欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (05): 772-777.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.00772

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

全基因组分析玉米MuDR转座因子插入突变体库

冯静1,傅学乾1,王婷婷2,陶勇生2,高友军1,*,郑用琏1   

  1. 1华中农业大学作物遗传改良国家重点实验室，湖北武汉430070；2河北农业大学作物遗传改良国家重点实验室河北实验基地，河北保定071000
  • 收稿日期:2010-10-23 修回日期:2011-03-08 出版日期:2011-05-12 网络出版日期:2011-03-24
  • 基金资助:

    This work was supported by the grants of “863” High-tech Program (No. 2006AA10A106), the China National Fundamental Fund of Personnel Training (No. J0730649) and partly supported by the open funds of the National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement.

Genome-wide Analysis of MuDR-related Transposable Elements Insertion Population in Maize

FENG Jing1,FU Xue-Qian1,WANG Ting-Ting2,TAO Yong-Sheng2,GAO You-Jun1,*,ZHENG Yong-Lian1   

  1. 1 National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
    2 Hebei Research Station of National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Agricultural University of Hebei, Baoding 071000, China
  • Received:2010-10-23 Revised:2011-03-08 Published:2011-05-12 Published online:2011-03-24
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the grants of “863” High-tech Program (No. 2006AA10A106), the China National Fundamental Fund of Personnel Training (No. J0730649) and partly supported by the open funds of the National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement.

PDF

1392

被引次数

4

摘要： 在功能基因组研究中，插入诱变被广泛用于基因敲除。玉米Mutator转座子因其具有较高的转座活性常被用于构建大型玉米插入突变体库。本研究利用具有活性MuDR因子的玉米材料与优良玉米自交系Z31杂交，获得1 000个M1单株，自交构建M2群体，并研究MuDR因子在基因组中插入位点特性。利用优化的MuTAIL-PCR方法分离出695条MuDR插入位点侧翼序列，经初步生物信息学分析得到374条非冗余的插入位点，其中的298条序列能够被定位在玉米基因组物理图谱单个位点上。实验结果揭示了MuDR因子插入的一些特性：在10条染色体上随机分布，偏向于插入到基因序列中，并在某些功能基因中有明显插入偏好。

关键词: 玉米, Mutator转座子, MuDR因子, 侧翼序列, 插入位点, MuTAIL-PCR

Abstract: Insertional mutagenesis has now been widely used to knockout genes for functional genomics. The maize Mutator transposons hold an advantage of high activity to construct large mutant libraries. In this study, a MuDR line was used to cross with an elite Chinese maize inbred line Z31. A total of 1000 M1 individuals were planted and self-pollinated to generatetheir M2 families. Experiments were conducted to investigate the insertion specificity of MuDR related transposable elements. Six hundred and ninety-five MuDR inserted flanking sequences were isolated with a modified MuTAIL-PCR method and analyzedwith bioinformatics. Three hundred and seventy-four non-redundant insertion sites were identified and 298 of them were mapped to a single locus on the integrated maize map. The results revealed some prominent features of the MuDR-related insertions of maize: random distribution across the 10 chromosomes, preferential insertion into genic sequence and favoring some classes of functional genes.

Key words: Zea mays, Mutator (Mu) transposons, MuDR elements, Flanking sequence, Insertion sites, MuTAIL-PCR

