Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica，

Acta Agronomica Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (11): 2715-2723.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.12040

• CROP GENETICS & BREEDING·GERMPLASM RESOURCES·MOLECULAR GENETICS • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Mapping of QTLs for resistance to white-backed planthopper in Guangxi wild rice Y11

YANG Ming1(), LI Dan-Ting2, FAN De-Jia1, TAN Song-Juan1, CHENG Xia-Nian1, LIU Yu-Qiang1,*(), WAN Jian-Min1,3   

  1. 1State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, China
    2Rice Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning 530007, Jiangsu, China
    3Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2021-06-06 Accepted:2022-05-05 Online:2022-11-12 Published:2022-05-24
  • Contact: LIU Yu-Qiang E-mail:2018101087@njau.edu.cn;yql@njau.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    The National Key Research and Development Program of China(2017YFD0100400-01);The National Natural Science Foundation of China(32088102);The National Natural Science Foundation of China(32072030);The Jiangsu Provincial Key Research Program(BE2019380)

RichHTML404

17

PDF

211

Abstract:

White-backed planthopper (WBPH) is one of the most serious pests in rice production. Breeding resistant varieties is the most economical and effective strategy to control the white-backed planthopper. In this study, we found that Guangxi wild rice variety ‘Y11’ had high resistance to white-backed planthopper. The number and survival rate of WBPH were significantly less than the susceptible variety ‘Guanghui 998’. These results showed that ‘Y11’ displayed higher antixenosis and antibiosis against WBPH. Subsequently, ‘Y11’ was as the donor parent and an indica cultivar ‘Guanghui 998’ was as the recurrent parent by continuous backcrossing and selfing to obtain the BC3F9 population. Furthermore, to identify the quantitative trait locus (QTL) for white-backed planthopper resistance, we completed the evaluation of this population for WBPH resistance at seedling stage and constructed the genome-wide linkage map. Three QTLs were detected on the three different rice chromosomes, and designed as qWBPH2Y11, qWBPH6Y11, and qWBPH11Y11, respectively. The LOD values were 4.8, 2.5, and 3.7, which accounted for 9.3%, 2.3%, and 5.6% of the phenotypic variation, respectively. All of the resistance alleles were from resistant parent ‘Y11’. Plant harboring qWBPH2 Y11 was selected from BC3F9 population to continuously backcross with ‘Guanghui 998’. The near isogenic line of qWBPH2 Y11 was developed by molecular marker assisted selection, which displayed higher resistance to WBPH than the background parent ‘Guanghui 998’. The mapping of WBPH resistance QTLs and the development of the near isogenic line in this study will be helpful for cloning resistance genes and breeding resistant in rice cultivars.

Key words: rice (Oryza sativa L.), white-backed planthopper (WBPH), QTLs, gene mapping

Table 1

Evaluation criteria for rice resistant against white-backed planthopper"

等级
Resistance score		 死苗率
Mortality rate (%)		 受害症状
Damage symptoms
0 <1.0 无损伤
No damage
1 1.1-10.0 非常微弱损伤
Very weak damage
3 10.1-30.0 第一、二叶叶尖发黄, 轻微的发育迟缓
The first and second leaves were yellow tips and slight developmental delay
5 30.1-50.0 明显的黄化矮化或大约一半的植物枯萎或死亡
Significant yellowing dwarfing or about half of the plants withered or died
7 50.1-70.0 超过半数植株死亡, 其他植株明显矮化萎蔫
More than half of the plants died, and the other plants were obviously dwarfed and wilted
9 >70.0 所有植株死亡
All the plants died

Fig. 1

Comparison of the resistance against WBPH between ‘Y11’ and ‘Guanghui 998’ A: ‘Y11’ and ‘Guanghui 998’ on 10 days post infestation with WBPH; B: seeding mortality rate of ‘Y11’ and ‘Guanghui 998’ on 10 days post infestation with WBPH; C: survival rate of WBPH on the plants of ‘Y11’ and ‘Guanghui 998’ on 1, 2, and 4 day(s) post infestation with WBPH, respectively; D: the number of WBPH on ‘Y11’ and ‘Guanghui 998’ on 0-, 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-day post infestation with 20 nymphs per plant, respectively. E: the number of WBPH on ‘Y11’ and ‘Guanghui 998’ surrounding the plant with heavily infested with WBPH at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h. *: P < 0.05; **: P < 0.01. Bar: 3 cm."

