Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica,

Acta Agronomica Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (11): 2220-2231.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.03018

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of elevated temperature and CO2 concentration on growth and yield of maize under intercropping with peanut

WANG Fei(), GUO Bin-Bin, SUN Zeng-Guang, YIN Fei, LIU Ling, JIAO Nian-Yuan*(), FU Guo-Zhan   

  1. College of Agriculture, Henan University of Science and Technology / Henan Dryland Agricultural Engineering Technology Research Center, Luoyang, 471023, Henan, China
  • Received:2020-03-21 Accepted:2021-04-26 Online:2021-11-12 Published:2021-06-05
  • Contact: JIAO Nian-Yuan E-mail:1216677627@qq.com;jiaony1@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province(182300410014);Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province(212300410342);Tackling Key Scientific and Technological Problems in Henan Province(182102110180)

Abstract:

To clarify the effects of climate change on the growth development and yield of maize in the system of maize intercropping peanut, we performed the planting pattern of two rows maize intercropping and four rows peanut. Field experiments were carried out with TC (ambient temperature and ambient CO2 concentration), +T+C (elevated temperature and elevated CO2 concentration) in 2018, and TC, +TC (elevated temperature and ambient CO2 concentration), and +T+C in 2019, with two phosphorus levels of P0 (P2O5 0 kg hm-2) and P180 (P2O5 180 kg hm-2), respectively. The effects of elevated temperature and CO2 concentration on growth, dry matter accumulation and distribution, photosynthesis and yield of intercropping maize were studied. Results were as follows: (1) Compared with TC, the numbers of days from emergence to silking, silking to maturity, and emergence to maturity of intercropping maize under +TC were shortened respective by 4, 2, and 6 days. Compared with +TC, the number of days from emergence to silking of intercropping maize under +T+C was shortened by three days, while the numbers of days from silking to maturity, and emergence to maturity were increased by five days and two days. Compared with TC, the number of days from emergence to silking, and emergence to maturity of intercropping maize under +T+C was shortened by 4-7 days and 2-4 days, respectively; and the number of days from emergence to maturity was extended by 1-4 days. (2) The leaf area, net photosynthetic rate, and leaf area duration of intercropping maize were +T+C>+TC>TC before silking, +T+C>TC>+TC from silking to milk stage, and +T >+T+C>+TC after milk stage. Compared with TC, ear grain number and 100-grain weight of intercropping maize under +T+C were increased by 4.14%-65.70% and 1.70%-14.0%, respectively. (3) Compared with TC, the dry matter of intercropping maize at maturity stage increased by 7.39%-21.30% and the yield increased by 19.18%-28.07% under +TC. The dry matter and yield of intercropping maize increased by 10.0%-57.7% and 4.41%-52.00% under +T+C, respectively. The grain yield of intercropping maize was improved by applying phosphorus after increasing temperature and CO2 concentration. These results indicated that elevated temperature and CO2 concentration could promote dry matter accumulation and grain yield improvement by increasing net photosynthetic rate, leaf area index, and leaf area duration of intercropping maize at early growth stage, shortening vegetative growth period, prolonging grain filling time, and increasing ear grain number and grain weight per panicle. Elevated temperature and CO2 concentration had mutual promoting effect on the growth of intercropping maize before silking stage, while increasing CO2 concentration could make up for the inhibiting effect of increasing temperature on the growth of intercropping maize after silking.

Key words: climatic change, intercropping maize, growth, dry matter accumulation, yield

Fig. 1

Field temperature and CO2 concentration during growing season in 2018 and 2019 TC: ambient temperature + ambient CO2 concentration; +TC: elevated temperature [ambient temperature +(2.0±0.5)℃+ ambient CO2 concentration (390 μmol mol-1) ]; +T+C: elevated temperature [ambient temperature +(2.0±0.5)℃+ elevated CO2 concentration (700±50) μmol mol-1]."

