小麦芽期和苗期耐盐鉴定方法的适用性评价

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.31049

Abstract

Abstract:

Salt tolerance identification is the premise of screening germplasm and breeding salt-tolerant wheat varieties. There are many methods for testing salt tolerance of wheat indoor, involving different growth stages and tissues or organs. In order to evaluate the applicability of these methods in production, we selected five salt-tolerant varieties and five salt-sensitive varieties from the Northern Winter Wheat Production Area of China to compare seven identification methods (involving 27 parameters) for the responses to salt stress of wheat at germination and seedling stages. The results showed that the relative salt-injury rate for germination of grains could not distinguish the tolerant- and sensitive-varieties, while the salt-injury index of leaf, the Na⁺ and K⁺ fluxes of root, and the relative salt-injury rates for root tip number, root diameter as well as leaf K⁺ content of seedlings were significantly different between the tolerant- and sensitive-varieties. Based on the results of regressive analysis and operability, the salt-injury index of leaf was considered to be an appropriate method for identifying salt tolerance that with high applicability in the Northern Winter Wheat Production Area, which can be used for germplasm screening or variety breeding by integrating the relative salt-injury rate for root tip number or leaf K⁺ content, and the Na⁺ or K⁺ flux of root. This study analyzed and evaluated

the salt tolerance identification methods from the aspect of application, and provide reference information for salt tolerance breeding in wheat.

Key words: wheat, salt-tolerance identification, method evaluation, germination stage, seedling stage

CHEN Jia-Ting, BAI Xin, GU Yu-Jie, ZHANG Xiao-Wen, GUO Hui-Juan, CHANG Li-Fang, CHEN Fang, ZHANG Shu-Wei, ZHANG Xiao-Jun, LI Xin, FENG Rui-Yun, CHANG Zhi-Jian, QIAO Lin-Yi. Applicability evaluation of screen methods to identify salt tolerance in wheat at germination and seedling stages[J].Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(5): 1193-1206.

Figures/Tables 10

Table 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Table S1

Phenotype data for salt tolerance of ten tested varieties used in this study"

