甘蓝型油菜种子萌发期耐苯磺隆种质筛选与综合评价

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.01169

Abstract

Abstract:

The purpose of this study is to explore the characteristics of tribenuron-methyl tolerance in different genotypes of Brassica napus, and establish the evaluation system for screening and breeding new cultivars with tribenuron-methyl tolerance. The germination vigor was measured on the third day after treatment and the germination rate, shoot length, root length, dry weight, as well as fresh weight were measured on the seventh day. The identification of tolerance at germination stage was performed by tribenuron-methyl tolerance comprehensive evaluation value (T), average subordinative function value (ASF) and weight tribenuron-methyl tolerance coefficient (WTC) in correlation analysis, frequency analysis, principal component analysis, grey analysis, cluster analysis and stepwise regression analysis. Based on the variance analysis of relative root length index in 11 tested materials, we determined the optimum treatment concentration (25 mg kg ^-1) for selecting and evaluating the tolerant germplasm resources to tribenuron-methyl in napeseed. Under the optimum concentration, the single factor variance analysis showed significant differences in root length, shoot length, germination rate, germination vigor and fresh weight among 241 accessions of Brassica napus. The clustering analysis according to T value exhibited that the tested cultivars were roughly divided into five tribenuron-methyl tolerance grades, including three in grade I, 30 in grade II, 198 in grade III, six in grade IV, and four in grade V. We conclude that the varieties (lines) with strong tribenuron-methyl tolerance at germination stage are Xiwang 106, SWU95, and WH-33, which could be used as the germplasm materials for the study on tolerance breeding and mechanism. Furthermore, the root length, fresh weight and germination rate could be used as index traits to evaluate the tolerance of rapeseed germplasm resources during germination stage.

Key words: Brassica napus L, Tribenuron-methyl tolerance, germplasm resources, comprehensive evaluation, germination stage

Qian WANG,Cui CUI,Sang YE,Ming-Sheng CUI,Yu-Feng ZHAO,Na LIN,Zhang-Lin TANG,Jia-Na LI,Qing-Yuan ZHOU. Screening and Comprehensive Evaluation of Germplasm Resources with Tribenuron-methyl Tolerance at Germination Stage in Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)[J].Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(8): 1169-1184.

Figures/Tables 10

Table 1

Table 2

Fig. 1

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

ASF value, WTC value, T value, and final rank of 241 accessions of rape germplasm resources under tribenuron-methyl stress"

