欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (05): 709-716.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

应用近红外光谱技术分析稻米蛋白质含量

毕京翠;张文伟;肖应辉;王海莲;江玲;刘玲珑;万向元; 翟虎渠;万建民   

  1. 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所,北京100081
  • 收稿日期:2005-05-16 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-05-12 网络出版日期:2006-05-12
  • 通讯作者: 万建民

Analysis for Protein Content in Rice by Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy (NIRS) Technique

BI Jing-Cui; ZHANG Wen-Wei; XIAO Ying-Hui; WANG Hai-Lian; JIANG Ling; LIU Ling-Long; WAN Xiang-Yuan; ZHAI Hu-Qu and WAN Jian-Min   

  1. China Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081; 3 Institute of Crop Sciences, China Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2005-05-16 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-05-12 Published online:2006-05-12
  • Contact: WAN Jian-Min

摘要:

以稻谷、米粒、米粉3种形态的样品,应用近红外光谱技术(NIRS)和偏最小二阶乘法(PLS),建立了6个稻米蛋白质含量近红外光谱数学模型,并对模型预测结果的准确性进行了评价。结果表明,糙米蛋白质含量的稻谷、糙米粒和糙米粉近红外光谱预测模型校正决定系数(RC2)分别为0.893、0.971和0.987,校正标准差(RMSEC)分别为0.507、0.259和0.183;精米蛋白质含量的稻谷、精米粒和精米粉近红外光谱预测模型RC2分别为0.897、0.984和0.986,RMSEC分别为0.497、0.186和0.190。模型内部交叉验证分析表明,预测糙米蛋白含量的稻谷、糙米粒和糙米粉模型内部交叉验证决定系数(RCV2)分别为0.865、0.962和0.984,内部验证标准差(RMSECV)分别为0.557、0.290和0.205;预测精米蛋白含量的稻谷、精米粒和精米粉的模型RCV2分别为0.845、0.951和0.979,RMSECV分别为0.594、0.316和0.233。模型外部验证分析表明,预测糙米蛋白含量的稻谷、糙米粒和糙米粉近红外光谱模型外部验证决定系数(RV2)分别为0.683、0.801和0.939,外部验证标准差(RMSEV)为0.962、0.799和0.434;预测精米蛋白含量的稻谷、精米粒和精米粉近红外光谱的模型RV2分别为0.673、0.921和0.959,RMSEV为0.976、0.513和0.344。用米粉建立的近红外光谱预模型准确性最高,米粒次之,基于稻谷的预测模型准确性相对较低;内部交叉验证和外部验证表明,近红外光谱分析技术与化学分析方法一致性较好,且能保证样品的完整性,在水稻优质育种和稻米品质分析中具有广泛的应用价值。

关键词: 水稻, 蛋白含量, 近红外光谱技术, 校正模型

Abstract:

Six predicted mathematic models for analysis of protein content in brown and milled rice were established, with the technique of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) and partial least square (PLS) algorithm. The protein content of brown rice and milled rice was determined by chemical methods. The different predicted models were established with the near infrared spectroscopy of paddy, whole grain and rice flour, which was to research the effect of sample forms on predicting veracity of NIR models. The determination coefficients (RC2) of calibration of NIR models of brown rice protein content for paddy, whole grain and flour were 0.893, 0.971 and 0.987 respectively, the root mean square errors of calibration (RMSEC) was 0.507, 0.259 and 0.183. The RC2 of NIR models of milled rice protein content for paddy, whole grain and flour were 0.897, 0.984 and 0.986,the RMSEC was 0.497, 0.186 and 0.190 respectively. The veracity of models was estimated by the determination coefficients (RCV2) and the root mean square errors (RMSECV) of cross-validation, the determination coefficients (RV2) and the root mean square errors (RMSEV) of external validation. The RCV2 of NIR models of brown rice protein content were 0.865, 0.962 and 0.984 respectively,the RMSECV 0.557, 0.290 and 0.205. The RCV2 of NIR models of milled rice protein content were 0.845, 0.951 and 0.979,the RMSECV 0.594, 0.316 and 0.233. The RV2 of the NIR models for brown rice protein content were 0.683, 0.801 and 0.939,the RMSEV 0.962, 0.799 and 0.434. The RV2 of the NIR models for milled rice protein content were 0.673, 0.921 and 0.959,the RMSEV 0.976, 0.513 and 0.344. From the above results, we concluded that the veracity of flour NIR models is the best, that of whole grain better, while that of paddy poor. The NIR method can substitute the chemical method and be widely used in the breeding and quality analysis of rice.