表型 Phenotype		耐盐品种 Salt-tolerant varieties					盐敏感品种 Salt-sensitive varieties
表型 Phenotype		小偃 60 XY60	青麦 6号 QM6	沧麦6005 CM6005	山融 3号 SR3	德抗 961 DK961	中麦 175 ZM175	鲁原502 LY502	京 411 J411	河农6425 HN6425	济麦 20 JM20
发芽率	CK (%)	97.00	98.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	83.75	100.00
Germination rate	NaCl (%)	53.61	41.31	74.42	62.31	61.77	62.62	38.36	41.06	19.14	83.75
	RSIR (%)	44.73	57.85	25.58	37.69	38.23	37.38	61.64	58.94	77.15	16.25
总根长	CK (cm)	73.64	34.26	45.23	65.84	62.44	33.15	35.23	34.26	52.67	78.66
Root total length	NaCl (cm)	37.76	22.62	30.91	32.56	43.20	22.30	16.67	26.27	31.57	33.99
	RSIR (%)	48.72	33.98	31.65	50.54	30.81	32.75	52.68	23.31	40.07	56.79
根表面积	CK (cm²)	7.53	5.14	6.45	10.25	4.13	4.33	4.90	4.59	7.77	11.00
Root surface area	NaCl (cm²)	3.05	2.95	4.08	4.92	3.25	3.82	2.30	3.60	4.60	4.83
	RSIR (%)	59.52	42.68	36.71	51.97	21.44	11.82	53.06	21.65	40.89	56.03
根体积	CK (cm³)	0.08	0.06	0.07	0.13	0.07	0.05	0.05	0.05	0.09	0.12
Root volume	NaCl (cm³)	0.03	0.03	0.04	0.06	0.04	0.03	0.03	0.04	0.05	0.06
	RSIR (%)	62.44	50.05	41.85	53.75	42.02	30.10	53.33	19.59	41.92	55.43
根径	CK (mm)	0.42	0.48	0.46	0.50	0.42	0.42	0.45	0.43	0.47	0.45
Root diameter	NaCl (mm)	0.42	0.41	0.42	0.48	0.31	0.42	0.43	0.44	0.46	0.45
	RSIR (%)	7.73	14.05	8.33	2.35	25.99	-1.11	3.73	-1.05	1.57	-0.40
根尖数	CK	91.50	56.00	45.60	89.20	82.30	43.20	53.00	79.60	109.60	114.40
Root tips number	NaCl	53.32	30.60	23.66	44.00	50.35	21.24	16.20	44.62	45.60	41.40
	RSIR (%)	41.73	45.36	48.11	50.67	38.82	50.84	69.43	43.95	58.39	63.81
根分叉数	CK	63.52	45.33	35.80	72.80	55.31	49.20	35.67	53.00	51.00	80.00
Root forks number	NaCl	9.01	24.40	18.95	39.00	32.19	14.90	15.00	39.40	41.20	23.40
	RSIR (%)	95.81	46.18	-21.23	46.43	41.80	-37.68	57.94	25.66	19.22	70.75
离子流速 Ions-flux	K⁺-flux (pmol cm^-2 s^-1)	-215.06	-240.00	-67.11	-120.38	-166.78	-46.65	-67.03	-176.05	-181.43	-195.29
	Na⁺-flux (pmol cm^-2 s^-1)	607.06	448.07	792.54	1589.41	385.65	523.28	347.25	1922.13	-89.79	102.16
叶部盐害指数 Salt-injury index of leaves (%)		51.61	42.09	22.50	40.54	39.19	58.79	43.75	57.61	58.22	55.00
根鲜重	CK (mg)	76.98	61.44	142.57	90.93	92.98	39.94	96.33	85.70	111.04	196.58
Fresh weight of root	NaCl (mg)	43.62	39.22	43.47	48.56	47.51	31.73	49.90	43.06	61.28	66.26
	RSIR (%)	43.34	36.17	69.51	46.60	48.90	20.56	48.20	49.75	44.81	66.29
地上部鲜重	CK (mg)	251.52	194.36	512.82	422.36	345.26	171.30	230.67	338.74	315.58	621.13
Fresh weight of shoot	NaCl (mg)	120.98	108.78	190.32	151.66	152.86	90.73	69.60	153.30	159.23	183.51
	RSIR (%)	51.90	44.03	62.89	64.09	55.73	47.04	69.83	54.74	49.54	70.46
鲜重根冠比	CK (%)	30.61	31.77	25.46	21.51	27.34	23.19	30.92	24.31	35.21	31.47
Ratio of FW-R/FW-S	NaCl (%)	36.05	36.32	22.81	32.03	32.16	31.96	34.48	28.09	39.27	38.48
	RSIR (%)	-17.79	-14.33	10.41	-48.90	-17.65	-37.83	-11.50	-15.54	-11.51	-22.28
根干重	CK (mg)	28.80	34.58	16.85	21.67	25.48	4.61	23.93	20.12	21.80	64.66
Dry weight of root	NaCl (mg)	12.33	4.45	7.37	19.16	11.96	5.51	5.00	9.08	7.60	10.43
	RSIR (%)	57.18	87.13	56.26	11.58	53.04	-19.51	79.11	54.87	65.14	83.87
地上部干重	CK (mg)	71.40	42.71	66.48	51.37	57.99	10.71	92.67	142.55	78.05	182.83