编号 Code	ASF值 ASF value		WTC值 WTC value		T值 T value		综合排序 Final rank
编号 Code	数值Value	排序Order	数值Value	排序Order	数值Value	排序Order	综合排序 Final rank
1	0.55	35	0.55	30	0.28	73	40
2	0.46	167	0.53	67	-0.30	178	141
3	0.49	127	0.55	32	0.07	108	81
4	0.48	138	0.54	62	-0.16	154	124
5	0.44	192	0.50	164	-0.55	201	192
6	0.57	24	0.55	26	0.65	31	25
7	0.48	141	0.48	194	-0.29	177	175
8	0.42	213	0.46	208	-0.53	199	212
9	0.47	148	0.52	101	-0.29	176	148
10	0.54	49	0.55	33	0.55	35	35
11	0.47	147	0.52	114	-0.14	145	138
12	0.52	78	0.52	121	0.05	111	103
13	0.45	177	0.52	106	-0.62	207	165
14	0.51	84	0.53	84	0.23	80	74
15	0.42	206	0.52	100	-0.66	215	178
16	0.47	150	0.49	174	-0.01	121	153
17	0.47	154	0.50	145	-0.15	151	154
18	0.50	98	0.53	83	0.10	105	85
19	0.42	203	0.49	178	-0.72	218	209
20	0.50	110	0.52	99	0.13	98	100
21	0.45	184	0.50	144	-0.55	203	181
22	0.44	194	0.51	132	-0.52	198	179
23	0.44	196	0.48	183	-0.54	200	202
24	0.49	122	0.53	65	-0.14	146	116
25	0.46	164	0.50	163	-0.12	141	161
26	0.47	155	0.51	123	-0.30	179	158
27	0.40	218	0.46	212	-0.83	227	218
28	0.49	134	0.52	94	0.05	110	118
29	0.60	11	0.57	7	0.79	24	11
30	0.42	209	0.48	191	-0.60	206	210
31	0.52	68	0.54	57	0.02	118	70
32	0.53	58	0.52	98	0.22	81	67
33	0.59	14	0.56	13	0.96	15	12
34	0.48	143	0.52	104	-0.21	163	140
35	0.33	235	0.41	236	-1.28	234	235
36	0.16	241	0.36	241	-2.57	241	241
37	0.50	92	0.50	141	-0.01	119	123
38	0.25	238	0.38	238	-1.77	238	238
39	0.48	140	0.53	66	-0.10	138	122
40	0.47	157	0.54	49	-0.07	133	119
41	0.46	169	0.53	82	-0.43	191	152
42	0.50	107	0.53	63	0.03	116	86
43	0.41	215	0.49	166	-0.57	204	206
编号 Code	ASF值 ASF value		WTC值 WTC value		T值 T value		综合排序 Final rank
编号 Code	数值Value	排序Order	数值Value	排序Order	数值Value	排序Order	综合排序 Final rank
44	0.46	162	0.50	147	-0.13	143	156
45	0.44	197	0.49	175	-0.39	186	194
46	0.49	120	0.54	47	-0.02	122	87
47	0.39	223	0.45	223	-0.74	219	223
48	0.51	89	0.54	40	0.35	64	54
49	0.54	43	0.53	81	0.35	63	52
50	0.53	52	0.55	25	0.21	82	46
51	0.42	204	0.47	206	-0.36	185	208
52	0.64	5	0.57	9	1.13	6	5
53	0.50	106	0.50	156	-0.07	135	134
54	0.50	108	0.51	137	0.36	60	99
55	0.44	187	0.48	186	-0.31	181	191
56	0.46	163	0.49	167	-0.17	157	164
57	0.45	182	0.47	197	-0.24	167	189
58	0.50	103	0.54	58	-0.15	152	106
59	0.46	168	0.48	185	-0.31	180	183
60	0.54	50	0.55	27	0.46	46	37
61	0.47	160	0.53	75	-0.33	182	144
62	0.51	83	0.53	86	0.33	67	66
63	0.32	236	0.42	235	-1.41	236	236
64	0.53	60	0.54	55	0.20	86	58
65	0.54	46	0.54	52	0.53	39	39
66	0.55	34	0.56	14	0.53	38	26
67	0.49	124	0.53	89	-0.27	172	131
68	0.50	104	0.53	73	-0.11	140	107
69	0.45	175	0.52	105	-0.39	188	162
70	0.52	71	0.52	102	0.18	88	78
71	0.39	222	0.44	224	-0.81	225	225
72	0.57	21	0.54	42	1.00	12	20
73	0.29	237	0.41	237	-1.47	237	237
74	0.53	51	0.54	38	0.13	99	53
75	0.45	174	0.54	61	-0.26	169	136
76	0.52	69	0.50	142	0.04	114	112
77	0.51	85	0.51	133	0.12	100	109
78	0.45	173	0.49	181	-0.17	155	172
79	0.52	72	0.52	118	0.16	92	84
80	0.40	219	0.45	222	-0.77	223	221
81	0.37	228	0.42	234	-0.75	221	229
82	0.54	42	0.51	124	0.11	101	82
83	0.42	211	0.47	198	-0.64	212	213
84	0.47	152	0.50	152	0.02	117	147
85	0.49	133	0.50	158	-0.08	136	150
86	0.45	179	0.45	215	-0.10	137	182
87	0.21	239	0.38	239	-1.99	239	239
88	0.56	31	0.54	59	0.44	48	41
89	0.53	63	0.52	96	0.52	40	57
90	0.45	172	0.49	169	-0.15	149	166
91	0.43	202	0.46	209	-0.22	164	201
92	0.50	101	0.53	74	0.32	69	73
93	0.51	90	0.51	139	0.35	61	89
94	0.52	77	0.56	22	0.42	55	45
95	0.47	156	0.49	165	-0.13	144	160
96	0.55	33	0.56	16	0.43	49	31
97	0.52	75	0.53	70	0.04	115	77
98	0.53	54	0.53	76	0.54	37	47
99	0.50	102	0.54	45	0.15	96	71
100	0.38	226	0.45	219	-0.92	231	227
101	0.45	171	0.50	161	-0.43	192	180
102	0.57	25	0.53	72	0.90	17	34
103	0.45	176	0.51	131	-0.35	183	167
104	0.53	62	0.50	143	0.15	95	95
105	0.42	212	0.47	205	-0.68	216	216
106	0.55	36	0.52	110	0.76	26	48
107	0.59	13	0.56	15	0.97	14	13
108	0.50	93	0.53	79	-0.15	150	111
109	0.54	44	0.54	53	0.43	50	44
110	0.51	88	0.51	136	0.20	83	101
111	0.48	137	0.50	148	-0.04	127	142
112	0.49	119	0.54	60	-0.04	129	102
113	0.52	79	0.50	159	0.37	59	91
114	0.52	80	0.53	64	0.20	84	64
115	0.49	125	0.52	97	0.27	75	92
116	0.49	131	0.51	127	-0.19	162	146
117	0.52	74	0.53	85	0.40	57	61
118	0.47	151	0.52	92	-0.16	153	133
