欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 780-786.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.04122

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    

马铃薯StIgt基因家族的鉴定及其对干旱胁迫的响应分析

秦天元1,2(), 刘玉汇1,2, 孙超1,2, 毕真真1,2, 李安一3, 许德蓉1,2, 王一好1,2, 张俊莲1, 白江平1,2,*()   

  1. 1甘肃省干旱生境作物学重点实验室 / 甘肃省作物遗传改良与栽培种创新重点实验室, 甘肃兰州 730070
    2甘肃农业大学农学院, 甘肃兰州 730070
    3兰州大学草地农业科技学院 / 草地农业生态系统国家重点实验室, 甘肃兰州 730020
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-04 接受日期:2020-10-14 出版日期:2021-04-12 网络出版日期:2020-11-06
  • 通讯作者: 白江平
  • 作者简介:E-mail: 1637835362@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(31660432);国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-09-P14);甘肃省马铃薯产业体系(GARS-03-P1);甘肃省创新能力提升项目(2019B-073);甘肃省科技计划项目(19ZD2WA002-02);甘肃省科技计划项目(18JR3RA174);甘肃农业大学国重实验室开放基金(GSCS-2017-9);甘肃农业大学创新基金项目(GAU-XKJS-2018-085)

Identification of StIgt gene family and expression profile analysis of response to drought stress in potato

QIN Tian-Yuan1,2(), LIU Yu-Hui1,2, SUN Chao1,2, BI Zhen-Zhen1,2, LI An-Yi3, XU De-Rong1,2, WANG Yi-Hao1,2, ZHANG Jun-Lian1, BAI Jiang-Ping1,2,*()   

  1. 1Gansu Provincial Key Lab of Aridland Crop Science / Gansu Key Laboratory of Crop Improvement & Germplasm Enhancement, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China
    2College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China
    3College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730020, Gansu, China
  • Received:2020-06-04 Accepted:2020-10-14 Published:2021-04-12 Published online:2020-11-06
  • Contact: BAI Jiang-Ping
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(31660432);China Agriculture Research System(CARS-09-P14);Gansu Province Potato Industry System(GARS-03-P1);Gansu Provincial Education Department(2019B-073);Gansu Provincial Science and Technology Department(19ZD2WA002-02);Gansu Provincial Science and Technology Department(18JR3RA174);Key Laboratory of Arid Land Crop Science of Gansu Agricultural University(GSCS-2017-9);Innovation Fund of Gansu Agricultural University(GAU-XKJS-2018-085)

RichHTML

34

PDF

1131

摘要：

干旱胁迫是影响马铃薯产量和品质的主要非生物胁迫因素之一。马铃薯在抵御干旱胁迫的过程中, 根系的生长发育和构型分布发挥着重要作用。Igt基因家族是普遍存在于植物中的一类功能基因, 在调控植物根系构型和提高植株抗逆性等方面效果显著。本研究以马铃薯双单倍体‘DM-v4.03’高质量基因组为参考, 在全基因组范围内分析鉴定了StIgt基因家族的成员, 并采用多种生物信息学软件对其进行了系统进化树构建、染色体定位、保守蛋白结构域、基因结构和顺式元件预测。同时, 利用本课题组前期对马铃薯四倍体品系在不同干旱条件下的转录组测序结果, 分析了StIgts响应干旱胁迫的表达谱。结果表明, 在马铃薯中共鉴定获得10个StIgt家族成员, 其中StIgt1由本课题组前期克隆获得。除StIgt1位置信息不明外, 其余基因不均匀地分布在1、2、5、7、10和11号染色体上。StIgt家族蛋白长度为110~283个氨基酸, 分子量介于13.136~32.542 kD之间, 预测等电点为3.82~9.86。系统进化树分析发现, 该基因家族可分为3个亚族, 亚族间的基因结构、蛋白保守域和顺式作用元件差别明显。干旱胁迫下的表达谱分析表明, StIgt6、StIgt7、StIgt9和StIgt10响应早期干旱胁迫, 在干旱2 h时即迅速上调表达。这些结果为阐明StIgt基因家族的进化关系和进一步研究其成员的功能特性提供了理论基础。

关键词: 全基因组, 马铃薯, StIgt基因家族, 干旱胁迫, 表达谱分析

Abstract:

