欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (07): 1307-1317.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.01307

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

氮肥和种植密度对带状种植小麦抗倒能力的影响及边际效应

樊高琼1,李金刚1,王秀芳1,郑亭1,郭翔2,陈溢1,吴中伟1,杨文钰1,*   

  1. 1农业部西南作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室 / 四川农业大学农学院,四川成都611130;2四川省农业气象中心,四川成都610071
  • 收稿日期:2011-07-25 修回日期:2012-04-20 出版日期:2012-07-12 网络出版日期:2012-05-11
  • 通讯作者: 杨文钰, E-mail: wenyu.yang@263.net
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由四川省小麦丰产科技工程项目(2006BAD02A05), 四川省育种攻关项目(2006YZGG-28)和教育厅青年基金项目(08ZB032)资助。

Lodging Resistance of Winter Wheat in Response to Nitrogen and Planting Density and Border Effect under Relay Intercropping Condition

FAN Gao-Qiong1,LI Jin-Gang1,WANG Xiu-Fang1,ZHEN Ting1,GUO Xiang2,CHEN Yi1,WU Zhong-Wei1,YANG Wen-Yu1,*   

  1. 1 Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China, Ministry of Agriculture / College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China; 2 Agrometeorological Center of Sichuan Meteorological Bureau, Chengdu 610071, China
  • Received:2011-07-25 Revised:2012-04-20 Published:2012-07-12 Published online:2012-05-11
  • Contact: 杨文钰, E-mail: wenyu.yang@263.net

摘要: 西南地区小麦以套作为主,因有效穗不足而使产量受到严重制约。本研究目的是提出该地区套作小麦高产栽培的适宜密度和氮肥施用量,提高小麦生育后期的抗倒伏能力,确保有效穗和最终产量。2009—2010和2010—2011连续两年度,选用主推品种川麦42,在纯氮120 kg hm-2和180 kg hm-2 2个施氮水平下,按60、120、180、240和300万株 hm-2密度进行带状种植,对小麦群体发展、茎秆形态特征和倒伏机械特性进行了行间差异分析。结果表明,边行、次边行和中间行均随种植密度的增加茎蘖数和有效穗增多,但单株干物重及其在穗中的分配比例下降,茎秆质量降低。群体发展和个体质量在拔节后表现出显著的边行优势,成穗率、有效穗、单茎干物重、节间粗度、茎壁厚度、节间充实度和机械强度均以边行最优;同时密度对边行优势有显著影响,180万株 hm-2密度下,边行的有效穗基本达到饱和;密度继续增加时次边行和中间行的有效穗显著增加,并伴随株高和重心高度增加、单茎干物重降低、干物质分配在穗中的比例减小、节间充实度和茎秆机械强度急剧下降、倒伏时期提前、倒伏指数和倒伏程度增加。增加施氮量有提高中间行茎秆机械强度和降低倒伏指数、增强茎秆抗倒伏能力的趋势,但总体表现不显著。因此认为,120~180万株 hm-2种植密度有利于套作小麦个体和群体质量的协调,是南方丘陵旱地带状种植小麦抗倒高产的适宜种植密度。

关键词: 套作小麦, 密度, 氮肥, 倒伏, 边际效应

Abstract: Southwest is the third largest wheat producing area in China, where wheat/corn relay intercropping is the typical cultivation mode. In this area, wheat is harvested in a relatively low yield due to deficiency of effective spikes. The objective of this study was to modulate spike enhancement and lodging resistance of wheat in the relay intercropping system through optimizing plant density and nitrogen application rate. Using Chuanmai 42, the major wheat cultivar in local production, a two-year field experiment was carried out in Sichuan Province from November 2009 to May 2011 under two-factor split-plot design. The main-plot was for N application rate at 120 kg ha-1 and 180 kg ha-1, and the sub-plot was for plant density in five levels (0.6, 1.2, 1.8, 2.4, and 3.0 million plants per hectare). The border effects on wheat population quality, stem morphology, and stem mechanical strength were investigated at different growth stages. The quantities of tillers and effective spikes in edge, second, and central lines were all enhanced with the increase of planting density; however, the biomass and its distribution proportion in spike were reduced, resulting in declined stem quality. Under the same density, border advantage was significant after jointing stage, when the edge line showed higher levels than the second and central lines in spike rate, number of effective spikes, plant dry weight, outside diameter, wall thickness of culm, internode filling degree, and mechanical strength. Plant density influenced the border effect on number of effective spikes, with the maximum effective spikes in plant density of 1.8 million plants per hectare; even higher density stimulated significant increases of the spike number in the second and central lines in company with the increased plant height and height of gravity centre, the decreased plant weight and biomass distribution proportion in spike, and the dramatically declined internode filling degree and mechanical strength, which resulted in the occurrence of early lodging and high lodging degree and lodging area percentage. Nitrogen application had positive effects on lodging index and mechanical strength of the central line, but the general effects were not significant in the two nitrogen treatments. Suggestively, plant density of 1.2–1.8 million per hectare is optimal for relay intercropping wheat in the hill area of Southwest China based on its lodging resistance and border effect on plant growth and yield formation.