119	0.49	121	0.52	117	-0.01	120	127
120	0.45	180	0.49	180	-0.51	197	193
121	0.50	99	0.52	95	0.08	107	96
122	0.42	207	0.47	201	-0.65	213	214
122	0.42	207	0.47	201	-0.65	213	214
123	0.38	225	0.43	227	-0.62	208	219
124	0.47	159	0.50	155	-0.40	189	171
125	0.44	190	0.46	207	-0.19	161	195
126	0.53	65	0.51	140	0.42	54	75
127	0.44	189	0.48	190	-0.63	209	207
128	0.51	87	0.52	109	-0.05	131	114
129	0.39	221	0.44	225	-0.77	224	224
130	0.42	208	0.51	135	-0.44	193	185
131	0.42	210	0.49	176	-0.17	156	188
132	0.40	217	0.46	210	-0.76	222	217
133	0.61	7	0.56	21	0.97	13	10
134	0.54	47	0.54	51	0.51	42	42
135	0.43	200	0.48	195	-0.36	184	203
136	0.41	214	0.45	220	-0.90	230	222
137	0.42	205	0.48	192	-0.71	217	211
138	0.50	111	0.53	88	0.10	102	97
139	0.50	94	0.54	56	-0.11	139	88
140	0.51	82	0.55	34	0.17	91	59
141	0.49	126	0.52	103	0.13	97	113
142	0.58	19	0.55	24	0.72	27	17
143	0.49	123	0.51	128	-0.04	128	129
144	0.50	109	0.53	87	-0.04	125	110
145	0.47	146	0.52	112	-0.17	159	145
146	0.55	39	0.57	10	0.80	22	18
147	0.44	198	0.49	182	-0.55	202	204
148	0.55	37	0.56	17	0.52	41	30
149	0.39	220	0.44	226	-0.81	226	226
150	0.49	129	0.52	116	-0.25	168	143
151	0.50	96	0.50	153	0.08	106	125
152	0.49	132	0.50	162	-0.07	134	151
153	0.50	113	0.52	120	0.07	109	120
154	0.49	130	0.50	154	-0.24	166	155
155	0.43	201	0.45	217	-0.65	214	215
156	0.49	128	0.52	119	0.17	90	117
157	0.59	16	0.57	6	0.66	30	15
158	0.57	20	0.56	23	0.60	33	22
159	0.56	26	0.56	20	0.40	58	32
160	0.50	95	0.54	39	0.10	103	68
161	0.45	183	0.48	184	-0.45	194	198
162	0.63	6	0.56	11	1.25	5	6
163	0.44	195	0.50	149	-0.46	195	187
164	0.56	28	0.55	29	0.89	18	21
165	0.49	117	0.46	211	0.71	28	126
166	0.35	232	0.42	230	-1.29	235	233
167	0.46	170	0.51	130	-0.49	196	170
168	0.49	135	0.53	69	-0.04	126	115
169	0.59	12	0.57	8	0.83	20	9
170	0.53	56	0.54	50	0.30	70	49
171	0.50	114	0.50	150	0.23	79	121
172	0.47	158	0.53	77	-0.26	170	137
173	0.52	73	0.49	173	0.35	65	104
174	0.53	64	0.54	43	0.30	71	50
175	0.51	81	0.51	129	0.43	51	79
176	0.58	18	0.57	5	0.54	36	16
177	0.53	55	0.55	36	0.15	94	51
178	0.49	115	0.52	93	0.10	104	105
179	0.44	191	0.52	108	-0.64	211	173
180	0.68	1	0.58	4	2.16	2	2
181	0.52	66	0.52	107	0.41	56	65
182	0.57	23	0.55	31	0.79	23	23
183	0.52	70	0.51	125	0.32	68	80
184	0.44	193	0.47	200	-0.12	142	184
185	0.68	2	0.60	2	1.12	7	4
186	0.53	53	0.51	126	0.93	16	55
187	0.48	142	0.49	171	-0.26	171	163
188	0.54	45	0.49	179	0.86	19	72
189	0.48	139	0.48	187	-0.05	130	157
190	0.37	229	0.45	221	-1.19	233	230
191	0.17	240	0.37	240	-2.14	240	240
192	0.53	61	0.52	115	0.46	45	63
193	0.38	224	0.43	229	-0.63	210	220
194	0.41	216	0.45	218	-0.14	148	205
195	0.48	145	0.53	78	0.28	74	93
196	0.44	186	0.47	202	-0.28	173	199
197	0.51	86	0.48	188	0.51	43	108
198	0.49	118	0.50	157	0.04	112	132
199	0.67	3	0.62	1	2.21	1	1
200	0.46	165	0.46	213	-0.28	175	190
201	0.50	97	0.52	91	0.18	89	83
202	0.45	178	0.48	193	-0.39	187	196
203	0.60	9	0.56	18	1.03	10	8
204	0.60	8	0.53	68	1.34	4	24
205	0.46	161	0.49	177	-0.28	174	176
206	0.36	230	0.42	233	-0.89	229	232
207	0.59	15	0.56	12	1.04	9	7
208	0.56	30	0.55	37	0.82	21	27
209	0.45	185	0.45	216	-0.23	165	200
210	0.49	116	0.50	146	-0.14	147	139
211	0.59	17	0.56	19	1.01	11	14
212	0.47	149	0.47	203	-0.17	158	174
213	0.47	153	0.46	214	-0.02	123	168
214	0.56	29	0.55	28	0.56	34	28
215	0.67	4	0.60	3	1.85	3	3
216	0.43	199	0.47	199	-0.19	160	197
217	0.36	231	0.43	228	-0.75	220	228
218	0.52	67	0.52	90	0.20	85	69
219	0.50	105	0.51	122	0.29	72	94
220	0.45	181	0.49	168	0.26	76	149
221	0.54	48	0.54	44	0.43	52	43
222	0.50	112	0.49	172	0.24	78	128
223	0.57	22	0.54	46	0.79	25	29
224	0.56	27	0.54	48	0.67	29	33
225	0.50	91	0.51	138	0.35	66	90
226	0.48	136	0.50	151	0.04	113	135
227	0.55	40	0.52	111	0.35	62	60
228	0.48	144	0.48	189	-0.03	124	159
229	0.60	10	0.54	54	1.07	8	19
230	0.52	76	0.51	134	0.16	93	98
231	0.46	166	0.48	196	-0.06	132	169
232	0.44	188	0.50	160	-0.41	190	186
233	0.50	100	0.47	204	0.25	77	130
234	0.53	57	0.49	170	0.63	32	76
235	0.37	227	0.42	231	-0.87	228	231
236	0.55	38	0.55	35	0.48	44	36
237	0.55	32	0.52	113	0.42	53	56
238	0.54	41	0.54	41	0.44	47	38
239	0.53	59	0.53	71	0.19	87	62
240	0.33	234	0.53	80	-0.57	205	177
241	0.34	233	0.42	232	-1.18	232	234

