欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 131-143.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.84024

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

冬闲期耕作方式对连作花生叶片衰老和产量的影响

刘妍(),刘兆新,何美娟,刘婷如,杨坚群,甄晓宇,栗鑫鑫,李向东(),杨东清()   

  1. 山东农业大学农学院 / 作物生物学国家重点实验室, 山东泰安 271018
  • 收稿日期:2018-02-11 接受日期:2018-08-20 出版日期:2018-09-28 网络出版日期:2018-09-28
  • 通讯作者: 李向东,杨东清
  • 基金资助:
    本研究由国家科技支撑计划项目(2014BAD11B04-2);国家自然科学基金项目(30840056);国家自然科学基金项目(31171496);山东省现代农业产业技术体系花生创新团队首席专家专项资助(SDAIT-04-01)

Effects of tillage modes in winter fallow period on leaf senescence and pod yield in continuous cropping peanut

Yan LIU(),Zhao-Xin LIU,Mei-Juan HE,Ting-Ru LIU,Jian-Qun YANG,Xiao-Yu ZHEN,Xin-Xin LI,Xiang-Dong LI(),Dong-Qing YANG()   

  1. Agronomy College, Shandong Agricultural University / State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Tai’an 271018, Shandong, China
  • Received:2018-02-11 Accepted:2018-08-20 Published:2018-09-28 Published online:2018-09-28
  • Contact: Xiang-Dong LI,Dong-Qing YANG
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the National Key Technology Support Program of China(2014BAD11B04-2);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(30840056);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(31171496);Shandong Modern Agricultural Technology & Industry System(SDAIT-04-01)

RichHTML

15

PDF

397

摘要：

大田连作条件下种植大花生品种“山花108”, 以冬闲期免耕晾晒土地后整地种植(冬闲免耕露地, MGLD)为对照, 设置冬闲免耕覆膜(冬闲期免耕晾晒土地后整地覆膜种植, MGFM)、冬闲翻耕露地(冬闲期翻耕晾晒土地后整地种植, FGLD)、冬闲翻耕覆膜(冬闲期翻耕晾晒土地后整地覆膜种植, FGFM)、冬闲压青露地(前茬花生收获后常规种植冬小麦, 于花生种植前粉碎还田后整地种植, YQLD)、冬闲压青覆膜(前茬花生收获后常规种植冬小麦, 于花生种植前粉碎还田后整地覆膜种植, YQFM)5种处理, 探究对连作花生叶片衰老、光合特性和产量的影响。结果表明, 覆膜、冬闲翻耕与压青处理均可提高植株功能叶片光合色素含量、净光合速率、气孔导度及蒸腾速率, 降低胞间CO2浓度; 同时提高叶片超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、过氧化氢酶(CAT)及过氧化物酶(POD)活性, 降低丙二醛(MDA)含量, 延缓叶片衰老, 进而增加荚果产量。YQFM、FGFM、MGFM处理的荚果产量较YQLD、FGLD、MGLD处理分别增加5.11%、6.77%、3.70%; 与MGFM处理相比, YQFM、FGFM处理分别增产14.83%、8.30%; 与MGLD处理相比, YQLD、FGLD处理分别增产13.30%、5.18%, 并且增产幅度由高到低依次是YQFM、YQLD、FGFM、FGLD、MGFM处理。冬闲压青覆膜处理的产量和经济效益最佳。

关键词: 连作花生, 冬闲期耕作方式, 衰老特性, 产量

Abstract:

