作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 1078-1085.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.01078
郭文琦,赵新华,陈兵林,刘瑞显,周治国*
GUO Wen-Qi,ZHAO Xin-Hua,CHEN Bing-Lin,LIU Rui-Xian,ZHOU Zhi-Guo*
摘要:
于2005—2006年在江苏南京农业大学卫岗试验站进行盆栽试验,设置正常灌水(土壤含水量为田间持水量的75%左右)和棉花花铃期土壤短期渍水处理(将正常灌水的棉花增加灌水至盆内有可见明水,持续8 d,然后用导管排除表面水层,使盆内土壤含水量逐渐恢复到田间持水量的75%左右),每个水分处理设置3个氮素水平(0、3.73、7.46 g N pot-1,分别相当于大田0、240、480 kg N hm-2),研究氮素对花铃期短期渍水棉花根系生长的影响。结果表明,在渍水处理结束时,与正常灌水处理相比,根干重和根冠比(R∶S)均降低;根系可溶性蛋白含量、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)和过氧化氢酶(CAT)活性降低,过氧化物酶(POD)活性升高,丙二醛(MDA)含量升高;棉花根系活力和单株光合速率(CAP)显著降低。增加施氮可降低渍水棉花根系SOD活性,提高POD和CAT活性,以3.73 g N pot-1(240 kg N hm-2)施氮水平下的棉花根干物重最大,根系MDA含量最低,根系活力最强,单株光合速率(CAP)最高,相应籽棉产量最高。渍水停止15 d后,渍水棉花根系抗氧化酶活性和MDA含量与正常灌水处理的差异较小;施氮仍可提高棉花根系POD与CAT活性,降低MDA含量,增强根系活力,提高CAP。
| [1] Hang H-L(韩会玲), Kang F-J(康凤君). Experiment and study on effect of moisture coerce on cotton producing. Trans CSAE (农业工程学报), 2001, 17(3): 37-40(in Chinese with English abstract) [2] Bange M P, Milroy S P, Thongbai P. Growth and yield of cotton in response to waterlogging. Field Crops Res, 2004, 88: 129-142 [3] Xue X-P(薛晓萍), Zhou Z-G(周治国), Zhang L-J(张丽娟), Wang Y-L(王以琳), Guo W-Q(郭文琦), Chen B-L(陈兵林). Development and application of critical nitrogen concentration dilution model for cotton after flowering. Acta Ecol Sin (生态学报), 2006, 26(6): 1781-1791(in Chinese with English abstract) [4] Halvoson A D, Reule C A. Nitrogen fertilizer requirements in an annual dryland cropping system. Agron J, 1994, 86: 315-318 [5] Zhou W, Zhao D, Lin X. Effects of Waterlogging on nitrogen accumulation and alleviation of waterlogging damage by application of nitrogen fertilizer and mixtalol in winter rape (Brassica napus L.). Plant Growth Regul, 1997, 16: 47-53 [6] Huang B, Johnson J W, Nesmith D S, Bridges D C. Growth, physiological and anatomical responses of two wheat genotypes to waterlogging and nutrient supply. J Exp Bot, 1994, 45: 193-202 [7] Sandhu B S, Singh B, Singh B, Khera K L. Maize response to intermittent submergence, straw mulching and supplemental N-fertilization in subtropical region. Plant Soil, 1986, 96: 45-56 [8] Jiang D, Fan X M, Dai T B, Cao W X. Nitrogen fertilizer rate and post-anthesis waterlogging effects on carbohydrate and nitrogen dynamics in wheat. Plant Soil, 2008, 304: 301-314 [9] Meyer W S, Reicosky D C, Barrs H D, Smith R C G. Physiological responses of cotton to a single waterlogging at high and low N-levels. Plant Soil, 1987, 102: 161-170 [10] Meng Y-L(孟亚利), Wang Y(王瑛), Wang L-G(王立国), Chen B-L(陈兵林), Zhang L-Z(张立桢), Shu H-M(束红梅), Zhou Z-G(周治国). Effect of the composite root population of wheat-cotton inter-cropping system on cotton root growth. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2006, 39(11): 2228-2236(in Chinese with English abstract) [11] Yang C M, Yang L Z, Yang Y X, Ouyang Z. Rice root growth and nutrient uptake as influenced by organic manure in continuously and alternately flooded paddy soils. Agric Water Manage, 2004, 70: 67-81 [12] Ahsan N, Lee D G, Lee S H, Lee K W, Bahk J D, Lee B H. A proteomic screen and identification of waterlogging-regulated proteins in tomato roots. Plant Soil, 2007, 295: 37-51 [13] Drew M C. Plant injury and adaptation to oxygen deficiency in the root environment: A review. Plant Soil, 1983, 75: 179-199 [14] Hocking P J, Reicosky D C, Meyer W S. Effects of intermittent waterlogging on the mineral nutrition of cotton. Plant Soil, 1987, 101: 211-221 [15] Biemelt S, Keetman U, Mock H P, Griemm B. Expression and activity of isoenzymes of superoxide dismutase in wheat roots in response to hypoxia and anoxia. Plant Cell Enviorn, 2000, 23: 135-144 [16] Yan B, Dai Q, Liu X, Huang S, Wang Z. Flooding induced membrane damage, lipid oxidation and activated