Table 6

Table 7

Table 8

Table 9

References 49

[1]	张朝贤, 胡祥恩, 钱益新 . 国外除草剂应用趋势及我国杂草科学研究现状和发展方向. 植物保护学报, 1997,24:278-282
	Zhang C X, Hu X E, Qian Y X . Trend of herbicides use in developed countries and current research and future directions in weed science research in China. J Plant Prot, 1997,24:278-282 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	张朝贤, 倪汉文, 魏守辉, 黄红娟, 刘延, 崔海兰, 隋标峰, 张猛, 郭峰 . 杂草抗药性研究进展. 中国农业科学, 2009,42:1274-1289
	Zhang C X, Ni H W, Wei S H, Huang H J, Liu Y, Cui H L, Sui B F, Zhang M, Guo F . Current advances in research on herbicide resistance. Sci Agric Sin, 2009,42:1274-1289 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	吴春华, 陈欣 . 农药对农区生物多样性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2004,15:341-344
	Wu C H, Chen X . Impact of pesticides on biodiversity in agricultural areas. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2004,15:341-344 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	单正军, 陈祖义 . 除草剂对非靶植物(农作物)的危害影响及控制技术. 农药科学与管理, 2007,28(9):50-54 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5480.2007.09.017
	Shan Z J, Chen Z Y . Harm and control technology of herbicides to non target plants (crops). Pestic Sci Admin, 2007,28(9):50-54 (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5480.2007.09.017
[5]	Brighenti A M, Moraes V J, Oliveira Jr R S, Gazziero D L P, Voll E, Gomes J A . Persistência e fitotoxicidade do herbicida atrazine aplicado na cultura do milho sobre a cultura do girassol em sucessão. Planta Daninha, 2002,20:291-297 doi: 10.1590/S0100-83582002000200016
[6]	林长福 . 玉米田化学除草现状及发展趋势. 农药, 1999, ( 9):3-4
	Lin C F . Present situation and development trend of chemical weed control in maize field. Agrochemicals, 1999, ( 9):3-4 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	王汉中 . 我国油菜产需形势分析及产业发展对策. 中国油料作物学报, 2007,29:101-105
	Wang H Z . Strategy for rapeseed industry development based on the analysis of rapeseed production and demand in China. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2007,29:101-105 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	Zhou W J, Yoneyama K, Takeuchi Y, Iso S, Rungmekarat S, Chae S H, Sato D, Joel D M . In vitro infection of host roots by differentiated calli of the parasitic plant orobanche. J Exp Bot, 2004,55:899-907 doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh098
[9]	Song W J, Zhou W J, Jin Z L, Gao D D, Joel D M, Takeuchi Y, Yoneyama K . Germination response of Orobanche seeds subjected to conditioning temperature, water potential and growth regulator treatments. Weed Res, 2005,45:467-476 doi: 10.1111/wre.2005.45.issue-6
[10]	俞琦英, 周伟军 . 油菜田的杂草发生特点及其防治研究概况. 浙江农业科学, 2010, ( 1):123-127 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0528-9017.2010.01.048
	Yu Q Y, Zhou W J . Study on weed occurrence characteristics and control in rape field. J Zhejiang Agric Sci, 2010, ( 1):123-127 (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0528-9017.2010.01.048
[11]	张宏军, 贾富勤, 张佳, 李晓晶 . 杂草对灭生性除草剂百草枯的抗性问题. 农药科学管理, 2003,24(12):26-29 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5480.2003.12.013
	Zhang H J, Jia F L, Zhang J, Li X J . The resistant weeds of no selective herbicide-paraquat. Pestic Sci Admini, 2003,24(12):26-29 (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5480.2003.12.013
[12]	张宏军, 刘学, 张佳, 崔海兰, 张朝贤, 朱文达 . 我国油菜田除草剂登记和使用情况. 科技创新导报, 2008, ( 15):252-253 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-098X.2008.15.201
	Zhang H J, Liu X, Zhang J, Cui H L, Zhang C X, Zhu W D . Herbicide registration and usage in rape fields in China. Sci Technol Innov Herald, 2008, ( 15):252-253 (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-098X.2008.15.201
[13]	孙妍妍, 曲高平, 黄谦心, 吕金洋, 郭媛, 胡胜武 . 甘蓝型油菜耐苯磺隆突变体ALS基因分析与SNP标记. 中国油料作物学报, 2015,37:589-595
	Sun Y Y, Qu G P, Huang Q X, Lyu J Y, Guo Y, Hu S W . SNP markers for acetolactate synthase genes from tribenuron-methyl resistant mutants in Brassica napus L. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2015,37:589-595 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	信晓阳, 曲高平, 张荣, 庞红喜, 吴强, 王发禄, 胡胜武 . 不同品种油菜对苯磺隆耐药性差异的鉴定. 西北农业学报, 2014,23(7):68-74 doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1004-1389.2014.07.012
	Xin X Y, Qu G P, Zhang R, Pang H X, Wu Q, Wang F L, Hu S W . Identification of the tribenuron-methyl tolerance in different rapeseed genotypes. Acta Agric Boreali-Occident Sin, 2014,23(7):68-74 (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1004-1389.2014.07.012
[15]	Yu C, Hu S, He P, Sun G, Zhang C, Yu Y . Inducing male sterility in Brassica napus L. by a sulphonylurea herbicide, tribenuron-methyl. Plant Breed, 2006,125:61-64 doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2006.01180.x
[16]	Li H, Li J, Zhao B, Wang J, Yi L, Liu C, Wu J, King G J, Liu K . Generation and characterization of tribenuron-methyl herbicide-resistant rapeseed (Brasscia napus) for hybrid seed production using chemically induced male sterility. Theor Appl Genet, 2015,128:107-118
[17]	吴学莉, 易丽聪, 侯凡, 吴江生, 姚璇, 刘克德 . 表达播娘蒿突变基因DsALS-108的抗苯磺隆甘蓝型油菜植株构建. 农业生物技术学报, 2016,24:469-477 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7968.2016.04.001
