欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (07): 1112-1120.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.01112

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同年代玉米品种根系对低氮干旱胁迫的响应分析

牛平平1,穆心愿1,张星1,杨春收2,李潮海1,*   

  1. 1 河南农业大学农学院 / 河南粮食作物协同创新中心,河南郑州 450002;2 郑州市粮丰农业科技有限公司,河南郑州 450002
  • 收稿日期:2014-12-31 修回日期:2015-05-04 出版日期:2015-07-12 网络出版日期:2015-05-14
  • 通讯作者: 李潮海, E-mail: lichaohai2005@163.com, Tel: 0371-63555629
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201203100)和国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-02-19)资助。

Response of Roots of Maize Varieties Released in Different Years to Low Nitrogen and Drought Stresses

NIU Ping-Ping1,MU Xin-Yuan1,ZHANG Xing1,YANG Chun-Shou2,LI Chao-Hai1,*   

  1. 1 Agronomy College, Henan Agricultural University / Collaborative Innovation Center of Henan Grain Crops, Zhengzhou 450002, China;
    2 Zhengzhou Liangfeng Seed Industry Co., Ltd. Zhengzhou 450002, China
  • Received:2014-12-31 Revised:2015-05-04 Published:2015-07-12 Published online:2015-05-14
  • Contact: 李潮海, E-mail: lichaohai2005@163.com, Tel: 0371-63555629

摘要:

1973年以来5个主推玉米品种中单2号、丹玉13、掖单13、农大108和郑单958以及新品种豫单606为材料,在低氮和低氮干旱复合胁迫下,研究了品种更替过程中根系变化特征。结果表明,随年代推进,玉米品种根干重、根长及根表面积呈先升后降又升的趋势,早期品种的3个根系性状逐渐增加,以获取更多的水分和养分,现代品种的3个根系性状逐渐减少,以减少冗余器官的消耗,而新品种有所上升,以满足产量持续增长所需水分和养分。在低氮和低氮干旱复合胁迫下,与早期品种相比,现代品种根干重变化小,但根长和根表面积增加多,根系平均直径变细,伤流量减少不显著。上述结果表明,不同年代玉米品种根系逐渐优化,现代品种根系形态调节能力增强,对低氮和低氮干旱复合胁迫的耐性提高。

关键词: 不同年代, 玉米, 根系, 低氮, 低氮干旱复合胁迫

Abstract:

The changes in root characteristics were studied under low nitrogen stress (LN) and combined stress of low nitrogen and drought (LD) using six maize varieties released from 1973 to 2009, including Zhongdan 2, Danyu 13, Yedan 13, Nongda 108 Zhengdan 958, and a new variety Yudan 606. The result showed that root dry weight, root length and root surface area of the varieties increased at first and then decreased, finally increased again in the process of time. The increase of the three parameters in earlier released varieties could get more water and nutrition from soil, the decrease of these in later released varieties was available to reduce the redundant organ’s dry matter consumption, and the increase again of these in the new variety would meet water and nutrition requirements for yield increase continuously. Compared with the old varieties, root dry weight of the modern varieties changed smaller, root length and surface areas increased more, root average diameter became thinner, root bleeding sap decreased non-significantly under the LN and LD conditions. These results suggested that root characteristics of the varieties have been optimized gradually, the adjustment ability of root morphology, and the LN and LD stress tolerance in modern varieties have been increased.

