Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica,

Acta Agron Sin ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (12): 2273-2279.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.02273

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Responses of Flour Quality and Dough Rheological Properties to Stiobion avenae F. Inoculated in Spring Wheat

SHI Gui-Ying1,SHANG Xun-Wu1,*,WANG Hua-Jun1,2,MA Xiao-Le1,HU Bing-Fen1,LI Chang-Sheng1   

  1. 1College of Agronomy,Gansu Agricultural University,Lanzhou 730070,China;2Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic & Gemplasm Enhancement,Gansu Agricultural University,Lanzhou 730070,China
  • Received:2008-11-19 Revised:2009-06-25 Online:2009-12-10 Published:2009-09-10
  • Contact: SHANG Xun-Wu, E-mail: shangxunwu@163.com

Abstract:

Sitobion avenae F., one of the important aphid species infesting spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in western China, causes not only yield loss but also quality degradation of wheat flour. In the authors’ earlier studies, two wheat lines with high resistance to S. avenae, 04-9284 and C272 were screened out from 521 accessions. Another five highly susceptible cultivars (lines) were also identified, including a specific cultivar “Guanchun 20” for Lanzhou hand-stretched noodles. The aims of the present study were to compare quality differences of resistant and susceptible wheat lines inoculated with aphids, and to assess the contributions of grain hardness and gliadin to aphid resistance. The lines 04-9284 and C272 (soft grain) were used as resistant lines, and four cultivars (lines), Ganchun 20 (hard grain) as well as Ganchuan 18, C162, and C167 (soft grain with specific ω gliadin in grains after aphid infecting) were susceptible to S. avenae. After artificial inoculation with S. avenae on 5 June, the density of aphid population was measured from 15 June to 20 July at an interval of 6–7 d. Flour quality and dough rheological properties were determined after grain maturing. The mean density of aphid population at peak occurrence was 4.3-fold higher in susceptible lines than in resistant lines. Aphid infecting resulted in no significant change in flour granule (t = 0.4312, P = 0.68), but induced significant increase in ash content (t = 2.9207, P = 0.03) and reductions in protein content (t = 2.5444, P = 0.05), SDS sedimentation value (t = 4.5736, P = 0.01), strength (t = 4.2517, P = 0.01), swelling (t = 6.6691, P = 0.00), extensibility (t = 3.1826, P = 0.02), tenacity (t = 3.6653, P = 0.01), and index of elastic (t = 2.8750, P = 0.03). In susceptible lines Ganchun 18, C162, and C167, aphid infecting significantly reduced quality parameters mentioned above excluding flour gradual and ash content. Ganchun 20 showed less influence than the other three susceptible lines,its protein content, swelling, and extensibility reduced insignificantly, and the other parameters decreased slightly. In resistant lines 04-9284 and C272, there were significant variations after aphid infecting only in strength and extensibility with much smaller values than those in the three susceptible lines. Correlation analysis showed that the peak aphid density in the five lines with soft grain was positively correlated with the decrease percentages of quality parameters, such as swelling (r = 0.9968,P<0.01), tenacity (r = 0.9619,P<0.01), SDS sedimentation, strength (r = 0.9108,P<0.05), and protein content (r = 0.8886,P<0.05). With respect to the hard-grain cultivar Ganchun 20, the flour quality was still qualified for processing hand-stretched noodles even at the high density of 214.67 aphids per tiller. Field investigation showed that the peak density of S. avenae on Ganchun 20 was 122.36–154.33 heads per tiller in common years, which is much fewer than that in this study. Therefore, Ganchun 20 is not degraded seriously in flour quality under normal occurrence of S. avenae and possesses a relative stability of quality in response to the infecting of aphid.

Key words: Aphids resistance, Wheat, Flour quality, Grain hardness, Aphid


[1] Hoffman T K, Kolb F L. Effects of barley yellow dwarf virus on root and shoot growth of winter wheat seedling grown in aeroponic culture. Plant Dis, 1997, 81: 497-500

[2] Özder N. Development and fecundity of Sitobion avenae on some wheat cultivars under laboratory conditions. Phytoparasitica, 2002, 30: 434-436

[3] Lee G, Stevens D J, Stokes S, Wratten S D. Duration of cereal aphid populations and the effects on wheat yield and bread making quality. Ann Appl Biol, 1981, 98: 169-178

