Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica，

Acta Agronomica Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (8): 2122-2130.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.44006

• RESEARCH NOTES • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Establishment of screening method for salt tolerance at germination stage and identification of salt-tolerant germplasms in soybean

LIU Xin-Yue1,2(), GUO Xiao-Yang2, WANG Xin-Ru2, XIN Da-Wei1,*(), GUAN Rong-Xia2,*(), QIU Li-Juan2,*()   

  1. 1Agricultural College, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, Heilongjiang, China
    2National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement (NFCRI) / Key Laboratory of Soybean Biology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs / State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding / Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2024-01-09 Accepted:2024-04-01 Online:2024-08-12 Published:2024-04-20
  • Contact: * E-mail: xdawei@163.com;E-mail: guanrongxia@caas.cn;E-mail: qiulijuan@caas.cn
  • Supported by:
    Science and Technology Innovation 2030-Major Projects(2023ZD0403601);National Natural Science Foundation of China(31830066)

RichHTML427

9

PDF

241

Abstract:

Salinity tolerance is prioritized for soybean because salt can affect soybean germination and growth. Screening for salt-tolerant soybean germplasms is of great significance for the breeding salt-tolerant soybean varieties and the utilization of saline lands for production. In this study, eight representative soybean germplasms were used as the experimental materials, soybean seeds were planted in vermiculite and treated with 150 mmol L-1 NaCl or water as the control. The germination rate and radicle length of soybean were measured after 2 days and 3 days treatment, aiming to establish the identification index and evaluation method of soybean salt tolerance at germination stage. In comparison to control, the germination rate and radicle length of soybean decreased under salt stress. No significant difference was observed in the germination rate and relative radicle length (RRL) between germplasms after 2 days salt treatment. Significant difference was observed in RRL after 3 days salt stress. Therefore, RRL was selected as the evaluation indicator to distinguish salt tolerance of 48 soybean germplasms. The 48 germplasms were divided into 5 levels by using RRL after 3 days salt treatment. Level 1, level 2, level 3, level 4, and level 5 was high tolerant, tolerant, medium sensitive, sensitive, and most sensitive, respectively. Five high salt-tolerant germplasms and 12 salt-tolerant germplasms were identified at germination stage. These germplasms were screened for salt tolerance at both emergence and seedling stages Three soybeans were identified for salt tolerance from germination stage to seeding stage, namely Zhonghuang 685, Heinong 94, and Dongsheng 104. In conclusion, a screening method for salt tolerance at germination stage under controlled condition was established, which laid a foundation for the identification and utilization of salt tolerant germplasms.

Key words: soybean, germplasm, germination stage, evaluation for salt tolerance

Table 1

Salt tolerance indices and GmSALT3 haplotype of 48 soybean germplasms at germination, emergence, and seedling stages"

序号
No.		 大豆名称
Soybean name		 3 d相对芽长Relative radicle length 3 d after salt stress 耐盐等级Salt tolerance level GmSALT3基因型
Haplotype of GmSALT3
萌发期Germination stage 出苗期Emergence stage 苗期Seedling stage
1 中黄685 Zhonghuang 685 0.61 1 1 2 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
2 东生104 Dongsheng 104 0.60 1 2 2 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
3 黑农94 Heinong 94 0.59 1 2 1 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
4 通农15 Tongnong 15 0.58 1 3 2 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
5 铁丰31 Tiefeng 31 0.56 1 2 4 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
6 中吉602 Zhongji 602 0.54 2 1 3 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
7 吉科黄豆20 Jikehuangdou 20 0.53 2 5 2 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
8 赤16-33 Chi 16-33 0.50 2 4 3 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
9 中黄39 Zhonghuang 39 0.50 2 2 3 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
10 齐农7号 Qinong 7 0.50 2 4 4 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
11 通农943 Tongnong 943 0.50 2 2 5 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
12 中黄320 Zhonghuang 320 0.49 2 2 4 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
13 中黄324 Zhonghuang 324 0.48 2 1 4 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
14 中联豆5022 Zhongliandou 5022 0.48 2 4 4 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
15 汾豆78 Fendou 78 0.47 2 3 1 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
16 中黄204 Zhonghuang 204 0.47 2 3 1 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
17 长农52 Changnong 52 0.46 2 3 4 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
18 抗线虫8号 Kangxianchong 8 0.45 3 2 4 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
19 中黄343 Zhonghuang 343 0.44 3 1 5 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
20 中黄48 Zhonghuang 48 0.44 3 1 4 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
21 中黄349 Zhonghuang 349 0.44 3 3 1 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
22 Williams 82 0.43 3 3 3 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
23 中黄311 Zhonghuang 311 0.41 3 1 4 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
24 通农102 Tongnong 102 0.40 3 2 4 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
25 中黄314 Zhonghuang 314 0.40 3 1 1 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
26 中黄329 Zhonghuang 329 0.40 3 2 4 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
27 中黄354 Zhonghuang 354 0.40 3 1 1 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
28 公552 Gong 552 0.39 3 4 4 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
29 中黄357 Zhonghuang 357 0.39 3 1 2 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
30 吉大豆2号 Jidadou 2 0.37 3 5 2 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
31 中黄37 Zhonghuang 37 0.36 3 5 1 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
32 中黄306 Zhonghuang 306 0.36 3 3 1 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
33 中黄339 Zhonghuang 339 0.36 3 1 1 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
34 吉育3528 Jiyu 3528 0.35 4 1 3 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
35 中黄301 Zhonghuang 301 0.34 4 2 3 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
36 通野19-4260-3 Tongye 19-4260-3 0.33 4 5 4 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
37 吉农169 Jinong 169 0.32 4 4 3 杂合 Heterozygous haplotype
38 齐农5号 Qinong 5 0.32 4 4 3 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
39 黑农532 Heinong 532 0.32 4 4 4 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
40 NY27-38 0.31 4 4 2 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
41 圣豆17 Shengdou 17 0.31 4 4 3 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
42 中黄302 Zhonghuang 302 0.30 4 3 1 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
43 中黄318 Zhonghuang 318 0.30 4 1 2 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
44 齐转19147 Qizhuan 19147 0.29 4 5 3 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
45 齐转20364 Qizhuan 20364 0.27 4 5 5 杂合 Heterozygous haplotype
46 中黄616 Zhonghuang 616 0.25 5 4 4 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
47 齐农30 Qinong 30 0.24 5 3 5 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
48 中黄618 Zhonghuang 618 0.21 5 4 4 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype

Fig. 1

Photos used for root system analysis A: black and white binary image of soybean; B: label of the radicle."

Fig. 2

Phenotypes of 8 soybean germplasms under control and 150 mmol L-1 NaCl treatment after 2 d (A) and 3 d (B)"

Fig. 3

Germination rate and radicle length of soybeans under 150 mmol L-1 NaCl treatment A and B: the germination rate and radicle length after 2 d treatments (control and 150 mmol L-1 NaCl); C and D: the germination rate and radicle length after 3 d treatments (control and 150 mmol L-1 NaCl). Data are means ± SEs with three biological replicates (n = 3). Lowercase letters above the column indicate statistic difference at P < 0.05 in the different concentrations of the same germplasm."

Table 2

Variation of relative germination rate and relative radicle length of soybean germplasms at germination stage"

指标
Index name		 最小值
Minimum		 最大值
Maximum		 平均值
Average		 标准偏差
Standard deviation		 偏度
Skewness		 峰度
Kurtosis		 变异系数
Coefficient of variation
2 d相对发芽率
Relative germination rate after 2 days (%)		 72 100 92.17 0.11 -0.75 -0.98 0.12
3 d相对发芽率
Relative germination rate after 3 days (%)		 74 100 95.76 0.10 -1.31 2.30 0.10
2 d相对芽长
Relative radicle length after 2 days		 0.26 0.52 0.39 0.10 -0.18 -1.80 0.25
3 d相对芽长
Relative radicle length after 3 days		 0.21 0.61 0.44 0.12 -0.63 0.35 0.27

Table 3

Relative germination rate and relative radicle length of eight soybeans under salt stress treatments after 2 d and 3 d"

大豆名称
Soybean name		 2 d相对发芽率
Relative germination rate after 2 d (%)		 3 d相对发芽率
Relative germination rate after 3 d (%)		 2 d相对芽长
Relative radicle length after 2 d		 3 d相对芽长
Relative radicle length after 3 d
中吉602 Zhongji 602 79±14 a 93±9 a 0.38±0.08 a 0.55±0.10 a
中黄685 Zhonghuang 685 100±0 a 97±5 a 0.50±0.06 a 0.61±0.06 a
中黄311 Zhonghuang 311 86±8 a 100±5 a 0.30±0.06 a 0.41±0.07 abc
中黄39 Zhonghuang 39 100±6 a 100±0 a 0.52±0.04 a 0.50±0.07 ab
中黄324 Zhonghuang 324 100±8 a 90±0 a 0.44±0.03 a 0.48±0.02 ab
中黄349 Zhonghuang 349 100±0 a 100±0 a 0.46±0.07 a 0.44±0.04 ab
中黄616 Zhonghuang 616 72±7 a 100±0 a 0.26±0.04 a 0.34±0.08 bc
中黄618 Zhonghuang 618 94±12 a 74±19 a 0.26±0.07 a 0.21±0.04 c

Fig. 4

Difference of salt tolerance levels at soybean germination, emergence, and seedling stages A: Relative radicle length differences among germplasms at germination stage; B: Venn diagram of salt-tolerant germplasms at germination, emergence, and seedling stages. Lowercase letters indicate significant difference at P < 0.05."

Table 4

Correlation analysis of salt tolerance level at three developmental stages in soybeans"

