欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (11): 2115-2121.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.02115

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

转Bt基因玉米叶面微生物区系和细菌生理群多样性变化

田晓燕1,2，赵蕾2，赵辉1,2，孙红炜1，李凡1，杨淑珂1，路兴波1,*   

  1. 1 山东省农业科学院植物保护研究所，山东济南 250100；2 山东师范大学生命科学学院，山东济南 250014
  • 收稿日期:2012-03-13 修回日期:2012-07-05 出版日期:2012-11-12 网络出版日期:2012-09-10
  • 通讯作者: 路兴波, E-mail: luxb99@sina.com, Tel: 0531-83178363
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家转基因生物新品种培育重大专项(2009ZX08011-020B)资助。

Changes in Microbial Flora and Bacterial Physiological Group Diversity on Leaf Surface of Transgenic Bt Corn

TIAN Xiao-Yan1,2,ZHAO Lei2,ZHAO Hui1,2,SUN Hong-Wei1,LI Fan1,YAN Shi-Lei2,LU Xing-Bo1,*   

  1. 1 Institute of Plant Protection, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China; 2 College of Life Science, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China
  • Received:2012-03-13 Revised:2012-07-05 Published:2012-11-12 Published online:2012-09-10
  • Contact: 路兴波, E-mail: luxb99@sina.com, Tel: 0531-83178363

PDF

1450

摘要：

大田栽培条件下，以转Bt基因玉米Mon810及其亲本玉米DK647作为材料，在玉米的不同生育期，于2010年和2011连续2年测定玉米叶面细菌、真菌和放线菌的数量变化，并对细菌生理群的数量和多样性进行分析。结果表明，虽然不同年份和生育期两个玉米品种叶面微生物数量存在差异，但年度间和相同的发育时期叶面微生物的数量变化趋势一致，由苗期开始增多，到生育后期达到数量高峰。转Bt基因玉米对叶面细菌和真菌影响较大，大部分生育期内Bt玉米叶面真菌和细菌数量与亲本玉米有显著差异，而放线菌数量与亲本相比差异不显著。2010年，苗期、拔节期和完熟期Bt玉米叶面细菌生理群Shannon-Wiener群落多样性指数、Simpson优势集中性指数和均匀度指数高于亲本玉米，2011年除喇叭口期Bt玉米细菌生理群的三种群落特征参数均大于对照。

关键词: 转Bt基因玉米, 叶面微生物, 多样性, 风险评估

Abstract:

In order to evaluate the effect of transgenic maize on epiphytes, the transgenic Bt maize Mon810 and its parental non-transgenic maize were grown in field to study the quantitative changes of culturable microorganisms and the diversity of bacterial functional groups at different growth stages in 2010 and 2011. Although there were differences in the colony-forming unites of culturable bacteria, actinomycetes and fungi of phyllosphere between Bt maize and non-Bt maize in different growing periods and different years, the trend of annual differences was basically consistent at the same growth period:the quantity of microbes in seeding stage is fewest and reaches the peak in the late of growing period. Compared with the controls, transgenic Bt maize seemed to stimulate the reproduction of phyllosphere fungi. However, no significant effect on the populations of actinomycete was observed. Significant differences were detected for bacteria at jointing stage, trumpet stage, silking stage and milking stage. In 2010, the Shannon-Wiener index, Simpson index and evenness index of bacteria physiological groups were higher at seeding, jointing and full-ripe stage, but lower at trumpet stage, tasseling stage, silking stage and milk stage. In 2011, the population characteristic parameters of the microorganisms of Bt-corn are more than the ones of non-Bt corn in the whole growing period except trumpet stage. It may be concluded there was some difference in terms of impacts between transgenic maize and non-transgenic maize, while the main impacts on microbial community composition were likely due to different years and different growth periods.

