欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (7): 1261-1267.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.01261

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

偏凸-柱穗山羊草双二倍体与普通小麦不同杂种世代的染色体及性状分离特点

王玉海14,王黎明5,鲍印广1,崔法1,郝元峰1,宗浩1,李兴锋1,高居荣3,王洪刚123*   

  1. 1山东农业大学作物生物学国家重点实验室，山东泰安271018；2山东农业大学农学院，山东泰安271018；3国家小麦改良中心泰安分中心，山东泰安271018；4枣庄学院，山东枣庄277100；5河南科技大学农学院，河南洛阳471003
  • 收稿日期:2008-11-28 修回日期:2009-03-23 出版日期:2009-07-12 网络出版日期:2009-05-19
  • 通讯作者: 王洪刚, E-mail: hgwang@sdau.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:E-mail: yhwang92@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家科技支撑计划（2006BAD13B02）资助。

Segregation of Chromosomes and Traits of Hybrid Generations Derived from Cross between Triticum aestivum and Amphidiploid of Aegilops ventricosa X Aegilops cylindrica

WANG Yu-Hai1,4,WANG Li-Ming5,BAO Yin-Guang1,CUI Fa1,HAO Yuan-Feng1,ZONG Hao1,LI Xing-Feng1,GAO Ju-Rong1,WANG Hong-Gang123*   

  1. 1State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology,Shandong Agricultural University,Tai'an 271018,China;2Agronomy College of Shandong Agricultural University,Tai'an 271018,China;3Subcenter of National Wheat Improvement Center,Tai'an 271018,China;4Zaozhuang College,Zaozhuang 277100,China;5College of Agronomy,Henan Science and Technology University,Luoyang 471003,China
  • Received:2008-11-28 Revised:2009-03-23 Published:2009-07-12 Published online:2009-05-19
  • Contact: WANG Hong-Gang, E-mail: hgwang@sdau.edu.cn
  • About author:E-mail: yhwang92@163.com

PDF

1683

被引次数

6

摘要：

为探讨偏凸山羊草－柱穗山羊草双二倍体SDAU18在小麦遗传改良中的利用价值，以SDAU18和普通小麦品种烟农15及其9个杂种世代为材料，分析不同自交和回交世代染色体和性状分离的特点。结果表明，随自交和以烟农15为轮回亲本回交世代的增加，染色体数目逐渐减少，回交比自交能使后代的染色体数目更快趋近普通小麦的42条，至F5和BC3F1代，染色体数目为42的植株已分别达93.9%和92.0%。与自交世代相比，回交后代减数第一分裂中期的花粉母细胞的染色体构型较为简单，回交次数过多不利于外源染色体与普通小麦染色体发生重组，一般应以回交2~3次为宜；随自交和回交世代的增进，杂种的育性提高，至F3和BC2F1代育性基本稳定。在不同杂种世代可分离出具有矮秆、大穗、大粒、对白粉病、条锈病免疫或高抗及外观品质优良的变异类型，以F3和BC1F1代的变异类型最丰富。

关键词: 偏凸山羊草, 柱穗山羊草, 双二倍体, 小麦, 杂种后代, 染色体分离

Abstract:

SDAU18 is an amphidiploid derived from the cross between Aegilops ventricosa and Ae. cylindrical, which carries excellent traits from the both parents. Because of the good crossability with common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), it also acts as a bridge material to transfer objective genes from Ae. ventricosa and Ae. cylindrical to improved wheat cultivarsthrough hybridization. To disclose the chromosome segregation of hybrid progenies derived from common wheat ´ SDAU18 cross, we used a common wheat cultivar Yannong 15 as female parent and recurrent parent to develop hybrid generations F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, BC1F1, BC2F1, BC3F1, and BC1F2. The mitosis in root tip cells and meiosis in pollen mother cells were observed. Agronomic traits, such as plant height, spike length, spikelet number per spike, grain number per spike, and seed-setting rate were also investigated in BC1F1, BC2F1, and BC3F1 generations. In higher generations of selfing and backcross, the chromosome number gradually decreased and eventually tended to 42, which was the same as common wheat. Backcrossing was able to fasten the process than selfing. In the F5 and BC3F1 generations, plants with 42 chromosomes were accounted for 93.9% and 92.0%, respectively. Chromosome configuration in PMCs MI was simpler in backcross generations than in selfing ones. Compared with the BC1F1 and BC2F1 generations, BC3F1 showed less diversity in chromosome configuration, indicating that excessive backcross resulted in less chromosomes recombination between SDAU18 and common wheat. Two or three rounds of backcross were feasible. With the increasing generation of selfing and backcross, fertility of the hybrid was improved till the stable status in F3 and BC2F1 generations. In various generations, variant plants with excellent traits were found, such as dwarf plant, huge spike, large grain, high resistance or immunity to powdery mildew and stripe rust, and good appearance of grain. In particular, the F3 and BC1F1 generations had the most variation types.