Drought stress is one of the main abiotic stress factors affecting potato yield and quality. The root growth, development and architecture play an important role in potato drought resistance. The Igt gene family is a functional gene family that are ubiquitous in plants, and has significant effects in regulating root architecture and improving plant stress resistance. In this study, the potato double haploid ‘DM-v4.03’ high-quality genome was used as a reference, and members of the StIgt gene family were identified and analyzed on a genome-wide scale. Phylogenetic trees, chromosomal location, conservative protein domains, gene structure and cis element prediction were carried out by bioinformatics software. Meanwhile, the expression profiles of StIgts in response to drought stress were analyzed based on the transcriptome sequencing results of potato tetraploid lines under different drought conditions. The results showed that a total of 10 StIgt family members were identified in potato, of which StIgt1 was obtained and cloned by our research group. Except for the unknown position information of StIgt1, the remaining genes are unevenly distributed on chromosome 1, 2, 5, 7, 10, and 11. StIgts proteins range in length from 110 to 283 amino acids and have molecular weights ranging from 13.136 kD to 32.542 kD. The predicted isoelectric point is 3.82 to 9.86. Phylogenetic tree analysis revealed that the gene family can be divided into three subfamilies. The gene structure, protein conserved domains and cis-acting elements differ significantly among three subfamilies. The expression profile analysis under drought stress showed that StIgt6, StIgt7, StIgt9 and StIgt10 responded to the early drought stress which rapidly up-regulated at two hours of drought treatment. These results provide a theoretical basis for elucidating the evolutionary relationship of the StIgt gene family and further studying the functional characteristics of its members.

Key words: genome-wide, potato, StIgt gene family, drought stress, gene expression analyses

表1

拟南芥、桃、玉米与水稻Igt基因登录号"

基因名称
Gene name		 基因登录号
GenBank No.		 基因名称
Gene name		 基因登录号
GenBank No.
AtDro1 AT1G72490 AtLazy6 AT3G27025
AtDro2 AT1G19115 PpeLazy1 LOC18782538
AtDro3 AT1G17400 PpeLazy2 LOC18790006
OsDro1 BAN59748.1 ZmLazy LOC100193776
PpeDro1 LOC103327608 OsLazy1 LOC4350543
PpeDro2 LOC18770522 PpeTac1 LOC18773917
AtLazy1 AT5G14090 Ostac1 LOC4347655
AtLazy5 AT3G24750 AtTac1 AT2G46640

表2

马铃薯StIgt基因家族信息"

基因名称
Gene name		 基因ID
Gene ID		 亚组
Group		 染色体位置
Chromosome location		 大小
Size		 分子量
MW (kD)		 等电点
pI
StIgt10 PGSC0003DMG400042006 I chr11: 19822270-19822602 110 13,136.1 9.86
StIgt9 PGSC0003DMG400035280 I chr01: 12153224-12154281 139 15,371.1 4.61
StIgt8 PGSC0003DMG400020205 I chr02: 48071799-48076548 256 29,350.3 6.41
StIgt7 PGSC0003DMG401019811 I chr05: 15169941-15172623 255 27,797.7 5.41
StIgt6 PGSC0003DMG400041371 II chr07: 26993146-27002422 275 31,382.8 4.38
StIgt5 PGSC0003DMG400005529 II chr10: 5159202-5164672 281 32,338.2 5.15
StIgt4 PGSC0003DMG400022847 II chr01: 59885567-59885980 137 15,989.9 3.82
StIgt3 PGSC0003DMG400000126 II chr01: 73826302-73827911 221 24,499.6 5.38
StIgt2 PGSC0003DMG400016036 III chr07: 39417955-39420740 228 26,123 6.17
StIgt1 StDro1 III 未知Unknown 283 32,542.3 6.68

图1

基于马铃薯和其他物种Igt基因家族系统进化树"

图2

马铃薯StIgt基因家族成员的蛋白保守域和基因结构 A: 蛋白结构域特征; B: 基因结构。"

图3

马铃薯StIgts的染色体定位(A)和顺式作用元件分析(B) ABRE: 脱落酸作用元件; ERE: 参与防御和应激反应的作用元件; MBS: 干旱胁迫反应元件; TCA-element: 水杨酸作用元件; TGA-element: 生长素响应元件; W-box: 胁迫响应元件。"

图4

马铃薯StIgt基因在不同干旱胁迫时间下的表达模式分析"

