欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (01): 112-117.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

旱种方式对水稻产量与品质的影响

徐国伟;王朋; 唐成;王志琴;刘立军; 杨建昌   

  1. 江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室,扬州大学,江苏扬州225009
  • 收稿日期:2005-11-16 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-01-12 网络出版日期:2006-01-12
  • 通讯作者: 杨建昌

Effect of Dry-Cultivation Patterns on the Yield and Quality of Rice

XU Guo-Wei; WANG Peng; TANG Cheng; WANG Zhi-Qin; LIU Li-Jun; YANG Jian-Chang   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2005-11-16 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-01-12 Published online:2006-01-12
  • Contact: YANG Jian-Chang

摘要:

以汕优63为材料,通过稻草覆盖旱种、地膜覆盖旱种和常规水种(对照)比较试验,研究了旱种水稻产量与品质的表现。结果表明,覆草旱种产量与水种稻产量无显著差异,但显著高于覆膜旱种稻的产量。覆草旱种稻米的碾磨品质、外观品质、蒸煮品质和营养品质与水种稻无显著差异,而覆膜旱种稻米的垩白度明显高于水种稻,胶稠度和碱解值则显著低于水种稻。水稻旱种后,淀粉谱的最高黏度和崩解值降低,消减值提高,覆膜旱种尤为明显。旱种稻的地上部干物质积累量减少,根干重增加,物质运转率和收获指数提高,灌浆中后期根系活力下降较快。表明覆草旱种的产量、稻米品质以及物质生产均优于覆膜旱种。对覆草旱种和覆膜旱种在产量和品质形成上的差异进行了讨论。

关键词: 水稻, 覆草旱种, 覆膜旱种, 产量, 米质

Abstract:

Rice dry-cultivation is a new technology in paddy rice production. An indica hybrid rice combination, Shanyou 63, was used to investigate the grain yield and quality of rice cultivated with different methods. Three treatments, dry-cultivation mulched with straw (DCMS, the field covered with rice straw before transplanting and not flooded), dry-cultivation mulched with film (DCMF, the field covered with plastic film before transplanting and not flooded), and moist-cultivation (MC, the field kept flooded, control), were established. Grain yield and its components, grain quality, starch profile characters, root dry weight and activity were determined. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the grain yield between DCMS and MC, but the grain yield of DCMS was significantly higher than that of DCMF. Under dry-cultivation, the panicles per square meter were significantly increased, but spikelets per panicle, grain setting percentage and 1 000-grain weight were decreased. More effective panicles by DCMS were produced than by DCMF, which attributed to higher grain yield for the former than the latter. The differences in the milling quality, appearance quality, and cooking and nutrient quality of rice were not significant between DCMS and MC, indicating that DCMS has no bad effect on the grain quality. Grains from DCMF had higher chalkiness, smaller gel consistency and alkali spreading value, when compared with those from MC. Peak viscosity and breakdown value were decreased and setback value of the starch profile of rice endosperm were increased by dry-cultivation, specially by DCMF, suggesting that the eating quality of the rice grown under DCMS is better than that under DCMF. Dry matter accumulation of shoot was reduced, but root dry weight, remobilization of assimilates from stems to grains and harvest index were increased by both DCMS and DCMF. Root activities under both DCMS and DCMF were higher than those under MC at heading and early grain filling stage, but decreased faster during the mid and late grain filling period. In comparison, DCMS exhibited a slower decrease in root activity and leaf senescence than DCMF. The results suggest that the grain yield and quality of rice under DCMS are better than those under DCMF, and all the dry-cultivation of rice do not produce low grain yield and poor rice quality. Reasons for the differences in the formation of grain yield and quality between DCMS and DCMF were discussed in the paper.

Key words: Rice, Dry-cultivation mulched with straw, Dry-cultivation mulched with film, Moist-cultivation, Grain yield, Rice quality

中图分类号: 