Key words: Aegilops ventricosa, Aegilops cylindrica, Amphidiploid, Wheat, Hybrid progenies, Chromosome segregation

[1] Xu N-Y(徐乃瑜). Plasmon differentiation in Triticum and Aegilops. Hereditas (遗传), 1987, 9(6): 28-32 (in Chinese)

[2] Golovnina K A, Glushkov S A, Blinov A G, Mayorov V I, Adkison L R, Goncharov N P. Molecular phylogeny of the genus Triticum L. Plant Syst Evol, 2007, 264: 195-216

[3] Ekiz H, Safi Kiral A, Akçin A, Simsek L. Cytoplasmic effects on quality traits of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Euphytica, 1998, 100: 189-196

[4] El Bouhssini M, Benlhabib O, Nachit M M, Houari A, Bentika A, Nsarellah N, Lhaloui S. Identification in Aegilops species of resistant sources to Hessian fly (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) in Morocco. Genet Resour Crop Evol, 1998, 45: 343-345

[5] Zaharieva M, Dimov A, Stankova P, David J, Monneveux P. Morphological diversity and potential interest for wheat improvement of three Aegilops L. species from Bulgaria. Genet Resour Evol, 2003, 50: 507-517

[6] Spetsov P, Plamenov D, Kiryakova V. Distribution and characterization of Aegilops and Triticum species from the Bulgarian Black Sea Coast. Central Eur J Biol, 2006, 1: 399-411

[7] Zaharieva M, Prosperi J M, Monneveux P. Ecological distribution and species diversity of Aegilops L. genus in Bulgaria. Biodiversity & Conserv, 2004, 13: 2319-2337

[8] Farooq S, Azam F. Co-existence of salt and drought tolerance in Triticeae. Hereditas, 2001, 135: 205-210

[9] Landjeva S, Merakchijska-Nikolova M, Ganeva G. Copper toxicity tolerance in Aegilops and Haynaldia seedlings. Biol Plant, 2003, 46: 479-480

[10] Shi F, Endo T R. Genetic induction of chromosomal rearrangements in barley chromosome 7H added to common wheat. Chromosoma, 2000, 109: 358-363

[11] Zhang A M, Yu F T, Zhang F S. Alien cytoplasm effects on phytosiderophore release in two spring wheats (Triticum aestivum L.). Genet Resour Crop Evol, 2003, 50: 767-772

[12] Wang Y-H(王玉海), Zhang L(张玲), Zhang G(张光), Hao Y-F(郝元峰), Zhang Z-W(张志雯), Si Y-J(司玉君), Wang H-G(王洪刚). IdentificationofAegilops ventricosa-Aegilops cylindricaAmphiploidSDAU18. J Triticeae Crops (麦类作物学报), 2006, 26 (3): 18-21 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[13] Liu S-B(刘树兵). Development of Wheat Near Isogenic Introgression Lines and Characterization of Progenies Derived from Triticum aestivum × Ae. Longissima. The Post Doctoral Working Report of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2005, 31-33 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[14] Wang H-G(王洪刚), Kong L-R(孔令让), Jiang L-J(姜丽君), Zhang D-S(张德水). Segregation of chromosomes and traits in selfing and backcross progenies of hybrid between octoploid Tritelytrigia and Triticum aestivum. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1996, 22(4): 508-513 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[15] Kong L-R(孔令让). The study on the tendency of segregation of chromosome in the different hybridized generations between Agrotriticum and common wheat. J Shandong Agric Univ (山东农业大学学报), 1990, 21(4): 1-7 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[16] Kong L-R(孔令让), Wang H-G(王洪刚), Zhao J-P(赵吉平), Jiang L-J(姜丽君). Cytogenetic studies of the offsprings of octoploid Agrotriticum × T. aestivum L. Acta Genet Sin (遗传学报), 1992, 19(5): 439-445(in Chinese with English abstract)

[17] Kong L-R(孔令让), Wang H-G(王洪刚), Zhao J-P(赵吉平), Jiang L-J(姜丽君). Cytogenetics of selfing offsprings between octoploid Agrotriticum and T. aestivum L. J Shandong Agric Univ (山东农业大学学报), 1992, 23(2): 142-148 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[18] Kong L-R(孔令让), Dong Y-C(董玉琛). Studies on the cytogenetics of progenies between Triticum aestivum L. and amphidiploid from Triticum durum-Ae. tauschii. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1997, 23(4): 505-509 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[19] Han F P, Liu B, Fedak G, Liu Z H. Genomic constitution and variation in five partial amphiploids of wheat-Thinopyrum intermedium as revealed by GISH, multicolor GISH and seed storage protein analysis. Theor Appl Genet, 2004, 109: 1070-1076

[20] Li L-H(李立会), Li X-Q(李秀全). Describing Criteria for Germplasmic Resources of Wheat (小麦种质资源描述规范和数据标准). Beijing: Chinese Agriculture Press, 2006. pp 59-60 (in Chinese)
Carvalho A, Guedes-Pinto H, Mártín A, Heslop-Harrison P. Genome discrimination and chromosome pairing in the Hordeum chilense × Aegilops tauschii amphiploid. Euphytica, 2005, 144: 85-89
[1] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[2] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[4] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[5] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[6] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[7] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[12] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[13] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[14] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
[15] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2