Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica,

Acta Agron Sin ›› 2015, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (07): 1105-1111.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.01105

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Different Cultivation Patterns on Cotton Field Resources Use Efficiency in Yangtze River Valley

ZHANG Chang-He,DAI Yan-Jiao,YANG Hong-Kun,ZHANG Xin-Yue,DU Xiang-Bei,CHEN Bing-Lin,ZHOU Zhi-Guo*   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology & Ecology, Ministry of Agriculture / Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
  • Received:2015-01-16 Revised:2015-05-04 Online:2015-07-12 Published:2015-05-14

Abstract:

The agricultural production in China is mainly dependent on nature environment. But the use efficiency of field resources in China is lower than those in developed countries, and the current crop cultivation theory and technology need to be innovated and improved continuously. The efficiency field stationary experiments using cotton cultivate Siza 3 with different cultivation patterns were carried out in high and low soil fertility levels in Dafeng, Jiangsu province. The cultivation patterns included super high cultivation patterns (SH), farmers practice cultivation (FP), high yield and high efficiency cultivation (HH). The result showed that lint yield of cotton was significantly affected by cultivation patterns and soil fertility levels. Lint yield difference was correlated with the differences of temperature production efficiency (TPE), radiation use efficiency (RUE) and nitrogen partial factor productivity (NPEP) under different cultivation patterns. Our results suggested that the key factor limited cotton production is the lower resources use efficiency. The lint yield, temperature and radiation use efficiency and nitrogen partial factor productivity of HH were 27.5%, 27.7%, 23.4%, and 10.1% higher than there of FP. Therefore, HH should be encouraged to extend in the Yangtze River Valley, and field resources use efficiency in wheat-cotton double cropping system should be further improved in the future for increasing cotton productivity.

Key words: Cotton, Cultivation patterns, Yield, Resources use efficiency

[1]Ali H, Afzal M N, Muhammad D. Effect of sowing dates and plant spacing on growth and dry matter partitioning in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Pakistan J Bot, 2009, 41: 2145–2155



[2]Ali M A, Tatla Y H, Aslam M. Response of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) to potassium fertilization in arid environment. J Agric Res, 2007, 45: 191–198



[3]Ruiz R, Bertero H. Light interception and radiation use efficiency in temperate quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars. Eur J Agron, 2008, 29: 144–152



[4]Zhang L, Van der Werf W, Bastiaans L, Zhang S, Li B, Spiertz J H J. Light interception and utilization in relay intercrops of wheat and cotton. Field Crops Res, 2008, 107: 29–42



[5]Dong H Z , Kong X Q , Li W J, Tang W, Zhang D M. Effects of plant density and nitrogen and potassium fertilization on cotton yield and uptake of major nutrients in two fields with varying fertility. Field Crops Res, 2010, 119: 106–113



[6]Kaggwa-Asiimwe R, Andrade-Sanchez P, Wang G Y. Plant architecture influences growth and yield response of upland cotton to population density. Field Crops Res, 2013, 145: 52–59



[7]Braunack M, Bange M, Johnston D. Can planting date and cultivar selection improve resource use efficiency of cotton systems? Field Crops Res, 2012, 137: 1–11



[8]Ali, Hakoomat A, Muhammad N A, Shakeel M, Dilbaugh. Effect of cultivars and sowing dates on yield and quality of (Gossypium hirsutum L) cotton. J Food, Agric Environ, 2009, 7: 244–247



[9]Milroy S P, Bange M P. Nitrogen and light responses of cotton photosynthesis and implications for crop growth. Crop Sci, 2003, 43: 904–913



[10]Boquet D J, Breitenbeck G A. Nitrogen rate effect on partitioning of nitrogen and dry matter by cotton. Crop Sci, 2000, 40: 1685–1693



[11]O’Connell M G, O’Leary G J, Whitfield D M, Connor D J. Interception of photosynthetically active radiation and radiation-use efficiency of wheat, field pea and mustard in a semi-arid environment. Field Crops Res, 2004, 85: 111–124



