欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (08): 1380-1384.

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

回交高代选择导入系的纹枯病抗性与抗旱性的遗传重叠研究

郑天清1,2,4;徐建龙2;傅彬英2;高用明2;Satish VERUKA4;Renee LAFITTE4;翟虎渠3;万建民1,2;朱苓华2;黎志康2,4,*   

  1. 1南京农业大学作物遗传与种质创新国家重点实验室,江苏省植物基因工程研究中心, 江苏 南京 210095;2中国农业科学院作物科学研究所,北京 100081;3中国农业科学院,北京 100081;4国际水稻研究所,菲律宾马尼拉DAPO Box 7777
  • 收稿日期:2006-06-16 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-08-12 网络出版日期:2007-08-12
  • 通讯作者: 黎志康

Preliminary Identification of Genetic Overlaps between Sheath Blight Resistance and Drought Tolerance in the Introgression Lines from Directional Selection

ZHENG Tian-Qing124,XU Jian-Long2,FU Bing-Ying2,GAO Yong-Ming2,Satish VERUKA4,Renee LAFITTE4,ZHAI Hu-Qu3,WAN Jian-Min12,ZHU Ling-Hua2,LI Zhi-Kang24*   

  1. 1 State Key Laboratory for Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing Agricultural University,Research Center of Plant Gene Engineering, Nanjing 210095, China; 2 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; 3 Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; 4 International Rice Research Institute, DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, Philippines
  • Received:2006-06-16 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-08-12 Published online:2007-08-12
  • Contact: LI Zhi-Kang

摘要:

利用来自抗旱性较好的供体亲本(BG300和BG304)、具有两种遗传背景(IR64和特青)的水稻高代回交(BC2)抗旱选择导入系,通过人工接种的方法鉴定纹枯病抗性,考察纹枯病抗性与抗旱性之间可能存在的遗传重叠。通过与受体亲本的纹枯病抗性表现比较发现,具有特青背景的抗旱选择导入系倾向于纹枯病抗性的降低,而IR64背景的抗旱选择导入系则倾向于纹枯病抗性的增强。基于基因型与表型的方差分析共鉴定到6个与纹枯病抗性相关的位点,其中QSbr6在不同供体和背景的两个群体中分别检测到,而QSbr10则在同一供体的两个遗传背景下均检测到;有3个位点(QSbr6、QSbr8和QSbr10)与同一群体中检测到的抗旱性位点位置相近,很可能是两种抗性重叠的遗传基础。尽管方差分析的方法在选择导入系的非选择目标性状相关位点的鉴定中存在相当程度的偏低估计,本研究所检测到的纹枯病抗性位点,特别是那些与抗旱性重叠位点的分子标记以及相关的抗性株系仍将为进一步的水稻纹枯病抗性和抗旱性的多抗性育种和深入的遗传重叠研究提供有用的信息和材料。

关键词: 水稻, 抗旱性, 纹枯病抗性, 遗传重叠, 数量性状位点

Abstract:

With the combination of advanced backcrossing and artificial directional selection for yield under drought stresses at rain-fed lowland and upland, sixty-five BC2 introgression lines (ILs) with two relatively uniformed genetic backgrounds (IR64 and Teqing) and two donors with relatively good drought tolerances (BG300 and BG304) were developed and assayed with SSR makers. Using this set of materials, SBR was identified by artificial inoculations of R. solani from fields at Philippines belonging to the AG-1 group. Lengths of all lesions (TLL) from 5 randomly selected tillers per hill were measured. Analysis of genetic overlap between SBR and DT was carried out at two levels. First is the phenotypic analysis for SBR of the DT ILs from directional selection, in which the recurrent parents (RP) were used as the control and the ILs behaved better in yield were selected under the stress when the RP were almost killed and had not seed. The Teqing DT ILs tended to be decreased in SBR due to the selective introgression comparing with their RP, which showed medium resistance (MR) in our test; while the IR64 DT ILs tended to be increased in SBR comparing with IR64, which represented medium susceptibility (MS) in the same test. This kind of purge caused by directional selection indicated the possible correlation of DT with SBR in this set of ILs at the phenotypic level. The sencond is the genomic region overlaps detected by ANOVA and excessive introgression. Besides the underestimates by ANOVA of SBR loci, a total of six loci were found to be associated with SBR in DT ILs and five of them matched the 7 of the 26 loci reported previously by other researchers. Among the 6 loci, QSbr10 was detected for the same donor alleles in both backgrounds, while QSbr6 was detected for different donor alleles in different backgrounds; three loci (QSbr6, QSbr8, and QSbr10) overlaped the DT loci detected with the same ILs in our previous study.