Dry weight of shoot	NaCl (mg)	24.93	17.22	25.31	35.56	26.46	10.21	17.80	106.40	24.52	33.96
	RSIR (%)	65.08	59.68	61.93	30.78	54.37	4.67	80.79	25.36	68.58	81.43
干重根冠比	CK (%)	40.34	42.47	25.39	44.79	55.33	43.71	25.83	66.08	27.76	28.19
Ratio of DW-R/DW-S	NaCl (%)	49.47	25.68	29.18	52.51	52.29	54.08	28.09	15.25	30.86	30.88
	RSIR (%)	-22.63	39.53	-14.92	-17.23	5.51	-23.73	-8.76	76.93	-11.16	-9.54
根中K⁺含量	CK (mg g^-1)	7.65	8.26	8.17	7.60	7.14	7.60	7.86	7.14	7.76	6.69
K⁺ contents in root	NaCl (mg g^-1)	8.04	8.04	7.86	8.56	7.74	7.05	8.84	7.19	8.74	6.42
	RSIR (%)	-5.02	2.68	3.74	-12.72	-8.39	7.23	-12.46	-0.74	-12.63	3.99
茎中K⁺含量	CK (mg g^-1)	25.24	23.25	26.38	24.48	24.25	26.25	24.59	24.87	25.77	26.07
K⁺ contents in stem	NaCl (mg g^-1)	25.87	24.87	25.45	26.69	27.82	25.19	25.13	26.38	25.05	26.92
	RSIR (%)	-2.50	-6.98	3.52	-9.05	-14.76	4.05	-2.19	-6.09	2.81	-3.23
叶中K⁺含量	CK (mg g^-1)	27.33	26.64	29.47	28.43	27.63	30.48	27.67	29.44	30.66	31.99
K⁺ contents in leaf	NaCl (mg g^-1)	29.98	29.35	30.75	31.99	31.24	30.03	30.35	29.47	30.15	31.01
	RSIR (%)	-9.67	-10.18	-4.32	-12.53	-13.07	1.46	-9.69	-0.11	1.65	3.06
根中Na⁺含量	CK (mg g^-1)	4.64	5.24	5.17	4.03	4.33	4.51	5.63	5.12	4.39	4.07
Na⁺ contents in root	NaCl (mg g^-1)	4.91	5.01	5.07	4.71	4.84	4.71	5.81	4.37	4.96	4.31
	RSIR (%)	-6.00	4.24	2.05	-17.09	-11.98	-4.59	-3.34	14.67	-12.92	-5.98
茎中Na⁺含量	CK (mg g^-1)	2.80	3.20	3.26	2.59	2.60	2.43	3.34	3.42	2.90	2.68
Na⁺ contents in stem	NaCl (mg g^-1)	2.85	3.25	2.68	2.35	2.78	3.16	3.48	3.09	2.93	2.42
	RSIR (%)	-1.97	-1.72	17.82	9.29	-6.85	-29.84	-4.16	9.48	-1.00	9.50
叶中Na⁺含量	CK (mg g^-1)	2.28	2.44	2.26	1.88	2.13	1.72	2.65	2.35	2.04	2.28
Na⁺ contents in leaf	NaCl (mg g^-1)	2.56	2.66	1.72	1.56	2.36	2.53	2.75	2.18	2.03	1.72
	RSIR (%)	-12.11	-8.94	24.06	17.24	-10.55	-47.12	-4.00	7.31	0.54	24.82
根中K⁺与Na⁺的含量比	CK	1.65	1.58	1.58	1.89	1.65	1.69	1.40	1.39	1.77	1.65
Ratio of K⁺ and Na⁺ contents in root	NaCl	1.64	1.60	1.55	1.82	1.60	1.50	1.52	1.65	1.76	1.49
Ratio of K⁺ and Na⁺ contents in root	RSIR (%)	0.92	-1.63	1.72	3.74	3.20	11.30	-8.82	-18.07	0.26	9.41
茎中K⁺与Na⁺的含量比	CK	9.02	7.27	8.10	9.44	9.33	10.79	7.36	7.28	8.88	9.75
Ratio of K⁺ and Na⁺ contents in stem	NaCl	9.07	7.65	9.52	11.34	10.02	7.97	7.22	8.53	8.54	11.12
Ratio of K⁺ and Na⁺ contents in stem	RSIR (%)	-0.52	-5.17	-17.40	-20.22	-7.40	26.10	1.89	-17.20	3.77	-14.06
叶中K⁺与Na⁺的含量比	CK	11.99	10.92	13.04	15.13	12.96	17.75	10.45	12.51	15.02	14.01
Ratio of K⁺ and Na⁺ contents in leaf	NaCl	11.73	11.04	17.91	20.57	13.26	11.89	11.02	13.51	14.85	18.06
Ratio of K⁺ and Na⁺ contents in leaf	RSIR (%)	2.18	-1.14	-37.37	-35.98	-2.27	33.02	-5.47	-8.00	1.12	-28.95
根中脯氨酸含量	CK (μg g^-1)	25.20	30.66	18.28	16.58	24.93	20.33	36.91	10.31	24.18	22.15
Proline contents in root	NaCl (μg g^-1)	964.23	570.92	521.75	338.13	251.10	625.37	708.36	436.70	347.56	184.11
	RSIR (%)	97.39	94.63	96.50	95.10	90.07	96.75	94.79	97.64	93.04	87.97
叶中脯氨酸含量	CK (μg g^-1)	11.46	14.68	2.78	14.79	45.07	29.62	32.25	28.80	3.63	1.05
Proline contents in leaf	NaCl (μg g^-1)	1555.03	1457.10	297.47	437.31	534.29	363.77	381.59	669.70	934.29	1821.49
	RSIR (%)	99.26	98.99	99.06	96.62	91.56	91.86	91.55	95.70	99.61	99.94