	Wu X L, Yi L C, Hou F, Wu J S, Yao X, Liu K D . Generation of tribenuron-methyl herbicide resistant rapeseed (Brasscia napus) plants expressing mutated gene DsALS-108 of flixweed(Descurainia sophia). J Agric Biotechnol, 2016,24:469-477 (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7968.2016.04.001
[18]	曲高平, 孙妍妍, 庞红喜, 吴强, 王发禄, 胡胜武 . 甘蓝型油菜EMS突变体库构建及抗除草剂突变体筛选. 中国油料作物学报, 2014,36:25-31 doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2014.01.004
	Qu G P, Sun Y Y, Pang H X, Wu Q, Wang F L, Hu S W . Ems mutagenesis and als-inhibitor herbicide-resistant mutants of Brassica napus L. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2014,36:25-31 (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2014.01.004
[19]	汪亚琴 . 水稻抗除草剂基因CYP81A6转化油菜的研究. 华中农业大学硕士学位论文, 湖北武汉, 2013
	Wang Y Q . The Expression of Rice Herbicide Resistance Gene CYP81A6 in Brassica napus. MS Thesis of Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China, 2013 ( in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	邱芳心, 杜桂萍, 刘开林, 毛爱星, 罗坤 . 杂草抗药性及其治理策略研究进展. 杂草科学, 2015, ( 2):1-6 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-935X.2015.02.001
	Qiu F X, Du G P, Liu K L, Mao A X, Luo K . Research progress on weed resistance to herbicides and control methods. Weed Sci, 2015, ( 2):1-6 (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-935X.2015.02.001
[21]	信晓阳 . 油菜苯磺隆抗性研究与转基因抗除草剂油菜的选育. 西北农林科技大学硕士学位论文, 陕西西安, 2013
	Xin X Y . Charaterization of Resistance to Tribenuron-Methyl in Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) and Development of Transgenic Rapeseed with Herbericide-Resistance. MS Thesis of Northwest A&F University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China, 2013 ( in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	Koger C H, Poston D H, Hayes R M, Montgomery R F . Glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) in Mississippi. Weed Technol, 2004,189:820-825
[23]	Kuk Y I, Kim K H, Kwon O D, Lee D J, Burgos N R, Jung S, Guh J O . Cross-resistance pattern and alternative herbicides for Cyperus difformis resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides in Korea. Pest Manage Sci, 2004,60:85-94 doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1526-4998
[24]	刘伟, 王金信, 杨广玲, 毕建杰, 隋标峰 . 不同小麦品种对苯磺隆耐药性差异及其机理. 植物保护学报, 2005,32:300-304
	Liu W, Wang J X, Yang G L, Bi J J, Sui B F . Different of tolerance and mechanism of various wheat varieties to tribenuron-methyl. Acta Phytophy Sin, 2005,32:300-304 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	Heap I M . International survey of herbicide-resistant weeds. Weed Technol, 1990,4(1):220 doi: 10.1017/S0890037X00025252
[26]	Deng W, Yang Q, Jiao H T, Zhang Y Z, Li X F, Zhang M Q . Cross-resistance pattern to four AHAS-inhibiting herbicides of tribenuron-methyl-resistant flixweed (Descurainia sophia) conferred by Asp-376-Glu mutation in AHAS. J Integr Agric, 2016,15:2563-2570
[27]	Sun J, Wang J X, Zhang H J, Liu J L, Bian S N . Study on mutations in ALS for resistance to tribenuron-methyl in Galium aparine L. Agric Sci Chin, 2011,10:86-91
[28]	Cumminsa I, Wortleyb David J, Sabbadin F, Heb Z, Coxona C R, Strakera H E, Sellarsa J D, Knighta K, Edwardsc L, Hughesd D, Kaundund S S, Hutchingsd S J, Steela P G, Edwardsb R . Key role for a glutathione transferase in multiple-herbicide resistance in grass weeds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2013,110:5812-5817 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1221179110 pmid: 23530204
[29]	商璐 . 抗草甘膦大豆种质挖掘及抗性机制研究. 东北农业大学硕士学位论文, 黑龙江哈尔滨, 2016
	Shang L . Study on Screening and Resistant Mechanism of Germplasm Resources to Glyphosate-Resistance in Soybean. MS Thesis of Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China, 2016 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	Kotoula-Syka E, Eleftherohorinos I G, Gagianas A A, Sficas A G . Phytotoxicity and persistence of chlorsulfuron, metsulfuron- methyl, triasulfuron and tribenuron-methyl in three soils. Weed Res, 2010,33:355-367
[31]	邹月利, 陶波 . 磺酰脲类除草剂的降解机制及代谢产物的研究进展. 农药科学与管理, 2011,32(10):24-31
	Zou Y L, Tao B . Research advance on the degradation mechanism and degradation products of sulfonylurea herbicides. Pestic Sci Admini, 2011,32(10):24-31 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]	王正贵 . 除草剂对小麦产量和品质的影响及其残留特性. 扬州大学博士学位论文, 江苏扬州, 2011 doi: 10.7666/d.y2050365
	Wang Z G . Effects of Herbicides on Grain Yield and Quality in Wheat and Relevant Residual Behavior. PhD Dissertation of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China, 2011 ( in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.7666/d.y2050365
[33]	江改青 . 小麦和土壤中苯磺隆与氯氟吡氧乙酸残留分析方法及消解动态研究. 安徽农业大学硕士学位论文, 安徽合肥, 2009 doi: 10.7666/d.y1597372
	Jiang G Q . Study on Analytical Mechods and Dynamics of Tribenuron-methyI and Fluroxypyr Residues in Wheat and Soil. MS Thesis of Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, Hanhui, China, 2009 ( in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.7666/d.y1597372
[34]	陈新, 张宗文, 吴斌 . 裸燕麦萌发期耐盐性综合评价与耐盐种质筛选. 中国农业科学, 2014,47:2038-2046
