Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica,

Acta Agron Sin ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (08): 1434-1443.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.01435

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION · PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Conditions and Indicators for Screening Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) Genotypes Tolerant to Low-Potassium

TIAN Xiao-Li,WANG Gang-Wei,ZHU Rui,YANG Pei-Zhu,DUAN Liu-Sheng,LI Zhao-Hu   

  1. Center of Crop Chemical Control / Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Farming System / State Key Laboratory of National Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
  • Received:2007-12-15 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2008-08-12 Published:2008-08-12
  • Contact: TIAN Xiao-Li

Abstract: Commercial cotton production is currently limited by varying levels of potassium (K) deficiency. Screening for low-potassium tolerant cotton genotypes is necessary to alleviate the shortage of available potassium in soil. However, there is no standard procedure for such screening. Fifty cotton genotypes, mainly predominant cultivars/lines developed in 2004 in China, were tested under a hydroponic culture at low (0.02 mmol L-1) and adequate (2.50 mmol L-1) K levels. We determined genotypic differences in dry matter and associated traits at the seedling stage and compared with dry weight of reproductive organs (squares, flowers and uncracked and cracked bolls) in a field with potassium-deficient soil (59.88 mg kg-1). Coefficient of variation (CV) among genotypes for whole plant dry weight increased from 15.13% at 1-leaf stage to 21.13% and 28.58% at 3- and 5-leaf stages, suggesting that differences among genotypes would manifest more clearly as seedlings aged. Together with the rather short grow-ing period (about 20 d), we considered the 5-leaf stage most suitable for the screening at the seedling stage. The relative dry weight (RDW) of the whole plant (0.02/2.50) correlated well (r = 0.7690, P < 0.01) with absolute dry weight (ADW) in the low K medium, but it had a higher CV than the latter (up to 37.39% at the 5-leaf stage). This suggests that the RDW would be a better screening index than ADW. Under the K-deficient media, highly significant positive correlations were observed between K ac-cumulation and dry matter (r = 0.9522), K utilization index (KUI, dry matter produced per 1‰ K) and dry matter (r = 0.9791), respectively. This shows that cotton tolerance to low K is a function of uptake and utilization. Correlation coefficients between root length and K accumulation, root surface area and K accumulation were 0.5201 (P < 0.01) and 0.3325 (P < 0.05), respectively. The ratio of spotted area caused by potassium deficiency to total cotyledon area (defined as S) was highly variable (CV = 44.46%) and normally distributed among genotypes, and inversely correlated with dry matter (r = –0.4455, P < 0.01). Thus the S value could be a secondary screening index for low K tolerance. The K content of seed did not affect the low-K tolerance of seedlings. We obtained a significantly positive correlation between dry matter at the seedling stage and dry weight of reproductive organs in the field (r = 0.5091, P < 0.01). Our conclusion is that preliminary screening of cotton genotypes tolerant to low-potassium at the seedling stage is feasible using a hydroponic culture. However, some important genotypes would need further screening in the field.

Key words: Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), Genotypes, Tolerance to low-potassium, Screening