Key words: Different eras, Maize, Root, Low nitrogen, Combined stress of low nitrogen and drought

[1]张世煌, 徐志刚. 耕作制度改革及其对农业技术发展的影响. 作物杂志, 2009, (1): 1–3



Zhang S H, Xu Z G. Reform of farming system and its impact on development of agricultural technology. Crops, 2009, (1): 1–3 (in Chinese)



[2]Niu X K, Xie R Z, Liu X, Zhang F L, Li S K, Gao S J. Maize yield gains in Northeast China in the last six decades. J Integr Agric, 2013, 12: 630–637



[3]Tollenaar M, Wu J. Yield improvement in temperate maize is attributable to greater stress tolerance. Crop Sci, 1999, 39: 1597–1603



[4]Donald N, Duvick. The contribution of breeding to yield advances in maize (Zea mays L.). Adv Agron, 2005, 86: 83–146



[5]田清震, 张世煌, 李新海, 李明顺, 谢传晓. 玉米育种发展动态. 玉米科学, 2007, 15(1): 24–28



Tain Q Z, Zhang S H, Li X H, Li M S, Xie C X. Technology development and strategy in maize breeding. J Maize Sci, 2007, 15(1): 24–28(in Chinese with English abstract)  



[6]陈国平, 高聚林, 赵明, 董树亭, 李少昆, 杨祁峰, 刘永红, 王立春, 薛吉全, 柳京国, 李潮海, 王永宏, 王友德, 宋慧欣, 赵久然. 近年来我国玉米超高产田的分布、产量构成及关键技术. 作物学报, 2012, 38: 80–85



Chen G P, Gao J L, Zhao M, Dong S T, Li S K, Yang Q F, Liu Y H, Wang L C, Xue J Q, Liu J G, Li C H, Wang Y H, Wang Y D, Song H X, Zhao J R. Distribution, yield structure, and key cultural techniques of maize super-high yield plots in recent years. Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38: 80–85 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[7]王玉贞, 李维岳, 尹枝瑞. 玉米根系与产量关系的研究进展. 吉林农业科学, 1999, 24(4): 6–8



Wang Y Z, Li W Y, Yin Z R. Research advancement of the relation between corn root and yield. Jilin Agric Sci, 1999, 24(4): 6–8(in Chinese)



[8]戴俊英, 鄂玉江, 顾慰连. 玉米根系的生长规律及其与产量关系的研究: II. 玉米根系与叶的相互作用及其与产量的关系. 作物学报, 1988, 14: 310–314



E Y J, Dai J Y, Gu W L. Studies on the relationship between root growth and yield in maize (Zea mays): II. The interaction of root system and leaves of maize and its relation with yield. Acta Agron Sin, 1988, 14: 310–314(in Chinese with English abstract)  



[9]杨建昌. 水稻根系形态生理与产量、品质形成及养分吸收利用的关系. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44: 36–46



Yang J C. Relationships of rice root morphology and physiology with the formation of grain yield and quality and nutrient absorption and utilization. Sci Agric Sin, 2011, 44: 36–46 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[10]Hammer G L, Dong Z, Mclean G, Doherty A, Messina C, Schussler J, Zinselmeier C, Paszkiewicz S, Cooper M. Can changes in canopy and/or root system architecture explain historical maize yield trends in the U.S. corn belt? Crop Sci, 2009, 49: 299–312



[11]王空军, 董树亭, 胡昌浩, 刘开昌, 张吉旺. 我国玉米品种更替过程中根系生理特性的演进: I. 根系活性与ATPase活性的变化. 作物学报, 2002, 28: 185–189



Wang K J, Dong S T, Hu C H, Liu K C, Zhang J W. The evolution of physiological characteristics of maize root during varieties replacing in China, 1950s to 1990s: I. Changes of root vigor & ATPase activity. Acta Agron Sin, 2002, 28: 185–189 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[12]王空军, 董树亭, 胡昌浩, 刘开昌, 张吉旺. 我国玉米品种更替过程中根系生理特性的演进: II. 根系保护酶活性及膜质过氧化作用的变化. 作物学报, 2002, 28: 384–388



Wang K J, Dong S T, Hu C H, Liu K C, Zhang J W. The evolution of physiological characteristics of maize root during varieties replacing in China, 1950s to 1990s: II. Changes of the protective enzyme activities and lipid per oxidation. Acta Agron Sin, 2002, 28: 384–388 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[13]王空军, 郑洪建, 刘开昌, 张吉旺, 董树亭, 胡昌浩. 我国玉米品种更替过程中根系时空分布特性的演变. 植物生态学报, 2001, 25: 472–475



