欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 162-172.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.00162

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

免耕抛栽对水稻产量及其源库特性的影响

吴建富1,2,潘晓华2,*,石庆华2   

  1. 1江西农业大学国土资源与环境学院，江西南昌330045；2江西农业大学农学院/江西省作物生理生态与遗传育种重点实验室，江西南昌330045
  • 收稿日期:2008-05-21 修回日期:2008-07-18 出版日期:2009-01-12 网络出版日期:2008-11-18
  • 通讯作者: 潘晓华
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家“十一五”科技支撑计划项目（2006BAD02A04），江西省教育厅项目资助

Effects of No-tillage Cast Transplanting on Rice Yield and Its Source-Sink Characteristics

WU Jian-Fu1,2,PAN Xiao-Hua2,*,SHI Qing-Hua2   

  1. 1College of Land Resources and environment,Jiangxi Agricultural University,Nanchang 330045,China; 2 College of Agronomy,Jiangxi Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology,Ecology,and Genetic Breeding of Jiangxi Province,Nanchang 330045,China
  • Received:2008-05-21 Revised:2008-07-18 Published:2009-01-12 Published online:2008-11-18
  • Contact: PAN Xiao-Hua

PDF

1482

被引次数

78

摘要：

于2005—2006年在双季稻田以翻耕处理为对照，研究了免耕抛栽对水稻产量及其源库特性的影响。结果表明, 每公顷有效穗数免耕抛秧处理略低于翻耕抛秧而高于翻耕移栽，结实率高于翻耕处理。随着免耕次数的增加，各处理产量基本持平。水稻一生中叶面积指数、抽穗后水稻群体光合势、势粒比、颖花伤流量、源库增量比和籽粒平均灌浆速率均免耕处理高于翻耕处理，而粒叶比则相反；剑叶中叶绿素含量以免耕高于翻耕，而丙二醛(MDA)含量以免耕低于翻耕。免耕抛栽水稻后期不易早衰，有利于同化物的转运和结实率的提高。

关键词: 稻田, 双季稻, 免耕抛栽, 产量, 源库特性

Abstract:

The experiments were conducted in double cropping rice field during 2005–2006 to study the effects of different tillage methods on rice yield and its source-sink characteristics. The results showed that the effect on panicle number was lower and on filled grain percentage was higher in no-tillage cast transplanting treatment than in conventional tillage cast transplanting treatment. With the time of no-tillage increased, rice yield in different treatments did not differ significantly. The leaf area index during growth stages, the population photosynthetic potential, photosynthetic potential-grain ratio, bleeding potential in neek of spike, ratio of source to sink in increment and mean grain filling rate in no-tillage treatment were higher than those in conventional tillage treatment, but the grain-leaf ratio in no-tillage treatment was lower than that in conventional tillage treatment. The content of chlorophyll was higher and the content of MDA was lower in flag leaf after heading in no-tillage treatment than in conventional tillage treatment. No-tillage treatment was delayed leaf senescence, facilitated the accumulation and transportation of carbohydrate, and improved grain setting rate.

Key words: Paddy field, Double cropping rice, No-tillage cast transplanted, Yield, Source-sink characteristics