Table S1

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

References 55

[1]	Safdar H, Amin A, Shafiq Y, Ali A, Yasin R, Shoukat A, Hussan M U, Sarwar M I. A review: impact of salinity on plant growth. Nat Sci, 2019, 1: 34-40.
[2]	赵广才. 中国小麦种植区划研究(一). 麦类作物学报, 2010, 30: 886-895.
	Zhao G C. Study on Chinese wheat planting regionalization (I). J Triticeae Crops, 2010, 30: 886-895 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3]	杨劲松, 姚荣江. 我国盐碱地的治理与农业高效利用. 中国科学院院刊, 2015, 30(增刊1): 162-170.
	Yang J S, Yao R J. Management and efficient agricultural utilization of salt-affected soil in China. Bull Chin Acad Sci, 2015, 30(S1): 162-170 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4]	邢锦城, 陈超, 董静, 刘冲, 朱小梅, 洪立洲. 长江中下游及黄淮冬麦区小麦主栽品种耐盐性评价. 大麦与谷类科学, 2017, 34(6): 8-13.
	Xing J C, Chen C, Dong J, Liu C, Zhu X M, Hong L Z. Evaluation of salt tolerance of main wheat cultivars planted in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River and Huang Huai area. Barley Cereal Sci, 2017, 34(6): 8-13 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[5]	Richards R A. Should selection for yield in saline conditions be made on saline or non-saline soils. Euphytica, 1983, 32: 431-438. doi: 10.1007/BF00021452
[6]	Munns R, James R A. Screening methods for salinity tolerance: a case study with tetraploid wheat. Plant Soil, 2003, 253: 201-218. doi: 10.1023/A:1024553303144
[7]	El-Hendawy S E, Hassan W M, Al-Suhaibani N A, Refay Y, Abdella K A. Comparative performance of multivariable agro- physiological parameters for detecting salt tolerance of wheat cultivars under simulated saline field growing conditions. Front Plant Sci, 2017, 8: 435. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00435 pmid: 28424718
[8]	Flowers T J, Yeo A R. Breeding for salinity resistance in crop plants: where next. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1995, 22: 875-884.
[9]	Yu S Z, Wu J H, Wang M, Shi W M, Xia G M, Jia J Z, Kang Z S, Han D J. Haplotype variations in QTL for salt tolerance in Chinese wheat accessions identified by marker-based and pedigree-based kinship analyses. Crop J, 2020, 8: 1011-1024. doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2020.03.007
[10]	Genc Y, McDonald G K, Tester M. Reassessment of tissue Na⁺ concentration as a criterion for salinity tolerance in bread wheat. Plant Cell Environ, 2007, 30: 1486-1498. doi: 10.1111/pce.2007.30.issue-11
[11]	Tao R, Ding J, Li C, Zhu X, Guo W, Zhu M. Evaluating and screening of agro-physiological indices for salinity stress tolerance in wheat at the seedling stage. Front Plant Sci, 2021, 12: 646175. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.646175
[12]	Masarmi A G, Solouki M, Fakheri B, Kalaji H M, Mahgdingad N, Golkari S, Telesiński A, Lamlom S F, Kociel H, Yousef A F. Comparing the salinity tolerance of twenty different wheat genotypes on the basis of their physiological and biochemical parameters under NaCl stress. PLoS One, 2023, 18: e0282606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282606
[13]	Wang M, Xia G M. The landscape of molecular mechanisms for salt tolerance in wheat. Crop J, 2018, 6: 42-47. doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2017.09.002
[14]	Tavakkoli E, Fatehi F, Rengasamy P, McDonald G K. A comparison of hydroponic and soil-based screening methods to identify salt tolerance in the field in barley. J Exp Bot, 2012, 63: 3853-3867. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers085 pmid: 22442423
[15]	Genc Y, Taylor J, Lyons G, Li Y, Cheong J, Appelbee M, Oldach K, Sutton T. Bread wheat with high salinity and solidity tolerance. Front Plant Sci, 2019, 10: 1280. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01280
[16]	Cuin T A, Bose J, Stefano G, Jha D, Tester M, Mancuso S, Shabala S. Assessing the role of root plasma membrane and tonoplast Na⁺/H⁺ exchangers in salinity tolerance in wheat: in planta quantification methods. Plant Cell Environ, 2011, 34: 947-961. doi: 10.1111/pce.2011.34.issue-6
[17]	豆昕桐, 王英杰, 王华忠, 岳洁瑜. 耐盐和盐敏感型小麦品种对NaCl胁迫的生理响应及耐盐性差异. 生态学报, 2021, 41: 4976-4992.
	Dou X T, Wang Y J, Wang H Z, Yue J Y. Physiological response and tolerance difference of two wheat varieties to NaCl stress. Acta Ecol Sin, 2021, 41: 4976-4992 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[18]	Luo Q L, Teng W, Fang S, Li H W, Li B, Chu J F, Li Z S, Zheng Q. Transcriptome analysis of salt-stress response in three seedling tissues of common wheat. Crop J, 2019, 7: 378-392. doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2018.11.009