Fig. 2

Frequency distribution of the WBPH-resistance score in ‘Y11’ / ‘Guanghui 998’ BC3F9 population"

Fig. 3

Molecular genetic map of ‘Y11’ / ‘Guanghui 998’ BC3F9 population"

Fig. 4

Chromosomal location of QTLs for WBPH resistance The black oval indicates the position of the QTLs on the chromosomes."

Table 2

QTLs for WBPH resistance detected in ‘Y11’/‘Guanghui 998’ BC3F9 population"

QTL 染色体
Chr.		 标记区间
Marker interval		 LOD值
LOD score		 贡献率
Variance explained (%)		 加性效应
Additive effect
qWBPH2Y11 2 id2013634 to id2015636 4.8 9.3 -0.20
qWBPH6Y11 6 id6006868 to id6007754 2.5 2.3 -0.07
qWBPH11Y11 11 id11005456 to K_id11007840 3.7 5.6 -0.17

Fig. 5

WBPH resistance of the near isogenic lines carrying qWBPH2Y11 A: ‘W0394’ and ‘Guanghui 998’ on 10 days post infestation with WBPH; B: seeding mortality rate of ‘W0394’ and ‘Guanghui 998’ on 10 days post infestation with WBPH. Bar: 3 cm; **: P < 0.01."