Wang K J, Zheng H J, Liu K C, Zhang J W, Dong S T, Hu C H. Evolution of maize root distribution in space-time during maize varieties replacing in China. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2001, 25: 472–475 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[14]Chen X C, Zhang J, Chen Y L, Li Q, Chen F J, Yuan L X, Mi G H. Changes in root size and distribution in relation to nitrogen accumulation during maize breeding in China. Plant Soil, 2014, 374: 121–130



[15]王思思. 干旱对我国不同年代玉米杂交种苗期生理特性的影响. 山东农业大学硕士学位论文, 2009



Wang S S. Effect of Drought on Physiological Characters of Maize Cultivars in Different Eras in China during Seeding Stage. MS Thesis of Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an, China, 2009(in Chinese with English abstract)



[16]Thomas H, Ougham H. The stay-green trait. J Exp Bot, 2014, 65: 3889–3900



[17]张景莲. 1982年以来我国玉米品种的演变. 河南农业科学, 2008, 37(6): 36–39



Zhang J L. Evolution of maize varieties in China since 1982. Henan Agric Sci, 2008, 37(6): 36–39 (in Chinese)



[18]司马林. 超高产玉米豫单606. 河南科技报, 2014.07.25



Si M L. A super high-yield variety: Yudan 606. Henan Sci Tech News, 2014.07.25 (in Chinese)



[19]陆卫平, 张其龙, 卢家栋, 王昭, 宗寿余. 玉米群体根系活力与物质积累及产量的关系. 作物学报, 1999, 25: 718–722



Lu W P, Zhang Q L, Lu J D, Wang Z, Zong S Y. Relationship of root activity to dry matter accumulation and grain yield in maize (Zea mays L.). Acta Agron Sin, 1999, 25: 718–722 (in Chinese with English abstract) 



[20]孙庆泉, 胡昌浩, 董树亭, 王空军. 我国不同年代玉米品种生育全程根系特性演化的研究. 作物学报, 2003, 29: 641–645



Sun Q Q, Hu C H, Dong S T, Wang K J. Evolution of root characters during all growth stage of maize cultivars in different eras in China. Acta Agron Sin, 2003, 29: 641–645 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[21]Zhang F L, Niu X K, Zhang Y M, Xie R Z, Liu X, Li S K, Gao S J. Studies on the root characteristics of maize varieties of different eras. J Integr Agric, 2013, 12: 426–435



[22]修文雯, 田晓东, 陈传晓, 彭正萍, 李少昆, 张凤路. 充足灌水条件下不同年代玉米品种根系性状比较研究. 玉米科学, 2013, 21(2): 78–82



Xiu W W, Tian X D, Chen C X, Peng Z P, Li S K, Zhang F L. Comparative study on the characteristics of maize root under the conditions of saturated irrigation in different eras. J Maize Sci, 2013, 21(2): 78–82 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[23]Zhang D Y, Sun G J, Jiang X H. Donald's ideotype and growth redundancy: a game theoretical analysis. Field Crops Res, 1999, 61: 179–187



[24]金成忠, 许德威. 作为根系活力指标的伤流液简易收集法. 植物生理学通讯, 1959, (4): 51–53



Jin C Z, Xu D W. Simple method to collect bleeding sap as an indicator of root activity. Plant Physiol Commun, 1959, (4): 51–53 (in Chinese)



[25]梁建生, 曹显祖. 杂交水稻叶片的若干生理指标与根系伤流强度关系. 扬州大学学报, 1993, 14(4): 25–30



Liang J S, Cao X Z. Studies on the relationship between several physiological characteristics of leaf and bleeding rate of roots in hybrid rice (O. sativa. L.). J Yangzhou Univ, 1993, 14(4): 25–30 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[26]李从峰, 赵明, 刘鹏, 张吉旺, 杨今胜, 柳京国, 王空军, 董树亭. 中国不同年代玉米单交种及其亲本主要性状演变对密度的响应. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46: 2421–2429