[1]Carpenter A E, Sabatini D M. Systematic genome-wide screens of gene function. Genetics, 2004, 5: 11–12
[2]Alonso J M, Stepanova A N, Leisse T J, Kim C J, Chen H M, Shinn P, Stevenson D K, Zimmerman J, Barajas P, Cheuk R, Gadrinab C, Heller C, Jeske A, Koesema E, Meyers C C, Parker H, Prednis L, Ansari Y, Choy N, Deen H, Geralt M, Hazari N, Hom E, Karnes M, Mulholland C, Ndubaku R, Schmidt I, Guzman P, Aguilar-Henonin L, Schmid M, Weigel D, Carter D E, Marchand T, Risseeuw E, Brogden D, Zeko A, Crosby W L, Berry C C, Ecker J R. Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science, 301: 653–657
[3]Rosso M G, Y Li, Strizho N, Reiss B, Dekker K, Weisshaar B. An Arabidopsis thaliana T-DNA mutagenized population (GABI-Kat) for flanking sequence tag-based reverse genetics. Plant Mol Biol, 2003, 53: 247–259
[4]An G H, Lee S, Kim S H, Kim S R. Molecular genetics using T-DNA in rice. Plant Cell Physiol, 2005, 46: 14–22
[5]Yazaki J, Kojima K, Suzuki K, Kishimoto N, Kikuchi S. The Rice PIPELINE: a unification tool for plant functional genomics. Nucl Acids Res, 2004, 32: D383–D387
[6]Zhang J, Guo D, Chang Y X, You C J, Li X W, Dai X X, Weng Q J, Zhang J W, Chen G X, Li X H, Liu H F, Han B, Zhang Q F, Wu C Y. Non-random distribution of T-DNA insertions at various levels of the genome hierarchy as revealed by analyzing 13 804 T-DNA flanking sequences from an enhancer-trap mutant library. Plant J, 2007, 49: 947–959
[7]Droc G, Perin C, Fromentin S, Larmande P, OryGenesD B. 2008 update: database interoperability for functional genomics of rice. Nucl Acids Res, 2009, 37: D992–D995
[8]Lunde C F, Morrow D J, Roy L M, Walbot V. Progress in maize gene discovery: a project update. Funct Integr Genomics, 2003, 3: 25–32
[9]Settles A M, Holding D R, Tan B C, Latshaw S P, Liu J, Suzuki M, Li L, O'Brien B A, Fajardo D S, Wroclawska E, Tseung C, Lai J S, Hunter C T, Avigne W T, Baier J, Messing J, Hannah L C, Koch K E, Becraft P W, Larkins B A, McCarty D R. Sequence-indexed mutations in maize using the UniformMu transposon-tagging population. BMC Genomics, 2007, 8: 116
[10]McClintock B. Mutable loci in maize. Carnegie Inst Wash Year Book, 1948, 47: 155–169
[11]Liu W T, Gao Y J, Teng F, Shi Q, Zheng Y L. Construction and genetic analysis of mutator insertion mutant population in maize. Chin Sci Bull, 2006, 51: 2604–2610
[12]Walbot V. Saturation mutagenesis using maize transposons. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2000, 3: 103–107
[13]Brutnell T P. Transposon taggging in maize. Funct Integr Genomics, 2002, 2: 4–12
[14]Dooner H K, Belachew R. Transposition pattern of the maize element Ac from the bz-m2 (Ac) allele. Genetics, 1989, 122: 447–457
[15]Brutnell T P, Conrad L J. Transposon tagging using Activator (Ac) in maize. Methods Mol Biol, 2003, 236: 157–176
[16]Cowperthwaite M, Park W, Xu Z N, Yan X H, Maurais S C, Dooner H K. Use of the transposon Ac as a gene-searching engine in the maize genome. Plant Cell, 2002, 14: 713–726
[17]Robertson D S. Characterization of a mutator system in maize. Mutation Res, 1978, 51: 21–28
[18]Lisch D. Mutator transposons. Trends Plant Sci, 2002, 7: 498–504
[19]Settles A M. Maize community resources for forward and reverse genetics. Maydica, 2005, 50: 405–411
[20]Kriz A L, Larkins B A. Molecular Genetic Approaches to Maize Improvement Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, vol 63. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2009. pp 143–159
[21]Walbot V, Hulbert G N. MuDR/Mu Transposon of Maize. Washington, D C: Amer Soc Microbiology, 2002
[22]Bennetzen J L. The Mutator transposable element system of maize. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol, 1996, 204: 195–229
[23]Liu S, Yeh C T, Ji T, Ying K, Wu H, Tang H M, Fu Y, Nettleton D, Schnable P S. Mu transposon insertion sites and meiotic recombination events co-localize with epigenetic marks for open chromatin across the maize genome. PLoS Genet, 2009, 5: e1000733
[24]Hershberger R J, Warren C A, Walbot V. Mutator activity in maize correlates with the presence and expression of the Mu transposable element Mu9. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1991, 88: 10198–202