[1]Ling Q-H(凌启鸿). Crop Population Quality (作物群体质量). Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical publisher, 2000. pp 12–209 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]Wang Y-F(王夫玉), Huang P-S(黄丕生). Study on source-sink characteristics and its high-yield cultivation strategies of rice population. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1997, 30(5): 25–33(in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]Shi T T, Da Y S. Effects of planting density and methods of supplement application of nitrogen fertilizer on sink/source ratio in rice plant. Jpn J Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 1990, 61: 485–492
[4]Sonnewald U, Willmitzer L. Molecular approaches to sink-source interaction. Plant Physiol, 1992, 99: 1267–1270
[5]Tanaka A. The relative importance of the source and the sink as the yield limited factors of rice. ASPAC. FFLC Tech Bull No. 6
[6]Chapin F S, Wardlaw I F. Effect of phosphorus deficiency on source-sink interactions between the flag leaf and developing grain in barely. J Exp Bot, 1988, 39: 165–177
[7]Liu H-Z(刘怀珍), Huang Q(黄庆), Li K-H(李康活), Lu X-M(陆秀明), Cheng Y-S(程永盛), Fu H(付华), Liu J(刘军). Study of continuous no-tillage and cast transplanting on soil physicochemical property. Guangdong Agri Sci (广东农业科学), 2000, (5): 8–11 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]Liu J(刘军), Huang Q(黄庆), Fu H(付华), Lu X-M(陆秀明), Liu H-Z(刘怀珍), Li K-H(李康活). Physiological mechanism of high and stable yield of no-tillage cast-transplanted rice. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2002, 35(2): 152–156 (in Chinese)
[9]Liu J-Z(刘敬宗), Li Y-K(李云康). Studies on the no-tillage and seedling-throwing culture in hybrid rice. Hybrid Rice (杂交水稻), 1999, 14(3): 33–34(in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]Wei S-Q(韦善清), Xu S-H(徐世宏), Li R-P(李如平), Lang N(郎宁), Jiang L-G(江立庚). Studies on source-sink characteristics of no-tillage and cast transplanting rice. Chin Agric Sci Bull (中国农学通报), 2005, 21(9): 237–241 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]Zhang X-Z(张宪政). Research Methods of Crop Physiology (作物生理研究法). Beijing: Agriculture Press, 1992. pp 150-153 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]Cao S-Q(曹树青), Zhang R-X(张荣铣), Tang Y-L(唐运来), Yang T-N(杨图南). A new index for identifying the relationship between leaf photosynthesis and grain filling in grain filling stage of rice. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2002, 28(4): 516–520 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]Wu J-F(吴建富), Pan X-H(潘晓华), Shi Q-H(石庆华), Liu Z-F(刘宗发), Hu J-H(胡金和). Effects of different tillage methods on rice yield and soil fertility. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2008, 14(3): 496–502 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]Chen S(陈松), Xia G-M(夏国绵), Zhao W-M(赵为明), Wu F-B(吴飞博), Zhang G-P(张国平). Characterization of leaf photosynthetic properties for no-tillage rice. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2007, 14(4): 283–288 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]Li K-H(李康活), Huang Q(黄庆), Lu X-M(陆秀明), Liu H-Z(刘怀珍), Zeng H-B(郑海波), Pan Y-S(潘玉桑), Yang G-S(杨观宋), Luo J-L(罗家镏). Techniques of no-tillage and cast transplanting in double continuous cropping rice. Guangdong Agric Sci (广东农业科学), 1997, (3): 2–5 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]Li H-X(李华兴), Lu W-S(卢维盛), Liu Y-J(刘远金), Zhang X-M(张新明). Effect of different tillage methods on rice growth and soil ecology. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2001, 12(4): 553–556 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]Yang J-C(杨建昌), Zhu Q-S(朱庆森), Cao X-Z(曹显祖). Effects of the structure and photosynthetic characters of thie canopy on the yield formation in rice plants. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1992, 25(4): 7–14 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]Sun C-M(孙成明), Su Z-F(苏祖芳), Zhang Y-J(张亚洁), Sha A-H(沙爱红), Sang D-Z(桑大志). Study on relationship between characters of plant type in elongation stage and yield in rice. J Yangzhou Univ (Agric & Life Sci Edn) (扬州大学学报·农业与生命科学版), 2002, 23(2): 46–49 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]Wu J-F(吴建富), Pan X-H(潘晓华), Shi Q-H(石庆华), Ma C-W(马众文), Hu J-H(胡金和), Liu Z-F(刘宗发). Study on the nutritional characteristics of no-tillage and cast transplanted rice. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2008, 14(4): 659–664 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]Su Z-f(苏祖芳), Xu N-X(许乃霞), Sun C-M(孙成明), Zhang Y-J(张亚洁). Study on the relationship between rice plant type indices after heading stage and yield formation. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2003, 36(1): 115–120 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]Wang Y-L(王余龙), Cai J-Z(蔡建中), He J-S(何杰升), Chen L(陈林), Xu J-K(徐家宽), Bian Y(卞悦). The Relationships between spikelet-root activity and grain filling and ripen in rice(Oryza sativa). Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1992, 18(2): 81–89 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]Wang Y-L(王余龙), Xu J-K(徐家宽), Bian Y(卞悦), Cai J-Z(蔡建中). Effect on the grain filling of spikelet-root activity and its analysis in rice. J Jiangsu Agric Coll (江苏农学院学报), 1993, 14(1): 11–16 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]Yang J-C(杨建昌), Su B-L(苏宝林), Wang Z-Q(王志琴), Lang Y-Z(郎有中), Zhu Q-S(朱庆森). Study on characteristics and physiology of grain filling in intersubspecific hybrid rice. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1998, 31(1): 7–14 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[6] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[7] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[8] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[9] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[10] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[11] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[12] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[13] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[14] 崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
[15] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2