Key words: Relay intercropping wheat, Density, Nitrogen, Lodging, Border effect

[1]Fan G-Q(樊高琼), Yang W-Y(杨文钰), Ren W-J(任万军), Zheng T(郑亭), Yong T-W(雍太文), Wang X-C(王小春), Chen M-X(陈明祥), Bai W-J(白文进). Effects of different bandwidth on the yield and border effect of relaying wheat. J Sichuan Agric Univ (四川农业大学学报), 2009, 27(2): 133−136 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[2]Tang Y-L(汤永禄), Li C-S(李朝苏), Yu X-F(余秀芳), Mo T-X(莫太相), Shu Z-G(舒泽刚). The sowing technique assembly and demonstration effect of strip-relay-intercropping wheat in dry land in Southwest region. Gengzuo yu Zaipei (耕作与栽培), 2010, (4): 60–61 (in Chinese)

[3]Yong T-W(雍太文), Ren W-J(任万军), Yang W-Y(杨文钰), Fan G-Q(樊高琼). Meaning and characteristic and cultivation technique of “wheat/maize/soybean” relay cropping system.Gengzuo yu Zaipei (耕作与栽培), 2006, (6): 78−81 (in Chinese)

[4]Li J-C(李金才), Yin J(尹钧), Wei F-Z(魏凤珍). Effects of planting density on characters of culm and culm lodging resistant index in winter wheat. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2005, 31(5): 662−666 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[5]Gou L(勾玲), Huang J-J(黄建军), Zhang B(张宾), Li T(李涛), Sun R(孙锐), Zhao M(赵明). Effects of population density on stalk lodging resistant mechanism and characteristics of maize. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(10): 1688−1695 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[6]Guo C-H(郭翠花), Gao Z-Q(高志强), Miao G-Y(苗果园). Relationship between lodging and mechanical characteristics of winter wheat stem under different yield levels. Trans CSAE (农业工程学报), 2010, 26(3): 151−155 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[7]Xiao S-H(肖世和), Zhang X-Y(张秀英), Yan C-S(闫长生), Zhang W-X(张文祥), Hai L(海林), Gou H-J(郭会君). Determination of resistance to lodging by stem strength in wheat. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2002, 35(1): 7−11 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[8]Liang L(梁莉), Guo Y-M(郭玉明). Correlation study of biomechanical properties and morphological characteristics of crop stalks. Trans CSAE (农业工程学报), 2008, 24(7): 1−6 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[9]Pu D-F(蒲定福), Zhou J-R(周俊儒), Li B-F(李邦发), Li Q(李全), Zhou Q(周强). Evaluation method of root lodging resistance in wheat. Acta Agric Boreali-Occident Sin (西北农业学报), 2000, 9(1): 58−61 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[10]Crook M J, Ennos A R. The effect of nitrogen and growth regulators on stem and root characteristics associated with lodging in two cultivars of winter wheat. J Exp Bot, 1995, 46: 931−938

[11]Yang S-M(杨世民), Xie L(谢力), Zheng S-L(郑顺林), Li J(李静), Yuan J-C(袁继超). Effects of nitrogen rate and transplanting density on physical and chemical characteristics and lodging resistance of culms in hybrid rice. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2009, 35(1): 93−103 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[12]Wang Y(王勇), Li C-H (李朝恒), Li A-F(李安飞), Li Q-Q(李晴祺). Study on culm quality in wheat cultivar. Tritical Crops (麦类作物), 1997, 17(3): 28–31 (in Chinese)

[13]Ma J(马均), Ma W-B(马文波), Tian Y-H(田彦华), Yang J-C(杨建昌), Zhou K-D(周开达), Zhu Q-S(朱庆森). The culm lodging resistance of heavy panicle type of rice. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2004, 30(2): 143–148 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[14]Dong Q(董琦), Wang A-P(王爱萍), Liang S-M(梁素明). Study on the arehitecturaI characteristics of wheat stalks. J Shanxi Agric Univ (山西农业大学学报), 2003, 23(3): 188−190 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[15]Guo Y-H(郭玉华), Zhu S-G(朱四光), Zhang L-B(张龙步). Influence of different cultivation conditions on biochemistry components of rice culms. J Shenyang Agric Univ (沈阳农业大学学报), 2003, 34(2): 89–91 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[16]Li Q-Q(李晴祺). Creation, Evaluation, and Utilization of Winter Wheat Gemplasm (冬小麦种质创新与评价利用). Jinan: Shandong Science and Technology Press, 1998. pp 203–219 (in Chinese)

