 a 9.70 c 6.77 a

Table 5

Variation of nitrogen accumulation amount in different potato cultivars (g plant-1)"

处理
Treatment		 品种
Cultivar		 出苗天数 Days after emergence
20 d 35 d 50 d 65 d 80 d
N- 麦肯1号 McCain 1 0.65 a 0.91 b 1.90 b 3.42 c 2.36 c
夏波蒂 Sheopdy 0.65 a 1.51 a 3.45 a 5.08 a 4.30 a
克新1号 Kexin 1 0.67 a 1.52 a 3.31 a 3.80 b 3.56 b
N+ 麦肯1号 McCain 1 0.83 c 1.37 c 3.03 c 5.54 b 3.79 c
夏波蒂 Sheopdy 0.93 b 2.40 b 4.87 b 7.85 a 6.61 b
克新1号 Kexin 1 1.12 a 2.68 a 5.83 a 7.99 a 7.22 a

Table 6

Variation of nitrogen uptake rate in potato cultivars with different N use efficiencies (g plant-1 d-1)"

处理
Treatment		 品种
Cultivar		 出苗天数 Days after emergence
0-20 d 20-35 d 35-50 d 50-65 d 65-80 d
N- 麦肯1号 McCain 1 32.81 a 17.21 b 66.03 b 101.23 a -70.73 c
夏波蒂 Sheopdy 32.92 a 56.78 a 129.60 a 109.03 a -52.48 b
克新1号 Kexin 1 33.53 a 56.60 a 119.58 a 32.45 b -15.83 a
N+ 麦肯1号 McCain 1 41.75 c 35.97 b 110.82 c 167.15 b -116.34 c
夏波蒂 Sheopdy 46.50 b 98.12 a 165.07 b 198.50 a -82.80 b
克新1号 Kexin 1 56.05 a 104.12 a 210.42 a 143.45 c -51.25 a
[1] 曾凡逵, 许丹, 刘刚 . 马铃薯营养综述. 中国马铃薯, 2015, ( 4):233-243.
Zeng F K, Xu D, Liu G . Potato nutrition: a critical review. Chin Potato J, 2015, ( 4):233-243 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[2] Zheng H L, Liu Y C, Qin Y L, Chen Y, Fan M S . Establishing dynamic thresholds for potato nitrogen status diagnosis with the SPAD chlorophyll meter. J Integr Agric, 2015,14:190-195.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60925-4
[3] Hawkesford M J, Kopriva S, Kok L J D . Nutrient use efficiency in plants. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal, 2001,32:921-950.
doi: 10.1081/CSS-100104098
[4] 刘敏娜, 刘晓霞, 丁文雅, 陈秋会, 林咸永 . 不同菠菜基因型氮素吸收与利用效率的差异及其评价. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2012,38:599-607.
doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2011.12.292
Liu M N, Liu X X, Ding W Y, Chen Q H, Lin X Y . Variation in nitrogen uptake and utilization efficiency in spinach genotypes and its evaluation. J Zhejiang Univ (Agric Life Sci), 2012,38:599-607 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2011.12.292
[5] 杨睿, 伍晓明, 安蓉, 李亚军, 张玉莹, 陈碧云, 高亚军 . 不同基因型油菜氮素利用效率的差异及其与农艺性状和氮营养性状的关系. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013,19:586-596.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0308
Yang R, Wu X M, An R, Li Y J, Zhang Y Y, Chen B Y, Gao Y J . Differences of nitrogen use efficiency of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) genotypes and their relations to agronomic and nitrogen characteristics. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2013,19:586-596 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0308
[6] 程建峰, 戴廷波, 荆奇, 姜东, 潘晓云, 曹卫星 . 不同水稻基因型的根系形态生理特性与高效氮素吸收. 土壤学报, 2007,44:266-272.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2007.02.011
Cheng J F, Dai T B, Jing Q, Jiang D, Pan X Y, Cao W X . Root morphological and physiological characteristics in relation to nitrogen absorption efficiency in different rice genotypes. Acta Pedol Sin, 2007,44:266-272 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2007.02.011
[7] 黄高宝, 张恩和, 胡恒觉 . 不同玉米品种氮素营养效率差异的生态生理机制. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2001,7:293-297.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2001.0308
Huang G B, Zhang E H, Hu H J . Eco-physiological mechanism on nitrogen use efficiency difference of corn varieties. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2001,7:293-297 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2001.0308
[8] 熊淑萍, 吴克远, 王小纯, 张捷, 杜盼, 吴懿鑫, 马新明 . 不同氮效率基因型小麦根系吸收特性与氮素利用差异的分析. 中国农业科学, 2016,49:2267-2279.
Xiong S P, Wu K Y, Wang X C, Zhang J, Du P, Wu Y X, Ma X M . Analysis of root absorption characteristics and nitrogen utilization of wheat genotypes with different N efficiency. Sci Agric Sin, 2016,49:2267-2279 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[9] 魏海燕, 张洪程, 杭杰, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 张胜飞, 马群, 张庆, 张军 . 不同氮素利用效率基因型水稻氮素积累与转移的特性. 作物学报, 2008,34:119-125.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00119