[1] Li Y, Cao Y, Zhou Q, Guo H, Ou G. The efficiency of southern rice black-streaked dwarf virus transmission by the vector Sogatella furcifera to different host plant species. J Integr Agric, 2012, 11: 621-627.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(12)60049-5
[2] Wu Y, Zhang G, Chen X, Li X, Xiong K, Cao S, Hu Y, Lu M, Liu W, Tuan H, Qi G, Zhao B. The influence of Sogatella furcifera (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) migratory events on the southern rice black-streaked dwarf virus epidemics. J Econom Entomol, 2017, 110: 854-864.
doi: 10.1093/jee/tox062
[3] Sidhu G, Khush G, Medrano F. A dominant gene in rice for resistance to white-backed planthopper and its relationship to other plant characteristics. Euphytica, 1979, 28: 227-232.
doi: 10.1007/BF00056579
[4] Angeles E, Khush G, Heinrichs E. New genes for resistance to white-backed planthopper in rice. Crop Sci, 1981, 21: 47-50.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100010014x
[5] Hernandez J, Khush G. Genetics of resistance to white-backed planthopper in some rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties. Oryza, 1981, 18: 44-50.
[6] Wu C, Khush G. A new dominant gene for resistance to white-backed planthopper in rice. Crop Sci, 1985, 25: 505-509.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci1985.0011183X002500030017x
[7] Li X M, Zhai H Q, Wan J M, Ma L Y, Zhuang J Y, Liu G J, Yang C D. Mapping of a new gene Wbph6(t) resistant to the white backed planthopper, Sogatella furcifera, in rice. Rice Sci, 2004, 11: 86-90.
[8] Sidhu N, Bansal U, Shukla K, Saini R. Genetics of resistance to white-backed planthopper in five rice stocks. SABRAO J Breed Genet, 2005, 37: 1-11.
[9] Yamasaki M, Yoshimura A, Yasui H. Genetic basis of ovicidal response to white-backed planthopper (Sogatella furcifera Horváth) in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol Breed, 2003, 12: 133-143.
doi: 10.1023/A:1026018821472
[10] Tan G, Weng Q, Ren X, Huang Z, Zhu L, He G. Two white-backed planthopper resistance genes in rice share the same loci with those for brown planthopper resistance. Heredity, 2004, 92: 212-217.
pmid: 14666132
[11] 沈子杰, 范德佳, 何俊, 黄捷, 江玲, 程遐年, 刘裕强, 万建民. 籼稻品种‘IR13427-45-2-1-2-2-2’抗白背飞虱QTL定位. 南京农业大学学报, 2017, 40: 957-962.
Shen Z J, Fan D J, He J, Huang J, Jiang L, Cheng X N, Liu Y Q, Wan J M. QTL mapping of indica rice variety ‘IR13427-45-2-1-2-2-2’ against white-backed planthopper. J Nanjing Agric Univ, 2017, 40: 957-962. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] McCouch S R, Khush G S, Tanksley S D. Tagging genes for disease and insect resistance via linkage to RFLP markers. In: BantaS J, ArgosinoG S,eds. Rice Genetics II. Manila: International Rice Research Institute, 2008. pp 443-449.
[13] Ramesh K, Padmavathi G, Deen R, Pandey M, Lakshmi J, Bentur J. White-backed planthopper Sogatella furcifera (Horváth) (Homoptera: Delphacidae) resistance in rice variety Sinna Sivappu. Euphytica, 2014, 200: 139-148.
doi: 10.1007/s10681-014-1175-4
[14] Yang Y, Xu J, Leng Y, Xiong G, Hu J, Zhang G, Huang L, Wang L, Guo L, Li J, Chen F, Qian Q, Zeng D. Quantitative trait loci identification, fine mapping and gene expression profiling for ovicidal response to white-backed planthopper (Sogatella furcifera Horvath) in rice (Oryza sativa L.). BMC Plant Biol, 2014, 14: 145.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-14-145
[15] Fan D J, Liu Y Q, Zhang H L, He J, Huang F K, Huang S S, Wu B Q, Liu D M, Wen P Z, Liu L L, Jiang L, Cheng X N, Wan J M. Identification and fine mapping of qWBPH11 conferring resistance to white-backed planthopper (Sogatella furcifera Horvath) in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol Breed, 2018, 38: 96-104.
doi: 10.1007/s11032-018-0846-6
[16] IRRI. Standard Evaluation Systems for Rice (SES). Manila: International Rice Research Institute, 2002. pp 12-21.
[17] Xu X, Kawasaki S, Fujimura T, Wang C. A protocol for high-throughput extraction of DNA from rice leaves. Plant Mol Biol Rep, 2005, 23: 291-295.
doi: 10.1007/BF02772759