[19]	Zhang Y, Liu Z, Khan A A, Lin Q, Han Y, Mu P, Liu Y, Zhang H, Li L, Meng X, Ni Z, Xin M. Expression partitioning of homeologs and tandem duplications contribute to salt tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 21476. doi: 10.1038/srep21476
[20]	Yu L, Wang W W, Niu L Y, Wang W, Lu L, Wang F Z, Wang L P, Wang Y, Zang X J. A new cultivation technique of Cangmai 6005 for high yield in Cangzhou dry-alkali land. Asian Agric Res, 2018, 10: 68-70.
[21]	Shan L, Li C, Chen F, Zhao S, Xia G. A Bowman-Birk type protease inhibitor is involved in the tolerance to salt stress in wheat. Plant Cell Environ, 2008, 31: 1128-1137. doi: 10.1111/pce.2008.31.issue-8
[22]	Wang Z Y, Qin X H, Li J H, Fan L F, Zhou Q, Wang Y Q, Zhao X, Xie C J, Wang Z Y, Huang L. Highly reproducible periodic electrical potential changes associated with salt tolerance in wheat plants. Environ Exp Bot, 2019, 160: 120-130. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.01.014
[23]	梁超, 王超, 杨秀风, 张秀田, 王玮. ‘德抗961’小麦耐盐生理特性研究. 西北植物学报, 2006, 26: 2075-2082.
	Liang C, Wang C, Yang X F, Zhang X T, Wang W. Salt-tolerant physiological characters of wheat variety Dekang 961. Acta Bot Boreal-Occident Sin, 2006, 26: 2075-2082 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[24]	Ma Q, Zhou H J, Sui X Y, Su C X, Yu Y C, Yang H B, Dong C H. Generation of new salt-tolerant wheat lines and transcriptomic exploration of the responsive genes to ethylene and salt stress. Plant Growth Regul, 2021, 94: 33-48. doi: 10.1007/s10725-021-00694-9
[25]	Guo G F, Ge P, Ma C Y, Li X H, Lü D W, Wang S L, Ma W J, Yan Y M. Comparative proteomic analysis of salt response proteins in seedling roots of two wheat varieties. J Proteomics, 2012, 75: 1867-1885. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.12.032 pmid: 22245046
[26]	Xiong H, Guo H, Xie Y, Zhao L, Gu J, Zhao S, Li J, Liu L. RNAseq analysis reveals pathways and candidate genes associated with salinity tolerance in a spaceflight-induced wheat mutant. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 2731. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03024-0 pmid: 28578401
[27]	马雅琴, 翁跃进. 引进春小麦种质耐盐性的鉴定评价. 作物学报, 2005, 31: 58-64.
	Ma Y Q, Weng Y J. Evaluation for salt tolerance in spring wheat cultivars introduced from abroad. Acta Agron Sin, 2005, 31: 58-64 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28]	Wang W, Wang W, Wu Y, Li Q, Zhang G, Shi R, Yang J, Wang Y, Wang W. The involvement of wheat U-box E3 ubiquitin ligase TaPUB1 in salt stress tolerance. J Integr Plant Biol, 2020, 62: 631-651. doi: 10.1111/jipb.v62.5
[29]	乔麟轶, 张潇文, 李世姣, 陈芳, 李欣, 郭慧娟, 张树伟, 常利芳, 张晓军, 畅志坚. 小偃麦渗入系苗期耐盐鉴定与分子标记评价. 山东农业科学, 2021, 53(5): 69-73.
	Qiao L Y, Zhang X W, Li S J, Chen F, Li X, Guo H J, Zhang S W, Chang L F, Zhang X J, Chang Z J. Salt-tolerance identification at seedling stage and molecular marker evaluation of wheat-Thinopyrum intermedium introgression lines. Shandong Agric Sci, 2021, 53(5): 69-73 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[30]	Kamiab F, Talaie A, Javanshah A, Khezri M, Khalighi A. Effect of long-term salinity on growth, chemical composition and mineral elements of pistachio (Pistacia vera cv. Badami-Zarand) rootstock seedlings. Ann Biol Res, 2012, 3: 5545-5551.
[31]	Soda N, Ephrath J E, Dag A, Beiersdorf I, Presnov E, Yermiyahu U, Ben-Gal A. Root growth dynamics of olive (Olea europaea L.) affected by irrigation induced salinity. Plant Soil, 2017, 411: 305-318. doi: 10.1007/s11104-016-3032-9
[32]	Tan J L, Ben-Gal A, Shtein I, Bustan A, Dag A, Erel R. Root structural plasticity enhances salt tolerance in mature olives. Environ Exp Bot, 2020, 179: 104224. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104224
[33]	Tester M, Davenport R. Na⁺ tolerance and Na⁺ transport in higher plants. Ann Bot, 2003, 91: 503-527. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcg058
[34]	Ashraf M, O’Leary J W. Responses of newly developed salt- tolerant genotype of spring wheat to salt stress: yield components and ion distribution. J Agron Crop Sci, 1996, 176: 91-101. doi: 10.1111/jac.1996.176.issue-2
[35]	Rashid A, Querishi R H, Hollington P A, Jones R G W. Comparative responses of wheat cultivars to salinity at the seedling stage. J Agron Crop Sci, 1999, 182: 199-207. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-037x.1999.00295.x
[36]	Poustini K, Siosemardeh A. Ion distribution in wheat cultivars in response to salinity stress. Field Crops Res, 2004, 85: 125-133. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00157-6
[37]	Walker D J, Leigh R A, Miller A J. Potassium homeostasis in vacuolate plant cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1996, 93: 10510-10514. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.19.10510 pmid: 11607707