Fig. 2

Model of elevated temperature and CO2 concentration during growing season in 2018 and 2019"

Table 1

Effects of elevated temperature and CO2 concentration on the growth process of intercropping maize"

年份
Year
磷水平
P-level
处理
Treatment
生育日期 Growth date (month/day) 生长天数 Growth days (d)
ES R1 R6 ES-R1 R1-R6 ES-R6
2018 P0 TC 6/10 7/30 9/16 50 48 98
+T+C 6/10 7/24 9/14 44 52 96
P180 TC 6/10 7/25 9/22 45 59 104
+T+C 6/10 7/21 9/19 41 60 101
年份
Year
磷水平
P-level
处理
Treatment
生育日期 Growth date (month/day) 生长天数 Growth days (d)
ES R1 R6 ES-R1 R1-R6 ES-R6
2019 P0 TC 6/24 8/15 10/4 52 50 102
+TC 6/24 8/11 9/28 48 48 96
+T+C 6/24 8/9 9/30 46 52 98
P180 TC 6/24 8/10 10/8 47 60 107
+TC 6/24 8/6 10/2 43 58 101
+T+C 6/24 8/3 10/5 40 63 103

Fig. 3

Effects of elevated temperature and CO2 concentration on plant height and panicle development of intercropping maize Treatments are the same as those given in Table 1."

Fig. 4

Effects of elevated temperature and CO2 concentration on leaf area per plant of intercropping maize Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at the 0.05 probability level among different regulator treatments on the same days after seedling. Treatments are the same as those given in Table 1."

Table 2

ANOVA of leaf-area per plant, photosynthetic potential, Pn, dry matter, and grain yield of intercropping maize under different treatments (F-value)"

单株叶面积
Leaf-area per plant (m2 plant-1)
光合势
Leaf area duration
(m2 m-2 d)
净光合速率
Pn
(μmol CO2 m-2 s-1)
干物质
Dry matter
(g plant-1)
产量
Yield
(kg hm-2)
增温且增CO2浓度
Elevated temperature and CO2 concentration
18.2** 4.68 42.6** 74.0** 180**
磷肥
P
48.8** 60.3** 78.8** 53.2** 524**
磷肥×增温且增CO2浓度
P × Elevated temperature and CO2 concentration
0.003 0.171 50.6** 0.047 0.226

Fig. 5

Effects of elevated temperature and CO2 concentration on photosynthetic potential of intercropping maize Treatments are the same as those given in Table 1."

Fig. 6

Effects of elevated temperature and CO2 concentration on net photosynthetic rate of ear leaves of intercropping maize SS: silking stage; FS: filling stage; MS: milking stage; DS: dough stage. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at the 0.05 probability level among different regulator treatments on the same day of growth stage. Treatments are the same as those given in Table 1."

Fig. 7

Effects of elevated temperature and CO2 concentration on dry matter accumulation of intercropping maize Treatments are the same as those given in Table 1."

Table 3

Effects of elevated temperature and CO2 concentration on dry matter accumulation and distribution of intercropping maize at maturity stage"

年份
Year
磷水平
P-level
处理
Treatment
干物质积累 Dry matter accumulation (g plant-1) 干物质分配 Dry matter distribution (%)

Stem

Leaf
苞叶
Husk
穗轴
Cob
籽粒
Kernel

Stem

Leaf
苞叶
Husk
穗轴
Cob
籽粒
Kernel
2018 P0 TC 48.5 b 14.8 b 8.40 a 14.2 b 96.8 c 26.5 bc 8.10 ab 4.60 a 7.77 a 53.0 a
+T+C 50.6 b 15.7 b 9.78 a 16.2 ab 111.0 ab 24.9 c 7.72 b 4.81 a 7.97 a 54.6 a
P180 TC 65.5 a 16.5 b 11.7 a 17.1 a 98.7 bc 31.3 a 7.88 ab 5.58 a 8.16 a 47.1 b
+T+C 66.2 a 21.8 a 11.9 a 17.5 a 116.0 a 28.4 ab 9.34 a 5.10 a 7.50 a 49.7 b
2019 P0 TC 30.0 d 15.4 c 6.48 d 9.11 c 65.1 d 23.8 ab 12.2 a 5.14 a 7.22 b 51.6 bc
+TC 32.7 cd 15.3 c 8.55 bc 11.6 bc 84.8 cd 21.4 ab 10.0 b 5.59 a 7.58 b 55.4 ab
+T+C 40.8 c 17.4 c 9.12 bc 14.0 b 118.0 b 20.5 b 8.73 b 4.58 a 7.02 b 59.2 a
P180 TC 54.7 b 27.0 b 11.4 b 19.6 a 104.3 bc 25.2 a 12.4 a 5.25 a 9.03 a 48.1 c
+TC 58.0 ab 28.3 b 11.0 b 19.0 a 120.0 b 24.5 ab 12.0 a 4.66 a 8.04 b 50.8 bc
+T+C 65.0 a 34.4 a 15.2 a 21.4 a 159.0 a 22.0 ab 11.7 a 5.15 a 7.25 b 53.9 b