图5

干旱胁迫时间下马铃薯StIgt1、StIgt3和StIgt10基因的表达 *, **分别表示在0.05和0.01水平上显著差异。"

[1] Boguszewskamańkowska D, Zarzyńska K, Nosalewicz A. Drought differentially affects root system size and architecture of potato cultivars with differing drought tolerance. Am J Potato Res, 2019,97:54-62.
doi: 10.1007/s12230-019-09755-2
[2] Guoju Q, Zhengji Z, Fengju M, Runyuan W. Influence of increased temperature on the potato yield and quality in a semiarid district of northwest china. Acta Ecol Sin, 2015,35:830-836.
[3] Devaux A, Haverkort A J. The effects of shifting planting dates and mulching on late blight ( Phytophthora infestans) and drought stress of potato crops grown under tropical highland conditions. Exp Agric, 2008,23:325-333.
doi: 10.1017/S001447970001721X
[4] Shuangyuan C. Growth and yield response of different crops sowing after potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.) harvest in Kunming area. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2013,41:3794-3796.
[5] Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D S M A. Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management to cite this version: review article. Agron Sustain Dev, 2009,29:185-212.
doi: 10.1051/agro:2008021
[6] Raza M A S, Shahid A M, Saleem M F. Effects and management strategies to mitigate drought stress in oilseed rape ( Brassica napus L.): a review. Zemdirbyste, 2017,104:85-94.
[7] Siddiqui M H, Al-Khaishany M Y, Al-Qutami M A, Al-Whaibi M H, Grover A, Ali H M, Al-Wahibi M S, Bukhari N A. Response of different genotypes of faba bean plant to drought stress. Int J Mol Sci, 2015,16:10214-10227.
doi: 10.3390/ijms160510214 pmid: 25950766
[8] Hollender C A, Dardick C. Molecular basis of angiosperm tree architecture. New Phytol, 2015,206:541-556.
doi: 10.1111/nph.13204 pmid: 25483362
[9] Uga Y, Sugimoto K, Ogawa S. Control of root system architecture by deeper rooting 1 increases rice yield under drought conditions. Nat Genet, 2013,45:1097-1102.
doi: 10.1038/ng.2725 pmid: 23913002
[10] Arai-Sanoh Y, Takai T, Yoshinaga S, Nakano H, Kojima M, Sakakibara H, Kondo M, Uga Y. Deep rooting conferred by deeper rooting 1 enhances rice yield in paddy fields. Sci Rep, 2014,4:5544-5563.
[11] Guseman J M, Webb K, Srinivasan C. DRO1 influences root system architecture in Arabidopsis and Prunus species. Plant J, 2017,89:1093-1105.
pmid: 28029738
[12] Dardick C, Callahan A, Horn R. Ppetac1 promotes the horizontal growth of branches in peach trees and is a member of a functionally conserved gene family found in diverse plants species. Plant J, 2013,75:618-630.
doi: 10.1111/tpj.12234 pmid: 23663106
[13] Coste A T, Karababa M, Ischer F, Bille J, Sanglard D. TAC1 transcriptional activator of CDR genes is a new transcription factor involved in the regulation of Candida albicans ABC transporters CDR1 and CDR2. Eukaryot Cell, 2004,6:1639-1652.
[14] Yu B, Lin Z, Li H. TAC1: a major quantitative trait locus controlling tiller angle in rice. Plant J, 2008,52:891-898.
pmid: 17908158
[15] Li P, Wang Y, Qian Q. LAZY1 controls rice shoot gravitropism through regulating polar auxin transport. Cell Res, 2007,17:327-327.
[16] Dong Z, Jiang C, Chen X, Zhang T. Maize lazy1 mediates shoot gravitropism and inflorescence development through regulating auxin transport, auxin signaling and light response. Plant Physiol, 2013,163:1306-1322.
pmid: 24089437
[17] Altschul S F, Madden T L, Schäffer A A. Gapped blast and psi-blast: a new generation of protein databases search programs. Nucleic Acids Res, 1997,25:3389-3402.
pmid: 9254694
[18] Aron M B, Derbyshire M K, Gonzales N R. CDD: NCBI’s conserved domain database. Nucleic Acids Res, 2014,43:222-226.