Key words: Rice (Oryza sativa L.), Drought tolerance (DT), Sheath blight resistance (SBR), Genetic overlap, QTL

[1] 胡赵, 钱润, 谢丰璞, 应素平. 水稻SPX基因家族鉴定及响应磷处理的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1902-1912.
[2] 邹仪妹, 徐敏, 汪海洋, 姚辉, 王加峰, 刘浩, 任代胜. 两系不育系水稻幼苗根系响应盐胁迫的转录因子调控网络鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[3] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[4] 陈伟, 卫万娟, 赵其兵, 常东伟, 余凌波, 翟鹏飞, 冯志明, 陈宗祥, 任仰涛, 杨鹏, 刘海浪, 李珍富, 杨永乐, 金彦刚, 左示敏. 利用CRISPR/Cas9编辑Hd6基因创制优质早熟水稻新种质[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1046-1056.
[5] 石少阶, 刘凯, 陈姿夷, 王卉颖, 李三和, 周雷, 游艾青. 水稻矮化多分蘖基因DMT1的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1022-1034.
[6] 覃奕琰, 付瑶, 苏畅, 李娜, 徐静茹, 程笑然, 张琪, 赵明辉. OsST41调控水稻苗期耐盐性的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 802-812.
[7] 叶凡, 李帅, 李思宇, 陈云, 窦超银, 刘立军. 不同节水灌溉方式对东北稻区水稻产量和群体质量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 895-907.
[8] 张胜忠, 李国卫, 戈立江, 王菲菲, 胡晓辉, 苗华荣, 李燕, 钟文, 陈静. 花生机械脱壳损伤相关农艺指标筛选与QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 644-652.
[9] 王婵, 吴莹莹, 李文奇, 李霞, 王芳权, 周彤, 杨杰. 基于HRM技术开发水稻抗条纹叶枯病基因STV11功能标记[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2547-2556.
[10] 陈惠莹, 何嘉欣, 朱斌, 黄士轩, 周星佑, 伍君权, 杨美艳. 水稻黄单胞菌噬菌体vB_XaS_HDB2的全基因组分析和生物学特性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2087-2099.
[11] 尹雨萌, 王雁楠, 康志河, 乔守晨, 卞倩倩, 李亚蔚, 曹郭郑, 赵国瑞, 徐丹丹, 杨育峰. 甘薯谷胱甘肽S-转移酶基因IbGSTU7的克隆及功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1736-1746.
[12] 杨海洋, 吴林宣, 李博纹, 石翰峰, 袁禧龙, 刘金朝, 蔡海荣, 陈诗怡, 郭涛, 王慧. 基于QTL定位发现的OsWRI3调控水稻种子的落粒性[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1712-1724.
[13] 雷松翰, 范骏扬, 车艳奕, 代永东, 郑雨萌, 田维江, 桑贤春, 王晓雯. 水稻内卷叶突变体acl3的鉴定及调控基因的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1467-1479.
[14] 李福媛, 杨奕, 马继琼, 许明辉, 林良斌, 孙一丁. 水稻OsPUB4基因克隆、激素诱导表达分析与互作蛋白筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1690-1700.
[15] 王梦宁, 谢可冉, 高逖, 王飞, 任孝俭, 熊栋梁, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 崔克辉. 水稻幼穗分化期至抽穗期高温对籽粒形态和充实的影响及其与粒重的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1347-1362.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!