欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (07): 990-999.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2016.00990

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

大豆盐胁迫相关GmNAC基因的鉴定、表达及变异分析

张彦威1,2,张礼凤1,李伟1,王彩洁1,张军1,徐冉1, *   

  1. 1 山东省农业科学院作物研究所, 山东济南 250131; 2 东北农业大学大豆生物学教育部重点实验室, 黑龙江哈尔滨 150001
  • 收稿日期:2015-12-16 修回日期:2016-03-14 出版日期:2016-07-12 网络出版日期:2016-03-28
  • 通讯作者: 徐冉, E-mail: soybeanxu@126.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由?东北农业大学大豆生物学教育部重点实验室开放基金项目(SB14A04), 国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-04-CES18), 国家自然科学基金项目(31501329)和山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2015YL070)资助。

Identification, Expression and Variation Analysis of Salt Tolerance Related GmNAC Genes in Soybean

ZHANG Yan-Wei1, 2,ZHANG Li-Feng1,LI Wei1,WANG Cai-Jie1,ZHANG Jun1,XU Ran1, *   

  1. 1 Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250131, China; 2 Key Laboratory of Soybean Biology in Chinese Ministry of Education, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150001, China
  • Received:2015-12-16 Revised:2016-03-14 Published:2016-07-12 Published online:2016-03-28
  • Contact: 徐冉, E-mail: soybeanxu@126.com
  • Supported by:

    The work was supported by Open Foundation of Key Laboratory of Soybean Biology in Chinese Ministry of Education, Northeast Agricultural University (SB14A04), China Agriculture Research System (CARS-04-CES18), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31501329), and Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZR2015YL070).

RichHTML

PDF

1371

摘要：

NAC基因在植物的逆境胁迫中发挥着重要作用。本研究参照水稻和拟南芥的逆境相关NAC基因, 采用生物信息学方法鉴定了大豆逆境相关GmNAC基因, 利用荧光定量PCR技术分析了GmNAC基因在耐盐差异的大豆品种根部、叶片的表达及其对NaCl胁迫的应答, 采用反转录PCR技术克隆了表达差异显著的GmNAC基因。结果表明, 大豆GmNAC基因家族包含175个基因, 其中11个GmNAC蛋白与水稻和拟南芥的逆境相关NAC蛋白位于同一进化分支, 这些蛋白具有高度保守的NAC结构域; 这11个GmNAC基因在大豆根部的表达均高于在叶片, 而且在叶片和根部均受NaCl诱导, 部分基因在根部和叶片以及品种间表现出不同的表达规律; 在大豆品种齐黄34、徐豆10和汾豆95中, Glyma06g11970.1存在3个同义突变和1个非同义突变, Glyma06g16440.2存在1个同义突变。

关键词: 大豆, GmNAC, 进化树, NaCl处理, 表达分析, 序列变异

Abstract:

NAC genes play an important role in plant stress tolerance. In this study, bioinformatics method was used to identify the stress related GmNAC gene in soybean; the expression of candidated GmNAC genes in root and leaf was analyzed in soybean with NaCl treatment by Real-time-PCR. Reverse transcription PCR was performed to clone genes with significant difference in expression. The results showed that there were 175 genes in soybean GmNAC gene family. There were 11 GmNACproteins with highly conserved NAC located on the same evolutionary branch with the stress related NAC proteins in rice and Arabidopsis. The expression of 11 GmNAC genes in soybean root was higher than that in leaf. The GmNAC genes were all induced by NaCl stress, but part of the GmNAC genes showed different expression levels between root and leaf in soybean varieties with different salt tolerances. There were three synonymous mutations and one non-synonymous mutation on the CDS region of Glyma06g11970.1 and one synonymous mutation on the CDS region of Glyma06g16440.2 in Qihuang 34, Xudou 10, and Fendou 95.

Key words: Soybean, GmNAC, Phylogenetic tree, NaCl treatment, Expression analysis, Sequence variation