[12]Steduto P, Albrizio R. Resource use efficiency of field-grown sunflower, sorghum, wheat and chickpea: II. Water use efficiency and comparison with radiation use efficiency. Agric For Meteorol, 2005, 130: 269–281



[13]Howden S M, Soussana J F, Tubiello F N, Chhetri N, Dunlop M, Meinke H. Adapting agriculture to climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2007, 104: 19691–19696



[14]Smit B, Skinner M W. Adaptation options in agriculture to climate change: a typology. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change, 2002, 7: 85–114



[15]Du X B, Chen B L, Shen T Y, Zhang Y X, Zhou Z G. Effect of cropping system on radiation use efficiency in double–cropped wheat–cotton. Field Crops Res, 2015, 170: 21–31



[16]Van Opstal N V, Caviglia O P, Melchiori R J M. Water and solar radiation productivity of double-crops in a humid temperature area. Aust J Crop Sci, 2011, 5: 1760–1766



[17]Caviglia O P, Sadras V O, Andrade F H. Intensi?cation of agriculture in the south-eastern Pampas I. Capture and efficiency in the use of water and radiation in double-cropped wheat-soybean. Field Crops Res, 2004, 87: 117–129



[18]Ferrise R, Triossi A, Stratonovitch P, Bindi M, Martre P. Sowing date and nitrogen fertilization effects on dry matter and nitrogen dynamics for durum wheat: an experimental and simulation study. Field Crops Res, 2010, 117: 245–257



[19]Willey R W. Resource use in intercropping systems. Agric Water Manag, 1990, 17: 215–231



[20]Read J J, Reddy K R, Jenkins J N. Yield and fiber quality of upland cotton as influenced by nitrogen and potassium nutrition. Eur J Agron, 2006, 24: 282–290



[21]Kaggwa-Asiimwe R, Andrade-Sanchez P, Wang G. Plant architecture influences growth and yield response of upland cotton to population density. Field Crops Res, 2013, 145: 52–59



[22]Tsubo M, Walker S. A model of radiation interception and use by a maize-bean intercrop canopy. Agric For Meteorol, 2002, 110: 203–215



[23]Hou Z A, Li P F, Li B G, Gong J, Wang Y N. Effects of fertigation scheme on N uptake and N use efficiency in cotton. Plant Soil, 2007, 290: 115–126



[24]McConnell J S, Baker W H, Miller D M, Frizzell B S, Varvil J J. Nitrogen fertilization of cotton cultivars of differing maturity. Agron J, 1993, 85: 1151–1156



[25]Yang G Z, Tang H Y, Tong J, Nie Y C, Zhang X L. Effect of fertilization frequency on cotton yield and biomass accumulation. Field Crops Res, 2012, 125: 161–166



[26]Yan X, Jin J Y, He P, Liang M Z. Recent advances on the technologies to increase fertilizer use efficiency. Agric Sci China, 2008, 7: 469–479



[27]Koch B, Khosla R, Frasier W M, Westfall D G, Inman D. Site-specific management: economic feasibility of variable-rate nitrogen application utilizing site-specific management zones. Agron J, 2004, 96: 1572–1580