[18] Li H, Ye G, Wang J. A modified algorithm for the improvement of composite interval mapping. Genetics, 2007, 175: 361-374.
doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.066811
[19] Meng L, Li H, Zhang L, Wang J. QTL IciMapping: integrated software for genetic linkage map construction and quantitative trait locus mapping in biparental populations. Crop J, 2015, 3: 269-283.
doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2015.01.001
[20] McCouch S. Gene nomenclature system for rice. Rice, 2008, 1: 72-84.
doi: 10.1007/s12284-008-9004-9
[21] Gomi K, Satoh M, Ozawa R, Shinonaga Y, Sanada S, Sasaki K, Matsumura M, Ohashi Y, Kanno H, Akimitsu K, Takabayashi J. Role of hydroperoxide lyase in white-backed planthopper (Sogatella furcifera Horváth)-induced resistance to bacterial blight in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant J, 2010, 61: 46-57.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04031.x
[22] Ma M, Wu Y, Peng Z, Zhao X, Zhang Y, Liao G, Zhai B. Migration analysis of Sogatella furcifera (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) in the northeastern Hunan province in June. Environ Entomol, 2017, 46: 757-765.
doi: 10.1093/ee/nvx092
[23] Wang Y, Cao L, Zhang Y, Cao C, Liu F, Huang F, Qiu Y, Li R, Lou X. Map-based cloning and characterization of BPH29, a B3 domain-containing recessive gene conferring brown planthopper resistance in rice. J Exp Bot, 2015, 66: 6035-6045.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv318
[24] Ren J, Gao F, Wu X, Lu X, Zeng L, Lyu J, Su X, Luo H, Ren G. Bph32, a novel gene encoding an unknown SCR domain- containing protein, confers resistance against the brown planthopper in rice. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 37645.
doi: 10.1038/srep37645
[1] XUE Jiao, LU Dong-Bai, LIU Wei, LU Zhan-Hua, WANG Shi-Guang, WANG Xiao-Fei, FANG Zhi-Qiang, HE Xiu-Ying. Genetic analysis and fine mapping of a bacterial blight resistance major QTL qBB-11-1 in high-quality rice ‘Yuenong Simiao’ [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(9): 2210-2220.
[2] HUANG Yi-Wen, SUN Bin, CHENG Can, NIU Fu-An, ZHOU Ji-Hua, ZHANG An-Peng, TU Rong-Jian, LI Yao, YAO Yao, DAI Yu-Ting, XIE Kai-Zhen, CHEN Xiao-Rong, CAO Li-Ming, CHU Huang-Wei. QTL mapping of seed storage tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(9): 2255-2264.
[3] DU Qi-Di, GUO Hui-Jun, XIONG Hong-Chun, XIE Yong-Dun, ZHAO Lin-Shu, GU Jia-Yu, ZHAO Shi-Rong, DING Yu-Ping, SONG Xi-Yun, LIU Lu-Xiang. Gene mapping of apical spikelet degeneration mutant asd1 in wheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(8): 1905-1913.
[4] LIU Cheng, ZHANG Ya-Xuan, CHEN Xian-Lian, HAN Wei, XING Guang-Nan, HE Jian-Bo, ZHANG Jiao-Ping, ZHANG Feng-Kai, SUN Lei, LI Ning, WANG Wu-Bin, GAI Jun-Yi. Wild segments associated with 100-seed weight and their candidate genes in a wild chromosome segment substitution line population [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(8): 1884-1893.
[5] ZHANG Sheng-Zhong, HU Xiao-Hui, CI Dun-Wei, YANG Wei-Qiang, WANG Fei-Fei, QIU Jun-Lan, ZHANG Tian-Yu, ZHONG Wen, YU Hao-Liang, SUN Dong-Ping, SHAO Zhan-Gong, MIAO Hua-Rong, CHEN Jing. QTLs analysis for reticulation thickness based on reconstruction of three dimensional models in peanut pods [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(8): 1894-1904.
[6] WEI Gang, CHEN Dan-Yang, REN De-Yong, YANG Hong-Xia, WU Jing-Wen, FENG Ping, WANG Nan. Identification and gene mapping of slender stem mutant sr10 in rice (Oryza sativa L.) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(8): 2125-2133.
[7] HUANG Fu-Deng, HUANG Yan, JIN Ze-Yan, HE Huan-Huan, LI Chun-Shou, CHENG Fang-Min, PAN Gang. Physiological characters and gene mapping of a precocious leaf senescence mutant ospls7 in rice (Orzo sativa L.) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(7): 1832-1842.
[8] HU Wen-Jing, LI Dong-Sheng, YI Xin, ZHANG Chun-Mei, ZHANG Yong. Molecular mapping and validation of quantitative trait loci for spike-related traits and plant height in wheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1346-1356.