[4] Basky Z, Fonagy A. Glutenin and gliadin contents of flour derived from wheat infested with different aphid species. Pest Manag Sci, 2003, 59: 426-430

[5] Shi G-Y(师桂英). Screening and evaluation for resistance to aphid (Sitobion avenae F.) and the resistant mechanism of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) germplasm. PhD Dissertation of Gansu Agricultural University, 2006. pp 7-9 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[6] Shi G-Y(师桂英), Shang X-W(尚勋武), Wang H-J(王化俊), Ma X-L(马小乐).Screening for resistance to aphid (Sitobion avenae F.) of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) germplasm. J Lanzhou Univ (Nat Sci)(兰州大学学报?自然科学版), 2008, 44(5): 40-43 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[7]Basky Z, Fonagy A. The effect of aphid infection and cultivar on the protein content governing baking quality of wheat. J Sci Food Agric, 2007, 87: 2488-2494

[8] Bask y Z, Fonagy A, Kiss B. Effect of aphid feeding on the glutenin, gliadin and total protein contents of wheat flour. Acta Phytopathol Entomol Hung, 2006, 41: 153-164

[9] Basky Z, Fonagy A, Kiss B. Baking quality of wheat flour affected by cereal aphids. Cereal Res Commun, 2006, 34: 1161-1166

[10] Li Q-S(李巧丝), Wu Y-Q(武予清), Li S-J(李素娟), Liu A-Z(刘爱芝), Liu Y-Y(刘媛媛). Effect of aphid feeding on bread baking quality of wheat. Plant Prot (植物保护), 2003, 29(1): 43-45 (in Chinese)

[11]Meng X-G(孟宪刚), Shang X-W(尚勋武), Zhang G-S(张改生), Lu J-L(路建龙), Shang L-P(尚立平). Effect of low molecular gluten subunits LMW GS on dough rheological properties .Acta Bot Boreal-Occident Sin (西北植物学报), 2004, 24(6): 959-965 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[12] Cai Q-N(蔡青年), Zhang Q-W(张青文), Wang Y(王宇), Zhou M-Z(周明牂). Effects of the secondary substances on wheat resistance to Sitobion avenae F.Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2003, 36(8): 910-915 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[13] Tottman D R, Broad H, Decimalcode for the growth stages of cereals. Ann Appl Biol, 1987, 110: 683-687

[14] Johansson E, Prieto-Linde M L, Svensson G, Jonsson J O. Infuences of cultivar, cultivation year and fertilizer rate on amount of protein groups and amount and size distribution of mono- and polymeric proteins in wheat. J Agric Sci, 2003, 140: 275-284

[15] Meng X-G(孟宪刚), Shang X-W(尚勋武), Zhang G-S(张改生), Chai S-X(柴守玺). Wheat flour quality requirement for Lanzhou hand stretched noodles: I. The relationship between the noodles quality and the general quality of wheat flour.Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2005,31(4): 481-486 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[16] Hu X S, Zhao H Y, Hu Z Q, Li D H,Zhang Y H. EPG comparison of Sitobion avenae (Fab.) feeding behavior on three wheat varieties. Agric Sci China, 2008, 7: 180-186

[17] Hu X-S(胡想顺), Zhao H-Y(赵惠燕), Hu Z-Q(胡祖庆), Li D-H(李东鸿),Zhang Y-H(张宇红). Comparison of Rhopalosiphum padi. Feeding behavior on seedlings of three wheat varieties. Acta Entomol Sin (昆虫学报), 2007, 50(11): 1105-1110 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[18] Brett F C. Genetic implication soft kernel NIR hardness on milling and flour quality inbread wheat. Sci Food Agric, 1994, 65: 125-132

[19] Zhang Y, He Z H, Ye G Y. Milling quality and protein properties of autumn-sown Chinese winter wheats evaluated through multi-location trials. Euphytica, 2005, 143: 209-222