[1] ZHU Jin-Cheng, YANG Qiu-Hua, CHENG Li-Xiang, LI Wen-Li, SHI Ming-Ming, LI Hui-Xia, ZHANG Feng. Screening of potato germplasm for resistance to Meloidogyne incognita and analysis of related physiological responses [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(9): 2307-2317.
[2] HU Run-Hui, WANG Jun-Cheng, SI Er-Jing, ZHANG Hong, LI Xing-Mao, MA Xiao-Le, MENG Ya-Xiong, WANG Hua-Jun, LIU Qing, YAO Li-Rong, LI Bao-Chun. Screening of drought and salt tolerant germplasm during wheat seedling stage and comprehensive evaluation of drought and salt tolerance [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(9): 2371-2386.
[3] WEN Xuan, ZHONG Xiu-Li, WANG Shang-Wen, JIN Tao, PENG Jun, LIU En-Ke. Screening of low nitrogen tolerant germplasm in seedling highland barley based on tolerance index and comprehensive evaluation of different nitrogen efficiency types [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(7): 1949-1958.
[4] JIN Gao-Rui, WU Xiao-Li, DENG Li, CHEN Yu-Ning, YU Bo-Lun, GUO Jian-Bin, DING Ying-Bin, LIU Nian, LUO Huai-Yong, CHEN Wei-Gang, HUANG Li, ZHOU Xiao-Jing, HUAI Dong-Xin, TAN Jia-Zhuang, JIANG Hui-Fang, REN Li, LEI Yong, LIAO Bo-Shou. Development and characterization of novel peanut genetic stocks with high oleic acid and enhanced resistance both to Aspergillus flavus infection and aflatoxin production [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(3): 687-895.
[5] MA Qun, WANG Zhi-Hao, YAN Lei, LI Yu-Jiao, WANG Jia-Qi, LI Zhao, LIU Wei, AI Xin, MA Qian-Chi, WANG Xiao-Guang, ZHONG Chao, REN Jing-Yao, LIU Xi-Bo, ZHAO Shu-Li, ZHANG He, ZHAO Xin-Hua, JIANG Chun-Ji, WANG Jing, YU Hai-Qiu. Screening and evaluation system for drought resistance in high-oleic acid and common peanut at the germination stage [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(12): 3266-3280.
[6] SUN Xian-Jun, YU Tai-Fei, HU Zheng, SHEN Xin-Ping, GE Wen-Yi, JIANG Xue-Min, WANG Shi-Jia, YU Si-Jia, WU Shu-Yu, HAN Long-Zhi, ZHANG Hui, JIANG Qi-Yan. Assessment of salt-alkali tolerance throughout the rice growth period and germplasm screening based on the coefficient of standard deviation weighting method [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(12): 3369-3376.
[7] MA Jun, CHEN Feng, YIN Gui-Hong, HU Hai-Yan, WEI Xue-Ning, XIE Chao-Jie, KONG Ling-Rang. Progress and prospects in genetic breeding for Fusarium crown rot resistance in wheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(10): 2559-2569.
[8] HU Zhi-Kang, SHU Yu, WANG Hui, YANG Ying-Ying, LIAO Jun-Yu, LIU Jia, CHENG Hong-Tao, GUO Chen, ZHANG Yuan-Yuan, LIU Sheng-Yi, HU Qiong, MEI De-Sheng, LI Chao. Comprehensive evaluation of alkaline tolerance in Brassica napus at the seedling stage [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(10): 2681-2692.
[9] LIU Ming, FAN Wen-Jing, ZHAO Peng, JIN Rong, ZHANG Qiang-Qiang, ZHU Xiao-Ya, WANG Jing, LI Qiang. Genotypes screening and comprehensive evaluation of sweetpotato tolerant to low potassium stress at seedling stage [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(4): 926-937.
[10] XU Zi-Yin, YU Xiao-Ling, ZOU Liang-Ping, ZHAO Ping-Juan, LI Wen-Bin, GENG Meng-Ting, RUAN Meng-Bin. Expression pattern analysis and interaction protein screening of cassava MYB transcription factor MeMYB60 [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(4): 955-965.
[11] ZHU Ling-Xiao, SONG Shi-Jia, LI Hao-Ran, SUN Hong-Chun, ZHANG Yong-Jiang, BAI Zhi-Ying, ZHANG Ke, LI An-Chang, LIU Lian-Tao, LI Cun-Dong. Screening of low nitrogen tolerant cultivars based on low nitrogen tolerance comprehensive index at seeding stage in cotton [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(7): 1800-1812.
[12] QIN Lu, HAN Pei-Pei, CHANG Hai-Bin, GU Chi-Ming, HUANG Wei, LI Yin-Shui, LIAO Xiang-Sheng, XIE Li-Hua, LIAO Xing. Screening of rapeseed germplasms with low nitrogen tolerance and the evaluation of its potential application as green manure [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1488-1501.
[13] WU Jia-Yi, YUAN Fang, MENG Li-Jiao, LI Chen-Yang, SHI Hong-Song, BAI Yan-Song, WU Xiao-Ru, LI Jia-Na, ZHOU Qing-Yuan, CUI Cui. QTL mapping and candidate genes screening of photosynthesis-related traits in Brassica napus L. during seedling stage under aluminum stress [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(11): 2749-2764.
[14] ZHANG He, JIANG Chun-Ji, YIN Dong-Mei, DONG Jia-Le, REN Jing-Yao, ZHAO Xin-Hua, ZHONG Chao, WANG Xiao-Guang, YU Hai-Qiu. Establishment of comprehensive evaluation system for cold tolerance and screening of cold-tolerance germplasm in peanut [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(9): 1753-1767.
[15] WANG Nan,QI Xian-Tao,LIU Chang-Lin,XIE Chuan-Xiao,ZHU Jin-Jie. Establishment of an efficient genotyping technique based on targeted DNA endonuclease in vitro activity of CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(7): 978-986.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!