[1] WANG Dan, ZHOU Bao-Yuan, MA Wei, GE Jun-Zhu, DING Zai-Song, LI Cong-Feng, ZHAO Ming. Characteristics of the annual distribution and utilization of climate resource for double maize cropping system in the middle reaches of Yangtze River [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2] WANG Wang-Nian, GE Jun-Zhu, YANG Hai-Chang, YIN Fa-Ting, HUANG Tai-Li, KUAI Jie, WANG Jing, WANG Bo, ZHOU Guang-Sheng, FU Ting-Dong. Adaptation of feed crops to saline-alkali soil stress and effect of improving saline-alkali soil [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[3] YAN Jia-Qian, GU Yi-Biao, XUE Zhang-Yi, ZHOU Tian-Yang, GE Qian-Qian, ZHANG Hao, LIU Li-Jun, WANG Zhi-Qin, GU Jun-Fei, YANG Jian-Chang, ZHOU Zhen-Ling, XU Da-Yong. Different responses of rice cultivars to salt stress and the underlying mechanisms [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[4] YANG Huan, ZHOU Ying, CHEN Ping, DU Qing, ZHENG Ben-Chuan, PU Tian, WEN Jing, YANG Wen-Yu, YONG Tai-Wen. Effects of nutrient uptake and utilization on yield of maize-legume strip intercropping system [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5] CHEN Jing, REN Bai-Zhao, ZHAO Bin, LIU Peng, ZHANG Ji-Wang. Regulation of leaf-spraying glycine betaine on yield formation and antioxidation of summer maize sowed in different dates [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6] LI Yi-Jun, LYU Hou-Quan. Effect of agricultural meteorological disasters on the production corn in the Northeast China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[7] ZHOU Jing-Yuan, KONG Xiang-Qiang, ZHANG Yan-Jun, LI Xue-Yuan, ZHANG Dong-Mei, DONG He-Zhong. Mechanism and technology of stand establishment improvements through regulating the apical hook formation and hypocotyl growth during seed germination and emergence in cotton [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1051-1058.
[8] SHI Yan-Yan, MA Zhi-Hua, WU Chun-Hua, ZHOU Yong-Jin, LI Rong. Effects of ridge tillage with film mulching in furrow on photosynthetic characteristics of potato and yield formation in dryland farming [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[9] SUN Si-Min, HAN Bei, CHEN Lin, SUN Wei-Nan, ZHANG Xian-Long, YANG Xi-Yan. Root system architecture analysis and genome-wide association study of root system architecture related traits in cotton [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1081-1090.
[10] YAN Xiao-Yu, GUO Wen-Jun, QIN Du-Lin, WANG Shuang-Lei, NIE Jun-Jun, ZHAO Na, QI Jie, SONG Xian-Liang, MAO Li-Li, SUN Xue-Zhen. Effects of cotton stubble return and subsoiling on dry matter accumulation, nutrient uptake, and yield of cotton in coastal saline-alkali soil [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[11] KE Jian, CHEN Ting-Ting, WU Zhou, ZHU Tie-Zhong, SUN Jie, HE Hai-Bing, YOU Cui-Cui, ZHU De-Quan, WU Li-Quan. Suitable varieties and high-yielding population characteristics of late season rice in the northern margin area of double-cropping rice along the Yangtze River [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[12] LI Rui-Dong, YIN Yang-Yang, SONG Wen-Wen, WU Ting-Ting, SUN Shi, HAN Tian-Fu, XU Cai-Long, WU Cun-Xiang, HU Shui-Xiu. Effects of close planting densities on assimilate accumulation and yield of soybean with different plant branching types [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[13] WANG Lyu, CUI Yue-Zhen, WU Yu-Hong, HAO Xing-Shun, ZHANG Chun-Hui, WANG Jun-Yi, LIU Yi-Xin, LI Xiao-Gang, QIN Yu-Hang. Effects of rice stalks mulching combined with green manure (Astragalus smicus L.) incorporated into soil and reducing nitrogen fertilizer rate on rice yield and soil fertility [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[14] ZHENG Shu-Feng, LIU Xiao-Ling, WANG Wei, XU Dao-Qing, KAN Hua-Chun, CHEN Min, LI Shu-Ying. On the green and light-simplified and mechanized cultivation of cotton in a cotton-based double cropping system [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 541-552.
[15] DU Hao, CHENG Yu-Han, LI Tai, HOU Zhi-Hong, LI Yong-Li, NAN Hai-Yang, DONG Li-Dong, LIU Bao-Hui, CHENG Qun. Improving seed number per pod of soybean by molecular breeding based on Ln locus [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!