Table 4

Effects of elevated temperature and CO2 concentration on yield and the components of maize under intercropping with peanut"

年份 Year 磷水平
P-level
处理
Treatment
穗部性状Ear traits 产量及构成Yield and the components
穗长
Ear length (cm)
秃尖长
Bare tip length (cm)
穗行数
Ear row
per ear
行粒数
Grains
per row
产量
Yield
(kg hm-2)
穗粒数
Grains
per ear
百粒重
100-grain weight (g)
穗数
Spikes
per hm2
2018 P0 TC 15.1 b 1.82 a 16.8 a 27.5 c 4725 c 463 b 21.7 c 49,128
+T+C 15.5 b 1.73 a 17.0 a 28.5 bc 4933 c 484 b 22.1 c 49,118
P180 TC 16.3 a 1.04 b 17.7 a 30.3 ab 5867 b 537 a 23.1 b 49,297
+T+C 16.8 a 1.00 b 17.9 a 31.3 a 6292 a 559 a 24.3 a 49,320
2019 P0 TC 11.1 d 2.03 a 15.8 c 19.3 d 3910 f 305 d 24.0 e 49,341
+TC 12.9 c 1.91 a 16.5 abc 25.5 c 5008 e 421 c 25.5 d 49,649
+T+C 14.4 b 1.43 b 16.4 bc 30.8 b 5943 d 505 b 27.4 bc 49,950
P180 TC 14.4 b 0.86 c 16.7 ab 31.2 b 6539 c 522 b 26.3 cd 49,630
+TC 15.4 a 0.47 c 17.3 a 32.0 ab 7793 b 555 ab 28.4 ab 49,642
+T+C 15.8 a 0.46 c 17.3 a 35.1 a 8203 a 609 a 29.8 a 49,670
[1] IPCC: Summary for policymakers. In: Edenhofer O, Pichs- Madruga R, Sokona Y, eds. Climate Change 2014. Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. pp 25, 77-78.
[2] 金奖铁, 李扬, 李荣俊, 刘秀林, 李林懋. 大气二氧化碳浓度升高影响植物生长发育的研究进展. 植物生理学报, 2019, 55: 558-568.
Jin J T, Li Y, Li R J, Liu X L, Li L M. Advances in studies on effects of elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration on plant growth and development. Plant Physiol J, 2019, 55: 558-568 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3] 王东明, 陶冶, 朱建国, 刘钢, 朱春梧. 稻米外观与加工品质对大气CO2浓度升高的响应. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33: 338-346.
Wang D M, Tao Y, Zhu J G, Liu G, Zhu C W. Responses of rice appearance and processing quality to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration. Chin J Rice Sci, 2019, 33: 338-346 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] 马娉, 李如楠, 王斌, 李玉娥, 万运帆, 秦晓波, 刘硕, 高清竹. 双季稻不同生育期净同化速率对大气CO2浓度和温度升高的响应. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31: 872-882.
Ma P, Li R N, Wang B, Li Y E, Wan Y F, Qin X B, Liu S, Gao Z Q. Responses of net assimilation rate to elevated atmospheric CO2 and temperature at different growth stages in a double rice cropping system. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2020, 31: 872-882 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[5] Donnelly A, Craigon J, Black C R, Colls J J, Landon G. Does elevated CO2 ameliorate the impact of O3 on chlorophyll content and photosynthesis in potato (Solanum tuberosum)? Physiol Plant, 2001, 111: 501-511.
pmid: 11299015
[6] Manderscheid R, Burkart S, Bramm A, Weigel H J. Effect of CO2 enrichment on growth and daily radiation use efficiency of wheat in relation to temperature and growth stage. Eur J Agron, 2003, 19: 411-425.
doi: 10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00133-8
[7] 李彦生, 金剑, 刘晓冰. 作物对大气CO2浓度升高生理响应研究进展. 作物学报, 2020, 46: 1819-1830.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.02027
Li Y S, Jin J, Liu X B. Physiological response of crop to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration: a review. Acta Agron Sin, 2020, 46: 1819-1830 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[8] Castro J C, Dohleman F G, Bernacchi C J, Long S P. Elevated CO2 significantly delays reproductive development of soybean under free-air concentration enrichment (FACE). J Exp Bot, 2009, 60: 2945-2951.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp170
[9] 宋晓雯, 王国骄, 孙备, 刘春溪, 宛涛, 李美松, 殷红, 隋明. 开放式增温对不同耐热性粳稻光合作用和产量的影响. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2019, 50: 648-655.
Song X W, Wang G J, Sun B, Liu C X, Wan T, Li M C, Yin H, Sui M. Effects of free air temperature increasing on photosynthesis and yield of japonica rice with different heat-tolerance characteristics. J Shenyang Agric Univ, 2019, 50: 648-655 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[10] Imai K, Okamoto-Sato M. Effects of temperature on CO2 dependence of gas exchanges in C3 and C4 crop plants. Jpn J Crop Sci, 1991, 60: 139-145.
doi: 10.1626/jcs.60.139
[11] Vu J C V, Jr L H A, Boote K J, Bowes G. Effects of elevated CO2 and temperature on photosynthesis and Rubisco in rice and soybean. Plant Cell Envion, 1997, 20: 68-76.
[12] Chaturvedi A K, Bahuguna R N, Shah D, Pal M, Jagadish K. High temperature stress during flowering and grain filling offsets beneficial impact of elevated CO2 on assimilate partitioning and sink-strength in rice. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 8227.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07464-6 pmid: 28811489
[13] Wheeler T R, Hong T D, Ellis R H, Batts G R, Morison J I L, Hadley P. The duration and rate of grain growth, and harvest index of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in response to temperature and CO2. J Exp Bot, 1996, 47: 623-630.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/47.5.623
[14] Lal M, Singh K K, Rathore L S, Srinivasanc G, Saseendranb S A. Vulnerability of rice and wheat yields in NW India to future changes in climate. Agric For Meteorol, 1998, 89: 101-114.
doi: 10.1016/S0168-1923(97)00064-6
[15] 李广, 李玥, 黄高宝, 罗珠珠, 王琦, 刘强, 燕振刚, 赵有益. 基于APSIM模型旱地春小麦产量对温度和CO2浓度升高的响应. 中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20: 1088-1095.
Li G, Li Y, Huang G B, Luo Z Z, Wang Q, Liu Q, Yan Z G, Zhao Y Y. Response of dryland spring wheat yield to elevated CO2 concentration and temperature by APSIM model. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2012, 20: 1088-1095 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16] 赖上坤, 庄时腾, 吴艳珍, 王云霞, 朱建国, 杨连新, 王余龙. 大气CO2浓度和温度升高对超级稻生长发育的影响. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34: 1253-1262.
Lai S K, Zhuang S T, Wu Y Z, Wang Y X, Zhu J G, Yang L X, Wang Y L. Impact of elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration and temperature on growth and development of super rice. Chin J Ecol, 2015, 34: 1253-1262 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17] 苏营, 张逸飞, 牟文雅, 邢光南, 陈法军. 大豆主要株型和产量指标对大气CO2和温度升高的响应. 生态学报, 2016, 36(9):152-161.
Su Y, Zhang Y F, Mou W Y, Xing G N, Chen F J. Morphological traits and yield of soybean under elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration and temperature. Acta Ecol Sin, 2016, 36(9):152-161 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[18] Jiao N Y, Wang J T, Ma C, Zhang C C, Guo D Y, Zhang F S, Jensen E S. The importance of aboveground and belowground interspecific interactions in determining crop growth and advantages of peanut/maize intercropping. Crop J, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2020.12.004.
[19] 焦念元, 宁堂原, 杨萌珂, 付国占, 尹飞, 徐国伟, 李增嘉. 玉米花生间作对玉米光合特性及产量形成的影响. 生态学报, 2013, 33: 4324-4330.
Jiao N Y, Ning T Y, Yang M K, Fu G Z, Yin F, Xu G W, Li Z J. Effects of maize-peanut intercropping on photosynthetic characters and yield forming of intercropped maize. Acta Ecol Sin, 2013, 33: 4324-4330 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] 焦念元, 李亚辉, 杨潇, 尹飞, 马超, 齐付国, 刘领, 熊瑛. 玉米/花生间作行比和施磷对玉米光合特性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27: 2959-2967.
Jiao N Y, Li Y H, Yang X, Yin F, Ma C, Qi F G, Liu L, Xiong Y. Effects of maize/peanut intercropping row ratio and phosphate fertilizer on photosynthetic characteristics of maize. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2016, 27: 2959-2967 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21] Zuo Y M, Liu Y X, Zhang F S, Peter C. Studies on the improvement iron nutrition of peanut intercropping with maize on nitrogen fixation at early stages of growth of peanut on a calcareous soil. Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 2004, 50: 1071-1078.
doi: 10.1080/00380768.2004.10408576
[22] 焦念元, 陈明灿, 付国占, 宁堂原, 王黎明, 李增嘉. 玉米花生间作复合群体的光合物质积累与叶面积指数变化. 作物杂志, 2007, (1):34-35.
Jiao N Y, Chen M C, Fu G Z, Ning T Y, Wang L M, Li Z J. Photosynthetic matter accumulation and leaf area index change in compound population of maize intercropping peanut. Crops, 2007, (1):34-35 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[23] 王飞, 孙增光, 尹飞, 郭彬彬, 刘领, 焦念元. 增温增CO2对间作玉米光合特性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54: 58-70.
Wang F, Sun Z G, Yin F, Guo B B, Liu L, Jiao N Y. Effects of elevated temperature and CO2 on the Photosynthetic characteristics of intercropping maize. Sci Agric Sin, 2021, 54: 58-70 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[24] 景立权, 赖上坤, 王云霞, 杨连新, 王余龙. 大气CO2浓度和温度互作对水稻生长发育的影响. 生态学报, 2016, 36: 4254-4265.
Jing L Q, Lai S K, Wang Y X, Yang L X, Wang Y L. Combined effect of increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration and temperature on growth and development of rice: a research review. Acta Ecol Sin, 2016, 36: 4254-4265 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[25] Fang S B, Su H, Liu W, Tan K Y, Ren S X. Infrared warming reduced winter wheat yields and some physiological parameters, which were mitigated by irrigation and worsened by delayed sowing. PLoS One, 2013, 8: e67518.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067518
[26] Dong W J, Chen J, Zhang B, Tian Y L, Zhang W J. Responses of biomass growth and grain yield of midseason rice to the anticipated warming with FATI facility in East China. Field Crops Res, 2011, 123: 259-265.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.05.024
[27] Madan P, Jagadish S V K, Craufurd P Q, Fitzgerald M, Lafarge T, Wheeler T R. Effect of elevated CO2 and high temperature on seed-set and grain quality of rice. J Exp Bot, 2012, 193: 117-130.
[28] Craufurd P Q, Wheeler T R. Climate change and flower time of annual crops. J Exp Bot, 2009, 60: 2529-2539.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp196 pmid: 19505929
[29] 蔡创. 冬小麦和水稻生长与产量对CO2浓度和温度同时升高的响应. 南京农业大学博士学位论文, 江苏南京, 2016.
Cai C. Responses of Winter Wheat and Rice Growth and Yield to the Combination of Elevated CO2 and Increased Temperature. PhD Dissertation of Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 2016 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[30] 汤晓昀, 李志强, 吕军, 刘瑜, 高志建. 施肥对青贮玉米产量及品质的影响研究. 新疆农垦科技, 2017, (6):44-46.
Tang X Y, Li Z Q, Lyu J, Liu Y, Gao Z J. Effects of fertilization on the yield and quality of silage corn was studied. Xinjiang Farm Res Sci Technol, 2017, (6):44-46 (in Chinese).
[31] Ainsworth E A, Long S P. What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? Ameta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. New Phytol, 2004, 165: 351-372.
doi: 10.1111/nph.2005.165.issue-2
[32] Sakai H, Hasegawa T, Kobayashi K. Enhancement of rice canopy carbon gain by elevated CO2 is sensitive to growth stage and leaf nitrogen concentration. New Phytol, 2006, 170: 321-332.
pmid: 16608457
[33] Tian Y, Zheng C Y, Chen J, Chen C Q, Deng A X, Song Z W, Zhang B M, Zhang W J. Climate warming increases winter wheat yield but reduces grain nitrogen concentration in east China. PLoS One, 2014, 9: e95108.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095108