Wei H Y, Zhang H C, Hang J, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Zhang S F, Ma Q, Zhang Q, Zhang J . Characteristics of N accumulation and translocation in rice genotypes with different N use efficiencies. Acta Agrona Sin, 2008,34:119-125 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00119
[10] Ankumah R O, Khan V, Mwamba K, Kpomblekou A K . The influence of source and timing of nitrogen fertilizers on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of four sweet potato cultivars. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2003,100:201-207.
doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00196-8
[11] Errebhi M, Rosen C J, Gupta S C, Birong D E . Potato yield response and nitrate leaching as influenced by nitrogen management. Agron J, 1998,90:10-15.
doi: 10.2134/agronj1998.00021962009000010003x
[12] Zvomuya F, Rosen C J, Jcjr M . Response of Russet Norkotah clonal selections to nitrogen fertilization. Am J Potato Res, 2002,79:231-239.
doi: 10.1007/BF02986355
[13] Trehan S P . Nutrient management by exploiting genetic diversity of potato: a review. Potato J, 2005,32:1-15.
[14] 姜丽霞 . 施肥对旱作马铃薯不同品种质氮磷钾吸收分配及产质量的影响. 内蒙古农业大学硕士学位论文,内蒙古呼和浩特 2010.
doi: 10.7666/d.d198021
Jiang L X . Effect of Fertilization on Absorption and Distribution of N, P, K and Yield and Quality of Potato under Drought Conditions. MS Thesis of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China, 2010. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.7666/d.d198021
[15] Sulaya Q, Jia L G, Qin Y L, Chen Y, Fan M S . Effects of different nitrogen forms on potato growth and development. J Plant Nutr, 2017,40:1151-1159.
doi: 10.1080/01904167.2016.1269345
[16] Gao Y, Jia L G, Bo H, Alva A, Fan M S . Potato stolon and tuber growth influenced by nitrogen form. Plant Product Sci, 2014,17:138-143.
doi: 10.1626/pps.17.138
[17] Beatty P H, Anbessa Y, Juskiw P, Carroll1 R T, Wang J, Good A G . Nitrogen use efficiencies of spring barley grown under varying nitrogen conditions in the field and growth chamber. Ann Bot, 2010,105:1171-1782.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcq025 pmid: 20308048
[18] Moll R H, Kamprath E J, Jackson W A . Analysis and interpretation of factors which contribute to efficiency of nitrogen utilization. Agron J, 1962,74:562-564.
[19] Hirose T . Nitrogen use efficiency revisited. Oecologia, 2011,166:863-867.
[20] Matson P, Lohse K A, Hall S J . The globalization of nitrogen deposition: consequences for terrestrial ecosystems. AMBIO, 2002,31:113-119.
doi: 10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0113:TGONDC]2.0.CO;2 pmid: 12077999
[21] Cormier F, Foulkes J, Hirel B, Gouache D, Moenne-Loccoz Y, Gouis J L . Breeding for increased nitrogen-use efficiency: a review for wheat (T. aestivum L.). Plant Breed, 2016,135:255-278.
doi: 10.1111/pbr.12371
[22] Bueren E T L V, Thorup-Kristensen K, Leifert C, Cooper J M, Becker H C . Breeding for nitrogen efficiency: concepts, methods, and case studies. Euphytica, 2014,199:1-2.
doi: 10.1007/s10681-014-1206-1
[23] Anbessa Y, Juskiw P, Good A, Nyachiro J, Helm J . Genetic variability in nitrogen use efficiency of spring barley. Crop Sci, 2009,49:1259-1269.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2008.09.0566
[24] Ior J, Sayre K D, Rajaram S, Mcmahon M . Genetic progress in wheat yield and nitrogen use efficiency under four nitrogen rates. Crop Sci, 1997,37:898-904
doi: 10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700030033x
[25] Saluzzo J A, Echeverria H E, Andrade F H, Huartc M . Nitrogen nutrition of potato cultivars differing in maturity. J Agron Crop Sci, 1999,183:157-165.
doi: 10.1046/j.1439-037x.1999.00323.x
[26] Kleinkopf G E, Westermann D T, Dwelle R B . Dry matter production and nitrogen utilization by six potato cultivars. Agron J, 1981,73:799-802.
doi: 10.2134/agronj1981.00021962007300050013x
[1] WANG Hai-Bo, YING Jing-Wen, HE Li, YE Wen-Xuan, TU Wei, CAI Xing-Kui, SONG Bo-Tao, LIU Jun. Identification of chromosome loss and rearrangement in potato and eggplant somatic hybrids by rDNA and telomere repeats [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1273-1278.