[9] TIAN Tian, CHEN Li-Juan, HE Hua-Qin. Identification of rice blast resistance candidate genes based on integrating Meta-QTL and RNA-seq analysis [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1372-1388.
[10] ZHENG Chong-Ke, ZHOU Guan-Hua, NIU Shu-Lin, HE Ya-Nan, SUN wei, XIE Xian-Zhi. Phenotypic characterization and gene mapping of an early senescence leaf H5(esl-H5) mutant in rice (Oryza sativa L.) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1389-1400.
[11] YU Chun-Miao, ZHANG Yong, WANG Hao-Rang, YANG Xing-Yong, DONG Quan-Zhong, XUE Hong, ZHANG Ming-Ming, LI Wei-Wei, WANG Lei, HU Kai-Feng, GU Yong-Zhe, QIU Li-Juan. Construction of a high density genetic map between cultivated and semi-wild soybeans and identification of QTLs for plant height [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1091-1102.
[12] LIU Lei, ZHAN Wei-Min, DING Wu-Si, LIU Tong, CUI Lian-Hua, JIANG Liang-Liang, ZHANG Yan-Pei, YANG Jian-Ping. Genetic analysis and molecular characterization of dwarf mutant gad39 in maize [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 886-895.
[13] XU Ning-Kun, LI Bing, CHEN Xiao-Yan, WEI Ya-Kang, LIU Zi-Long, XUE Yong-Kang, CHEN Hong-Yu, WANG Gui-Feng. Genetic analysis and molecular characterization of a novel maize Bt2 gene mutant [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 572-579.
[14] WANG Yan, CHEN Zhi-Xiong, JIANG Da-Gang, ZHANG Can-Kui, ZHA Man-Rong. Effects of enhancing leaf nitrogen output on tiller growth and carbon metabolism in rice [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 739-746.
[15] HUANG Li, CHEN Yu-Ning, LUO Huai-Yong, ZHOU Xiao-Jing, LIU Nian, CHEN Wei-Gang, LEI Yong, LIAO Bo-Shou, JIANG Hui-Fang. Advances of QTL mapping for seed size related traits in peanut [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(2): 280-291.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] TIAN Meng-Liang;HUNAG Yu-Bi;TAN Gong-Xie;LIU Yong-Jian;RONG Ting-Zhao. Sequence Polymorphism of waxy Genes in Landraces of Waxy Maize from Southwest China[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(05): 729 -736 .
[2] Wang Yiqun. Infection of Rhizobia to Rice[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2002, 28(01): 32 -35 .
[3] KE Li-Ping;ZHENG Tao;WU Xue-Long;HE Hai-Yan;CHEN Jin-Qing. Analysis of Self-Incompatibility Locus Gene in Brassica napus[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(05): 764 -769 .
[4] CUI Xiu-Hui. Male Sterility Induced by Chemical Hybridizing Agent SQ-1 in Common Millet[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(01): 106 -110 .
[5] WANG Ying;WU Cun-Xiang;ZHANG Xue-Ming;WANG Yun-Peng;HAN Tian-Fu. Effects of Soybean Major Maturity Genes under Different Photoperiods[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(07): 1160 -1168 .
[6] WANG Guo-Li;GUO Zhen-Fei. Effects of Phosphorus Nutrient on the Photosynthetic Characteristics in Rice Cultivars with Different Cold-Sensitivity[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33(08): 1385 -1389 .
[7] WANG Jia-Yu;FAN Shu-Xiu;XU Zheng-Jin;CHEN Wen-Fu. Filling Properties of Grains on Different Positions in a Panicle of Rice with Different Panicle Types[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33(08): 1366 -1371 .
[8] CHEN Guang-Yao;WANG Guo-Huai;LUO Feng;NIE Ming-Jian. Effects of Endogenous Hormones on Pre-harvest Sprouting in Siliqua of Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33(08): 1324 -1328 .
[9] WANG Jing-Er;SUN Yu-Qiang;ZHANG Fang-Biao;SHEN Xiao-Jia;ZHU Shui-Jin. Somatic Embryogenesis and Plant Regeneration in Wild Cotton Species of G Genome[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33(08): 1279 -1285 .
[10] XU Yan-Hong;GUAN Jian-Ping;ZONG Xu-Xiao. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Cowpea Germplasm Resources by SSR[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33(07): 1206 -1209 .
Add: No. 80 Xueyuan South Rd, Beijing 100081, P. R. China E-mail: zwxb301@caas.cn
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd