欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (04): 482-491.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2016.00482

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

利用单片段代换系测交群体定位玉米产量相关性状的杂种优势位点

彭倩**,薛亚东**,张向歌,李慧敏,孙高阳,李卫华,谢慧玲,汤继华*   

  1. 省部共建小麦玉米作物学国家重点实验室 / 河南省粮食作物协同创新中心 / 河南农业大学农学院, 河南郑州450002
  • 收稿日期:2015-07-04 修回日期:2016-01-11 出版日期:2016-04-12 网络出版日期:2016-01-26
  • 通讯作者: 汤继华, E-mail: tangjihua1@163.com, Tel: 0371-63558377.
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(31271732)资助。

Identification of Heterotic Loci for Yield and Ear Traits Using CSSL Test Population in Maize

PENG Qian**,XUE Ya-Dong**,ZHANG Xiang-Ge,LI Hui-Min,SUN Gao-Yang,LI Wei-Hua,XIE Hui-Ling,TANG Ji-Hua*   

  1. Key Laboratory of Wheat and Maize Crops Science / Collaborative Innovation Center of Henan Grain Crops/ College of Agronomy, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China
  • Received:2015-07-04 Revised:2016-01-11 Published:2016-04-12 Published online:2016-01-26
  • Contact: 汤继华, E-mail: tangjihua1@163.com, Tel: 0371-63558377.
  • Supported by:

    This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

摘要:

杂种优势利用是提高农作物产量与品质的一种重要途径, 而明确杂种优势的遗传机制将促进优良玉米新品种的选育, 但是截至目前其遗传机制仍然不清楚。本研究以玉米自交系lx9801背景的昌7-2的单片段代换系为基础材料, 利用与自交系T7296的测交群体, 对昌7-2和lx9801对应染色体片段与T7296之间存在差异的杂种优势位点进行了分析, 共检测出64个不同穗部性状和产量的杂种优势位点(HL), 其中23个在2个环境中同时被检测到, 包括4个穗长的HL, 4个穗粗的HL, 4个穗行数的HL, 7个行粒数的HL和4个产量的HL, 并在多个染色体片段上鉴定出同时包含产量及其构成因子的杂种优势位点, 该研究为进一步解析玉米产量杂种优势形成的遗传机制奠定了材料基础。

关键词: 玉米, 染色体片段代换系, 产量, 杂种优势, 数量性状位点

Abstract:

Heterosis plays an important role in enhancingcrop yield and quality.Dissecting the genetic basis of heterosis can promote hybrid maize selection, however that is unclear up to now. In this study, a set of chromosome segment substitution lines (CSSLs) population,which was constructed using the inbred line lx9801 as the receptor parent and the inbred line Chang7-2 as the donor parent, was crossed with the inbred line T7296 to construct the corresponding test population. The test population was used to identify the heterotic loci (HL) for grain yield and ear traits in maize,which showed significant difference inheterosisbetween the corresponding chromosomal region of the inbred line Chang7-2 and lx9801as well as the test inbred line T7296. A total of 64HL were identified for gain yield and ear traits, and among them 23 HL were identified at the two environments simultaneously, including 4 HL for ear length, 4 HL for ear width, 4 HL for row number, 7 HL for kernels per row, and 4HL for grain yield. Additionally, the HL for both grain yield and its components simultaneously were found on many chromosomal regions.This study could offer a basic material for thoroughly dissecting the genetic basis of heterosis for grain yield and its components in maize.

Key words: Maize, Chromosome segment substitution lines, Grain yield, Heterosis, Quantitative trait loci

[1]Shull G H. The composition of a field of maize. J Heredity, 1908, 4: 296–301



[2]Bruce A B. The Mendelian theory of heredity and the augmentation of vigor. Science, 1910, 32:627–628



[3]Jones D F. Dominance of linked factors as a means of accounting for heterosis. Proc Natl Acad SciUSA, 1917, 3: 310–312



[4]East E M. Heterosis. Genetics, 1936, 21:375–397



[5]Yu S B, Li J X, Xu C G, Yan Y F, Gao Y J. Importance of epistasis as the genetic basis of the heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad SciUSA, 1997, 94: 9226–9231