[19] Finn R D, Alex B, Jody C. Pfam: the protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res, 2014,42:222-230.
[20] Thompson J D, Gibson T J, Higgins D G. Multiple sequence alignment using clustalw and clustalx. Curr Protoc Bioinf, 2003,23:1-22.
[21] Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. Mega 7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol, 2016,33:1870-1874.
[22] Bailey T L, Nadya W, Chris M. Meme: discovering and analyzing dna and protein sequence motifs. Nucleic Acids Res, 2006,34:369-373.
[23] Madke S S, Cherian K J, Badere R S. A modified Murashige and Skoog media for efficient multipleshoot induction in G. arborea Roxb. J For Res, 2014,3:557-564.
[24] Eiasu B K, Soundy P, Hammes P S. Response of potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.) tuber yield components to gelpolymer soil amendments and irrigation regimes. Crop Hortic, 2007,35:25-31.
[25] Walworth J L, Carling D E. Tuber initiation and development in irrigated and nonirrigated potatoes. Am J Potato Res, 2002,79:387-395.
[26] Lopes M S, Reynolds M P. Partitioning of assimilates to deeper roots is associated with cooler canopies and increased yield under drought in wheat. Funct Plant Biol, 2010,37:147-156.
[27] Lynch J P. Steep cheap and deep: an ideotype to optimize water and nacquisition by maize root systems. Ann Bot, 2013,112:347-357.
[28] Villordon A Q, Ginzberg I, Firon N. Root architecture and root and tuber crop productivity. Trends Plant Sci, 2014,19:419-425.
pmid: 24630073
[29] Roychoudhry S, Kepinski S. Shoot and root branch growth angle control the wonderfulness of lateralness. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2015,23:124-131.
[30] Yoshihara T, Spalding E P. LAZY genes mediate the effects of gravity on auxin gradients and plant architecture. Plant Physiol, 2017,175:959-969.
doi: 10.1104/pp.17.00942 pmid: 28821594
[31] Zhang S L, Li D F. The prediction of rice gene by Fgenesh. Agric Sci China, 2008,7:387-394.
[32] Scott M, Madden T L. Blast: at the core of a powerful and diverse set of sequence analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res, 2004,32:20-25.
[1] 陈国欢, 张锐, 李艳迪, 赵佳琪, 任湧涛, 张天赐, 郭华春, 李俊, 杨芳. 外源硒叶面喷施对浅紫色马铃薯块茎花青素合成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1876-1890.
[2] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[3] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[4] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[5] 王文辕, 燕雪嘉, 刘玉霖, 孙晓彤, 李亚楠, 唐鑫华, 石瑛. 耐弱光马铃薯品种筛选及转录因子编码基因StPIF3的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1631-1645.
[6] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[7] 谷春苗, 王润风, 黄璐, 刘浩, 鲁清, 李海芬, 李少雄, 何双呈, 洪彦彬, 陈小平, 谭斌, 余倩霞. 花生WOX基因家族的全基因组分析及不定芽再生候选基因的鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1326-1340.
[8] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[9] 田立涛, 丁宁, 王树林, 齐恩芳, 张荣, 王蕊蕊, 马利雯, 李建武, 杨江伟. 马铃薯Argonaute基因家族鉴定及晚疫病诱导表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1116-1126.
[10] 汪玲, 胡好, 宋家凤, 程洁蓝, 陈颖, 郑婷婷, 吕钊彦, 朱晓彪, 侯华兰. 马铃薯UDP-糖基转移酶基因StUGT52的克隆及功能验证[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 665-676.
[11] 张宇, 刘芳, 蔡诚诚, 杨小华, 吉阿么石扎, 杨元军, 王西瑶. 溴乙烷与赤霉素协同处理破除马铃薯块茎休眠的机理初探[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 825-838.
[12] 徐强, 谢奎忠, 胡新元, 岳云, 董博, 罗爱花. 连作对马铃薯根际土壤线虫群落结构与功能的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 527-538.
[13] 杨飚, 杜帅康, 张继旺, 石瑛, 张丽莉. 马铃薯III类POD基因家族的全基因组鉴定及其表达谱分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 405-420.
[14] 鲁雅妮, 丁超杰, 张煜, 杜习军, 齐学礼, 胡琳, 许为钢. 河南省200份小麦品种苗期茎基腐病抗性鉴定与全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 363-375.
[15] 李诗晴, 王茜, 王素华, 张耀文, 王丽侠. 绿豆种质资源苗期耐盐性鉴定及相关基因发掘[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 376-388.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2