[2] SHI Yan-Yan, MA Zhi-Hua, WU Chun-Hua, ZHOU Yong-Jin, LI Rong. Effects of ridge tillage with film mulching in furrow on photosynthetic characteristics of potato and yield formation in dryland farming [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[3] FENG Ya, ZHU Xi, LUO Hong-Yu, LI Shi-Gui, ZHANG Ning, SI Huai-Jun. Functional analysis of StMAPK4 in response to low temperature stress in potato [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 896-907.
[4] ZHANG Xia, YU Zhuo, JIN Xing-Hong, YU Xiao-Xia, LI Jing-Wei, LI Jia-Qi. Development and characterization analysis of potato SSR primers and the amplification research in colored potato materials [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 920-929.
[5] JIN Rong, JIANG Wei, LIU Ming, ZHAO Peng, ZHANG Qiang-Qiang, LI Tie-Xin, WANG Dan-Feng, FAN Wen-Jing, ZHANG Ai-Jun, TANG Zhong-Hou. Genome-wide characterization and expression analysis of Dof family genes in sweetpotato [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 608-623.
[6] TAN Xue-Lian, GUO Tian-Wen, HU Xin-Yuan, ZHANG Ping-Liang, ZENG Jun, LIU Xiao-Wei. Characteristics of microbial community in the rhizosphere soil of continuous potato cropping in arid regions of the Loess Plateau [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 682-694.
[7] ZHANG Hai-Yan, XIE Bei-Tao, JIANG Chang-Song, FENG Xiang-Yang, ZHANG Qiao, DONG Shun-Xu, WANG Bao-Qing, ZHANG Li-Ming, QIN Zhen, DUAN Wen-Xue. Screening of leaf physiological characteristics and drought-tolerant indexes of sweetpotato cultivars with drought resistance [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(2): 518-528.
[8] JIAN Hong-Ju, SHANG Li-Na, JIN Zhong-Hui, DING Yi, LI Yan, WANG Ji-Chun, HU Bai-Geng, Vadim Khassanov, LYU Dian-Qiu. Genome-wide identification and characterization of PIF genes and their response to high temperature stress in potato [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(1): 86-98.
[9] XU De-Rong, SUN Chao, BI Zhen-Zhen, QIN Tian-Yuan, WANG Yi-Hao, LI Cheng-Ju, FAN You-Fang, LIU Yin-Du, ZHANG Jun-Lian, BAI Jiang-Ping. Identification of StDRO1 gene polymorphism and association analysis with root traits in potato [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(1): 76-85.
[10] ZHANG Si-Meng, NI Wen-Rong, LYU Zun-Fu, LIN Yan, LIN Li-Zhuo, ZHONG Zi-Yu, CUI Peng, LU Guo-Quan. Identification and index screening of soft rot resistance at harvest stage in sweetpotato [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(8): 1450-1459.
[11] SONG Tian-Xiao, LIU Yi, RAO Li-Ping, Soviguidi Deka Reine Judesse, ZHU Guo-Peng, YANG Xin-Sun. Identification and expression analysis of cell wall invertase IbCWIN gene family members in sweet potato [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(7): 1297-1308.
[12] TANG Rui-Min, JIA Xiao-Yun, ZHU Wen-Jiao, YIN Jing-Ming, YANG Qing. Cloning of potato heat shock transcription factor StHsfA3 gene and its functional analysis in heat tolerance [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(4): 672-683.
[13] LI Peng-Cheng, BI Zhen-Zhen, SUN Chao, QIN Tian-Yuan, LIANG Wen-Jun, WANG Yi-Hao, XU De-Rong, LIU Yu-Hui, ZHANG Jun-Lian, BAI Jiang-Ping. Key genes mining of DNA methylation involved in regulating drought stress response in potato [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(4): 599-612.
[14] QIN Tian-Yuan, LIU Yu-Hui, SUN Chao, BI Zhen-Zhen, LI An-Yi, XU De-Rong, WANG Yi-Hao, ZHANG Jun-Lian, BAI Jiang-Ping. Identification of StIgt gene family and expression profile analysis of response to drought stress in potato [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(4): 780-786.
[15] JIANG Wei, PAN Zhe-Chao, BAO Li-Xian, ZHOU Fu-Xian, LI Yan-Shan, SUI Qi-Jun, LI Xian-Ping. Genome-wide association analysis for late blight resistance of potato resources [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(2): 245-261.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Add: No.12 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing 100081,China Email:xbzw@chinajournal.net.cn
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd