欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (12): 1922-1927.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

水稻籽粒多胺浓度与米质的关系

王志琴;张耗;王学明;张自常;杨建昌   

  1. 扬州大学江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室,江苏扬州225009
  • 收稿日期:2007-05-08 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-12-12 网络出版日期:2007-12-12

Relationship between Concentrations of Polyamines in Filling Grains and Rice Quality

WANG Zhi-Qin,ZHANG Hao,WANG Xue-Ming,ZHANG Zi-Chang,YANG Jian-Chang   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2007-05-08 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-12-12 Published online:2007-12-12

摘要: 采用12个不同基因型的水稻材料,测定了结实期籽粒中腐胺(Put)、亚精胺(Spd)和精胺(Spm)浓度和稻米品质,分析了它们之间的关系并用化学调控的方法进行了验证。结果表明,加工品质和外观品质较好的品种,结实期籽粒Spd和Spm浓度较高,Put浓度较低。灌浆各期籽粒Spd和Spm浓度与谷粒充实率、粒重、出糙率和出精率均呈显著或极显著正相关,与垩白度呈极显著负相关,灌浆各期籽粒Put浓度与谷粒充实率、粒重、出糙率和出精率均呈显著或极显著负相关,与垩白度呈显著或极显著正相关,灌浆各期籽粒Spd、Spm和Put浓度与稻米的整精米率及直链淀粉含量的相关均不显著。灌浆初期对稻穗喷施Spd和Spm,籽粒最大胚乳细胞数增加,蔗糖合成酶(SuS)、ADP葡萄糖焦磷酸化酶(AGP)和可溶性淀粉合成酶(SSS)活性增强,稻米的加工品质和外观品质改善,喷施Put或多胺合成抑制剂(MGBG)的效果则相反。说明通过品种选育和化学调控等途径增加籽粒Spd和Spm浓度或降低Put浓度,可以在一定程度上改善稻米的加工品质和外观品质。

关键词: 水稻, 多胺, 加工品质, 外观品质, 谷粒充实率

Abstract: Polyamines have been frequently described as endogenous plant growth regulators or intracellular messengers mediating physiological processes. This study investigated whether polyamines are related with the grain quality of rice. Twelve rice genotypes were grown in the field, and used to determine the concentrations of putrescine (Put), spermidine (Spd), and spermine (Spm) in the grains during the grain filling period. The relationship between polyamine concentrations and rice quality were analyzed, and chemical regulators were applied to verify the roles of polyamines in regulating rice quality. The results showed that a genotype with better milling and appearance qualities had higher concentrations of Spd and Spm, and lower put concentrations, in grains during the filling period. Concentrations of Spd and Spm in the grains were significantly or very significantly and positively correlated with grain plumpness, grain weight, brown rice, and milled rice, and negatively correlated with chalkiness. Concentrations of Put were significantly or very significantly and negatively correlated with grain plumpness, grain weight, brown rice, and milled rice, whereas positively correlated with chalkiness. Neither of Put nor Spd and Spm was significantly correlated with head rice and amylose content. Application of Spd or Spm to panicle at the early grain filling stage significantly increased the maximum endosperm cell number and activities of sucrose synthetase (SuS), adenine diphosphoglucose pyrophosphorylase (AGP), and soluble starch synthetase (SSS) in grains, and improved the milling and appearance qualities. Application of Put or methylglyoxal -bis (guanylhydrazone) (MGBG, an inhibitor of S-adenosyl-L-methionine decarboxylase) exhibited an opposite effect. The results suggested that the milling and appearance qualities would be improved to a certain degree by increasing Spd and Spm, or reducing Put, concentrations in the filling grains through variety breeding or application of chemical regulators.

Key words: Rice, Polyamines, Milling quality, Appearance quality, Grain plumpness

[1] 田甜, 陈丽娟, 何华勤. 基于Meta-QTL和RNA-seq的整合分析挖掘水稻抗稻瘟病候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1372-1388.
[2] 郑崇珂, 周冠华, 牛淑琳, 和亚男, 孙伟, 谢先芝. 水稻早衰突变体esl-H5的表型鉴定与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1389-1400.
[3] 周文期, 强晓霞, 王森, 江静雯, 卫万荣. 水稻OsLPL2/PIR基因抗旱耐盐机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1401-1415.
[4] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[5] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[6] 杨建昌, 李超卿, 江贻. 稻米氨基酸含量和组分及其调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1037-1050.
[7] 杨德卫, 王勋, 郑星星, 项信权, 崔海涛, 李生平, 唐定中. OsSAMS1在水稻稻瘟病抗性中的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1119-1128.
[8] 朱峥, 王田幸子, 陈悦, 刘玉晴, 燕高伟, 徐珊, 马金姣, 窦世娟, 李莉云, 刘国振. 水稻转录因子WRKY68在Xa21介导的抗白叶枯病反应中发挥正调控作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1129-1140.
[9] 王小雷, 李炜星, 欧阳林娟, 徐杰, 陈小荣, 边建民, 胡丽芳, 彭小松, 贺晓鹏, 傅军如, 周大虎, 贺浩华, 孙晓棠, 朱昌兰. 基于染色体片段置换系群体检测水稻株型性状QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1141-1151.
[10] 王泽, 周钦阳, 刘聪, 穆悦, 郭威, 丁艳锋, 二宫正士. 基于无人机和地面图像的田间水稻冠层参数估测与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1248-1261.
[11] 陈悦, 孙明哲, 贾博为, 冷月, 孙晓丽. 水稻AP2/ERF转录因子参与逆境胁迫应答的分子机制研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 781-790.
[12] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[13] 巫燕飞, 胡琴, 周棋, 杜雪竹, 盛锋. 水稻延伸因子复合体家族基因鉴定及非生物胁迫诱导表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 644-655.
[14] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
[15] 王琰, 陈志雄, 姜大刚, 张灿奎, 查满荣. 增强叶片氮素输出对水稻分蘖和碳代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 739-746.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!