[1] Atkinson N J, Urwin P E. The interaction of plant biotic and abiotic stresses: from genes to the field. J Exp Bot, 2012, 63: 3523–3543
[2] 李鹏, 黄耿青, 李学宝. 植物NAC转录因子. 植物生理学通讯, 2010, 46: 294–300
Li P, Huang G Q, Li X B. Plant NAC transcription factors. Plant Physiol Mol Biol, 2010, 46: 294–300 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] Aida M, Ishida T, Fukaki H, Fujisawa H, Tasaka M. Genes involved in organ separation in Arabidopsis: an analysis of the cup-shaped cotyledon mutant. Plant Cell, 1997, 9: 841–857
[4] 柳展基, 邵凤霞, 唐桂英. 植物NAC转录因子的结构功能及其表达调控研究进展. 西北植物学报, 2007, 27: 1915–1920
Liu Z J, Shao F X, Tang G Y. The research progress of structure, function and regulation of plant NAC transcription factors. Acta Bot Boreal-Occident Sin, 2007, 27(9): 1915–1920 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5] Hickman R, Hill C, Penfold CA, Breeze E, Bowden L, Moore J D, Zhang P, Jackson A, Cooke E, Bewicke-Copley F, Mead A, Beynon J, Wild D L, Denby K J, Ott S, Buchanan-Wollaston V. A local regulatory network around three NAC transcription factors in stress responses and senescence in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant J, 2013, 75: 26–39
[6] Guan Q, Yue X, Zeng H, Zhu J. The protein phosphatase RCF2 and its interacting partner NAC019 are critical for heat stress-responsive gene regulation and thermo tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 2014, 26: 438–453
[7] Bu Q, Jiang H, Li C B, Zhai Q, Zhang J, Wu X, Sun J, Xie Q, Li C. Role of the Arabidopsis thaliana NAC transcription factors ANAC019 and ANAC055 in regulating jasmonic acid-signaled defense responses. Cell Res, 2008, 18: 756–767
[8] Jiang H, Li H, Bu Q, Li C. The RHA2a-interacting proteins ANAC019 and ANAC055 may play a dual role in regulating ABA response and jasmonate response. Plant Signal Behav, 2009, 4: 464–466
[9] Christianson J A, Wilson I W, Llewellyn D J, Dennis E S. The low-oxygen-induced NAC domain transcription factor ANAC102 affects viability of Arabidopsis seeds following low-oxygen treatment. Plant Physiol, 2009, 149: 1724–1738
[10] You J, Zong W, Li X, Ning J, Hu H, Li X, Xiao J, Xiong L. The SNAC1-targeted gene OsSRO1c modulates stomatal closure and oxidative stress tolerance by regulating hydrogen peroxide in rice. J Exp Bot, 2013, 64: 569–583
[11] Hu H, Dai M, Yao J, Xiao B, Li X, Zhang Q, Xiong L. Overexpressing a NAM, ATAF, and CUC (NAC) transcription factor enhances drought resistance and salt tolerance in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2006, 103: 12987–12992
[12] Kikuchi K, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Yoshida K T, Nagato Y, Matsusoka M, Hirano H Y. Molecular analysis of the NAC gene family in rice. Mol Gen Genet, 2000, 262: 1047–1051
[13] Liu G, Li X, Jin S, Liu X, Zhu L, Nie Y, Zhang X. Overexpression of rice NAC gene SNAC1 improves drought and salt tolerance by enhancing root development and reducing transpiration rate in transgenic cotton. PLoS One, 2014, 9(1): e86895
[14] Taga Y, Takai R, Kaneda T, Matsui H, Isogai A, Che F S. Role of OsHSP90 and IREN, Ca2+ dependent nuclease, in plant hypersensitive cell death induced by transcription factor OsNAC4. Plant Signal Behav, 2009, 4:740–742
[15] Kaneda T, Taga Y, Takai R, Iwano M, Matsui H, Takayama S, Isogai A, Che F S. The transcription factor OsNAC4 is a key positive regulator of plant hypersensitive cell death. EMBO J, 2009, 28: 926–936
[16] Nakashima K, Tran LS, Van Nguyen D, Fujita M, Maruyama K, Todaka D, Ito Y, Hayashi N, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Functional analysis of a NAC-type transcription factor OsNAC6 involved in abiotic and biotic stress-responsive gene expression in rice. Plant J, 2007, 51: 617–630
[17] 孟庆长. 大豆GmNAC和GmLFY转录因子编码基因的克隆、鉴定和种子性状的QTL定位研究. 南京农业大学博士论文, 江苏南京, 2006
   Meng Q C. Cloning and Identification of Genes Encoding Two Types of Transcription Factor, GmNAC and GmLFY and QTL Mapping for Seed Traits in Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). PhD Dissertation of Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China, 2006 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18] Meng Q, Zhang C, Gai J, Yu D. Molecular cloning, sequence characterization and tissue-specific expression of six NAC-like genes in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). J Plant Physiol, 2007, 164: 1002–1012
[19] 韩巧玲. 大豆重要抗逆相关基因GmE2、GmNAC2a的特性分析及功能鉴定. 西北农林科技大学硕士学位论文, 陕西杨凌, 2010
   Han Q L. Characteristics and Functional Identification of Two Important Stress-Related Genes GmE2 and GmNAC2a from Soybean. MS Thesis of Northwest A & F University, Yangling, China, 2010 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20] 金杭霞. 大豆转录因子GmNAC2和GmNAC5功能验证. 南京农业大学博士学位论文, 江苏南京, 2011
   Jin H X. Functional Analysis of Two Transfactors GmNAC2 and GmNAC5 in Soybean. PhD Dissertation of Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China, 2011 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21] 才华, 朱延明, 李勇, 柏锡, 纪巍, 王冬冬, 孙晓丽. 野生大豆转录因子GsNAC20基因的分离及胁迫耐性分析. 作物学报, 2011, 37: 1351–1359
   Cai H, Zhu Y M, Li Y, Bai X, Ji W, Wang D D, Sun X L. Isolation and tolerance analysis of GsNAC20 gene linked to response to stress in Glycine soja. Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37: 1351–1359 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22] Tran L S, Quach T N, Guttikonda S K, Aldrich D L, Kumar R, Neelakandan A, Valliyodan B, Nguyen H T. Molecular characterization of stress-inducible GmNAC genes in soybean. Mol Genet Genom, 2009, 281: 647–664
[23] Le D T, Nishiyama R, Watanabe Y, Mochida K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K, Tran L S. Genome-wide survey and expression analysis of the plant-specific NAC transcription factor family in soybean during development and dehydration stress. DNA Res, 2011, 18: 263–276
[24] Le D T, Nishiyama R, Watanabe Y, Tanaka M, Seki M, Ham le H, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K, Tran L S. Differential gene expression in soybean leaf tissues at late developmental stages under drought stress revealed by genome-wide transcriptome analysis. PLoS One, 2012, 7(11): e49522
[25] 王洋, 柏锡. 大豆NAC基因家族生物信息学分析. 大豆科学, 2014, 33: 325–333
   Wang Y, Bai X. Bioinformatics analysis of NAC gene family in Glycine max L. Soybean Sci, 2014, 33: 325–333 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26] Hao Y J, Song Q X, Chen H W, Zou H F, Wei W, Kang X S, Ma B, Zhang W K, Zhang J S, Chen S Y. Plant NAC-type transcription factor proteins contain a NARD domain for repression of transcriptional activation. Planta, 2010, 232: 1033–1043
[27] Hao Y J, Wei W, Song Q X, Chen H W, Zhang Y Q, Wang F, Zou H F, Lei G, Tian A G, Zhang W K, Ma B, Zhang J S, Chen S Y. Soybean NAC transcription factors promote abiotic stress tolerance and lateral root formation in transgenic plants. Plant J, 2011, 68: 302–313
[28] 李伟, 韩蕾, 钱永强, 巨关升, 孙振元. 非生物逆境胁迫相关NAC转录因子的生物信息学分析. 西北植物学报, 2012, 32: 454–464
   Li W, Han L, Qian Y Q, Ju G S, Sun Z Y. Bioinformatics analysis of abiotic stress related NAC transcription factors. Acta Bot Boreal-Occident Sin, 2012, 32: 454–464 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29] You J, Zhang L, Song B, Qi X, Chan Z. Systematic analysis and identification of stress-responsive genes of the NAC gene family in Brachypodium distachyon. PloS One, 2015, 10(3): e0122027
[1] 左同鸿, 张贺翠, 曾静, 朱利泉. 甘蓝自交不亲和相关基因BoPUB3L的克隆与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1698-1710.
[2] 金昱何, 王雪菲, 徐张一娃, 缪怡宁, 蒋云杰, 伊莹, 缪德麟, 朱静仪, 钟一帆, 陈铭亨, 方芳, 刘鹏. 外源激素对低温胁迫下大豆叶片叶绿素荧光参数及抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1817-1829.
[3] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[4] 胡赵, 钱润, 谢丰璞, 应素平. 水稻SPX基因家族鉴定及响应磷处理的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1902-1912.
[5] 姚术, 郭凯悦, 翟慧慧, 姚佳慧, 邓文琪, 闫玲, 黄驰, 高阳, 俞嫣然, 赵振邦, 李英慧, 王晓波, 李佳佳. 大豆苗期耐低铁综合评价及优异种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1373-1387.
[6] 田立涛, 丁宁, 王树林, 齐恩芳, 张荣, 王蕊蕊, 马利雯, 李建武, 杨江伟. 马铃薯Argonaute基因家族鉴定及晚疫病诱导表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1116-1126.
[7] 杨宗桃, 杨婷, 王禹童, 艾静, 李燕烨, 刘家勇, 邓军, 赵勇, 张跃彬. 甘蔗CLC基因家族鉴定与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 722-734.
[8] 孟成, 王哲. 玉米ZmPFK基因家族全基因组鉴定及响应胁迫表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 764-779.
[9] 张力岚, 杨军, 王让剑. 基于WGCNA发掘茶树糖苷类香气前体含量性状相关的候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 494-513.
[10] 张晴, 杨昱, 郭茜, 岳霈尧, 殷丛丛, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 大豆GmARA6a的克隆及响应盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 480-493.
[11] 王克晶, 李向华. 我国珍稀的大豆属多年生烟豆和短绒野大豆物种遗传资源濒危性评估分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2009-2019.
[12] 孟然, 李赵嘉, 冯薇, 陈悦, 刘路平, 杨春燕, 鲁雪林, 王秀萍. 大豆不同生育时期耐盐性综合评价及耐盐种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 1991-2008.
[13] 贺红利, 张雨涵, 杨静, 程云清, 赵杨, 李星诺, 司洪亮, 张兴政, 杨向东. 大豆e1-as基因突变体的创制及生理分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2228-2239.
[14] 王彬, 蒙姜宇, 邱浩良, 贺亚军, 钱伟. 甘蓝型油菜BnaDUF579基因家族的鉴定与表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2100-2110.
[15] 胡蒙, 沙丹, 张晟瑞, 谷勇哲, 张世碧, 李静, 孙君明, 邱丽娟, 李斌. 大豆分枝数QTL定位及候选基因筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1747-1756.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2