A field experiment was conducted using large peanut variety Shanhua 108 with five treatments, including mulching after no tillage in winter fallow period (MGFM), planting peanut after plowing tillage in winter fallow period (FGLD), mulching after plowing tillage in winter fallow period (FGFM), planting peanut after previous crop wheat as green manure straw returned to the field (YQLD), mulching after previous crop wheat as green manure straw returned to the field (YQFM), and the conventional planting method, planting peanut after non tillage in winter fallow period (MGLD) as the control. The treatments of mulching, green manure and plowing tillage significantly improved photosynthetic pigment content, net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate, and decreased intercellular CO2 concentration in functional leaves. Meanwhile, the above three treatments also significantly increased leaf superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD) activities, decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) content, thereby delaying leaf senescence and increasing pod yield. The pod yield of YQFM, FGFM and MGFM treatments increased by 5.11%, 6.77%, 3.70% compared with YQLD, FGLD, and MGLD treatments. Compared with MGFM treatment, YQFM and FGFM treatments significantly increased pod yield by 14.83%, 8.30%, respectively. Compared with MGLD treatment, the pod yield under YQLD and FGLD treatments significantly increased by 13.30%, 5.18%, respectively, and YQFM, YQLD, FGFM, FGLD, and MGFM treatments had the increase of pod yield from high to low in order. From the perspective of pod yield and economic benefit, YQFM is the optimum treatment.

Key words: continuous cropping peanuts, tillage modes in winter fallow period, leaf senescence characteristics, pod yield

表1

试验设计"

处理
Treatment		 耕作方式
Tillage mode
冬闲期翻耕晾晒土地后整地种植FGLD 前茬花生收获后于10月10日翻耕, 冬闲晾晒土地, 直至花生播种前于次年5月5日旋耕两遍, 花生播种后不覆膜。
The land was plowed on October 10th in winter fallow period after former peanuts were harvested. Then rotary tillage was conducted twice on May 5th of following year, and peanuts were not covered with film after sowing.
冬闲期翻耕晾晒土地后整地覆膜种植FGFM 前茬花生收获后于10月10日翻耕, 冬闲晾晒土地, 直至花生播种前于次年5月5日旋耕两遍, 花生播种后覆膜。
The land was plowed on October 10th in winter fallow period after former peanuts were harvested. Then rotary tillage was conducted twice on May 5th of following year, and peanuts were covered with film after sowing.
前茬花生收获后常规种植冬小麦, 于花生种植前粉碎还田后整地种植YQLD 前茬花生收获后于10月10日翻耕, 旋耕2遍, 种上小麦, 至灌浆初期次年5月5日进行小麦秸秆压青还田, 翻耕, 旋耕两遍, 花生播种后不覆膜。
The land was plowed with rotary tillage twice on October 10th in winter fallow period after former peanuts were harvested, and then wheat was planted. The wheat straw as green manure was returned to the field on May 5th of following year, and land was plowed with rotary tillage twice. Then peanuts were not covered with film after sowing.
前茬花生收获后常规种植冬小麦, 于花生种植前粉碎还田后整地覆膜种植YQFM 前茬花生收获后于10月10日翻耕, 旋耕2遍, 种上小麦, 至灌浆初期次年5月5日进行小麦秸秆压青还田, 翻耕, 旋耕两遍, 花生播种后覆膜。
The land was plowed with rotary tillage twice on October 10th in winter fallow period after former peanuts were harvested, and then wheat was planted. The wheat straw as green manure was returned to the field on May 5th of following year, and land was plowed with rotary tillage twice. Then peanuts were covered with film after sowing.
冬闲期免耕晾晒土地后整地种植MGLD 前茬花生收获后不翻耕, 冬闲晾晒土地, 于次年5月5日进行翻耕, 然后旋耕两遍, 花生播种后不覆膜。
Non tillage was conducted in winter fallow period after former peanuts were harvested. Then land was plowed with rotary tillage twice on May 5th of the following year, and peanuts were not covered with film after sowing.
冬闲期免耕晾晒土地后整地覆膜种植MGFM 前茬花生收获后不翻耕, 冬闲晾晒土地, 于次年5月5日进行翻耕, 然后旋耕两遍, 花生播种后覆膜。
Non tillage was conducted in winter fallow period after former peanuts were harvested. Then land was plowed with rotary tillage twice on May 5th of following year, and peanuts were covered with film after sowing.