	Chen X, Zhang Z W, Wu B . Comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance and screening for salt tolerant accessions of naked oat (Avena nuda L.) at germination stage. Sci Agric Sin, 2014,47:2038-2046 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35]	汪梦竹, 慕小倩, 李玉菲, 崔宏安, 郭媛, 胡胜武 . 油菜和小麦种苗根系对乙草胺的耐性差异分析. 植物保护学报, 2017,44:337-342 doi: 10.13802/j.cnki.zwbhxb.2017.2015145
	Wang M Z, Mu X Q, Li Y F, Cui H A, Guo Y, Hu S W . Analysis of acetochlor tolerance in root of Brassica napus L. and Triticum aestivum L. J Plant Prot, 2017,44:337-342 (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.13802/j.cnki.zwbhxb.2017.2015145
[36]	刘安芳, 伍莲 . 生物统计学. 重庆: 西南师范大学出版社, 2013. pp 279-285
	Liu A F, Wu L. Biostatistics. Chongqing: Southwest China Normal University Press, 2013. pp 279-285(in Chinese)
[37]	唐启义, 冯明光 . DPS数据处理系统: 实验设计统计分析及数据挖掘. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007. pp 636-644, 682-690, 1027-1036
	Tang Q Y, Feng M G. DPS Data Processing System: Statistical Analysis and Data Mining of Experimental Design. Beijing: Science Press, 2007. pp 636-644, 682-690, 1027-1036(in Chinese)
[38]	闫锋, 崔秀辉, 李清泉, 王成, 曾玲玲, 刘峰, 马波, 袁明 . 绿豆品种的灰色关联度分析及综合评价. 中国种业, 2011, ( 增刊2):31-33
	Yan F, Cui X H, Li Q Q, Wang C, Zeng L L, Liu F, Ma B, Yuan M . Grey relational grade analysis and comprehensive evaluation of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) germplasm resources. Chin Seed Ind, 2011, ( suppl-2):31-33 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[39]	Upadhyaya Hari D . Variability for drought resistance related traits in the mini core collection of peanut. Crop Sci, 2005,45:1432-1440 doi: 10.2135/cropsci2004.0389
[40]	汪灿, 周棱波, 张国兵, 张立异, 徐燕, 高旭, 姜讷, 邵明波 . 薏苡种质资源萌发期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选. 植物遗传资源学报, 2017,18:846-859 doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.2017.05.006
	Wang C, Zhou L B, Zhang G B, Zhang L Y, Xu Y, Gao X, Jiang N, Shao M B . Identification and indices screening of drought resistance in Job’s tears germplasm resources at germination stage. J Plant Genet Resour, 2017,18:846-859 (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.2017.05.006
[41]	于泉林, 武宝悦 . 不同作物对苯磺隆残留敏感性室内模拟研究. 河北职业技术师范学院学报, 2003,17(1):16-19
	Yu Q L, Wu B Y . Different crops on the sensitivity of the indoor simulation of tribenuron-methyl residues. J Hebei Normal Univ Sci Technol, 2003,17(1):16-19 (in Chinese)
[42]	牛志锋, 杜慧玲 . 不同小麦品种对苯磺隆除草剂的耐药性研究. 山西农业科学, 2008,36(2):28-29 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2008.02.011
	Niu Z F, Du H L . Study on tolerance of different wheat variety to tribenuron-methyl. J Shanxi Agric Sci, 2008,36(2):28-29 (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2008.02.011
[43]	娄国强, 吕文彦, 职明星 . 苯磺隆、苄嘧磺隆对不同小麦品种安全性及叶绿素含量的影响. 中国农学通报, 2005,21(10):317-320 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2005.10.089
	Lou G Q, Lyu W Y, Zhi M X . Studies on safety tribenuron- methyl and bensulfuron-methyl and their impact to the content of chlorophyll. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2005,21(10):317-320 (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2005.10.089
[44]	范志金, 钱传范, 于维强, 陈俊鹏, 李正名, 王玲秀 . 氯磺隆和苯磺隆对玉米乙酰乳酸合成酶抑制作用的研究. 中国农业科学, 2003,36:173-178
	Fan Z J, Qian C F, Yu W Q, Chen J P, Li Z M, Wang L X . Study on enzymatic inhibition of acetolactate synthase from maize (Zea mays L.) by chlorsulfuron and tribenuron-methyl. Sci Agric Sin, 2003,36:173-178 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[45]	李脉泉, 化宿南, 郭兵福, 刘明, 宋健, 陈建港, 周福来, 于莉莉, 陶波, 邱丽娟 . 大豆微核心种质对草甘膦的耐受性鉴定. 植物遗传资源学报, 2015,16:940-946 doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.2015.05.003
	Li M Q, Hua S N, Guo B F, Liu M, Song J, Chen J G, Zhou F L, Yu L L, Tao B, Qiu L J . Identification of glyphosate-tolerance in soybean mini-core collection. J Plant Genet Resour, 2015,16:940-946 (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.2015.05.003
[46]	王园园 . 棉花草甘膦自然抗性评价及抗性基因源挖掘研究. 中国农业科学院博士学位论文, 北京, 2015 doi: 10.7666/d.Y2787485
	Wang Y Y . Identification of Natural Resistance to Glyphosate in Gossypium and the Excavation of Glyphosate-resistant Gene Resources in Gossypium hirsutum Races. PhD Dissertation of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China, 2015 (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.7666/d.Y2787485
[47]	苏少泉 . 抗咪唑啉酮类除草剂作物的发展与未来. 现代农药, 2006,5(1):1-4
	Su S Q . The development and future of imidazolinone herbicide-resistant crops. Mod Agrochem, 2006,5(1):1-4 (in Chinese)
[48]	王米道, 程凤侠, 司友斌 . 铜与草甘膦复合污染对小麦种子发芽与根伸长的抑制作用. 生态毒理学报, 2009,4:591-596
	Wang M D, Cheng F X, Si Y B . The inhibition of the combined pollution of copper and glyphosate to the seed germination and root elongation of wheat. Asian J Ecotoxicol, 2009,4:591-596 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[49]	杜小娟, 梁婷婷, 慕小倩 . 8种常用除草剂对黄芩种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响. 西北农业学报, 2012,21:202-206 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1389.2012.04.040
	Du X J, Liang T T, Mu X Q . Effects of eight herbicides on seed germination and seedling growth of Scutellaria baicalensis Georg. Acta Agric Boreali-Occident Sin, 2012,21:202-206 (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1389.2012.04.040

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

品种(系) Variety (line)	苯磺隆浓度 Concentration of tribenuron-methyl
品种(系) Variety (line)	0.25 mg kg^-1		2.50 mg kg^-1		25.00 mg kg^-1		250.00 mg kg^-1
炎81-2 Yan 81-2	70.3±0.007	c	17.8±0.015	de	10.4±0.003	f	10.3±0.003	de
SWU92	82.5±0.030	b	19.3±0.009	de	14.5±0.002	def	11.7±0.011	de
SWU101	64.5±0.077	cd	15.3±0.017	de	12.5±0.001	ef	9.3±0.012	e
782	48.5±0.003	e	18.5±0.004	de	13.5±0.006	ef	12.9±0.002	cde
509	50.0±0.008	e	19.8±0.021	de	15.4±0.004	cdef	14.5±0.009	bcde
P18	106.3±0.091	a	36.0±0.031	a	31.1±0.002	a	28.8±0.016	a
甲预31棚 Jiayu 31 peng	24.6±0.010	f	22.4±0.013	cd	19.6±0.029	bcd	15.8±0.006	bcde
苏油1号 Suyou 1	95.7±0.039	a	26.1±0.008	bc	23.8±0.012	b	20.0±0.004	bc
至尊 Zhizun	85.2±0.002	b	29.3±0.030	ab	22.3±0.001	bc	21.4±0.019	ab
B265	96.4±0.044	a	31.1±0.054	ab	18.5±0.011	bcde	18.0±0.006	bcd
中双12 Zhongshuang 12	60.1±0.010	d	13.3±0.017	e	13.2±0.038	ef	13.5±0.059	cde

项目 Item	参数 Parameter		根长 RL (cm)	芽长 SL (cm)	发芽势 GV (%)	发芽率 GR (%)	鲜重 FW (g)	干重 DW (g)
对照 Control	最大值 Max.		13.13	5.81	100.00	100.00	0.79	0.08
	最小值 Min.		0.55	0.76	10.00	15.00	0.08	0.01
	均值 Average		7.38^**	2.27^**	81.31^**	87.94^**	0.38^**	0.04^**
	标准差 SE		1.61	1.24	19.87	14.47	0.11	0.01
	变异系数 CV (%)		21.77	54.56	24.44	16.45	28.91	26.74
胁迫 Stress	最大值 Max.		2.97	6.24	100.00	100.00	0.79	0.06
	最小值 Min.		0.34	0.71	5.00	15.00	0.12	0.01
	均值 Average		0.94^**	2.37^**	75.77^**	83.22^**	0.36^**	0.04^**
	标准差 SE		0.38	1.30	21.47	16.66	0.10	0.01
	变异系数 CV (%)		40.00	54.83	28.34	20.01	28.00	25.91
较对照变化		均值 Average	-6.44	0.10	-5.54	-4.72	-0.02	0
Comparison with the control		变异系数 CV (%)	18.23	0.27	3.90	3.56	-0.91	-0.83

参数 Parameter	根长 RL	芽长	发芽势	发芽率	鲜重	干重
参数 Parameter	根长 RL	SL	GV	GR	FW	DW
最大值 Max.	0.588	2.005	1.000	1.000	2.357	1.946
最小值 Min.	0.050	0.494	0.143	0.333	0.411	0.333
均值 Average	0.136^**	1.052^**	0.926^**	0.942^**	0.980^**	1.055
标准差 SE	0.066	0.187	0.123	0.097	0.202	0.136
变异系数 CV (%)	48.950	17.800	13.269	10.276	20.593	12.856

指标 Index	根长 RL	芽长 SL	鲜重 FW	发芽率 GR	发芽势 GV	干重 DW
RL	1
SL	0.046	1
FW	0.042	0.215^**	1
GR	-0.150^*	-0.059	-0.018	1
GV	-0.171^**	0.031	0.022	0.687^**	1
DW	-0.128^*	0.031	0.062	0.133^*	0.097	1

主成分 Principal component	特征值 Eigen value	贡献率 Variance contribution (%)	累计贡献率 Accumulated variance contribution (%)	所测指标的特征向量值 Eigen vector of measured indicators
主成分 Principal component	特征值 Eigen value	贡献率 Variance contribution (%)	累计贡献率 Accumulated variance contribution (%)	发芽率 GR	发芽势GV	鲜重 FW	根长 RL	芽长 SL	干重 DW
1	1.810	30.167	30.167	0.978	0.945	0.279	0.011	0.261	0.617
2	1.310	21.825	51.992	-0.358	-0.263	0.841	0.396	0.769	0.258
3	1.096	18.267	70.259	0.115	0.311	-0.263	0.904	0.195	-0.637
4	0.790	13.159	83.418	-0.044	-0.057	0.316	0.508	-0.755	0.323

Screening and Comprehensive Evaluation of Germplasm Resources with Tribenuron-methyl Tolerance at Germination Stage in Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)

RichHTML335

PDF

PDF

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 49

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

指标 Index	等权关联度γ_T		权重系数 ω_i	加权关联度γ_WTC
指标 Index	数值 Value	排序 Order	权重系数 ω_i	数值 Value	排序 Order
发芽率 GR	0.649	3	0.163	0.669	5
发芽势 GV	0.634	4	0.159	0.671	4
鲜重 FW	0.658	2	0.165	0.745	2
干重 DW	0.633	5	0.159	0.615	6
根长 RL	0.781	1	0.196	0.763	1
芽长 SL	0.630	6	0.158	0.673	3

指标 Index	隶属函数值 Subordinate function value
指标 Index	I	II	III	V	IV
发芽率 GR	0.94	0.94	0.93	0.84	0.48
发芽势 GV	0.98	0.96	0.92	0.83	0.43
鲜重 FW	0.71	0.28	0.21	0.16	0.15
干重 DW	0.50	0.43	0.41	0.35	0.22
根长 RL	0.44	0.29	0.15	0.11	0.09
芽长 SL	0.40	0.47	0.40	0.32	0.28
ASF值 ASF value	0.67	0.57	0.50	0.43	0.28
WTC值 WTC value	0.60	0.54	0.52	0.48	0.40
T值 T value	2.08	0.77	0.12	-0.47	-1.63