[38]	Isabelle C, Cécile L, Martin B, Hervé S. Molecular mechanisms involved in plant adaptation to low K⁺ availability. J Exp Bot, 2013, 3: 833-848.
[39]	Anschütz U, Becker D, Shabala S. Going beyond nutrition: regulation of potassium homeostasis as a common denominator of plant adaptive responses to environment. J Plant Physiol, 2014, 171: 670-687. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2014.01.009
[40]	张潇文, 李世姣, 张晓军, 李欣, 杨足君, 张树伟, 陈芳, 常利芳, 郭慧娟, 畅志坚, 乔麟轶. 小麦品系CH7034中耐盐QTL定位. 作物学报, 2022, 48: 2646-2654.
	Zhang X W, Li S J, Zhang X J, Li X, Yang Z J, Zhang S W, Chen F, Chang L F, Guo H J, Chang Z J, Qiao L Y. QTL mapping for salt tolerance in wheat line CH7034. Acta Agron Sin, 2022, 48: 2646-2654 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[41]	周升辉, 吴秋红, 谢菁忠, 陈娇娇, 陈永兴, 傅琳, 王国鑫, 于美华, 王振忠, 张德云, 王令, 王丽丽, 张艳, 梁荣奇, 韩俊, 刘志勇. 小麦燕大1817×北农6号重组自交系群体在正常和盐胁迫水培条件下苗期性状的QTL定位. 作物学报, 2016, 42: 1764-1778.
	Zhou S H, Wu Q H, Xie J Z, Chen J J, Chen Y X, Fu L, Wang G X, Yu M H, Wang Z Z, Zhang D Y, Wang L, Wang L L, Zhang Y, Liang R Q, Han J, Liu Z Y. Mapping QTLs for wheat seedling traits in RILs population of Yanda 1817 × Beinong 6 under normal and salt-stress conditions. Acta Agron Sin, 2016, 42: 1764-1778 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2016.01764
[42]	Richards R A, Dennett C W, Qualset C O, Epstein E, Norlyn J D, Winslow M D. Variation in yield of grain and biomass in wheat, barley, and triticale in a salt-affected ﬁeld. Field Crops Res, 1987, 15: 277-287. doi: 10.1016/0378-4290(87)90017-7
[43]	Houshmand S, Arzani A, Maibody S A M, Feizi M. Evaluation of salt-tolerant genotypes of durum wheat derived from in vitro and field experiments. Field Crops Res, 2005, 91: 345-354. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2004.08.004
[44]	Weimberg R. Solute adjustment in leaves of two species of wheat at two different stages of growth in response to salinity. Physiol Plant, 1987, 70: 381-388.
[45]	Chen Z, Zhou M, Newman I A, Mendham N J, Zhang G, Shabala S. Potassium and sodium relations in salinized barley tissues as a basis of differential salt tolerance. Funct Plant Biol, 2007, 34: 150-162. doi: 10.1071/FP06237
[46]	Cuin T A, Betts S A, Chalmandrier R, Shabala S. A root’s ability to retain K⁺ correlates with salt tolerance in wheat. J Exp Bot, 2008, 59: 2697-2706. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern128
[47]	Oyiga B C, Sharma R C, Baum M, Ogbonnaya F C, Léon J, Ballvora A. Allelic variations and differential expressions detected at quantitative trait loci for salt stress tolerance in wheat. Plant Cell Environ, 2018, 41: 919-935. doi: 10.1111/pce.v41.5
[48]	Davenport R, James R A, Zakrisson-Plogander A, Tester M, Munns R. Control of sodium transport in durum wheat. Plant Physiol, 2005, 137: 807-818. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.057307 pmid: 15734907
[49]	Santa-Maria G E, Epstein E. Potassium/sodium selectivity in wheat and amphiploid cross wheat × Lophopyrum elongatum. Plant Sci, 2001, 160: 523-534. pmid: 11166440
[50]	Meneguzzo S, Navari-Izzo F, Izzo R. NaCl effects on water relations and accumulation of mineral nutrients in shoots, roots and cell sap of wheat seedling. J Plant Physiol, 2000, 156: 711-716. doi: 10.1016/S0176-1617(00)80236-9
[51]	Gaxiola R A, Rao R, Sherman A, Grisafi P, Alper S L, Fink G R. The Arabidopsis thaliana proton transporters, AtNhx1 and Avp1, can function in cation detoxification in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1999, 96: 1480-1485. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.4.1480 pmid: 9990049
[52]	Qiu D, Hu W, Zhou Y, Xiao J, Hu R, Wei Q, Zhang Y, Feng J, Sun F, Sun J, Yang G, He G. TaASR1-D confers abiotic stress resistance by affecting ROS accumulation and ABA signalling in transgenic wheat. Plant Biotechnol J, 2021, 19: 1588-1601. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13572 pmid: 33638922
[53]	Rong W, Qi L, Wang A, Ye X, Du L, Liang H, Xin Z, Zhang Z. The ERF transcription factor TaERF3 promotes tolerance to salt and drought stresses in wheat. Plant Biotechnol J, 2014, 12: 468-479. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12153 pmid: 24393105
[54]	Cuin T A, Tian Y, Betts S A, Chalmandrier R, Shabala S. Ionic relations and osmotic adjustment in durum and bread wheat under saline conditions. Funct Plant Biol, 2009, 36: 1110-1119. doi: 10.1071/FP09051
[55]	Raven J A. Regulation of pH and generation of osmolarity in vascular plants: a cost-benefit analysis in relation to efficiency of use energy, nitrogen and water. New Phytol, 1985, 101: 25-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1985.tb02816.x pmid: 33873830