Key words: Bt corn, Epiphytes, Diversity, Risk assessment

[1]Shi W(施雯), Zhang H-B(张汉波). Characteristics of phyllosphere and epiphytes. Microbiology (微生物学通报), 2007, 34(4): 761–764 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[2]Katherine K, Donegan K K, Deborah L. Microbial population, fungal species diversity and plant pathogen levels in field plots of potato plants expressing the Bacillus thuringiensis var. tenebrionis endotoxin. Transgenic Res, 1996, 5: 25–35



[3]Lottmann J, Heuer H, Smalla K. Influence of transgenic T4 lysozyme producing potato plants on potentially beneficial plant associated bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 1999, 29: 365–377



[4]Zhao T-C(赵廷昌), Sun F-Z(孙福在), Zhang Y-J(张永军), Hong Y-M(洪玉梅), Liu P(刘鹏), Xie Y-J(谢扬军), Huang C(黄翅). Preliminary Study on Bacterial Population Fluctuation of Leaf Surface of Transgenic Cotton (转基因棉花叶面细菌数量消长的初步研究). In: Proceedings of Annual Conference of the Chinese Society of Plant Pathology in 2004 (中国植物病理学会2004年学术年会论文集), 2004. pp 155–158 (in Chinese)



[5]Wang Y-G(王元格), Tan M-Y(谭茂玉), Li J-E(李金娥), Xie X-E(谢庆恩), Fan Z-X(范作晓), Shen F-F(沈法富). Changes in diversity of culturable microorganisms on leaf surface of transgenic Bt cotton. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2007, 18(3): 549–553 (in Chinese with English abstract) 



[6]Losey G E, Raynor L S, Cater M E. Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae. Nature, 1999, 399: 214



[7]Sun C-X(孙彩霞), Wu Z-J(武志杰), Chen L-J(陈利军). Advances in the eco-safety researches of transgenic Bt maize. Acta Ecol Sin (生态学报), 2004, 24(4): 798–805 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[8]Saxena D, Stotzky G. Bacillus thuringiensis toxin released from root exudates and biomass of Bt corn has no apparent effect on earthworms, nematodes, protozoa, bacteria and fungi in soil. Soil Biol Biochem, 2001, 33: 1225–1230



[9]Watrud L S, Seidlet R J. Nontarget ecological effects of plants, microbial, and chemical introductions to terrestrial systems. In: Soil Chemistry and Ecosystem Health, Special Publication 52, 1998. pp 313–340



[10]Wang M(王敏), Sun H-W(孙红炜), Wu H-B(武海斌), Yang C-L(杨崇良), Li B-D(李宝笃), Lu X-B(路兴波). Quantity of culturable microorganisms and diversity of bacterial physiological groups in transgenic Bt corn rhizosphere. Chin J Ecol (生态学杂志), 2010, 29(3): 511–516 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[11]Tapp H, Callaghan M, Stotzky G. Adsorption and binding of the insecticidal proteins form Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki and subsp. tenebrionis on clay. Soil Biol Biochem, 1994, 25: 663–679



[12]Diane E S H, Galen P D, Richard L H, Heather R M, Mark K S, Robyn R, Laura C H J, John E L, John J O, Les L. Assessing the impact of Cry1Ab-expressing corn pollen on monarch butterfly larvae in field studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2001, 98: 11931–11936



[13]Zangerl A R, McKenna D, Wraight C L, Carroll M, Ficarello P, Warner R, Berenbaum M R. Effects of exposure to event 176 Bacillus thuringiensis corn pollen on monarch and black swallowtail caterpillars under field conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2001, 98: 11908–11912



[14]Li L-L(李丽莉), Wang Z-Y(王振营), He K-L(何康来), Bai S-X(白树雄), Hua L(花蕾). Effects of transgenic corn expressing Bacillus thuringiensis cry1Ab toxin on population increase of Rhopalosiphum maidis Fitch. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2007, 18(5): 1077–1080 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[15]Lu X-B(路兴波), Sun H-W(孙红炜), Yang C-L(杨崇良), Liu K-Q(刘开启), Shang Y-F(尚佑芬), Zhao J-H(赵玖华). Gene flow of transgenic corn to cultivated relatives in China. Acta Ecol Sin (生态学报), 2005, 25(9): 2450–2453 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[16]Di H(邸宏), Liu Z-J(刘昭军). Gene flow of Bar transgenic maize (Zea mays L.). Chin Agric Sci Bull (中国农学通报), 2008, 24(12): 111–113 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[17]Zhou Y(周育), Qiao X-T(乔雄梧), Wang J(王静), Cui Z-L(崔中利), Li S-P(李顺鹏). Extraction methods of microorganisms from phyllosphere. Bull Bot Res (植物研究), 2006, 26(2): 233–237 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[18]Li Z-G(李振高), Luo Y-M(骆永明), Teng Y(滕应). Research Methods for Soil and Environmental Microbiology (土壤与环境微生物研究法). Beijing: Science Press, 2008. pp 52–61 (in Chinese)