[17]Chen Y-H(陈雨海), Li L-G(李永庚), Yu S-L(余松烈), Yu Z-W(于振文). Border effect and standardization of cropping patterns of wheat. J Triticeae Crops (麦类作物学报), 2003, 23(2): 68−71 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[18]Chen Y-H(陈雨海), Yu S-L(余松烈), Yu Z-W(于振文). Study on the edge effect in wheat. J Shandong Agri Univ (山东农业大学学报), 1999, 30(4): 431−435 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[19]Zhao B Q(赵秉强), Yu S L(余松烈), Li F C(李凤超), Yu Z W(于振文). Studies on correlation of strip type, population and yield in wheat. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2000, 26(3): 278−284 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[20]Zhao B Q(赵秉强), Yu S L(余松烈), Li F C(李凤超), Yu Z W(于振文). Study on the edge effect in winter wheat: II. The correlation of planting density and the edge effect in winter wheat. Gengzuo yu Zaipei (耕作与栽培), 1997(5): 12−16 (in Chinese)

[21]Tripathi S C, Sayre K D, Kaul J N, Norden A J, Frey K J. Growth and morphology of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) culms and their association with lodging: effects of genotypes, N levels and ethephon. Field Crops Res, 2003, 84: 271−290

[22]Xu L(徐磊), Wang D-W(王大伟), Shi R-S(时荣盛), Sheng Z-F(盛中飞), Li A-F(李安飞). Relationship between lodging-resistance and the density of the bottom elongate stem in wheat. Triticeae Crops (麦类作物学报), 2009, 29(4): 673−679 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[23]Wei F-Z(魏凤珍), Li J-C(李金才), Wang Y-C(王雨成), Qu H-J(屈会娟), Shen X-S(沈学善). Effects of nitrogenous fertilizer application model on culm lodging resistance in winter wheat. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2008, 34(6): 1080−1085 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[2] 闫宇婷, 宋秋来, 闫超, 刘爽, 张宇辉, 田静芬, 邓钰璇, 马春梅. 连作秸秆还田下玉米氮素积累与氮肥替代效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 962-974.
[3] 袁嘉琦, 刘艳阳, 许轲, 李国辉, 陈天晔, 周虎毅, 郭保卫, 霍中洋, 戴其根, 张洪程. 氮密处理提高迟播栽粳稻资源利用和产量[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 667-681.
[4] 冯健超, 许倍铭, 江薛丽, 胡海洲, 马英, 王晨阳, 王永华, 马冬云. 小麦籽粒不同层次酚类物质与抗氧化活性差异及氮肥调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 704-715.
[5] 张特, 王蜜蜂, 赵强. 滴施缩节胺与氮肥对棉花生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 396-409.
[6] 张军, 周冬冬, 许轲, 李必忠, 刘忠红, 周年兵, 方书亮, 张永进, 汤洁, 安礼政. 淮北地区麦茬机插优质食味粳稻氮肥减量的精确运筹[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 410-422.
[7] 张倩, 韩本高, 张博, 盛开, 李岚涛, 王宜伦. 控失尿素减施及不同配比对夏玉米产量及氮肥效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 180-192.
[8] 蹇述莲, 李书鑫, 刘胜群, 李向楠. 覆盖作物及其作用的研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 1-14.
[9] 于芮苏, 田小康, 刘斌斌, 段迎新, 李婷, 张秀英, 张兴华, 郝引川, 李勤, 薛吉全, 徐淑兔. 玉米抗倒伏相关性状QTL的关联和连锁分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 138-150.
[10] 赵雪, 周顺利. 玉米抗茎倒伏能力相关性状与评价研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 15-26.
[11] 颜为, 李芳军, 徐东永, 杜明伟, 田晓莉, 李召虎. 行距与氮肥或甲哌鎓化控对棉花冠层结构、温度和相对湿度的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1654-1665.
[12] 王建国, 张佳蕾, 郭峰, 唐朝辉, 杨莎, 彭振英, 孟静静, 崔利, 李新国, 万书波. 钙与氮肥互作对花生干物质和氮素积累分配及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1666-1679.
[13] 娄洪祥, 姬建利, 蒯婕, 汪波, 徐亮, 李真, 刘芳, 黄威, 刘暑艳, 尹羽丰, 王晶, 周广生. 种植密度对油菜正反交组合产量与倒伏相关性状的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1724-1740.
[14] 陈云, 刘昆, 张宏路, 李思宇, 张亚军, 韦佳利, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 机插密度和穗肥减量对优质食味水稻品种籽粒淀粉合成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1540-1550.
[15] 张学林, 李晓立, 何堂庆, 张晨曦, 田明慧, 吴梅, 周亚男, 郝晓峰, 杨青华. 丛枝菌根真菌对玉米籽粒产量和氮素吸收的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1603-1615.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!