[34] Kim S H, Gitz D C, Sicher R C, Baker J T, Timlin D J, Reddy V R. Temperature dependence of growth, development, and photosynthesis in maize under elevated CO2. Environ Exp Bot, 2007, 61: 224-236.
doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.06.005
[35] Clifford S C, Stronach I M, Black C R, Singleton-Jones P R, Crout N M J. Effects of elevated CO2, drought and temperature on the water relations and gas exchange of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) stands grown in controlled environment glasshouses. Physiol Plant, 2000, 110: 78-88.
doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2000.110111.x
[36] 孟凡超, 张佳华, 姚凤梅. CO2浓度升高和降水增加协同作用对玉米产量及生长发育的影响. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38: 1064-1073.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00100
Meng F C, Zhang J H, Yao F M. Interactive effects of elevated CO2 concentration and increasing precipitation on yield and growth development in maize. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2014, 38: 1064-1073 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[37] Baker J T, Allen L H, Boote K J. Response of rice to carbon dioxide and temperature. Agric For Meteorol, 1992, 60: 153-166.
doi: 10.1016/0168-1923(92)90035-3
[38] 王帅, 杨劲峰, 韩晓日, 刘小虎, 战秀梅, 刘顺国. 不同施肥处理对旱作春玉米光合特性的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2008, (6):23-27.
Wang S, Yang J F, Han X R, Liu X H, Zhan X M, Liu S G. Effects of different fertilization treatments on the photosynthesis characteristics of dry spring corn. Soils Fert Sci Chin, 2008, (6):23-27 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[39] Long S P, Ainsworth E A, Leakey A D B, Nösberger J, Ort D R. Food for thought: lower-than-expected crop yield stimulation with rising CO2 concentrations. Science, 2006, 312: 1918-1921.
doi: 10.1126/science.1114722
[40] Cure J D, Acock B. Crop responses to carbon dioxide doubling: a literature survey. Agric For Meteorol, 1986, 38: 127-145.
doi: 10.1016/0168-1923(86)90054-7
[41] 李兆君, 杨佳佳, 范菲菲, 侯云鹏, 谢佳, 梁永超. 不同施肥条件下覆膜对玉米干物质积累及吸磷量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17: 571-577.
Li Z J, Yang J J, Fan F F, Hou Y P, Xie J, Liang Y C. Effect of plastic film mulching on dry mass accumulation and phosphorus uptake of corn receiving different fertilizers. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2011, 17: 571-577 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[42] Ottman M J, Kimball B A, Pinter P J. Elevated CO2 effects on sorghum growth and yield at high and low soil water content. New Phytol, 2001, 150: 261-273.
doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2001.00110.x
[43] Lyu G H, Wu Y F, Bai W B, Ma B, Wang C Y, Song J Q. Influence of high temperature stress on net photosynthesis, dry matter partitioning and rice grain yield at flowering and grain filling stages. J Integr Agric, 2013, 12: 603-609.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60278-6
[1] WANG Dan, ZHOU Bao-Yuan, MA Wei, GE Jun-Zhu, DING Zai-Song, LI Cong-Feng, ZHAO Ming. Characteristics of the annual distribution and utilization of climate resource for double maize cropping system in the middle reaches of Yangtze River [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2] WANG Wang-Nian, GE Jun-Zhu, YANG Hai-Chang, YIN Fa-Ting, HUANG Tai-Li, KUAI Jie, WANG Jing, WANG Bo, ZHOU Guang-Sheng, FU Ting-Dong. Adaptation of feed crops to saline-alkali soil stress and effect of improving saline-alkali soil [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[3] YAN Jia-Qian, GU Yi-Biao, XUE Zhang-Yi, ZHOU Tian-Yang, GE