[19]Magurran A E. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1988. pp 86–97



[20]Guo H(国辉), Mao Z-Q(毛志泉), Liu X-L(刘训理). Research progress of interaction between plant and microorganism. Chin Agric Sci Bull (中国农学通报), 2011, 27(9): 28–33 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[21]Cui Y-S(崔永三), Zhao B-G(赵博光), Liu Y-P(刘云鹏). Advance in the study on the plant phyllosphere bacteria. Forest Pest and Disease(中国森林病虫), 2007, 26(3): 26–29 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[22]Shen F-F(沈法富), Han X-L(韩秀兰), Fan S-L(范术丽). Changes in microbial flora and bacterial physiological group diversity in rhizosphere soil of transgenic Bt cotton. Acta Ecol Sin (生态学报), 2004, 24(3): 432–437 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[23]Baumgarte S, Tebbe C C. Field studies on the environmental fate of the Cry1Ab Bt-toxin produced by transgenic maize (MON810) and its effect on the bacterial communities in the maize rhizosphere. Mol Ecol, 2005, 14: 2539–2551
[1] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[2] 徐建霞, 丁延庆, 曹宁, 程斌, 高旭, 李文贞, 王若若, 王磊, 张立异. 397份高粱种质资源在贵州表型多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1073-1087.
[3] 田春艳, 陆鑫, 吴才文, 徐超华, 刘家勇, 边芯, 桃联安. 基于荧光SSR的甘蔗创新种质遗传多样性分析及育种潜力评估[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1057-1072.
[4] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
[5] 梅飘, 刘丁丁, 叶圆圆, 张晨禹, 丁诗琦, 李亚奇, 王培鑫, 梅菊芬, 马春雷. 基于茶树液相功能芯片的白化茶树资源遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2358-2370.
[6] 王天译, 杨绣娟, 赵佳佳, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 李晓华, 郝水源, 郑军. 山西小麦醇溶蛋白多样性及其对面粉品质效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1784-1800.
[7] 旺姆, 卓嘎, 扎桑, 西若曲宗, 达瓦顿珠, 郭刚刚, 张京, 卓嘎, 伦珠朗杰. 基于6个表型性状的青稞种质遗传多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1526-1537.
[8] 王浩辰, 王克晶, 韩娟, 李向华. 东南沿海短绒野大豆两种代表性生境自然种群的空间遗传结构特征:种群内取样策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2875-2885.
[9] 陈佳伟, 林艳, 张明星, 周诗晶, 饶力群, 周池, 李鑫. 贝莱斯芽孢杆菌YCH92对棉花根际土壤微生物群落及棉花产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2821-2835.
[10] 张红岩, 敏玉霞, 滕长才, 彭小星, 陈志凯, 周仙莉, 娄树宝, 刘玉皎. 利用130K液相芯片分析中国蚕豆种质资源遗传多样性[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(8): 1989-2000.
[11] 李长喜, 董占鹏, 关永虎, 刘金伟, 李航, 梅拥军. 南疆陆地棉农艺性状与皮棉产量性状的遗传贡献及决策系数分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(6): 1486-1502.
[12] 柯会锋, 苏红梅, 孙正文, 谷淇深, 杨君, 王国宁, 徐东永, 王洪这, 吴立强, 张艳, 张桂寅, 马峙英, 王省芬. 棉花现代品种资源产量与纤维品质性状鉴定及分子标记评价[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(2): 280-293.
[13] 苏一钧, 赵路宽, 唐芬, 戴习彬, 孙亚伟, 周志林, 刘亚菊, 曹清河. 378份甘薯引进种遗传多样性及群体结构分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(9): 2582-2593.
[14] 徐高峰, 申时才, 张付斗, 杨韶松, 金桂梅, 郑凤萍, 温丽娜, 张云, 吴冉迪. 土壤微生物对长雄野生稻及其化感潜力后代抑草作用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(9): 2562-2571.
[15] 王倩, 张立媛, 许月, 李海, 刘少雄, 薛亚鹏, 陆平, 王瑞云, 刘敏轩. 黍稷高基元EST-SSR标记开发及200份核心种质资源遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(8): 2308-2318.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2