Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica,

Acta Agron Sin ›› 2015, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (04): 633-641.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.00633

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION · PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effect of Straw Returning and Reduced Tillage on Interspecific Competition and Complementation in Wheat/Maize Intercropping System

IN Wen**, ZHAO Cai**,YU Ai-Zhong, CHAI Qiang*, HU Fa-Long,FENG Fu-Xue   

  1. Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Arid Land Crop Science / Faculty of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou730070, China
  • Received:2014-08-22 Revised:2014-12-19 Online:2015-04-12 Published:2015-02-14
  • Contact: 柴强, E-mail: chaiq@gsau.edu.cn E-mail:yinwentx@126.com

Abstract:

Conservation tillage has the advantages of enhancing water use efficiency and reducing water/energy consumption simultaneously in common cropping systems. However, this technique has not been well studied and practiced in intercropping system. A field experiment was conducted in 2011 and 2012 growing seasons to investigate the effects of different straw returning ways on crop yields, and interspecific competitiveness and complementation in wheat/maize intercropping system. Three wheat straw returning treatments were designed, which were no-tillage with 25 cm straw standing (NTSS), no-tillage with 25 cm straw covering (NTS), and tillage with 25 cm straw incorporation (TIS). Conventional tillage (CT) was used as the control. In the intercropping system, the land use efficiency (LER) of reduced tillage treatments under straw returning condition increased compared with that of CT, showing the intercropping superiority (LER>1). Simultaneously, the competitiveness of wheat with maize in the whole wheat growing duration decreased in treatments NTSS, NTS and TIS by 37–54%, 108–141%, and 22–24%, respectively. Compared with monocropping maize, intercropping maize had higher rates of relative growth with the increased percentages of 54–59% in NTSS, 66–71% in NTS, 61–63% in TIS and 71–78% in CT. Clearly, NTS showed the most effect on maize growth after wheat harvest. In the intercropping system, the total yields of both crops were 6–10% (2011) and 4–12% (2012) higher in the straw returning treatments than in CT. NTS exhibited the most significant effect on enhancing yield. A quadratic relationship was observed between the total yield of intercropping system and the competitivenessof wheatversus maize, and high yields of both crops were obtained when the competitiveness ranged from 0.24 to 0.27. Our results showed that straw returning in combination with reduced tillage is feasible to regulate the interspecific competitiveness in wheat/maize intercropping system, and NTS treatment is recommended.

Key words: Intercropping, Strawreturning, Competitiveness, Relative crowding coefficient, Yield

[1]Firbank LG, Watkinson AR. On the effects of plant competition: from monocultures to mixtures. In: Grace J B, Tilman D. Perspectives on Plant Competition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1990.pp 165–192



[2]Takim FO. Advantages of maize-cowpea intercropping over sole cropping through competition indices.J Agric Biodiversity Res, 2012,1:53–59



[3]Vandermeer JH. The Ecology of Intercropping.New York: Cambridge University Press,1989



[4]Li L, Sun J H, Zhang F S, Li X L,Yang S C, Rengel Z. Wheat/maize or wheat/soybean strip intercropping: I. Yield advantage and interspecific interactions on nutrients. Field Crops Res,2001,71: 123–137



[5]Tsay JS, Fukai S, Wilson GL. Effects of relative sowing time of soybean on growth and yield of cassava in cassava /soybean intercropping. Field Crops Res, 1988, 19: 227–239



[6]Woldeamlaki A, Bastiaans L, Struik PC. Competition and niche differentiation in barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) mixtures under rainfed conditions in the Central Highlands of Eritrea. Netherlands J Agric Sci, 2001,49: 95–112



[7]张海林,高旺盛,陈阜,朱文珊.保护性耕作研究现状、发展趋势及对策.中国农业大学学报,2005,10(1):16–20



Zhang HL, Gao WS, Chen F, Zhu WS. Prospects and present situation of conservation tillage. J China Agric Univ, 2005, 10(1): 16–20(in Chinese with English abstract)



[8]Sun H Y, Shao L W, Liu X W, Miao W F, Chen S Y, Zhang X Y. Determination of water consumption and the water-saving potential of three mulching methods in a jujube orchard. Eur J Agron, 2012, 43: 87–95



[9]Monneveux P, Quillerou E, Sanchez1 C, Lopez-Cesati J. Effect of zero tillage and residues conservation on continuous maize cropping in a subtropical environment. Plant Soil, 2006, 279: 95–105



[10]Al-Kaisi MM, Yin X. Tillage and crop residue effects on soil carbon and carbon dioxide emission in corn-soybean rotation. J Environ Qual, 2005, 34:437–445



[11]Mariela F, Claudia H, Jorge E, Fernando DL, Armando G, Luc D, Nele V, Bram G. Conservation agriculture, increased organic carbon in the top-soil macro-aggregates and reduced soil CO2 emissions. Plant Soil, 2012, 355:183–193



[12]Cahill JF. Fertilization effects on interaction between above- and below-ground competition in an old field.Ecology, 1999, 80: 466–480



[13]Dhima KV, Lithourgidis AS, Vasilakoglou IB,Dordas CA. Competition indices of common vetch and cereal intercrops in two seeding ratio. Field Crops Res, 2007, 100: 249–256



[14]Willey R W. Intercropping its importance and research needs: I. Competition and yield advantage. Field Crops Abstr, 1979, 32: 1–10



[15]Li L, Sun J H, Zhang F S, Li X L,Rengel Z, Yang S C. Wheat/maize or wheat/soybean strip intercropping: II. Recovery or compensation of maize and soybean after wheat harvesting. Field Crops Res, 2001, 71: 173–181



[16]Zhang F S, Li L. Using competitive and facilitative interactions in intercropping systems enhances crop productivity and nutrient-use efficiency.Plant Soil, 2003, 248: 305–312



[17]Midmore MD, Roca J, BerriosID. Potato (Solanum spp.) in the hot tropics: IV. Intercropping with maize and the influence of shade on potato microenvironment and crop growth. Field Crops Res, 1988,18: 145–157



[18]樊志龙,陶志强,柴强,于爱忠,黄鹏.少耕秸秆覆盖对小麦间作玉米产量和水分利用的影响.灌溉排水学报,2012,31(1):109–112



Fan ZL, Tao ZQ, Chai Q, Yu AZ, Huang P. Yield and water use efficiency of wheat corn intercropping with reduced tillage and wheat straw mulching. J Irrig Drainage, 2012,31(1):109–112(in Chinese with English abstract)



[19]Gao Z Q,Yin J.Effects of tillage and mulch methods on soil moisture in wheat fields of Loess Plateau,China. Pedosphere,1999,9:161–168



[20]Domzal H,Slowinska-Jurkiewica A.Effects of tillage and weather conditions on structure and physical properties of soil and yield of winter wheat.Soil Till Res,1987,10:225–241



[21]冯福学,黄高宝,于爱忠,柴强,陶明,李杰.不同保护性耕作措施对武威绿洲灌区冬小麦水分利用的影响.应用生态学报,2009,20:1060–1065



Feng F X, Huang G B, Yu A Z, Chai Q, Tao M, Li J. Effects of different conservation tillage measures on winter wheat water use in Wuwei oasis irrigated area. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2009, 20: 1060–1065(in Chinese with English abstract)



[22]卜玉山, 苗果园, 邵海林, 王建程. 对地膜和秸秆覆盖玉米生长发育与产量的分析. 作物学报, 2006,32: 1090–1093



Bu Y S, Miao G Y, Shao H L, Wang J C. Analysis of growth and development and yield of corn mulched with plastic film and straw.Acta Agron Sin, 2006,32: 1090–1093 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[23]王喜庆, 李生秀, 高亚军. 地膜覆盖对旱地春玉米生理生态和产量的影响.作物学报, 1998, 24: 348–353



Wang X Q, Li S X, Gao Y J. Effect of plastic film mulching on ecophysiology and yield of the spring maize on the arid land. Acta Agron Sin, 1998, 24: 348–353 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[24]齐万海,柴强.不同隔根方式下间作小麦玉米的竞争力及产量响应.中国生态农业学报,2010,18:31–34



Qi W H, Chai Q. Yield response to wheat/maize competitiveness in wheat/maize intercropping system under different root partition patterns. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2010, 18: 31–34(in Chinese with English abstract)

[1] Hu Chuan, Zhao Kai-Nan, Huang Xiu-Li, Wu Jin-Zhi, Ren Kai-Ming, Wang He-Zheng, Fu Guo-Zhan, Huang Ming, Li You-Jun. Effects of tillage methods and nitrogen rates on yield and quality of dryland wheat under one-off irrigation [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] Ma Sheng-Qian, Wang Zhi-Ping, Chen Hao-Tian, Dou Shu-Xian, Zhang Yan, Deng Ai-Xing, Zhang Wei-Jian, Yuan Xiang-Yang, Song Zhen-Wei. Effects of tillage methods and nitrogen application rate on maize yield and soil aggregates in northeastern China under straw returning [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3] Zhang Si-Si, Zhao Xiang-Hui, Zhou Yang, Yao Yun-Feng, Zhu Rong-Yu, Dong Yuan-Jie, Hu Guo-Qing, Xu Tong, Liu Zhao-Xin. Effects of plowing and green manure returning in winter fallow period on soil physicochemical properties and yield in continuously cropped peanut [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[4] Zhang Ning-Ning, Teng Yu-Fei, Ren Na-Na, Wei Xing-Zhuo, Yan Shu-Hao, Fan Ke-Xin, Wang Yong-Hong, Chen Wen-Kang, Zhang Xing-Hua, Zhu Wan-Chao, Xu Shu-Tu, Xue Ji-Quan. Phenotypic evaluation and plasticity analysis of drought resistance in 201 maize inbred lines [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] Wang Yu-Cheng, Zhang Lu, Liu A-Kang, Huang Jian-Liang, Peng Shao-Bing, Yuan Shen. Strategies and prospects for large-scale crop yield improvement based on yield gap [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[6] Zhang Zhen, Feng Lian-Jie, Shi Yu, Yu Zhen-Wen, Zhang Yong-Li. Yield formation of wheat with different ear types under water-saving supplementary irrigation conditions [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[7] Yan An, Jiang Kun-Wei, Wang Rong-Yuan, Tian Lin, Zhang Lu, Wang Yun, Xu Jian-Long. Identification and cloning of SVN7 controlling small vascular bundle number in the rice flag leaf [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[8] Liu Xin-Meng, Ren Hao, Zhang Ji-Bo, Zhang Ji-Wang, Zhao Bin, Ren Bai-Zhao, Liu Peng, Wang Hong-Zhang. Physiological mechanisms of methyl jasmonate (MeJA) alleviating the effects of heat stress on ear differentiation in maize [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[9] Wang Zhuang-Zhuang, Wu Zi-Jun, Zhang Yong-Xin, Zhang Xin-Yuan, Yuan Li-Xue, Chen Ru-Xue, Liu Shi-Ju, Duan Jian-Zhao, Feng Wei, Wang Tong-Chao, Wang Yong-Hua. Optimized water-nitrogen synergy enhances winter wheat yield and nitrogen use efficiency in clay-loam fluvo-aquic soils of southeastern Henan, China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[10] Zhang Hong-Rong, Wang Fei-Er, Li Pan, Qiu Hai-Long, Zhu Jing, Zhao Lian-Hao, Nan Yun-You, He Wei, Fan Zhi-Long, Hu Fa-Long, Chai Qiang, Yin Wen. Photosynthetic characteristics of 20% reduced irrigation combined with 25% organic substitution for chemical fertilizer in increasing silage maize yield [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[11] Zhao Jia-Xue, Zhou Long-Hao, Guo Qi-Yuan, Shang Lun-Xiao, Wang Han, Liu Zhi-Tao, Chen Xi, Zhang Xiao-Pei, Song Xian-Liang, Ahmedov Miraziz Baltaevich, Mao Li-Li. Long-term stubble return and subsoiling enhance cotton yields in coastal saline-alkali soils by improving soil conditions and photosynthetic characteristics [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[12] Guo Xing-Yu, Hu Dan, Lin Su-Qi, Wang Meng-Kai, Tan Wen-Feng, Huang Chuan-Qin. Biochar combined with chemical fertilizer increases maize yield and soil ecosystem multifunctionality in an intercropped maize-soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[13] Cai Hong-Wei, Yu Ai-Zhong, Jiang Ke-Qiang, Wang Peng-Fei, Wang Yu-Long, Huo Jian-Zhe, Pang Xiao-Neng, Yin Bo, Shang Yong-Pan. Key mechanisms underlying the enhancement of sweet maize yield through partial substitution of chemical fertilizers with organic manure in arid irrigation districts [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[14] Cui Xue-Mei, Liu Yan-Di, Liu Jing-Hui, Mi Jun-Zhen, Wu Jun-Ying, Zhao Bao-Ping. Study on the relationship between physiological characteristics of superior and inferior grains with yield in different oat genotypes [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
[15] Yang Rui, Chen Jing-Dong, Huang Ying, Zhang Xue-Kun, Zhou Deng-Wen, Liu Qing-Yun, Xu Jin-Song, Xie Ling-Li, Xu Ben-Bo. Study on breeding and cultivation strategies for winter rapeseed to cope with climate change in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!