oxygen generation in corn leaves. Plant Soil, 1996, 179: 261-268 [17] Huang B, Johnson J W. Root respiration and carbohydrate status of two wheat genotypes in response to hypoxia. Ann Bot, 1995, 75: 427-432 [18] Wang K H, Jiang Y W. Antioxidant responses of creeping bentgrass roots to waterlogging. Crop Sci, 2007, 47: 232-238 [19] Dong S-T(董树亭). Research and determining method of crop canopy apparent photosynthesis under field condition. Tillage and Cultivation (耕作与栽培), 1988, 3: 62-64(in Chinese) [20] Li H-S(李合生). Principles and techniques of plant physiological experiment. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000. pp 164-167(in Chinese) [21] Rubio G, Casasola G, Lavado R S. Adaptations and biomass production of two grasses in response to waterlogging and soil nutrient enrichment. Oecologia, 1995, 102: 102-105 [22] Voesenek L A C J, Blom C W P M, Pouwels R H W. Root and shoot development of Rumex species under waterlogged conditions. Can J Bot, 1989, 67: 1865-1869 [23] Wang C-Y(王晨阳), Ma Y-X(马元喜), Zhou S-M(周苏玫), Zhu Y-J(朱云集), Li J-X(李九星), Wang H-C(王化岑). Effects of waterlogging on the metabolism of active oxygen and the physiological activities of wheat root systems. Acta Agron Sci (作物学报), 1996, 22(6): 712-719(in Chinese with English abstract) [24] Li J-C(李金才), Wei F-Z(魏凤珍), Wang C-Y(王成雨), Yin J(尹钧). Effects of waterlogging on senescence of root system at booting stage in winter wheat. Acta Agron Sci (作物学报), 2006, 32(9): 1355-1360(in Chinese with English abstract) [25] Zhai B-N(翟丙年), Sun C-M(孙春梅), Wang J-R(王俊儒), Li S-X(李生秀). Effects of nitrogen deficiency on the growth and development of winter wheat roots. Acta Agron Sci (作物学报), 2003, 29(6): 913-918(in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [1] | 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560. |
| [2] | 张曦, 王广恩, 李邵琦, 刘祎, 李俊兰, 钱玉源. 基于转录组测序解析陆海杂交姊妹系马克隆值差异的形成机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1442-1458. |
| [3] | 杨宗桃, 杨婷, 王禹童, 艾静, 李燕烨, 刘家勇, 邓军, 赵勇, 张跃彬. 甘蔗CLC基因家族鉴定与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 722-734. |
| [4] | 于天一, 王春晓, 肖丽, 钟召迪, 王宣仓, 赵勇, 路亚, 吴月, 吴正锋. 不同结瘤特性花生品种氮素累积、产量及品质特性对氮肥用量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 881-894. |
| [5] | 刘宁, 樊平, 王成, 陈琪琪, 成庆悦, 铁夏娜, 汤菁莎, 刘彬彬, 谢鸿堃, 王嘉悦, 施园青, 马均. 减氮配施有机肥对机插稻产量形成与氮素利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 866-880. |
| [6] | 周琦翔, 朱艳, 汪楚博, 朱柏林, 李俊博, 宋利兵. 基于DSSAT模型模拟气候变化对新疆棉花物候期及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 590-602. |
| [7] | 刘吉昌, 李思烨, 李雪婷, 王洪章, 刘鹏, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 任昊. 盐胁迫对不同耐盐型夏玉米品种根系生长及养分吸收效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 565-577. |
| [8] | 尤根基, 谢昊, 梁毓文, 李龙, 王玉茹, 蒋晨炀, 郭剑, 李广浩, 陆大雷. 氮肥减施措施对江淮春玉米产量和氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2152-2163. |
| [9] | 闫喆林, 任强, 樊志龙, 殷文, 孙亚丽, 范虹, 何蔚, 胡发龙, 闫丽娟, 柴强. 氮肥后移优化绿洲灌区小麦间作玉米种间关系提高氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2190-2203. |
| [10] | 霍建喆, 于爱忠, 王玉珑, 王鹏飞, 尹波, 刘亚龙, 张冬玲, 姜科强, 庞小能, 王凤. 有机肥替代化肥对绿洲灌区甜玉米产量、品质及氮素利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1887-1900. |
| [11] | 郭栋财, 吕涛, 蔡永生, 买吾鲁达·艾合买提, 全家, 曲延英, 郑凯. 棉花纤维品质相关性状QTL元分析及候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1445-1466. |
| [12] | 王亚雯, 戚正阳, 尤佳琦, 聂新辉, 曹娟, 杨细燕, 涂礼莉, 张献龙, 王茂军. 棉花60K功能位点基因芯片的制备及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1178-1188. |
| [13] | 闫秉春, 万雪, 钟敏, 刘宇奇, 赵艳泽, 姜红芳, 刘雅, 刘惠玲, 马沁春, 高继平, 张文忠. 氮素水平对北方优良食味粳米品质及精碾磨粉颗粒特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 503-515. |
| [14] | 黄绒, 周渠晨, 陈楚铭, 罗倩, 易东, 杜常欢, 黄祥宇, 盛锋, 杜雪竹. 过表达BnNRT2.3-like对油菜氮素吸收利用及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3184-3197. |
| [15] | 丁俊沣, 许映飞, 张祥, 陈媛, 陈德华. 生长调节剂吲哚丁酸对移栽棉苗成活及生长发育的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3331-3341. |
|
||