耐盐等级
Salt tolerance
level		 萌发期
Germination stage		 出苗期
Emergence stage		 苗期
Seedling stage
萌发期Germination stage 1
出苗期Emergence stage 0.282 1
苗期Seedling stage 0.136 0.093 1
[1] Parida A K, Das A B. Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 2005, 60: 324-349.
[2] FAO. 2021. Salt-affected soils. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. Available from: http://www.fao.org/soils-portal/soil-management/management-of-some-problem-soils/salt-affected-soils/more-information-on-salt-affected-soils/en/.
[3] 王佳丽, 黄贤金, 钟太洋, 陈志刚. 盐碱地可持续利用研究综述. 地理学报, 2011, 66: 673-684.
Wang J L, Huang X J, Zhong T Y, Chen Z G. Review on sustainable utilization of salt-affected land. Acta Geogr Sin, 2011, 66: 673-684 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.11821/xb201105010
[4] 佚名. 中国大豆优势区域布局规划(2008-2015年). 农业工程技术(农产品加工业), 2009, (8): 4-5.
Yi M. Soybean advantage area layout planning in China (2008-2015). Agric Engr Technol (Agric Prod Proc Ind), 2009, (8): 4-5 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[5] Phang T H, Shao G, Lam H M. Salt tolerance in soybean. J Integr Plant Biol, 2008, 50: 1196-1212.
[6] Jenks M A, Hasegawa P M, Jain S M. Advances in Molecular Breeding Toward Drought and Salt Tolerant Crops. Dordrech: Springer, 2007. pp 739-773.
[7] Abel G H, MacKenzie A J. Salt Tolerance of soybean varieties (Glycine max L. Merrill) during germination and later growth. Crop Sci, 1964, 4: 157-161.
[8] Singleton P W, Bohlool B B. Effect of salinity on nodule formation by soybean. Plant Physiol, 1984, 74: 72-76.
doi: 10.1104/pp.74.1.72 pmid: 16663389
[9] Katerji N, Van Hoorn J W, Hamdy A, Mastrorilli M, Karam F. Salinity and drought, a comparison of their effects on the relationship between yield and evapotranspiration. Agric Water Manag, 1998, 36: 45-54.
[10] Parker M B, Gaines T P, Hook J E, Gascho G J, Maw B W. Chloride and water stress effects on soybean in pot culture. J Plant Nutr, 1987, 10: 517-538.
[11] 邵桂花, 宋景芝, 刘惠令. 大豆种质资源耐盐性鉴定初报. 中国农业科学, 1986, 19(6): 30-35.
Shao G H, Song J Z, Liu H L. Preliminary studies on the evaluation of salt tolerance in soybean varieties. Sci Agric Sin, 1986, 19(6): 30-35 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12] 韩毅强, 高亚梅, 杜艳丽, 张玉先, 杜吉到, 张文慧, 潘绍玉. 大豆耐盐碱种质资源鉴定. 中国油料作物学报, 2021, 43: 1016-1024.
doi: 10.19802/j.issn.1007-9084.2020353
Han Y Q, Gao Y M, Du Y L, Zhang Y X, Du J D, Zhang W H, Pan S Y. Identification of saline-alkali tolerant germplasm resources of soybean during the whole growth stage. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2021, 43: 1016-1024 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] 刘谢香, 常汝镇, 关荣霞, 邱丽娟. 大豆出苗期耐盐性鉴定方法建立及耐盐种质筛选. 作物学报, 2020, 46: 1-8.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.94062
Liu X X, Chang R Z, Guan R X, Qiu L J. Establishment of screening method for salt tolerant soybean at emergence stage and screening of tolerant germplasm. Acta Agron Sin, 2020, 46: 1-8 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] 郭秀秀, 李照君, 樊守金, 李娜娜, 蒲艳艳, 宫永超, 丁汉凤. 大豆种质资源芽期耐盐性鉴定及耐盐品种筛选. 安徽农业科学, 2019, 6: 47-51.
Guo X X, Li Z J, Fan S J, Li N N, Pu Y Y, Gong Y C, Ding H F. Identification of salt tolerance and screening of salt tolerant varieties of soybean germplasm at germination stage. Anhui Agric Sci, 2019, 6: 47-51 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15] 张鹏, 徐晨, 徐克章, 张治安, 李大勇, 季平, 冯引弟. 大豆品种耐盐性的快速鉴定法及不同时期耐盐性的研究. 中国油料作物学报, 2013, 35: 572.
doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2013.05.016
Zhang P, Xu C, Xu K Z, Zhang Z A, Li D Y, Ji P, Feng Y D. Fast identification method of salt-tolerance and research on salt- tolerance at different stages of soybean cultivars. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2013, 35: 572 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16] 张新草, 薛项潇, 姜深, 王延峰, 曹永策. 大豆种质发芽期耐盐碱性鉴定及指标筛选. 西北农业学报, 2020, 29(3): 8.