Li C F, Zhao M, Liu P, Zhang J W, Yang J S, Liu J G, Wang K J, Dong S T. Responses of main traits of maize hybrids and their parents to density in different eras of China. Sci Agric Sin, 2013, 46: 2421–2429 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[27]Melchiori R J M, Cavigliaa O P. Maize kernel growth and kernel water relations as affected by nitrogen supply. Field Crops Res, 108: 198–205



[28]张卫星, 赵致, 柏光晓, 付芳婧, 曹绍书. 不同玉米杂交种对水分和氮胁迫的响应及其抗逆性. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40: 1361–1370



Zhang W X, Zhao Z, Bai G X, Fu F J, Cao S S. Response on water stress and low nitrogen in different maize hybrid varieties and evaluation for their adversity-resistance. Sci Agric Sin, 2007, 40: 1361–1370 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[29]彭云峰, 张吴平, 李春俭. 不同氮吸收效率玉米品种的根系构型差异比较:模拟与应用. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42: 843–853



Peng Y F, Zhang W P, Li C J. Relationship between nitrogen efficiency and root architecture of maize plants: simulation and application. Sci Agric Sin, 2009, 42: 843–853 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[30]顾东祥, 汤亮, 徐其军, 雷晓俊, 曹卫星, 朱艳. 水氮处理下不同品种水稻根系生长分布特征. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35: 558–566



Gu D X, Tang L, Xu Q J, Lei X J, Cao W X, Zhu Y. Root growth and distribution in rice cultivars as affected by nitrogen and water supply. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2011, 35: 558–566 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[31]David W. Carbon and nitrogen assimilation in relation to yield: mechanisms are the key to understanding production systems. J Exp Bot, 2002, 53: 773–787



[32]杜红霞, 冯浩, 吴普特, 王百群. 水、氮调控对夏玉米根系特性的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2013, 31(1): 89–94



Du H X, Feng H, Wu P T, Wang P Q. Influence of water and N fertilizer regulation on root growth characteristics of summer maize. Agric Res Arid Areas, 2013, 31(1): 89–94 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[33]易建华, 贾志红, 孙在军. 不同根系土壤温度对烤烟生理生态的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2008, 16: 62–66



Yi J H, Jia Z H, Sun Z J. Physiological and ecological effect of rhizospheric soil temperature on flue-cured tobacco. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2008, 16: 62–66 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[34]苗果园, 高志强, 张云亭, 尹钧, 张爱良. 水肥对小麦根系整体影响及其与地上部相关的研究. 作物学报, 2002, 28: 445–450



Miao G Y, Gao Z Q, Zhang Y T, Yin J, Zhang A L. Effect of water and fertilizer to root system and its correlation with tops in wheat. Acta Agron Sin, 2002, 28: 445–450(in Chinese with English abstract)



[35]吴龙华, 张素君, 刘兰民, 杨跃, 张国忠. 不同土壤类型和肥力玉米地土壤养分根际效应研究. 应用生态学报, 2000, 11: 545–548



Wu L H, Zhang S J, Liu L M, Yang Y, Zhang G Z. Rhizosphere effect of nutrients in different maize soils with different fertility levels. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2000, 11: 545–548 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[1] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[3] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[4] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[5] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[6] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[7] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[8] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[9] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[10] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[11] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[12] 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[13] 杨亚莉, 徐明睿, 马越飞, 海艺蕊, 刘凯栋, 刘万茂, 孙颖. 玉米根尖及整根响应缺铁的转录组比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1006-1021.
[14] 马亮, 马璐, 张舒钰, 章慧敏, 王仁明, 宋旭东, 张振良, 冒宇翔, 陆虎华, 陈国清, 郝德荣, 周广飞. 玉米苞叶数目转录组分析及候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 790-801.
[15] 孟成, 王哲. 玉米ZmPFK基因家族全基因组鉴定及响应胁迫表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 764-779.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!