Key words: Rice, Protein content, Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy technique, Calibration model

中图分类号: 

  • S511
[1] 胡赵, 钱润, 谢丰璞, 应素平. 水稻SPX基因家族鉴定及响应磷处理的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1902-1912.
[2] 邹仪妹, 徐敏, 汪海洋, 姚辉, 王加峰, 刘浩, 任代胜. 两系不育系水稻幼苗根系响应盐胁迫的转录因子调控网络鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[3] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[4] 陈伟, 卫万娟, 赵其兵, 常东伟, 余凌波, 翟鹏飞, 冯志明, 陈宗祥, 任仰涛, 杨鹏, 刘海浪, 李珍富, 杨永乐, 金彦刚, 左示敏. 利用CRISPR/Cas9编辑Hd6基因创制优质早熟水稻新种质[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1046-1056.
[5] 石少阶, 刘凯, 陈姿夷, 王卉颖, 李三和, 周雷, 游艾青. 水稻矮化多分蘖基因DMT1的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1022-1034.
[6] 覃奕琰, 付瑶, 苏畅, 李娜, 徐静茹, 程笑然, 张琪, 赵明辉. OsST41调控水稻苗期耐盐性的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 802-812.
[7] 叶凡, 李帅, 李思宇, 陈云, 窦超银, 刘立军. 不同节水灌溉方式对东北稻区水稻产量和群体质量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 895-907.
[8] 王婵, 吴莹莹, 李文奇, 李霞, 王芳权, 周彤, 杨杰. 基于HRM技术开发水稻抗条纹叶枯病基因STV11功能标记[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2547-2556.
[9] 陈惠莹, 何嘉欣, 朱斌, 黄士轩, 周星佑, 伍君权, 杨美艳. 水稻黄单胞菌噬菌体vB_XaS_HDB2的全基因组分析和生物学特性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2087-2099.
[10] 杨海洋, 吴林宣, 李博纹, 石翰峰, 袁禧龙, 刘金朝, 蔡海荣, 陈诗怡, 郭涛, 王慧. 基于QTL定位发现的OsWRI3调控水稻种子的落粒性[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1712-1724.
[11] 雷松翰, 范骏扬, 车艳奕, 代永东, 郑雨萌, 田维江, 桑贤春, 王晓雯. 水稻内卷叶突变体acl3的鉴定及调控基因的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1467-1479.
[12] 李福媛, 杨奕, 马继琼, 许明辉, 林良斌, 孙一丁. 水稻OsPUB4基因克隆、激素诱导表达分析与互作蛋白筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1690-1700.
[13] 王梦宁, 谢可冉, 高逖, 王飞, 任孝俭, 熊栋梁, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 崔克辉. 水稻幼穗分化期至抽穗期高温对籽粒形态和充实的影响及其与粒重的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1347-1362.
[14] 盛倩男, 方娅婷, 赵剑, 杜思垚, 胡行珍, 余秋华, 朱俊, 任涛, 鲁剑巍. 不同养分管理措施对稻田和旱地油菜产量的影响及其对冻害的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1286-1298.
[15] 翁文安, 邢志鹏, 胡群, 魏海燕, 廖萍, 朱海滨, 瞿济伟, 李秀丽, 刘桂云, 高辉, 张洪程. 无人化旱直播水稻产量形成特征及其能量与经济效益研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1363-1377.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!