[20] Oda S, Komae K, Yasue T. Relation between starch granule protein and endosperm softness in Japanese wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Jpn J Breed, 1992,42: 161-165
[1] HU Wen-Jing, LI Dong-Sheng, YI Xin, ZHANG Chun-Mei, ZHANG Yong. Molecular mapping and validation of quantitative trait loci for spike-related traits and plant height in wheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1346-1356.
[2] GUO Xing-Yu, LIU Peng-Zhao, WANG Rui, WANG Xiao-Li, LI Jun. Response of winter wheat yield, nitrogen use efficiency and soil nitrogen balance to rainfall types and nitrogen application rate in dryland [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1262-1272.
[3] LEI Xin-Hui, WAN Chen-Xi, TAO Jin-Cai, LENG Jia-Jun, WU Yi-Xin, WANG Jia-Le, WANG Peng-Ke, YANG Qing-Hua, FENG Bai-Li, GAO Jin-Feng. Effects of soaking seeds with MT and EBR on germination and seedling growth in buckwheat under salt stress [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1210-1221.
[4] FU Mei-Yu, XIONG Hong-Chun, ZHOU Chun-Yun, GUO Hui-Jun, XIE Yong-Dun, ZHAO Lin-Shu, GU Jia-Yu, ZHAO Shi-Rong, DING Yu-Ping, XU Yan-Hao, LIU Lu-Xiang. Genetic analysis of wheat dwarf mutant je0098 and molecular mapping of dwarfing gene [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 580-589.
[5] FENG Jian-Chao, XU Bei-Ming, JIANG Xue-Li, HU Hai-Zhou, MA Ying, WANG Chen-Yang, WANG Yong-Hua, MA Dong-Yun. Distribution of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities in layered grinding wheat flour and the regulation effect of nitrogen fertilizer application [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 704-715.
[6] LIU Yun-Jing, ZHENG Fei-Na, ZHANG Xiu, CHU Jin-Peng, YU Hai-Tao, DAI Xing-Long, HE Ming-Rong. Effects of wide range sowing on grain yield, quality, and nitrogen use of strong gluten wheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 716-725.
[7] YAN Yan, ZHANG Yu-Shi, LIU Chu-Rong, REN Dan-Yang, LIU Hong-Run, LIU Xue-Qing, ZHANG Ming-Cai, LI Zhao-Hu. Variety matching and resource use efficiency of the winter wheat-summer maize “double late” cropping system [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(2): 423-436.
[8] WANG Yang-Yang, HE Li, REN De-Chao, DUAN Jian-Zhao, HU Xin, LIU Wan-Dai, GU Tian-Cai, WANG Yong-Hua, FENG Wei. Evaluations of winter wheat late frost damage under different water based on principal component-cluster analysis [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(2): 448-462.
[9] CHEN Xin-Yi, SONG Yu-Hang, ZHANG Meng-Han, LI Xiao-Yan, LI Hua, WANG Yue-Xia, QI Xue-Li. Effects of water deficit on physiology and biochemistry of seedlings of different wheat varieties and the alleviation effect of exogenous application of 5-aminolevulinic acid [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(2): 478-487.
[10] XU Long-Long, YIN Wen, HU Fa-Long, FAN Hong, FAN Zhi-Long, ZHAO Cai, YU Ai-Zhong, CHAI Qiang. Effect of water and nitrogen reduction on main photosynthetic physiological parameters of film-mulched maize no-tillage rotation wheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(2): 437-447.
[11] MA Bo-Wen, LI Qing, CAI Jian, ZHOU Qin, HUANG Mei, DAI Ting-Bo, WANG Xiao, JIANG Dong. Physiological mechanisms of pre-anthesis waterlogging priming on waterlogging stress tolerance under post-anthesis in wheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(1): 151-164.
[12] MENG Ying, XING Lei-Lei, CAO Xiao-Hong, GUO Guang-Yan, CHAI Jian-Fang, BEI Cai-Li. Cloning of Ta4CL1 and its function in promoting plant growth and lignin deposition in transgenic Arabidopsis plants [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(1): 63-75.
[13] WEI Yi-Hao, YU Mei-Qin, ZHANG Xiao-Jiao, WANG Lu-Lu, ZHANG Zhi-Yong, MA Xin-Ming, LI Hui-Qing, WANG Xiao-Chun. Alternative splicing analysis of wheat glutamine synthase genes [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(1): 40-47.
[14] LI Ling-Hong, ZHANG Zhe, CHEN Yong-Ming, YOU Ming-Shan, NI Zhong-Fu, XING Jie-Wen. Transcriptome profiling of glossy1 mutant with glossy glume in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(1): 48-62.
[15] LUO Jiang-Tao, ZHENG Jian-Min, PU Zong-Jun, FAN Chao-Lan, LIU Deng-Cai, HAO Ming. Chromosome transmission in hybrids between tetraploid and hexaploid wheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(8): 1427-1436.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!