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

育成品种 Variety	耐盐性 Salt tolerance	参考文献 Reference	审定编号 Approval number
小偃60 Xiaoyan 60	耐盐 Tolerant	[18]	国审麦20220069 Guoshenmai 20220069
青麦6号 Qingmai 6	耐盐 Tolerant	[19]	国审麦2016027 Guoshenmai 2016027
沧麦6005 Cangmai 6005	耐盐 Tolerant	[20]	冀审麦2012007 Jishenmai 2012007
山融3号 Shanrong 3	耐盐 Tolerant	[21]	鲁农审字[2004] 030 Lunongshenzi [2004] 030
德抗961 Dekang 961	耐盐 Tolerant	[22,23]	鲁农审字[2004] 031 Lunongshenzi [2004] 031
中麦175 Zhongmai 175	盐敏感 Sensitive	[18]	国审麦2011018 Guoshenmai 2011018
鲁原502 Luyuan 502	盐敏感 Sensitive	[24]	国审麦2011016 Guoshenmai 2011016
京411 Jing 411	盐敏感 Sensitive	[22,25]	1991年通过北京市品种审定 Passed variety approval in Beijing in 1991
河农6425 Henong 6425	盐敏感 Sensitive	[17]	冀审麦200901 Jishenmai 200901
济麦20 Jimai 20	盐敏感 Sensitive	[26]	鲁农审字[2003] 029 Lunongshenzi [2003] 029

Applicability evaluation of screen methods to identify salt tolerance in wheat at germination and seedling stages

