欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (12): 2176-2183.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.02176

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

穗肥施量对水稻植株形态、群体生态及穗叶温度的影响

闫川;丁艳锋;王强盛;李刚华;刘正辉;缪小建;郑永美;魏广彬;王绍华*   

  1. 南京农业大学农业部作物生长调控重点开放实验室 / 江苏省信息农业高技术研究重点实验室,江苏南京210095
  • 收稿日期:2008-03-06 修回日期:2008-05-03 出版日期:2008-12-12 网络出版日期:2008-10-10
  • 通讯作者: 王绍华
  • 作者简介:闫川(1981-),男,安徽宿州人,博士研究生,主要从事作物生理生态研究
  • 基金资助:

    国家粮食丰产科技工程项目(2006BAD02A03);国家自然科学基金项目(30471016)

Effect of Panicle Fertilizer Application Rate on Morphological, Ecological Characteristics, and Organ Temperature of Rice

YAN Chuan,DING Yan-Feng,WANG Qiang-Sheng,LI Gang-Hua,LIU Zheng-Hui,MIAO Xiao-Jian,ZHENG Yong-Mei,WEI Guang-Bin,WANG Shao-Hua*   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Growth Regulation, Ministry of Agriculture / High-Tech Key Laboratory of Information Agriculture of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2008-03-06 Revised:2008-05-03 Published:2008-12-12 Published online:2008-10-10
  • Contact: WANG Shao-Hua

摘要:

以2个籼、粳稻品种为材料,设置高、中、低3个穗肥处理,以空白为对照,构建不同的群体结构,研究穗肥施量对植株形态和群体生态及穗叶温度的影响。结果表明,穗肥施量对穗长、穗弯曲度、叶长和叶角有明显影响;不同穗肥处理群体内部温度、湿度、光照强度和CO2浓度等微气象因子具有一定差异,中肥处理具有良好的群体微气象环境;此外,中肥处理群体具有适宜的LAI、净光合速率和蒸腾速率,冠层温度较低;施肥水平显著影响植株器官的温度,穗叶的温度随穗肥施量的增加而降低,中肥与高肥处理植株穗叶的温度差异不显著,但与低肥和空白处理差异显著。研究结果说明通过优化田间管理如合理的施肥来构建良好的群体,对降低植株穗叶和冠层温度以提高水稻抗热害能力效果显著。

关键词: 水稻, 穗肥, 形态, 群体生态, 穗叶温度

Abstract:

Using 2 japonica and indica rice cultivars with three panicle fertilizer application rate treatments and a control, different populations of rice were constructed, and the effect of panicle fertilizer application rate (PFAR) on morphological, ecological characteristics and organ temperature of rice were studied. The results showed that PFAR had a significant effect on length of panicle, panicle camber, length of leaf and leaf angle. It was also observed that air temperature, humidity, light intensity and content of CO2 were also affected by different PFAR treatments, medium PFAR was proved to be best for microclimate within rice population. Besides, there were felicitous leaf area index, length of second leaf, photosynthetic rate, transpiration and lower canopy temperature at medium PFAR. The temperature of plant organs was significantly affected by PFAR, the more the PFAR, the lower the temperature of panicle and leaf. The organ temperature was significantly different at the 0.05 level between medium PFAR and lower PFAR, control treatments, while not significantly between medium PFAR and higher PFAR. This study clearly showed that appropriate agronomic practices, such as PFAR, have a significant effect on the temperature of plant organs and canopy, and also enhance the resistance to heat stress.

Key words: Rice, Panicle fertilizer, Morphological, Microclimate, Temperature of panicle and leaf