[6]Song R T, Messing J. Gene expression of a gene family in maize based on noncollinear haplotypes. Proc Natl Acad SciUSA, 2003, 100: 9055–9060



[7]Hoecker N, Keller B, Muthreich N, Chollet D, Descombes P, Piepho HP, Hochholdinger F. Comparison of maize (Zea mays L.) F1-hybrid and parental inbred line primary root transcription suggests organ-specific patterns of nonadditive gene expression and conserved expression trends. Genetics, 2008, 179: 1275–1283



[8]Fu Z Y, Jin X N, Ding D, Li Y L, Fu Z J, Tang J H. Proteomic analysis of heterosis during maize seed germination. Proteomics, 2011, 11:1462–1472



[9]Ding D, Wang Y J, Han M S, Fu Z Y, Li W H, Liu Z H, Hu Y M, Tang J H. MicroRNA transcriptomic analysis of heterosis during maize seed germination. PLoS One, 2012, 7(6):e39578



[10]Guo M, Rupe M A, Wei J, Winkler C, Goncalves-Butruille M, Weers B P, Cerwick S F, Dieter J A, Duncan K E, Howard R J, Hou Z, L?ffler C M, Cooper M, Simmons C R. Maize ARGOS1 (ZAR1) transgenic alleles increase hybrid maize yield. J Exp Bot, 2014, 65: 249–260



[11]严建兵, 汤华, 黄益勤, 石永刚, 李建生, 郑用琏. 不同发育时期玉米株高QTL的动态分析. 科学通报, 2003, 48: 1959–1964



Yan JB, Tang H, Huang Y Q, Si Y G, Li J S Zheng Y L. Dynamic QTL analysis for plant height in different developing stages in maize. Chin Sci Bull, 2003,48: 1959–1964(in Chinese with English abstract)



[12]Li Z K, Luo L J, Mei H W, Wang D L, Shu Q Y, Tabien R, Zhong D B, Ying C S, Stansel J W, Khush G S, Paterson AH. Overdominance epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice. I. Biomass and grain yield. Genetics, 2001, 158: 1737–1753



[13]Kusterer B, Muminovic J, Utz HF, Piepho HP, Barth S, Heckenberger M, Meyer R C, Altmann T, Melchinger A E. Analysis of a triple testcross design with recombinant inbred lines reveals a significant role of epistasis in heterosis for biomass-related traits in Arabidopsis. Genetics, 2007, 175: 2009–2017



[14]Kusterer B, Piepho HP, Utz HF, Muminovic J, Meyer R C, Altmann T, Melchinger A E. Heterosis for biomassrelated traits in Arabidopsis investigated by a novel QTL analysis of the triple testcross design with recombinant inbred lines. Genetics, 2007, 177:1839–1850



[15]Hua J, Xing Y, Wu W, Xu C, Sun X, Yu S B, Zhang Q F. Single-locus heterotic effects and dominance by dominance interactions can adequately explain the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad SciUSA, 2003,100: 2574–2579



[16]Xiao J H, Li J M, Yuan L P, Tanksley S D. Dominance is the major genetic basis of the heterosis in rice as revealed by QTL analysis using molecular markers. Genetics, 1995, 140: 745–754



[17]Lu H, Romero-Severson J, Bernarbo R. Genetic basis of heterosis explored by simple sequence repeat markers in a random-mated maize population. Theor Appl Genet, 2003, 107: 494–502



[18]Semel Y, Nissenbaum J, Menda N, Zinder M, Krieger U, Issman N, Pleban T, Lippman Z, Gur A, Zamir D. Overdominant quantitative trait loci for yield and fitness in tomato. Proc Natl Acad SciUSA, 2006, 103: 12981–12986



[19]Krieger U, Lippman ZB, Zamir D. The flowering gene single flower truss drives heterosis for yield in tomato. Nat Genet, 2010, 42: 459–463



[20]Wang Z Q, Yu CY, Liu X, Liu S J, Yin C B, Liu L L, Lei J G, Jiang L, Yang C, Chen L M, Zhai H Q, Wan J M. Identification of indica rice chromosome segments for the improvement of Japonica inbreds and hybrids. Theor Appl Genet, 2012, 124: 1351–1364



[21]Meyer R C, Kusterer B, Lisec J, Steinfath M, Becher M, Scharr H, Melchinger AE, Selbig J, Schurr U, Willmitzer L, Altmann T. QTL analysis of early stage heterosis for biomass in Arabidopsis. Theor Appl Genet, 2010, 120: 227–237



[22]Guo X, Guo Y, Ma J, Wang F, Sun M, Gui L J, Zhou J J, Song X L, Sun X Z, Zhang T Z. Mapping heterotic loci for yield and agronomic traits using chromosome segment introgression lines in cotton. J Integr Plant Biol, 2013, 55: 759–774



[22]Stuber CW, Lincoln SE, Wolff DW, Helentjaris T, Lander ES. Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics, 1992, 132: 823–839



[23]王懿波, 王振华, 王永普, 张新, 陆利行. 中国玉米主要种质杂交优势利用模式研究, 中国农业科学, 1997, 30(4) : 16–24



Wang Y B, Wang Z H, Wang Y P, Zhang X, Lu L X. Studies on the heterosis utilizing models of main maize germplasms in China. Sci Agric Sin, 1997, 30(4): 16–24(in Chinese with English abstract)



[24]滕文涛, 曹靖生, 陈彦惠, 刘向辉, 景希强, 张发军, 李建生. 十年来中国玉米杂种优势群及其模式变化的分析. 中国农业科学, 2004, 37: 1804–1811



Teng W T, Cao J S, Chen YH, Liu X H, Jing X Q, Zhang F J, Li J S. Analysis of maize heterotic groups and patterns during past decade in China. Sci Agric Sin, 2004,37: 1804–1811(in Chinese with English abstract)



[25]袁亮, 丁冬, 李卫华, 谢惠玲, 汤继华, 付志远. 玉米优良自交系单片段代换系的构建.玉米科学, 2012, 20(2): 52–55



Yuan L, Ding D, Li W H, Xie H L, Tang J H, Fu Z Y. Construction of single segment substitution lines (SSSLs) of the elite inbred lines in maize.J Maize Sci, 2012, 20(2): 52–55(in Chinese with English abstract)



[26]Duvick D N. Biotechnology in the 1930s: the development of hybrid maize. Nature, 2001, 2: 69–74



[27]Tang J H, Ma X Q, Teng W T, Yan J B, Wu W R, Dai J R, Li J S. Detection of quantitative trait loci and heterosis for plant height in maize in ‘‘immortalized F2’’ (IF2) population. Chin Sci Bull, 2006, 51:2864–2869



[28]Wei X Y, Wang B, Peng Q, Wei F, Mao K J, Zhang X G, Sun P, Liu Z H, Tang J H.  Heterotic loci for various morphological traits of maize detected using a single segment substitution lines test-cross population. Mol Breed, 2015,35(3): 1–13



[29]Tang J H, Yan J B, Ma X Q, Teng W T, Dai J R, Dhillon B S, Melchinger A E. Dissection of the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite maize hybrid by QTL mapping in an “immortalized F2” population. Theor Appl Genet, 2010, 120: 333–340



[30]王懿波, 王振华, 陆利行, 王永普, 张新, 田曾元. 中国玉米种质基础、杂种优势群划分与杂种优势模式研究. 玉米科学, 1998, 6(1): 9–13



Wang Y B, Wang Z H, Lu L H, Wang Y P, Zhang X, Tian Z Y. Studies on maize germplasm base, division of heterosis groups and utilizing models of heterosis in China. J Maize Sci, 1998, 6(1): 9–13(in Chinese with English abstract)



[31]吴金凤, 宋伟, 王蕊, 田红丽, 李雪, 王凤格, 赵久然, 蔚荣海. 利用SNP标记对51份玉米自交系进行类群划分. 玉米科学, 2014, 22(5): 29–34



Wu J F, Song W, Wang R, Tian H L, Li X, Wang F G, Zhao J R, Wei R H. Heteroticgroupingof51maizeinbredlinesbySNPmarkers. J Maize Sci, 2014, 22(5): 29–34(in Chinese with English abstract)

[1] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[4] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[5] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[6] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[7] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[8] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[9] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[10] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[11] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[12] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[13] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[14] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[15] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!