[25]Takumi S, Walbot V. Epigenetic silencing and unstable inheritance of MuDR activity monitored at four b22-mu alleles in maize (Zea mays L.). Genes Genet Syst, 2007, 82: 387–401
[26]Cresse A D, Hulbert S H, Brown W E, Lucas J R, Bennetzen J L. Mu1-related transposable elements of maize preferentially insert into low copy number DNA. Genetics, 1995, 140: 315–24
[27]Fernandes J, Dong Q F, Schneider B, Morrow D J, Nan G L, Brendel V, Walbot V. Genome-wide mutagenesis of Zea mays L. using RescueMu transposons. Genome Biol, 2004, 5: R82
[28]Settles A M, Latshaw S, McCarty D R. Molecular analysis of high-copy insertion sites in maize. Nucl Acids Res, 2004, 32: e54
[29]Frey M, Stettner C, Gierl A. A general method for gene isolation in tagging approaches: amplification of insertion mutagenised sites (AIMS). Plant J, 1998, 13: 717–721
[30]Liu Y G, Mitsukawa N, Oosumi T, Whittier R F. Efficient isolation and mapping of Arabidopsis thaliana T-DNA insert junctions by thermal asymmetric interlaced PCR. Plant J, 1995, 8: 457–463
[31]Yi G, Luth D, Goddman T D, Lawrence C L, Becraft P W. High-throughput linkage of Mutator insertion sites in maize. Plant J, 2009, 58: 883–892
[32]Liu S Z, Dietrich C R, Schnable P S. DLA-based strategies for cloning insertion mutants: cloning the gl4 locus of maize using Mu transposon tagged alleles. Genetics, 2009, 183: 1215–1225
[33]Ashburner M, Ball C A, Blake J A, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry J M, Davis A P, Dolinski K, Dwight S S, Eppig J T, Harris M A, Hill D P, Issel-Tarver L, Kasarskis A, Lewis S, Matese J C, Richardson J E, Ringwald M, Rubin G M, Sherlock G. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet, 2000, 25: 25–29
[34]Maere S, Heymans K, Kuiper M. BiNGO: a cytoscape plugin to assess overrepresentation of gene ontology categories in biological networks. Bioinformatics, 2005, 21: 3448–3449
[35]Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga N S, Wang J T, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res, 2003, 13: 2498–2504
[36]McCarty D R, Hattori T, Carson C B, Vasil V, Lazar M, Vasil I K. The Viviparous-1 developmental gene of maize encodes a novel transcriptional activator. Cell, 1991, 66: 895–905
[37]Porch T G, Tseung C W, Schmelz E A, Settles A M. The maize Viviparous10/Viviparous13 locus encodes the Cnx1 gene required for molybdenum cofactor biosynthesis. Plant J, 2006, 45: 250–263
[38]Tan B C, Schwartz S H, Zeevaart J A, McCarty D R. Genetic control of abscisic acid biosynthesis in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1997, 94: 12235–12240
[39]Suzuki M, Settles A M, Tseung C W, Li Q B, Latshaw S, Wu S, Porch T G, Schmelz E A, James M G, McCarty D R. The maize viviparous15 locus encodes the molybdopterin synthase small subunit. Plant J, 2006, 45: 264–274
[40]Bensen R J, Johal G S, Crane V C, Tossberg J T, Schnable P S, Meeley R B, Briggs S P. Cloning and characterization of the maize An1 gene. Plant Cell, 1995, 7: 75–84
[41]May B P, Liu H, Vollbrecht E, Senior L, Rabinowicz P D, Roh D, Pan X, Stein, Freeling M, Alexander D, Martienssen R. Maize-targeted mutagenesis: a knockout resource for maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2003, 100: 11541–11546
[1] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[3] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[6] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[7] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[8] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[9] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[10] 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[11] 杨亚莉, 徐明睿, 马越飞, 海艺蕊, 刘凯栋, 刘万茂, 孙颖. 玉米根尖及整根响应缺铁的转录组比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1006-1021.
[12] 张超, 郭欢, 李忠玲, 岳淑宁, 赵娜. 基于BSA-seq技术定位玉米籽粒花青素关联基因[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 780-789.
[13] 郭向阳, 涂亮, 王栋, 刘鹏飞, 王安贵, 易强, 任洪, 李刚, 祝云芳, 吴迅, 蒋喻林, 田丰, 陈泽辉. 热带Suwan种质在我国玉米种质改良中的创新与利用[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 655-664.
[14] 孟成, 王哲. 玉米ZmPFK基因家族全基因组鉴定及响应胁迫表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 764-779.
[15] 李新浩, 邢梦柯, 周梓惠, 李思烨, 任昊, 王洪章, 赖华江. 外源褪黑素通过协调光反应与暗反应增强玉米苗期的耐热性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 839-856.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2