[1] Houghton J T, Ding Y, Griggs D J. Climate Change 2001: Scientific Basis. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001. pp 25-28
[2] Peng S B, Huang J L, Sheehy J E. Rice yield decline with higher night temperature from global warming. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2004, 101: 9971-9975
[3] IPCC. Climate Change 2001—the Scientific Basis. Cam-bridge, U K: Cambridge University, 2001. pp 101-125
[4] Ge D-K(葛道阔), Jin Z-Q(金之庆), Shi C-L(石春林), Gao L-Z(高亮之). Gradual impacts of climate change on rice production and adaptation strategies in southern China. Jiangsu J Agric Sci (江苏农业学报), 2002, 18(1): 1-8(in Chinese with English abstract)
[5] Krishnan P, Swain D K, Chandra Bhaskar B, Nayak S K, Dash R N. Impact of elevated CO2 and temperature on rice yield and methods of adaptation as evaluated by crop simulation studies. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2007, 122: 233-242
[6] Yang H-C(杨惠成), Huang Z-Q(黄仲青), Jiang Z-Y(蒋之埙), Wang X-W(王相文). Effects of high temperature on yield and its defense technique of medium rice in 2003. J Anhui Agric Sci (安徽农业科学), 2004, 32(1): 3-4(in Chinese with Eng-lish abstract)
[7] Horie T, Matsui T, Nakagawa H. Effect of elevates CO2 and global climate change on rice yield in Japan. In: Omasa K, Kai K, Toda H, eds. Climate Change and Plants in East Asia. Tokyo, Japan: Springer-Verlag, 1996. pp 39-56
[8] Matsui T, Omasa K. Rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars tolerant to high temperature at flowering: anther characteristics. Ann Bot, 2002, 89: 683-687
[9] Matsui T, Omasa K, Horie T. High temperature at flowering inhibits swelling of pollen grains, a driving force for thecae dehiscence in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Prod Sci, 2000, 3: 430-434
[10] Garrity D P, O'Toole J C. Selection for reproductive stage drought avoidance in rice, using infrared thermometry. Agron J, 1995, 87: 773-779
[11] Fischer R A, Rees D, Sayre K D, Lu Z M, Condon A G. Wheat yield progress associated with a higher stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rate, and cooler canopies. Crop Sci, 1998, 38: 1467-1475
[12] Tumer N C, O'Toole J C, Cruz R T. Response of seven di-verse rice cultivars to water deficits: I. Stress development, canopy temperature, leaf rolling and growth. Field Crops Res, 1986, 13: 257-271
[13] Chauham J S, Moya T B, Singh R K, Singh C V. Influence of soil moisture stress during reproductive stage on physiologi- cal parameters and grain yield in upland rice. Oryza, 1999, 36: 130-135
[14] Zhang W-Z(张文忠), Han Y-D(韩亚东), Du H-J(杜宏绢), Huang R-D(黄瑞东), Chen W-F(陈温福). Relationship be-tween canopy temperature and soil water content, yield com-ponents at flowering stage in rice. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2007, 21(1): 99-102(in Chinese with English abstract)
[15] Mackill D J, Coffmam W R. Inheritance of high temperature tolerance and pollen shedding in a rice cross. Z Pflan-zenzuecht, 1983, 91: 61-69
[16] Xu W-G(许为钢), Hu L(胡琳), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒). A study on heat tolerance of wheat cultivars. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin (华北农学报), 1999, 14(2): 1-5(in Chinese with English ab-stract)
[17] Prasad P V V, Boote K J, Allen L H, Sheehy J E, Thomas J M G. Species, ecotype and cultivar differences in spikelet ferti- lity and harvest index of rice in response to high temperature stress. Field Crops Res, 2006, 95: 398-411
[18] Zhang B(张彬), Zheng J-C(郑建初), Yang F(杨飞), Tian Y-L(田云录), Peng L(彭兰), Li M-A(李明安), Bian X-M(卞新民), Zhang W-J(张卫建). Effects of fertilization level on panicle temperature at heading stage of rice. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2007, 21(2): 191-196(in Chinese with Eng-lish abstract)
[19] Sun C-M(孙成明), Fu G-C(伏广成), Dong G-C(董桂春), Yan D-H(阎德湖), Wang Y-L(王余龙). Study on the relationship between rice leaf in heading stage and yield component. Chin Agric Sci Bull (中国农学通报), 2005, 21(10): 132-135(in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 胡赵, 钱润, 谢丰璞, 应素平. 水稻SPX基因家族鉴定及响应磷处理的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1902-1912.
[2] 邹仪妹, 徐敏, 汪海洋, 姚辉, 王加峰, 刘浩, 任代胜. 两系不育系水稻幼苗根系响应盐胁迫的转录因子调控网络鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[3] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[4] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[5] 陈伟, 卫万娟, 赵其兵, 常东伟, 余凌波, 翟鹏飞, 冯志明, 陈宗祥, 任仰涛, 杨鹏, 刘海浪, 李珍富, 杨永乐, 金彦刚, 左示敏. 利用CRISPR/Cas9编辑Hd6基因创制优质早熟水稻新种质[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1046-1056.
[6] 石少阶, 刘凯, 陈姿夷, 王卉颖, 李三和, 周雷, 游艾青. 水稻矮化多分蘖基因DMT1的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1022-1034.
[7] 覃奕琰, 付瑶, 苏畅, 李娜, 徐静茹, 程笑然, 张琪, 赵明辉. OsST41调控水稻苗期耐盐性的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 802-812.
[8] 叶凡, 李帅, 李思宇, 陈云, 窦超银, 刘立军. 不同节水灌溉方式对东北稻区水稻产量和群体质量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 895-907.
[9] 王婵, 吴莹莹, 李文奇, 李霞, 王芳权, 周彤, 杨杰. 基于HRM技术开发水稻抗条纹叶枯病基因STV11功能标记[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2547-2556.
[10] 陈惠莹, 何嘉欣, 朱斌, 黄士轩, 周星佑, 伍君权, 杨美艳. 水稻黄单胞菌噬菌体vB_XaS_HDB2的全基因组分析和生物学特性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2087-2099.
[11] 蔡金珊, 李超男, 王景一, 李宁, 柳玉平, 景蕊莲, 李龙, 孙黛珍. 小麦幼苗根系性状全基因组关联分析及TaSRL-3B优异等位基因发掘[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2020-2032.
[12] 杨海洋, 吴林宣, 李博纹, 石翰峰, 袁禧龙, 刘金朝, 蔡海荣, 陈诗怡, 郭涛, 王慧. 基于QTL定位发现的OsWRI3调控水稻种子的落粒性[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1712-1724.
[13] 雷松翰, 范骏扬, 车艳奕, 代永东, 郑雨萌, 田维江, 桑贤春, 王晓雯. 水稻内卷叶突变体acl3的鉴定及调控基因的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1467-1479.
[14] 李福媛, 杨奕, 马继琼, 许明辉, 林良斌, 孙一丁. 水稻OsPUB4基因克隆、激素诱导表达分析与互作蛋白筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1690-1700.
[15] 王梦宁, 谢可冉, 高逖, 王飞, 任孝俭, 熊栋梁, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 崔克辉. 水稻幼穗分化期至抽穗期高温对籽粒形态和充实的影响及其与粒重的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1347-1362.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!