RichHTML424

PDF

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 55

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	LU Ru-Hua, WANG Wen-Xuan, CAO Qiang, TIAN Yong-Chao, ZHU Yan, CAO Wei-Xing, LIU Xiao-Jun. Research on the effects of nitrogen fertilizer and rice straw return on wheat yield and N₂O emission and recommended fertilization under rice-wheat rotation pattern [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(5): 1300-1311.
[2]	LI Hang, LIU Li, HUANG Qian, LIU Wen-Hao, SI Ai-Jun, KONG Xian-Hui, WANG Xu-Wen, ZHAO Fu-Xiang, MEI Yong-Jun, YU Yu. Identification and screening of salt tolerance of cotton germplasm resources at germination stage [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(5): 1147-1157.
[3]	QI Xue-Li, LI Ying, LI Chun-Ying, HAN Liu-Peng, ZHAO Ming-Zhong, ZHANG Jian-Zhou. Alleviative effect of salicylic acid on wheat seedlings with stripe rust based on transcriptome and differentially expressed genes [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(4): 1080-1090.
[4]	XU Nai-Yin, JIN Shi-Qiao, JIN Fang, LIU Li-Hua, XU Jian-Wen, LIU Feng-Ze, REN Xue-Zhen, SUN Quan, XU Xu, PANG Bin-Shuang. Genetic similarity and its detection accuracy analysis of wheat varieties based on SNP markers [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(4): 887-896.
[5]	HUANG Hong-Sheng, ZHANG Xin-Yue, JU Hui, HAN Xue. Spectral characteristics of winter wheat canopy and estimation of aboveground biomass under elevated atmospheric CO₂ concentration [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(4): 991-1003.
[6]	WANG Tian-Ning, FENG Ya-Lan, JU Ji-Hao, WU Yi, ZHANG Jun, MA Chao. Whole genome identification and analysis of GRFs transcription factor family in wheat and its ancestral species [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(4): 897-813.
[7]	ZHANG Zhen, ZHAO Jun-Ye, SHI Yu, ZHANG Yong-Li, YU Zhen-Wen. Effects of different sowing space on photosynthetic characteristics after anthesis and grain yield of wheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(4): 981-990.
[8]	HAO Qian-Lin, YANG Ting-Zhi, LYU Xin-Ru, QIN Hui-Min, WANG Ya-Lin, JIA Chen-Fei, XIA Xian-Chun, MA Wu-Jun, XU Deng-An. QTL mapping and GWAS analysis of coleoptile length in bread wheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(3): 590-602.
[9]	ZHAO Rong-Rong, CONG Nan, ZHAO Chuang. Optimal phase selection for extracting distribution of winter wheat and summer maize over central subregion of Henan Province based on Landsat 8 imagery [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(3): 721-733.
[10]	JU Ji-Hao, MA Chao, WANG Tian-Ning, WU Yi, DONG Zhong, FANG Mei-E, CHEN Yu-Shu, ZHANG Jun, FU Guo-Zhan. Genome wide identification and expression analysis of TaPOD family in wheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(3): 779-792.
[11]	ZHANG Bao-Hua, LIU Jia-Jing, TIAN Xiao, TIAN Xu-Zhao, DONG Kuo, WU Yu-Jie, XIAO Kai, LI Xiao-Juan. Cloning, expression, and functional analysis of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) TaSPX1 gene in low nitrogen stress tolerance [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(3): 576-589.
[12]	ZHANG Kang, NIE Zhi-Gang, WANG Jun, LI Guang. Sensitivity analysis and optimization of spring wheat grain growth parameters under APSIM model with the increase of temperature [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(2): 464-477.
[13]	TAN Dan, CHEN Jia-Ting, GAO Yu, ZHANG Xiao-Jun, LI Xin, YAN Gui-Yun, LI Rui, CHEN Fang, CHANG Li-Fang, ZHANG Shu-Wei, GUO Hui-Juan, CHANG Zhi-Jian, QIAO Lin-Yi. Discovery of auxin pathway genes involving spike type and association analysis between TaARF23-A and spikelet number in wheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(2): 506-513.
[14]	LI Yan, FANG Yu-Hui, WANG Yong-Xia, PENG Chao-Jun, HUA Xia, QI Xue-Li, HU Lin, XU Wei-Gang. Transcriptomics profile of transgenic OsPHR2 wheat under different phosphorus stress [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(2): 340-353.
[15]	XIE Wei, HE Peng, MA Hong-Liang, LEI Fang, HUANG Xiu-Lan, FAN Gao-Qiong, YANG Hong-Kun. Effects of straw mulching from autumn fallow and phosphorus application on nitrogen uptake and utilization of winter wheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(2): 440-450.