Asymmetric warming,Winter wheat,Superior grain,Inferior grain,Key enzymes for starch synthesis,1000-grain weight,"/> 非对称性增温对冬小麦强势粒和弱势粒淀粉合成关键酶活性的影响
欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (06): 1031-1038.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.01031

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

非对称性增温对冬小麦强势粒和弱势粒淀粉合成关键酶活性的影响

田云录1,陈金1,董文军1,邓艾兴2,张卫建1,2,*   

  1. 1南京农业大学应用生态研究所,江苏南京 210095;2中国农业科学院作物科学研究所 / 农业部作物生理生态与栽培重点开放实验室,北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2010-11-04 修回日期:2011-03-28 出版日期:2011-06-12 网络出版日期:2011-04-12
  • 通讯作者: 张卫建, E-mail: zhangweij@caas.net.cn, Tel: 010-62156856
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(30771278), 江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK2007159), 教育部新世纪优秀人才资助计划项目(NCET-05-0492)和中国农业科学院院所长基金项目资助。

Effects of Asymmetric Warming on Key Enzyme Activities of Starch Synthesis in Superior and Inferior Grains of Winter Wheat under FATI Facility

TIAN Yun-Lu1,CHEN Jin1,DONG Wen-Jun1,DENG Ai-Xing2,ZHANG Wei-Jian1,2,*   

  1. 1 Institute of Applied Ecology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; 2 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/ Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology & Production, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2010-11-04 Revised:2011-03-28 Published:2011-06-12 Published online:2011-04-12
  • Contact: 张卫建, E-mail: zhangweij@caas.net.cn, Tel: 010-62156856

摘要: 以扬麦11为材料,采用全生育期田间开放式增温系统进行增温处理,研究了不同增温处理对小麦强和弱势粒淀粉合成关键酶活性的影响差异。结果表明,冬小麦强势粒中蔗糖合酶(SS)、腺苷二磷酸葡萄糖焦磷酸化酶(AGPase)和淀粉分支酶(SBE)的活性较弱势粒高,而且三者白天的活性均比夜间高。不增温条件下,整个灌浆期强势粒中SS、AGPase和SBE的活性平均分别比弱势粒高72.9%、111.4%和7.8%。全天、白天和夜间增温条件下,强势粒SS白天的活性比常温对照的高8.4%~31.2%,夜间的活性比对照高11.1%~20.3%;弱势粒SS白天的活性比对照高9.7%~20.3%之间,夜间的活性比对照高6.1%~32.0%。弱势粒中AGPase活性在不同增温处理下也显著提高,其白天的活性比对照高54.2%~124.4%,夜间的活性比CK高20.7%~99.3%。增温对SBE活性的影响较小,强势粒和弱势粒在增温条件下其白天的活性均比对照高3.9%~12.1%,夜间的活性均比对照高1.0%~7.6%。相关分析表明,AGPase和SBE的活性与千粒重之间存在极显著正相关,增温条件下AGPase和SBE的活性显著提高,尤其是弱势粒中AGPase和SBE活性的显著提高是千粒重提高的一个重要原因。

关键词: 非对称性增温, 冬小麦, 强势粒, 弱势粒, 淀粉合成关键酶, 千粒重

Abstract: Using Yangmai 11 as the material, we investigated the impacts of asymmetric warming on the key enzyme activities in starch synthesis in winter-wheat superior and inferior grains based on field study with FATI (Free Air Temperature Increased) facility. The results showed that the activities of sucrose synthase (SS), ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGPase), and starch branching enzyme(SBE) were higher in superior grains than in inferior grains, and also higher in the daytime than at night. In the control during the grain filling stage, the average activities of SS, AGPase, and SBE were 72.9%, 111.4%, and 7.8% higher in superior grains than in inferior grains. In superior grains, the SS activities in all-day warming, daytime warming and nighttime warming treatments were 8.4–31.2% higher than those in the ambient control in the daytime, and 11.1–20.3% higher than those in the control at night. In inferior grains, the increased percentages were 9.7–20.3% in the daytime and 6.1–32.0% at night. In inferior grains, the AGPase activities were elevated significantly compared to the control with 54.2–124.4% in the daytime and 20.7–99.3% at night. The SBE activities were also higher in the warming treatments than in the control with the increase of 3.9–12.1% in the daytime and 1.0–7.6% at night. Besides, the correlations existed between the activities of AGPase and SBE and the 1000-grain weight were positive and significant. This result indicated that elevation of AGPase and SBE activities plays an important role in the enhancement of 1000-grain weight.

Key words:

Asymmetric warming')">font-size: 9pt" lang="EN-US">Asymmetric warming, Winter wheat, Superior grain, Inferior grain, Key enzymes for starch synthesis, 1000-grain weight

[1] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[2] 崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
[3] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[4] 陈如雪, 孙丽芳, 张芯源, 牟海萌, 张永新, 袁丽雪, 彭仕乐, 王壮壮, 王永华. 秸秆还田与微生物菌剂配施对冬小麦旗叶碳氮代谢及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1901-1913.
[5] 吴柳格, 陈坚, 张鑫, 邓艾兴, 宋振伟, 郑成岩, 张卫建. 近二十年国审冬小麦品种的产量与品质性状变化趋势研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1814-1826.
[6] 赵刚, 张建军, 党翼, 樊廷录, 王磊, 周刚, 王淑英, 李兴茂, 倪胜利, 米文博, 周旭姣, 程万莉, 李尚中. 黄土旱塬区秸秆覆盖量对不同降雨年型土壤水温效应和冬小麦产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1643-1653.
[7] 王东, 王森, 尚丽, 冯浩伟, 张永巧, 崔佳鸣, 李爽, 章佳聪, 车欢. 补灌对黄土高原半湿润区冬小麦产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1312-1325.
[8] 王娇, 白海霞, 韩语燕, 梁惠, 冯雅楠, 张东升, 李萍, 宗毓铮, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇. CO2浓度升高、升温及其交互作用对良星99冬小麦叶片碳氮代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1061-1076.
[9] 苏明, 吴佳瑞, 洪自强, 李翻过, 周甜, 吴宏亮, 康建宏. 西北半干旱区马铃薯块茎淀粉形成及产量对磷肥减量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 713-727.
[10] 雍瑞, 胡文静, 吴迪, 汪尊杰, 李东升, 赵蝶, 尤俊超, 肖永贵, 王春平. 小麦穗粒数QTL分析及其对千粒重多效性评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 312-323.
[11] 张妍妍, 李迎, 刘栩辰, 黄超, 吕佳宁, 周海佳, 马守田, 秦安振, 高子乐, 吴光辉, 陈丹, 姬夏楠, 刘战东. 深松耕作条件下滴灌对冬小麦花后干物质积累及灌浆特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 3065-3079.
[12] 张军, 胡川, 周起晖, 任开明, 董誓言, 刘傲寒, 吴金芝, 黄明, 李友军. 减氮及有机肥替代对旱地冬小麦干物质积累、转运、分配和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 207-220.
[13] 马艳明, 娄鸿耀, 王威, 孙娜, 颜国荣, 张胜军, 刘杰, 倪中福, 徐麟. 新疆冬小麦籽粒品质性状遗传差异与关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(6): 1394-1405.
[14] 黄宏胜, 张馨月, 居辉, 韩雪. 大气CO2浓度升高背景下冬小麦冠层光谱特征和地上生物量估算[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 991-1003.
[15] 赵荣荣, 丛楠, 赵闯. 基于Landsat 8影像提取豫中地区冬小麦和夏玉米分布信息的最佳时相选择[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(3): 721-733.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!