Zhang X C, Xue X X, Jiang S, Wang Y F, Cao Y C. Identification of mixed saline-alkali tolerance and screening of indicators in soybean at germination stage. J Northwest Agric Sci, 2020, 29(3): 8 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17] 徐恒恒, 黎妮, 刘树君, 王伟青, 王伟平, 张红, 程红焱, 宋松泉. 种子萌发及其调控的研究进展. 作物学报, 2014, 40: 1141-1156.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.01141
Xu H H, Li N, Liu S J, Wang W Q, Wang W Q, Zhang H, Cheng H Y, Song S Q. Research progress in seed germination and its control. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40: 1141-1156 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[18] 牛远, 杨修艳, 戴存凤, 王博文, 任高磊, 吴静磊, 王飞兵, 陈新红. 大豆芽期和苗期耐盐性评价指标筛选. 大豆科学, 2018, 37: 215-223.
Niu Y, Yang X Y, Dai C F, Wang B W, Ren G L, Wu J L, Wang F B, Chen X H. Related indices selection of soybean salt tolerance at germination and seedling. Soybean Sci, 2018, 37: 215-223 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[19] 姬丹丹, 刘畅, 曹其聪, 向凤宁. 不同大豆品种芽期和苗期耐盐性比较研究. 山东轻工业学院学报(自然科学版), 2011, 25(2): 4-7.
Ji D D, Liu C, Cao Q C, Xiang F N. Comparison of the salt tolerance at sprout and seedling in different soybean. Shandong Polytechnic Univ (Nat Sci Edn), 2011, 25(2): 4-7 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] 邵桂花, 万超文, 李舒凡. 大豆芽期耐盐生理初步研究. 作物杂志, 1994, (6): 25-27.
Shao G H, Wan C W, Li S F. Preliminary study on salt tolerance physiology of soybean at germination stage. Crops, 1994, (6): 25-27 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21] Hosseini M K, Powell A A, Bingham I J. Comparison of the seed germination and early seedling growth of soybean in saline conditions. Seed Sci Res, 2002, 12: 165-172.
[22] 姜静涵, 关荣霞, 郭勇, 常汝镇, 邱丽娟. 大豆苗期耐盐性的简便鉴定方法. 作物学报, 2013, 39: 1248-1256.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.01248
Jiang J H, Guan R X, Guo Y, Chang R Z, Qiu L J. Simple evaluation method of tolerance to salt at seedling stage in soybean. Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39: 1248-1256 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[23] Guan R X, Yu L L, Liu X X, Li M Q, Chang R Z, Gilliham M, Qiu L J. Selection of the salt tolerance gene GmSALT3 during six decades of soybean breeding in China. Front Plant Sci, 2021, 12: 794241.
[24] Shao G H, Wan C W, Li S F. Preliminary study on the physiology of soybean tolerance to salt stress at germinating stage. Crops, 1994, 6: 25-27.
[25] 张兆宁, 李江辉, 赵怡宇, 范亚茹, 杜艳丽, 韩德志, 张玉先, 杜吉到. 不同程度盐胁迫下大豆萌发期耐盐性鉴定. 大豆科学, 2023, 42: 335-343.
Zhang Z N, Li J H, Zhao Y Y, Fan Y R, Du Y L, Han D Z, Zhang Y X, Du J D. Salt tolerance identification of soybean at germination stage under different. Soybean Sci, 2023, 42: 335-343 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[26] Ohto M, Fischer R L, Goldberg R B, Nakamura K, Harada J J. Control of seed mass by APETALA2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2005, 102: 3123.
[27] 白光红, 张义荣, 刘弋菊, 邢鸿雁, 严建兵, 彭惠茹, 章建新, 李建生. ImageJ图象处理软件在测量玉米子粒大小中的应用. 玉米科学, 2009, 17(1): 147-151.
Bai G H, Zhang Y R, Liu Y J, Xing H Y, Yan J B, Peng H R, Zhang J X, Li J S. Application of ImageJ analysis software in measuring kernel size of maize seeds. J Maize Sci, 2009, 17(1): 147-151 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28] Flowers T J. Improving crop salt tolerance. J Exp Bot, 2004, 55: 307-319.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh003 pmid: 14718494
[29] 张巧凤, 陈宗金, 吴纪中, 蒋彦婕, 杨继书, 蔡士宾. 小麦种质芽期和苗期的耐盐性鉴定评价. 植物遗传资源学报, 2013, 14: 620-626.
doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.2013.04.007
Zhang Q F, Chen Z J, Wu J Z, Jiang Y J, Yang J S, Cai S B. Screening for salinity tolerance at germination and seedling stages in wheat germplasm. J Plant Genet Resour, 2013, 14: 620-626 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[30] Khatun S, Flowers T J. Effects of salinity on seed set in rice. Plant Cell Environ, 1995, 18: 61-67.
[31] Giaveno C D, Ribeiro R V, Souza G M, Oliveira R F. Screening of tropical maize for salt stress tolerance. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol, 2007, 7: 304-313.