表2

冬闲期耕作方式对连作花生土壤容重、孔隙度和有机质含量的影响"

项目
Item		 土层
Soil layer (cm)		 处理 Treatment
YQFM YQLD FGFM FGLD MGFM MGLD
土壤容重
Soil bulk density
(g cm-3)		 0-10 1.28 d 1.33 c 1.34 c 1.39 b 1.41 b 1.45 a
10-20 1.31 d 1.35 c 1.38 c 1.43 b 1.44 b 1.48 a
20-30 1.47 d 1.50 cd 1.52 bc 1.53 bc 1.55 b 1.59 a
土壤孔隙度
Soil porosity (%)		 0-10 51.07 a 49.73 b 49.69 b 47.36 c 47.02 c 45.35 d
10-20 49.91 a 48.32 b 48.23 b 46.91 c 46.87 c 45.41 d
20-30 44.57 a 42.73 b 42.67 b 41.45 bc 41.24 c 39.90 d
有机质
Soil organic matter content (g kg-1)		 0-10 11.96 a 11.72 a 11.25 b 10.98 c 10.65 d 10.34 e
10-20 10.87 a 10.52 b 10.11 c 9.67 d 9.48 d 9.21 e
20-30 6.38 a 6.01 b 5.88 b 5.85 b 5.61 c 5.42 d

表3

冬闲期耕作方式对连作花生叶片色素含量的影响"

项目
Item		 处理
Treatment		 生育时期 Growth stage
2016 2017
花针期
FP		 结荚期
PS		 饱果期
PF		 收获期
HS		 花针期
FP		 结荚期
PS		 饱果期
PF		 收获期
HS
叶绿素a YQFM 1.73 a 2.16 a 1.62 a 1.41 a 1.84 a 2.25 a 1.69 a 1.42 a
Chl a YQLD 1.65 b 2.06 b 1.55 b 1.34 b 1.41 b 2.09 b 1.60 b 1.35 b
FGFM 1.75 a 1.95 c 1.49 c 1.31 b 1.89 a 1.98 c 1.46 c 1.33 b
FGLD 1.67 b 1.87 d 1.37 d 1.25 c 1.80 a 1.93 d 1.39 d 1.26 c
MGFM 1.72 a 1.83 e 1.32 d 1.19 d 1.82 a 1.90 d 1.35 e 1.22 c
项目
Item		 处理
Treatment		 生育时期 Growth stage
2016 2017
花针期
FP		 结荚期
PS		 饱果期
PF		 收获期
HS		 花针期
FP		 结荚期
PS		 饱果期
PF		 收获期
HS
MGLD 1.61 c 1.75 f 1.23 e 1.05 e 1.31 b 1.78 e 1.29 f 1.12 d
叶绿素b YQFM 0.63 a 0.72 a 0.57 a 0.55 a 0.69 a 0.74 a 0.60 a 0.57 a
Chl b YQLD 0.56 b 0.68 b 0.53 b 0.51 b 0.48 bc 0.70 b 0.56 b 0.53 b
FGFM 0.64 a 0.66 b 0.51 b 0.49 b 0.71 a 0.69 b 0.53 bc 0.52 b
FGLD 0.57 b 0.62 c 0.47 c 0.45 c 0.64 ab 0.65 c 0.51 cd 0.48 c
MGFM 0.62 a 0.61 c 0.45 c 0.43 c 0.68 a 0.61 d 0.49 d 0.47 c
MGLD 0.54 b 0.57 d 0.41 d 0.39 d 0.45 c 0.56 e 0.45 e 0.42 d
类胡萝卜素 YQFM 0.36 ab 0.46 a 0.38 a 0.35 a 0.35 ab 0.47 a 0.37 a 0.34 a
Car YQLD 0.31 cd 0.42 b 0.34 b 0.31 b 0.36 a 0.43 b 0.33 b 0.30 b
FGFM 0.38 a 0.41 b 0.33 b 0.30 b 0.36 a 0.42 b 0.32 b 0.29 b
FGLD 0.32 cd 0.37 c 0.29 c 0.26 c 0.37 a 0.38 c 0.29 c 0.25 c
MGFM 0.34 bc 0.36 c 0.28 c 0.25 c 0.32 b 0.37 c 0.28 c 0.24 c
MGLD 0.30 d 0.32 d 0.24 d 0.21 d 0.34 ab 0.33 d 0.24 d 0.20 d
叶绿素a+b YQFM 2.27 b 2.88 a 2.18 a 1.96 a 2.52 a 2.99 a 2.29 a 1.99 a
Chl a+b YQLD 2.14 c 2.74 b 2.08 b 1.85 b 2.41 a 2.79 b 2.16 b 1.88 b
FGFM 2.35 a 2.61 c 2.00 c 1.80 b 2.60 a 2.67 c 1.99 c 1.85 b
FGLD 2.17 c 2.49 d 1.84 d 1.70 c 2.43 a 2.58 d 1.90 d 1.74 c
MGFM 2.25 b 2.44 d 1.77 d 1.62 d 2.50 a 2.51 e 1.84 e 1.69 d
MGLD 2.04 d 2.32 e 1.65 e 1.44 e 2.36 a 2.34 f 1.74 f 1.54 e

图1

冬闲期耕作方式对连作花生叶片净光合速率(Pn)的影响 缩写同表3。"

图2

冬闲期耕作方式对连作花生叶片气孔导度(Gs)的影响 缩写同表1和表3。"

图3

冬闲期耕作方式对连作花生叶片胞间CO2浓度(Ci)的影响 缩写同表1和表3。"

图4

冬闲期耕作方式对连作花生叶片蒸腾速率(Tr)的影响 缩写同表1和表3。"

图5

冬闲期耕作方式对连作花生叶片SOD、CAT、POD活性和MDA含量的影响(2016年) 缩写同表1和表3。"

表4

冬闲期耕作方式对连作花生产量及经济效益的影响"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 荚果产量
Pod yield
(kg hm-2)		 籽仁产量
Kernel yield
(kg hm-2)		 单株结果数
Pods per plant		 千克果数
Pods per kg		 出仁率
Shelling rate (%)		 经济效益
Economic benefit
(yuan hm-2)
2016 FGLD 4659.13 c 3585.47 c 18.67 c 549.34 b 68.46 c 12 495.65 c
FGFM 4981.32 b 3775.31 b 21.00 b 544.78 b 68.52 c 13 506.60 a
YQLD 4995.12 b 3795.39 b 22.00 b 526.14 c 69.80 b 13 050.60 b
YQFM 5250.52 a 4058.12 a 23.50 a 521.17 c 70.19 a 13 727.60 a
MGLD 4408.14 d 3350.79 d 16.15 e 567.39 a 67.51 e 11 240.70 e
MGFM 4606.16 c 3556.44 c 17.50 d 562.67 a 67.92 d 11 630.80 d
2017 FGLD 4778.38 c 3605.36 c 20.47 c 515.00 b 71.12 d 13 091.90 c
FGFM 5095.29 b 3735.89 b 22.26 b 510.50 b 71.73 c 14 076.45 b
YQLD 5171.36 b 3802.68 b 23.78 a 485.00 c 73.18 b 13 931.80 b
YQFM 5435.14 a 4238.02 a 24.40 a 479.50 c 74.26 a 14 650.70 a
MGLD 4565.87 d 3299.58 d 16.18 e 538.00 a 70.11 e 12 029.35 d
MGFM 4698.17 c 3582.17 c 17.73 d 533.00 a 70.36 e 12 090.85 d

表5

光合参数、抗氧化系统参数与产量及其构成因素的相关系数"

项目
Item		 荚果产量
Pod yield		 籽仁产量
Kernel yield		 单株结果数
Pods per plant		 千克果数
Pods per kg		 出仁率
Shelling rate
净光合速率 Pn 0.994** 0.974** 0.975** -0.924** 0.927**
蒸腾速率 Tr 0.989** 0.975** 0.969** -0.910* 0.913*
气孔导度 Gs 0.975** 0.950** 0.971** -0.904* 0.894*
胞间CO2浓度 Ci -0.979** -0.977** -0.972** 0.922** -0.921**
SOD活性 SOD activity 0.991** 0.988** 0.964** -0.930** 0.945**
CAT活性 CAT activity 0.967** 0.967** 0.930** -0.851* 0.861*
POD活性 POD activity 0.990** 0.990** 0.960** -0.913* 0.926**
MDA含量 MDA content -0.994** -0.975** -0.988** 0.955** -0.955**
[1] 滕应, 任文杰, 李振高, 王小兵, 刘五星, 骆永明 . 花生连作障碍发生机理研究进展. 土壤学报, 2015,47:259-265.
Teng Y, Ren W J, Li Z G, Wang X B, Liu W X, Luo Y M . Research progress of peanut mechanism in continuous cropping obstacle. Acta Pedol Sin, 2015,47:259-265 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[2] 韩宾, 孔凡磊, 张海林, 陈阜 . 耕作方式转变对小麦/玉米两熟农田土壤固碳能力的影响. 应用生态学报, 2010,21:91-98.
Han B, Kong F L, Zhang H L, Chen F . Effects of cultivation modes on soil carbon fixation ability of wheat-corn two cropped farmland. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2010,21:91-98 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3] 刘苹, 赵海军, 万书波, 任海霞, 李瑾, 杨力, 于淑芳 . 连作对花生根系分泌物化感作用的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2011,19:639-644.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2011.00639
Liu P, Zhao H J, Wan S B, Ren H X, Li J, Yang L, Yu S F . Effect of continuous cropping on allelopathy of peanut root exudates. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2011,19:639-644 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2011.00639
[4] 徐瑞富, 王小龙 . 花生连作田土壤微生物群落动态与土壤养分关系研究. 花生学报, 2003,32(3):19-24.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-4093.2003.03.004
Xu R F, Wang X L . Research on the relationship between soil microbial community dynamics and soil nutrients in peanut continuous cropping. J Peanut Sci, 2003,32(3):19-24 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-4093.2003.03.004
[5] 封海胜, 张思苏 . 花生连作对土壤及根际微生物区系的影响. 山东农业科学, 1993, ( 1):13-15.
Feng H S, Zhang S S . Effects of continuous cropping on soil and rhizosphere microflora of peanut. J Shandong Agric Sci, 1993, ( 1):13-15 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[6] 杜长玉, 赵华强, 李明琴 . 大豆连作对植株形态和生理指标的影响. 内蒙古农业科技, 2003, ( 4):14-15.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-0907.2003.04.007
Du C Y, Zhao H Q, Li M Q . Effects of soybean continuous cropping on plant morphology and physiological indexes. Inner Mongolia Agric Sci Tech, 2003, ( 4):14-15 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-0907.2003.04.007
[7] 樊堂群, 王树兵, 姜淑庆, 成波, 李晔, 初长江 . 连作对花生光合作用和干物质积累的影响. 花生学报, 2007,36(2):35-37.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-4093.2007.02.008
Fan T Q, Wang S B, Jiang S Q, Cheng B, Li Y, Chu C J . Effect of continuous cropping on photosynthesis and accumulation of dry matter in peanut. J Peanut Sci, 2007,36(2):35-37 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-4093.2007.02.008
[8] 阎成士, 李德全, 张建华 . 植物叶片衰老与氧化胁迫. 植物学报, 1999,16:398-404.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3466.1999.04.012
Yan C S, Li D Q, Zhang J H . Plant leaf senescence and oxidative stress. Bull Bot, 1999,16:398-404 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3466.1999.04.012
[9] 姬生栋, 朱命炜, 卜艳珍, 王丹, 李高岩, 徐存拴 . 小麦细胞核的超微结构在旗叶衰老中的动态变化. 电子显微学报, 2000,19:347-348.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6281.2000.03.083
Ji S D, Zhu M W, Bu Y Z, Wang D, Li G Y, Xu C S . Dynamic changes of ultrastructure of wheat nuclei in senescence of flag leaves. J Chin Electron Micro Soc, 2000,19:347-348 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6281.2000.03.083
[10] 魏晓东, 陈国祥, 徐艳丽, 雷华, 施大伟 . 银杏叶片衰老过程中光合生理特性及叶绿体超微结构的变化. 植物研究, 2008,28:433-437.
Wei X D, Chen G X, Xu Y L, Lei H, Shi D W . Changes in photosynthesis and ultrastructure of chloroplasts during leaf senescence of ginkgo. Bull Bot Res, 2008,28:433-437 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11] Jagtap V, Bhargava S . Variation in the antioxidant metabolism of drought tolerant and drought susceptible varieties of Sorghum bicolor(L.) Moench. exposed to highlight, low water and high temperature stress. J Plant Physiol, 1995,145:195-197.
doi: 10.1016/S0176-1617(11)81872-9
[12] Pospíšil P . Molecular mechanisms of production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species by photosystem II. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2012,1817:218-231.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2011.05.017 pmid: 21641332
[13] Yang X M, Wander M M . Tillage effects on soil organic carbon distribution and estimation of C storage in a siltyloam soil in Illinois. Soil Till Res, 1999,52:1-9.
doi: 10.1016/S0167-1987(99)00051-3
[14] Wang Y T, Yang C Y, Chen Y T . Characterization of senescence associated proteases in post harvest broccoli florets. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2004,42:663-670.
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2004.06.003 pmid: 15331096
[15] Wilson K A, Mc Manus M T, Gordon M E . The proteomics of senescence in leaves of white clover,Trifolium repens(L.). Proteomics, 2002,2:1114-1122.
doi: 10.1002/1615-9861(200209)2:9<1114::AID-PROT1114>3.0.CO;2-O pmid: 12362330
[16] 林萌萌, 孙涛, 尹继乾, 李琦瑶, 宁堂原, 米庆华 . 不同生物降解地膜对花生光合特性和产量的影响. 中国农学通报, 2015,31(27):190-197.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15030142
Lin M M, Sun T, Yin J Q, Li Q Y, Ning T Y, Mi Q H . Effects of different biodegradable films mulching on the photosynthetic characteristics and yield of peanut. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2015,31(27):190-197 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15030142
[17] 杨富军, 高华援, 赵叶明, 朱统国, 王绍伦, 周玉萍 . 地膜覆盖栽培对花生生殖生长及产量的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2013,41:10643-10645.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2013.26.031
Yang F J, Gao H Y, Zhao Y M, Zhu T G, Wang S L, Zhou Y P . Effects of plastic film mulching on reproductive growth and yield of peanut. Anhui Agric Sin, 2013,41:10643-10645 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2013.26.031
[18] 赵亚丽, 郭海斌, 薛志伟, 穆心愿, 李潮海 . 耕作方式与秸秆还田对冬小麦-夏玉米轮作系统中干物质生产和水分利用效率的影响. 作物学报, 2014,40:1797-1807.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.01797
Zhao Y L, Guo H B, Xue Z W, Mu X Y, Li C H . Effects of tillage and straw returning on biomass and water use efficiency in a winter wheat and summer maize rotation system. Acta Agron Sin, 2014,40:1797-1807 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.01797
[19] 常帅, 闫慧峰, 杨举田, 张永春, 孙艳茹, 贺远 . 两种禾本科冬绿肥生长规律及腐解特征比较. 中国土壤与肥料, 2015, ( 1):101-105.
doi: 10.11838/sfsc.20150119
Chang S, Yan H F, Yang J T, Zhang Y C, Sun Y R, He Y . The comparison of growth dynamic and decomposing characteristics of two kinds of winter green manure. Soil Fert Sci China, 2015, ( 1):101-105 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.11838/sfsc.20150119
[20] 王丹英, 彭建, 徐春梅, 赵锋, 章秀福 . 油菜作绿肥还田的培肥效应及对水稻生长的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2012,26:85-91.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.10017216.2012.01.014
Wang D Y, Peng J, Xu C M, Zhao F, Zhang X F . Effects of rape straw manuring on soil fertility and rice growth. Chin J Rice Sci, 2012,26:85-91 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.10017216.2012.01.014
[21] 鲍士旦 . 土壤农化分析(第3版). 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. pp 25-111.
Bao S D. Soil Agricultural Chemistry Analysis, 3rd edn. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000. pp 25-111(in Chinese).
[22] Arnon D I . Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplast, poly-phenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol, 1949,24:1-15.
[23] 赵世杰, 许长城, 邹琦 . 植物组织中丙二醛测定方法的改进. 植物生理学通讯, 1994,30:207-210.
Zhao S J, Xu C C, Zou Q . The improvement of MDA measurement in plant. Plant Physiol Commun, 1994,30:207-210 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[24] 邹琦 . 植物生理学实验指导. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. pp 173-174.
Zou Q. Experimental of Plant Physiology. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000. pp 173-174(in Chinese).
[25] Buttery B R, Buzzell R I . The relationship between chlorophyll content and rate of photosynthesis in soybeans. Can J Plant Sci, 1977,57:1-5.
doi: 10.4141/cjps77-001
[26] 吴正锋, 成波, 王才斌, 郑亚萍, 刘俊华, 陈殿绪 . 连作对花生幼苗生理特性及荚果产量的影响. 花生学报, 2006,35(1):29-33.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-4093.2006.01.007
Wu Z F, Cheng B, Wang C B, Zheng Y P, Liu J H, Chen D X . Effect of continuous cropping on peanut seedling physiological characteristics and pod yield. J Peanut Sci, 2006,35(1):29-33 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-4093.2006.01.007
[27] 张艳君, 郭丽华, 于涛, 华丽民, 叶鑫 . 花生连作对植株生长发育及主要农艺生理指标的影响. 辽宁农业科学, 2015, ( 6):17-20.
Zhang Y J, Guo L H, Yu T, Hua L M, Ye X . Effect of peanut in plant growth and main agronomic and physiological indexes during continuous cropping. Liaoning Agric Sci, 2015, ( 6):17-20 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28] 冯国艺, 张谦, 祁虹, 杜海英, 王树林, 李智峰 . 不同深耕时间对滨海盐碱棉田土壤理化性质及棉苗光合特性的影响. 河南农业科学, 2015,44(2):34-38.
doi: 10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2015.02.007
Feng G Y, Zhang Q, Qi H, Du H Y, Wang S L, Li Z F . Effects of different deep ploughing time on physico-chemical properties of soil and photosynthetic characteristics of cotton seedlings in coastal saline area. J Henan Agric Sci, 2015,44(2):34-38 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2015.02.007
[29] 孟玉山, 潘文杰, 陈伟, 陈世军, 宗学凤, 王三根 . 绿肥压青对烤烟光合特性的影响研究. 西南农业学报, 2011,24:2156-2159.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4829.2011.06.027
Meng Y S, Pan W J, Chen W, Chen S J, Zong X F, Wang S G . Effects of green manureon photosynthetic characteristics in flue-cured tobacco. J Southwest Agric, 2011,24:2156-2160 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4829.2011.06.027
[30] 孙涛, 张智猛, 宁堂原, 米庆华, 张学鹏, 冯宇鹏 . 有色地膜覆盖对花生叶片光合特性及产量的影响. 作物杂志, 2013, ( 6):82-86.
Sun T, Zhang Z M, Ning T Y, Mi Q H, Zhang X P, Feng Y P . Effects of coloured mulching on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of peanut leaves. Crops, 2013, ( 6):82-86 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[31] 李向东, 王晓云, 张高英, 万勇善, 李军 . 花生衰老的氮素调控. 中国农业科学, 2000,33:30-35.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2000.05.005
Li X D, Wang X Y, Zhang G Y, Wan Y S, Li J . The regulation of nitrogen in peanut senescence. Sci Agric Sin, 2000,33:30-35 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2000.05.005
[32] 孙虎, 王月福, 王铭伦, 赵长星 . 施氮量对不同类型花生品种衰老特性和产量的影响. 生态学报, 2010,30:2671-2677.
Sun H, Wang Y F, Wang M L, Zhao C X . Effects of nitrogen fertilizer rate on senescence characteristics and yield of different peanut. Acta Ecol Sin, 2010,30:2671-2677 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[33] 王才斌, 吴正锋, 成波, 郑亚萍, 万书波, 郭峰 . 连作对花生光合特性和活性氧代谢的影响. 作物学报, 2007,33:1304-1309.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2007.08.014
Wang C B, Wu Z F, Cheng B, Zheng Y P, Wan S B, Guo F . Effects of continuous cropping on photosynthetic characteristics and active oxygen metabolism of peanut. Acta Agron Sin, 2007,33:1304-1309 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2007.08.014
[34] 桑丹丹, 高聚林, 王志刚, 于晓芳, 李丽君, 王俊秀 . 不同覆膜方式下超高产春玉米花粒期叶片衰老特性研究. 玉米科学, 2009,17(5):77-81.
Sang D D, Gao J L, Wang Z G, Yu X F, Li L J, Wang J X . Study on leaf senescence of super-high yield spring maize during flowering and heading period on different film-covering modes. J Maize Sci, 2009,17(5):77-81 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[35] 郭书亚, 张新, 张前进, 王振华, 李亚贞, 顾顺芳 . 秸秆覆盖深松对夏玉米花后穗位叶衰老和产量的影响. 玉米科学, 2012,20(1):104-107.
Guo S Y, Zhang X, Zhang Q J, Wang Z H, Li Y Z, Gu S F . Effects of straw mulching and subsoiling on ear leaf senescence after anthesis and yield of summer maize. J Maize Sci, 2012,20(1):104-107 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[36] Chen M N, Li X, Yang Q L, Chi X, Pan L, Chen N . Soil eukaryotic microorganism succession as affected by continuous cropping of peanut-pathogenic and beneficial fungi were selected. PLoS One, 2012,7:e40659.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040659 pmid: 22808226
[37] 孙秀山, 封海胜 . 连作花生田主要微生物类群与土壤酶活性变化及其交互作用. 作物学报, 2001,27:617-621.
Sun X S, Feng H S . Changes of main microbial strains and enzymes activities in peanut continuous cropping soil and their interactions. Acta Agron Sin, 2001,27:617-621 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[38] 林英杰, 李向东, 周录英, 李宝龙, 赵华建, 高芳 . 花生不同种植方式对田间土壤微环境和产量的影响. 水土保持学报, 2010,24(3):131-135.
Lin Y J, Li X D, Zhou L Y, Li B L, Zhao H J, Gao F . Effects of different planting patterns on fields soil microenvironment and pod yield. J Soil Water Conserv, 2010,24(3):131-135 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[39] 周开芳, 何炎 . 豆科冬绿肥翻压对土壤肥力和杂交玉米产量及品质的影响. 贵州农业科学, 2003,31(增刊):42-43.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2003.z1.009
Zhou K F, He Y . Effects of soybean and green manure fertilizer on soil fertility and yield and quality of hybrid maize. Guizhou Agric Sci, 2003,31(suppl):42-43 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2003.z1.009
[40] 冯国艺, 翟黎芳, 杜海英, 张谦, 梁青龙, 祁虹 . 不同深耕时间对河北省滨海盐碱地土壤理化性质以及棉花植株性状和产量的影响. 河北农业科学, 2016,20(1):25-29.
Feng G Y, Zhai L F, Du H Y, Zhang Q, Liang Q L, Qi H . Effects of different plough-deep times on physico-chemical properties of soil and the yield and plant trait of cotton in coastal saline area of Hebei. J Hebei Agric Sci, 2016,20(1):25-29 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[41] 侯乐新 . 豫东平原夏花生生产量构成因素分析及增产途径探讨. 商丘师范学院学报, 2005,21(5):129-130.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3600.2005.05.037
Hou L X . An analysis of the factors for the yield and the ways for the yield increase of summer pea-nut in Yudong plain. J Shangqiu Teach Coll, 2005,21(5):129-130 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3600.2005.05.037
[1] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[3] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[4] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[7] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[8] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[9] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[10] 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[11] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[12] 杜浩, 程玉汉, 李泰, 侯智红, 黎永力, 南海洋, 董利东, 刘宝辉, 程群. 利用Ln位点进行分子设计提高大豆单荚粒数[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
[13] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
[14] 袁嘉琦, 刘艳阳, 许轲, 李国辉, 陈天晔, 周虎毅, 郭保卫, 霍中洋, 戴其根, 张洪程. 氮密处理提高迟播栽粳稻资源利用和产量[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 667-681.
[15] 丁红, 徐扬, 张冠初, 秦斐斐, 戴良香, 张智猛. 不同生育期干旱与氮肥施用对花生氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 695-703.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2