因变量 Dependent variable	多元逐步回归方程 Multiple stepwise regression equation	相关系数 r	F值 F-value	P值 P-value
ASF值 ASF value	y = -0.4505+0.6436x₁+0.1260x₃+0.4108x₅+0.1421x₆	0.9555	620	0.0001
WTC值 WTC value	y = -0.0506+0.2568x₁+0.1867x₂+0.3401x₃-0.0606x₄+0.0910x₅+0.0320x₆	0.9578	433	0.0001
T值 T value	y = -6.5511+4.5564x₁+1.5790x₃+5.2021x₅	0.9247	466	0.0001

[1]	CHEN Xiao-Hong, LIN Yuan-Xiang, WANG Qian, DING Min, WANG Hai-Gang, CHEN Ling, GAO Zhi-Jun, WANG Rui-Yun, QIAO Zhi-Jun. Development of DNA molecular ID card in hog millet germplasm based on high motif SSR [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 908-919.
[2]	HU Liang-Liang, WANG Su-Hua, WANG Li-Xia, CHENG Xu-Zhen, CHEN Hong-Lin. Identification of salt tolerance and screening of salt tolerant germplasm of mungbean (Vigna radiate L.) at seedling stage [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(2): 367-379.
[3]	ZHAO Gai-Hui, LI Shu-Yu, ZHAN Jie-Peng, LI Yan-Bin, SHI Jia-Qin, WANG Xin-Fa, WANG Han-Zhong. Mapping and candidate gene analysis of silique number mutant in Brassica napus L. [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(1): 27-39.
[4]	SONG Li-Jun, NIE Xiao-Yu, HE Lei-Lei, KUAI Jie, YANG Hua, GUO An-Guo, HUANG Jun-Sheng, FU Ting-Dong, WANG Bo, ZHOU Guang-Sheng. Screening and comprehensive evaluation of shade tolerance of forage soybean varieties [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(9): 1741-1752.
[5]	ZHANG He, JIANG Chun-Ji, YIN Dong-Mei, DONG Jia-Le, REN Jing-Yao, ZHAO Xin-Hua, ZHONG Chao, WANG Xiao-Guang, YU Hai-Qiu. Establishment of comprehensive evaluation system for cold tolerance and screening of cold-tolerance germplasm in peanut [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(9): 1753-1767.
[6]	WANG Yan-Yan, WANG Jun, LIU Guo-Xiang, ZHONG Qiu, ZHANG Hua-Shu, LUO Zheng-Zhen, CHEN Zhi-Hua, DAI Pei-Gang, TONG Ying, LI Yuan, JIANG Xun, ZHANG Xing-Wei, YANG Ai-Guo. Construction of SSR fingerprint database and genetic diversity analysis of cigar germplasm resources [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(7): 1259-1274.
[7]	ZHANG Chun, ZHAO Xiao-Zhen, PANG Cheng-Ke, PENG Men-Lu, WANG Xiao-Dong, CHEN Feng, ZHANG Wei, CHEN Song, PENG Qi, YI Bin, SUN Cheng-Ming, ZHANG Jie-Fu, FU Ting-Dong. Genome-wide association study of 1000-seed weight in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(4): 650-659.
[8]	WEI Li-Juan, SHEN Shu-Lin, HUANG Xiao-Hu, MA Guo-Qiang, WANG Xi-Tong, YANG Yi-Ling, LI Huan-Dong, WANG Shu-Xian, ZHU Mei-Chen, TANG Zhang-Lin, LU Kun, LI Jia-Na, QU Cun-Min. Genome-wide association analysis reveals zinc-tolerant loci of rapeseed at germination stage [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(2): 262-274.
[9]	XIE Pan, LIU Wei, KANG Yu, HUA Wei, QIAN Lun-Wen, GUAN Chun-Yun, HE Xin. Identification and relative expression analysis of CBF gene family in Brassica napus L. [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(12): 2394-2406.
[10]	SUN Zhi-Guang, WANG Bao-Xiang, ZHOU Zhen-Ling, FANG Lei, CHI Ming, LI Jing-Fang, LIU Jin-Bo, Bello Babatunde Kazeem, XU Da-Yong. Screening of germplasm resources and QTL mapping for germinability under submerged condition in rice (Oryza sativa L.) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(1): 61-70.
[11]	FENG Tao,TAN Hui,GUAN Mei,GUAN Chun-Yun. Mechanism of BnaBZR1 and BnaPIF4 regulating photosynthetic efficiency in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) under poor light [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(8): 1146-1156.
[12]	Li-Ge BAO,Ping LU,Meng-Sha SHI,Yue XU,Min-Xuan LIU. Screening and identification of Chinese sorghum landraces for salt tolerance at germination and seedling stages [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(5): 734-744.
[13]	ZHANG Xiao-Jun,XIAO Jin,WANG Hai-Yan,QIAO Lin-Yi,LI Xin,GUO Hui-juan,CHANG Li-Fang,ZHANG Shu-Wei,YAN Xiao-Tao,CHANG Zhi-Jian,WU Zong-Xin. Evaluation of resistance to Fusarium head blight in Thinopyrum-derived wheat lines [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(01): 62-73.
[14]	SUN Cheng-Ming,CHEN Feng,CHEN Song,PENG Qi,ZHANG Wei,YI Bin,ZHANG Jie-Fu,FU Ting-Dong. Genome-wide association study of seed number per silique in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(01): 147-153.
[15]	SUN Cheng-Ming,CHEN Song,PENG Qi,ZHANG Wei,YI Bin,ZHANG Jie-Fu,FU Ting-Dong. Genome-wide association study of silique length in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(9): 1303-1310.