[32] Zhang W, Liao X, Cui Y, Ma W Y, Zhang X N, Du H Y, Ma Y J, Ning L H, Wang H, Huang F, Yang H, Kan G Z, Yu D Y. A cation diffusion facilitator, GmCDF1, negatively regulates salt tolerance in soybean. PLoS Genet, 2019, 15: e1007798.
[33] Guan R X, Qu Y, Guo Y, Yu L L, Liu Y, Jiang J H, Chen J G, Ren Y L, Liu G Y, Tian L, Jin L G, Liu Z X, Hong H L, Chang R Z, Gilliham M, Qiu L J. Salinity tolerance in soybean is modulated by natural variation in GmSALT3. Plant J, 2015, 80: 937-950.
[1] NIE Bo-Tao, LIU De-Quan, CHEN Jian, CUI Zheng-Guo, HOU Yun-Long, CHEN Liang, QIU Hong-Mei, WANG Yue-Qiang. Analysis and comprehensive evaluation of agronomic and quality traits of spring soybean varieties in northern China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(9): 2248-2266.
[2] YE Liang, ZHU Ye-Lin, PEI Lin-Jing, ZHANG Si-Ying, ZUO Xue-Qian, LI Zheng-Zhen, LIU Fang, TAN Jing. Screening candidate resistance genes to ear rot caused by Fusarium verticillioides in maize by combined GWAS and transcriptome analysis [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(9): 2279-2296.
[3] YAN Feng, DONG Yang, LI Qing-Quan, ZHAO Fu-Yang, HOU Xiao-Min, LIU Yang, LI Qing-Chao, ZHAO Lei, FAN Guo-Quan, LIU Kai. Comprehensively evaluation on cold tolerance of foxtail millet varieties at germination stage [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(9): 2207-2218.
[4] SUN Xian-Jun, HU Zheng, JIANG Xue-Min, WANG Shi-Jia, CHEN Xiang-Qian, ZHANG Hui-Yuan, ZHANG Hui, JIANG Qi-Yan. Identification, evaluation and screening of salt-tolerant of soybean germplasm resources at seedling stage [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(9): 2179-2186.
[5] LI Xiao-Fei, GAO Hua-Wei, GUANG Hui, SHI Yu-Xin, GU Yong-Zhe, QI Zhao-Ming, QIU Li-Juan. Identification and evaluation of atrazine tolerance of soybean germplasm resources at germination stage and screening of excellent germplasm [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(7): 1699-1709.
[6] WANG Rui, SUN Bo, ZHANG Yun-Long, ZHANG Ming-Qi, FAN Ya-Ming, TIAN Hong-Li, ZHAO Yi-Kun, YI Hong-Mei, KUANG Meng, WANG Feng-Ge. Application analysis of chloroplast markers on rapid classification in maize germplasm [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(7): 1867-1876.
[7] ZHANG Hong-Mei, ZHANG Wei, WANG Qiong, JIA Qian-Ru, MENG Shan, XIONG Ya-Wen, LIU Xiao-Qing, CHEN Xin, CHEN Hua-Tao. Genome-wide association study for vitamin E content in soybean (Glycine max L.) seed [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(5): 1223-1235.
[8] MIAO Long, SHU Kuo, LI Juan, HUANG Ru, WANG Ye-Xing, Soltani Muhammad YOUSOF, XU Jing-Hao, WU Chuan-Lei, LI Jia-Jia, WANG Xiao-Bo, QIU Li-Juan. Identification and gene mapping of soybean mutant Mrstz in root-stem transition zone [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(5): 1091-1103.
[9] LI Hang, LIU Li, HUANG Qian, LIU Wen-Hao, SI Ai-Jun, KONG Xian-Hui, WANG Xu-Wen, ZHAO Fu-Xiang, MEI Yong-Jun, YU Yu. Identification and screening of salt tolerance of cotton germplasm resources at germination stage [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(5): 1147-1157.
[10] CHEN Jia-Ting, BAI Xin, GU Yu-Jie, ZHANG Xiao-Wen, GUO Hui-Juan, CHANG Li-Fang, CHEN Fang, ZHANG Shu-Wei, ZHANG Xiao-Jun, LI Xin, FENG Rui-Yun, CHANG Zhi-Jian, QIAO Lin-Yi. Applicability evaluation of screen methods to identify salt tolerance in wheat at germination and seedling stages [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(5): 1193-1206.
[11] WANG Ya-Qi, XU Hai-Feng, LI Shu-Guang, FU Meng-Meng, YU Xi-Wen, ZHAO Zhi-Xin, YANG Jia-Yin, ZHAO Tuan-Jie. Genetic analysis and two pairs of genes mapping in soybean mutant NT301 with disease-like rugose leaf [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(4): 808-819.
[12] WANG Qiong, ZHU Yu-Xiang, ZHOU Mi-Mi, ZHANG Wei, ZHANG Hong-Mei, CEHN Xin, CEHN Hua-Tao, CUI Xiao-Yan. Genome-wide association analysis and candidate genes predication of leaf characteristics traits in soybean (Glycine max L.) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(3): 623-632.