Qian-Qian, ZHANG Hao, LIU Li-Jun, WANG Zhi-Qin, GU Jun-Fei, YANG Jian-Chang, ZHOU Zhen-Ling, XU Da-Yong. Different responses of rice cultivars to salt stress and the underlying mechanisms [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[4] YANG Huan, ZHOU Ying, CHEN Ping, DU Qing, ZHENG Ben-Chuan, PU Tian, WEN Jing, YANG Wen-Yu, YONG Tai-Wen. Effects of nutrient uptake and utilization on yield of maize-legume strip intercropping system [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5] CHEN Jing, REN Bai-Zhao, ZHAO Bin, LIU Peng, ZHANG Ji-Wang. Regulation of leaf-spraying glycine betaine on yield formation and antioxidation of summer maize sowed in different dates [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6] LI Yi-Jun, LYU Hou-Quan. Effect of agricultural meteorological disasters on the production corn in the Northeast China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[7] ZHOU Jing-Yuan, KONG Xiang-Qiang, ZHANG Yan-Jun, LI Xue-Yuan, ZHANG Dong-Mei, DONG He-Zhong. Mechanism and technology of stand establishment improvements through regulating the apical hook formation and hypocotyl growth during seed germination and emergence in cotton [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1051-1058.
[8] SHI Yan-Yan, MA Zhi-Hua, WU Chun-Hua, ZHOU Yong-Jin, LI Rong. Effects of ridge tillage with film mulching in furrow on photosynthetic characteristics of potato and yield formation in dryland farming [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[9] LEI Xin-Hui, WAN Chen-Xi, TAO Jin-Cai, LENG Jia-Jun, WU Yi-Xin, WANG Jia-Le, WANG Peng-Ke, YANG Qing-Hua, FENG Bai-Li, GAO Jin-Feng. Effects of soaking seeds with MT and EBR on germination and seedling growth in buckwheat under salt stress [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1210-1221.
[10] YAN Xiao-Yu, GUO Wen-Jun, QIN Du-Lin, WANG Shuang-Lei, NIE Jun-Jun, ZHAO Na, QI Jie, SONG Xian-Liang, MAO Li-Li, SUN Xue-Zhen. Effects of cotton stubble return and subsoiling on dry matter accumulation, nutrient uptake, and yield of cotton in coastal saline-alkali soil [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[11] WANG Ze, ZHOU Qin-Yang, LIU Cong, MU Yue, GUO Wei, DING Yan-Feng, NINOMIYA Seishi. Estimation and evaluation of paddy rice canopy characteristics based on images from UAV and ground camera [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1248-1261.
[12] KE Jian, CHEN Ting-Ting, WU Zhou, ZHU Tie-Zhong, SUN Jie, HE Hai-Bing, YOU Cui-Cui, ZHU De-Quan, WU Li-Quan. Suitable varieties and high-yielding population characteristics of late season rice in the northern margin area of double-cropping rice along the Yangtze River [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[13] YUAN Da-Shuang, DENG Wan-Yu, WANG Zhen, PENG Qian, ZHANG Xiao-Li, YAO Meng-Nan, MIAO Wen-Jie, ZHU Dong-Ming, LI Jia-Na, LIANG Ying. Cloning and functional analysis of BnMAPK2 gene in Brassica napus [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 840-850.
[14] KONG Chui-Bao, PANG Zi-Qin, ZHANG Cai-Fang, LIU Qiang, HU Chao-Hua, XIAO Yi-Jie, YUAN Zhao-Nian. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on sugarcane growth and nutrient- related gene co-expression network under different fertilization levels [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 860-872.
[15] LI Rui-Dong, YIN Yang-Yang, SONG Wen-Wen, WU Ting-Ting, SUN Shi, HAN Tian-Fu, XU Cai-Long, WU Cun-Xiang, HU Shui-Xiu. Effects of close planting densities on assimilate accumulation and yield of soybean with different plant branching types [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!