欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (02): 283-287.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

结实期不同时段高温对稻米品质的影响

张国发;王绍华;尤娟;王强盛;丁艳锋;吉志军   

  1. 南京农业大学农业部作物生长调控重点开放实验室,江苏省信息农业高技术研究重点实验室,江苏南京210095
  • 收稿日期:2004-12-20 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-02-12 网络出版日期:2006-02-12
  • 通讯作者: 丁艳锋

Effect of Higher Temperature in Different Filling Stages on Rice Qualities

ZHANG Guo-Fa; WANG Shao-Hua; YOU Juan; WANG Qiang-Sheng; DING Yan-Feng; and JI Zhi-Jun   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Growth Regulation, Ministry of Agriculture, Hi-Tech Key Laboratory of Information Agriculture, Nanjing 210095,Jiangsu
  • Received:2004-12-20 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-02-12 Published online:2006-02-12
  • Contact: DING Yan-Feng

摘要:

选用扬稻6号(籼稻)和武育粳3号(粳稻)两个品种,利用人工气候室进行灌浆结实期阶段控温试验,探讨结实期高温对稻米品质指标和淀粉RVA的影响,以及温度影响的时段效应。结果表明,结实期温度对稻米品质影响明显,且不同品种、不同品质指标对温度的反应存在差异。结实期高温,使两品种长宽比变小,垩白粒率、垩白度变大,糙米率、精米率和整精米率显著降低,蛋白质含量升高,淀粉RVA谱特征值糊化开始温度、冷胶黏度、回复值和消减值升高,最高黏度、热浆黏度和崩解值下降;结实期温度对AC的影响因品种而异,高温使扬稻6号AC升高,武育粳3号AC降低。全结实期高温对稻米品质的影响最大,结实前期高温次之,结实后期高温的影响较小。从抽穗到开花后20 d是温度影响稻米品质的关键时期,对稻米品质的形成具有决定性作用,而结实后期(开花20 d后)环境温度对稻米品质的影响较弱。

关键词: 水稻, 稻米品质, 高温, 淀粉黏滞性谱

Abstract:

The temperature of rice grain-filling stage is the primary ecologic factor for rice qualities. Yangdao6 (indica rice) and Wuyujing3 (japonica rice) were used to study the effects of higher temperatures in different filling stage on rice qualities and characteristic values of Rapidvisco-analyzer with climatic cabinets. The temperature treatments were as follows: higher temperature (30℃) in whole grain-filling stage (A); higher temperature in early grain-filling stage (GFS) and optimum temperature (23℃) in later GFS stage (B); optimum temperature in early GFS and higher temperature in later GFS(C); optimum temperature in whole GFS (D,CK) (Table 1). The results showed that, different cultivars had different responses to various temperature treatments, and so did the various indexes of rice qualities. With high temperature in GFS, rice grain chalkness rate and grain chalkness were increased, while the brow rice rate, the milled rice rate and the head rice rate decreased significantly (Table 2); the effects of GFS temperature on rice AC value were various with cultivars, under high temperature treatments, Yangdao 6’s AC value were increased, while Wuyujing3’s AC value decreased (Fig.1). Under high temperature treatments, both cultivars performed higher protein content (Fig.2), higher Gelatinization temperature, Final viscosity, Consistency and Setback, lower Peak viscosity, Hot viscosity, and Breakdown (Table 3). Compared with D treatment, the rice qualities were affected by a treatment mostly, moderately by B treatment, while least by C treatment. The rice quality indexes under A and B treatments were various greatly with those under C and D treatment; while those under A treatment were various slightly with those under B treatment, and so did those under C treatment with D treatment. It can be concluded that: the period from heading to the 20 days later is the vital stage for whole rice quality in response to higher temperature, which affects rice qualities decisively; while the effect of the temperature in the later stage (beyond 20 days from heading) is slight. And the effect of higher temperature on some parameters of quality differs with cultivar, even though higher temperature degrades whole rice quality in general.

Key words: Rice(Oryza sativa), Rice quality, Higher temperature, Rapidvisco-analyzer

中图分类号: 

  • S511
[1] 田甜, 陈丽娟, 何华勤. 基于Meta-QTL和RNA-seq的整合分析挖掘水稻抗稻瘟病候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1372-1388.
[2] 郑崇珂, 周冠华, 牛淑琳, 和亚男, 孙伟, 谢先芝. 水稻早衰突变体esl-H5的表型鉴定与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1389-1400.
[3] 周文期, 强晓霞, 王森, 江静雯, 卫万荣. 水稻OsLPL2/PIR基因抗旱耐盐机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1401-1415.
[4] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[5] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[6] 杨建昌, 李超卿, 江贻. 稻米氨基酸含量和组分及其调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1037-1050.
[7] 杨德卫, 王勋, 郑星星, 项信权, 崔海涛, 李生平, 唐定中. OsSAMS1在水稻稻瘟病抗性中的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1119-1128.
[8] 朱峥, 王田幸子, 陈悦, 刘玉晴, 燕高伟, 徐珊, 马金姣, 窦世娟, 李莉云, 刘国振. 水稻转录因子WRKY68在Xa21介导的抗白叶枯病反应中发挥正调控作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1129-1140.
[9] 王小雷, 李炜星, 欧阳林娟, 徐杰, 陈小荣, 边建民, 胡丽芳, 彭小松, 贺晓鹏, 傅军如, 周大虎, 贺浩华, 孙晓棠, 朱昌兰. 基于染色体片段置换系群体检测水稻株型性状QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1141-1151.
[10] 王泽, 周钦阳, 刘聪, 穆悦, 郭威, 丁艳锋, 二宫正士. 基于无人机和地面图像的田间水稻冠层参数估测与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1248-1261.
[11] 陈悦, 孙明哲, 贾博为, 冷月, 孙晓丽. 水稻AP2/ERF转录因子参与逆境胁迫应答的分子机制研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 781-790.
[12] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[13] 巫燕飞, 胡琴, 周棋, 杜雪竹, 盛锋. 水稻延伸因子复合体家族基因鉴定及非生物胁迫诱导表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 644-655.
[14] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
[15] 王琰, 陈志雄, 姜大刚, 张灿奎, 查满荣. 增强叶片氮素输出对水稻分蘖和碳代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 739-746.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!