  • S511.1043
[1] 薛皦, 卢东柏, 刘维, 陆展华, 王石光, 王晓飞, 方志强, 何秀英. 优质稻“粤农丝苗”白叶枯病抗性遗传分析及主效QTL qBB-11-1的精细定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(9): 2210-2220.
[2] 黄祎雯, 孙滨, 程灿, 牛付安, 周继华, 张安鹏, 涂荣剑, 李瑶, 姚瑶, 代雨婷, 谢开珍, 陈小荣, 曹黎明, 储黄伟. 对水稻种子耐储性QTL的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(9): 2255-2264.
[3] 周群, 袁锐, 朱宽宇, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 不同施氮量下籼/粳杂交稻甬优2640产量和氮素吸收利用的特点[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(9): 2285-2299.
[4] 邬腊梅, 杨浩娜, 王立峰, 李祖任, 邓希乐, 柏连阳. 除草型麻地膜在水稻秧田的应用及对水稻的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(9): 2315-2324.
[5] 陈志青, 冯源, 王锐, 崔培媛, 卢豪, 魏海燕, 张海鹏, 张洪程. 外源钼对水稻产量形成及氮素利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(9): 2325-2338.
[6] 王权, 王乐乐, 朱铁忠, 任浩杰, 王辉, 陈婷婷, 金萍, 武立权, 杨茹, 尤翠翠, 柯健, 何海兵. 离体饲养下HgCl2影响水稻叶片光合特性及其生理机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(9): 2377-2389.
[7] 王云奇, 高福莉, 李傲, 郭同济, 戚留冉, 曾寰宇, 赵建云, 王笑鸽, 高国英, 杨佳鹏, 白金泽, 马亚欢, 梁月馨, 张睿. 小麦花后穗部温度变化规律及其与产量的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(9): 2400-2408.
[8] 桑国庆, 唐志光, 毛克彪, 邓刚, 王靖文, 李佳. 基于GEE云平台与Sentinel数据的高分辨率水稻种植范围提取——以湖南省为例[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(9): 2409-2420.
[9] 夏秀忠, 张宗琼, 杨行海, 荘洁, 曾宇, 邓国富, 宋国显, 黄欲晓, 农保选, 李丹婷. 广西水稻地方品种核心种质芽期耐盐性全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(8): 2007-2015.
[10] 朱春权, 魏倩倩, 项兴佳, 胡文君, 徐青山, 曹小闯, 朱练峰, 孔亚丽, 刘佳, 金千瑜, 张均华. 褪黑素和茉莉酸甲酯基质育秧对水稻耐低温胁迫的调控作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(8): 2016-2027.
[11] 刘昆, 黄健, 周沈琪, 张伟杨, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 穗肥施氮量对不同穗型超级稻品种产量的影响及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(8): 2028-2040.
[12] 李鑫, 王剑, 李亚兵, 韩迎春, 王占彪, 冯璐, 王国平, 熊世武, 李存东, 李小飞. 不同间套作模式对棉花产量和生物量累积、分配的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(8): 2041-2052.
[13] 委刚, 陈单阳, 任德勇, 杨宏霞, 伍靖雯, 冯萍, 王楠. 水稻细长秆突变体sr10的鉴定与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(8): 2125-2133.
[14] 周驰燕, 李国辉, 许轲, 张晨晖, 杨子君, 张芬芳, 霍中洋, 戴其根, 张洪程. 不同类型水稻品种茎叶维管束与同化物运转特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(8): 2053-2065.
[15] 陈驰, 陈代波, 孙志豪, 彭泽群, 贺登美, 张迎信, 程海涛, 于萍, 马兆慧, 宋建, 曹立勇, 程式华, 孙廉平, 占小登, 吕文彦. 水稻典败型隐性核雄性不育突变体ap90的鉴定与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(7): 1569-1582.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 袁美;杨光圣;傅廷栋;严红艳. 甘蓝型油菜生态型细胞质雄性不育两用系的研究Ⅲ. 8-8112AB的温度敏感性及其遗传[J]. 作物学报, 2003, 29(03): 330 -335 .
[2] 王永胜;王景;段静雅;王金发;刘良式. 水稻极度分蘖突变体的分离和遗传学初步研究[J]. 作物学报, 2002, 28(02): 235 -239 .
[3] 胡玉琪;廖晓海. 玉米叶形系数研究[J]. 作物学报, 1986, (01): 71 -72 .
[4] 梁太波;尹燕枰;蔡瑞国;闫素辉;李文阳;耿庆辉;王平;王振林. 大穗型小麦品种强、弱势籽粒淀粉积累和相关酶活性的比较[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(01): 150 -156 .
[5] 王成章;韩锦峰;史莹华;李振田;李德锋. 不同秋眠类型苜蓿品种的生产性能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(01): 133 -141 .
[6] 田志坚;易蓉;陈建荣;郭清泉;张学文. 苎麻纤维素合成酶基因cDNA的克隆及表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(01): 76 -83 .
[7] 赵秀琴;朱苓华;徐建龙;黎志康. 灌溉与自然降雨条件下水稻高代回交导入系产量QTL的定位[J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(09): 1536 -1542 .
[8] 吴影;宋丰顺;陆徐忠;赵 伟;杨剑波;李莉. 实时荧光PCR技术定量检测转基因大豆方法的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(10): 1733 -1737 .
[9] 勾玲;黄建军;张宾;李涛;孙锐;赵明. 群体密度对玉米茎秆抗倒力学和农艺性状的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(10): 1688 -1695 .
[10] 于晶;张林;崔红;张永侠;苍晶;郝再彬;李卓夫. 高寒地区冬小麦东农冬麦1号越冬前的生理生化特性[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(11): 2019 -2025 .