[13] LIU Wei, WANG Yu-Bin, LI Wei, ZHANG Li-Feng, XU Ran, WANG Cai-Jie, ZHANG Yan-Wei. Overexpression of soybean isopropyl malate dehydrogenase gene GmIPMDH promotes flowering and growth [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(3): 613-622.
[14] SONG Jian, XIONG Ya-Jun, CHEN Yi-Jie, XU Rui-Xin, LIU Kang-Lin, GUO Qing-Yuan, HONG Hui-Long, GAO Hua-Wei, GU Yong-Zhe, ZHANG Li-Juan, GUO Yong, YAN Zhe, LIU Zhang-Xiong, GUAN Rong-Xia, LI Ying-Hui, WANG Xiao-Bo, GUO Bing-Fu, SUN Ru-Jian, YAN Long, WANG Hao-Rang, JI Yue-Mei, CHANG Ru-Zhen, WANG Jun, QIU Li-Juan. Genetic analysis of seed coat and flower color based on a soybean nested association mapping population [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(3): 556-575.
[15] KE Hui-Feng, SU Hong-Mei, SUN Zheng-Wen, GU Qi-Shen, YANG Jun, WANG Guo-Ning, XU Dong-Yong, WANG Hong-Zhe, WU Li-Qiang, ZHANG Yan, ZHANG Gui-Yin, MA Zhi-Ying, WANG Xing-Fen. Identification for yield and fiber quality traits and evaluation of molecular markers in modern cotton varieties [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(2): 280-293.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] WANG Li-Yan;ZHAO Ke-Fu. Some Physiological Response of Zea mays under Salt-stress[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2005, 31(02): 264 -268 .
[2] Qi Zhixiang;Yang Youming;Zhang Cunhua;Xu Chunian;Zhai Zhixi. Cloning and Analysis of cDNA Related to the Genes of Secondary Wall Thickening of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Fiber[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2003, 29(06): 860 -866 .
[3] NI Da-Hu;YI Cheng-Xin;LI Li;WANG Xiu-Feng;ZHANG Yi;ZHAO Kai-Jun;WANG Chun-Lian;ZHANG Qi;WANG Wen-Xiang;YANG Jian-Bo. Developing Rice Lines Resistant to Bacterial Blight and Blast with Molecular Marker-Assisted Selection[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(01): 100 -105 .
[4] DAI Xiao-Jun;LIANG Man-Zhong;CHEN Liang-Bi. Comparison of rDNA Internal Transcribed Spacer Sequences in Oryza sativa L.[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33(11): 1874 -1878 .
[5] WANG Bao-Hua;WU Yao-Ting;HUANG Nai-Tai;GUO Wang-Zhen;ZHU Xie-Fei;ZHANG Tian-Zhen. QTL Analysis of Epistatic Effects on Yield and Yield Component Traits for Elite Hybrid Derived-RILs in Upland Cotton[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33(11): 1755 -1762 .
[6] WANG Chun-Mei;FENG Yi-Gao;ZHUANG Li-Fang;CAO Ya-Ping;QI Zeng-Jun;BIE Tong-De;CAO Ai-Zhong;CHEN Pei-Du. Screening of Chromosome-Specific Markers for Chromosome 1R of Secale cereale, 1V of Haynaldia villosa and 1Rk#1 of Roegneria kamoji[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33(11): 1741 -1747 .
[7] ZHOU Lu-Ying;LI Xiang-Dong;WANG Li-Li;TANG Xiao;LIN Ying-Jie. Effects of Different Ca Applications on Physiological Characteristics, Yield and Quality in Peanut[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(05): 879 -885 .
[8] WANG Li-Xin; LI Yun-Fu; CHANG Li-Fang; HUANG Lan ;; LI Hong-Bo ; GE Ling-Ling; Liu Li-Hua ;; YAO Ji ;; ZHAO Chang-Ping ;. Method of ID Constitution for Wheat Cultivars[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33(10): 1738 -1740 .
[9] ZHENG Tian-Qing;XU Jian-Long;FU Bing-Ying;GAO Yong-Ming;Satish VERUKA;Renee LAFITTE;ZHAI Hu-Qu;WAN Jian-Min;ZHU Ling-Hua;LI Zhi-Kang. Preliminary Identification of Genetic Overlaps between Sheath Blight Resistance and Drought Tolerance in the Introgression Lines from Directional Selection[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33(08): 1380 -1384 .
[10] YANG Yan;ZHAO Xian-Lin; ZHANG Yong;CHEN Xin-Min;HE Zhong-Hu;YU Zhuo;XIA Lan-Qin
. Evaluation and Validation of Four Molecular Markers Associated with Pre-Harvest Sprouting Tolerance in Chinese Wheats[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(01): 17 -24 .
Add: No. 80 Xueyuan South Rd, Beijing 100081, P. R. China E-mail: zwxb301@caas.cn
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd