欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (9): 1628-1636.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.01628

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

水稻双组分系统基因干旱胁迫表达谱分析

潘雅姣1,王迪1,朱苓华1,傅彬英1,*,黎志康1,2,*   

  1. 1中国农业科学院作物科学研究所/农作物基因资源与遗传改良重大科学工程，北京100081；2International Rice Research Institute，DAPO Box 7777，Metro Manila，Philippines
  • 收稿日期:2009-03-02 修回日期:2009-04-21 出版日期:2009-09-12 网络出版日期:2009-07-03
  • 通讯作者: 傅彬英, E-mail: fuby@caas.net.cn; Tel: 010-62136042; 黎志康, E-mail: lizhk@caas.net.cn; Tel: 010-62136040
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家重点基础研究发展计划（973计划）项目（2003CB114308）和国家高技术研究发展计划（863计划）项目（2007AA10Z191）资助。

Differential Expression of Rice Two-Component Elements Genes under Drought Stress

PAN Ya-Jiao1,WANG Di1,ZHU Ling-Hua1,FU Bin-Ying1,*,LI Zhi-Kang1,2,*   

  1. 1 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Beijing 100081, China; 2 International Rice Research Institute, DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, Philippines
  • Received:2009-03-02 Revised:2009-04-21 Published:2009-09-12 Published online:2009-07-03
  • Contact: FU Bin-Ying, E-mail: fuby@caas.net.cn; Tel: 010-62136042; LI Zhi-Kang, E-mail: lizhk@caas.net.cn; Tel: 010-62136040

PDF

3633

被引次数

5

摘要：

利用全基因组表达芯片，系统分析干旱胁迫条件下水稻双组分信号系统(two component system, TCS)相关基因在其不同发育阶段、不同组织以及抗旱能力不同的株系中的表达谱变化特征。结果表明, 双组分信号系统基因在干旱胁迫环境下的表达具明显的时空特异性，表现为不同组织的TCS基因干旱胁迫表达谱差异较大，而同一组织内表达谱相似，其中生殖生长期(幼穗分化期和孕穗期)两个叶片材料中TCS基因表达谱最为接近；与细胞分裂素信号传导负向调控相关的A型应答调控器在旱胁迫下表达下调，而与CK信号传导正向调控相关的B型应答调控器呈现明显上调趋势，推测与干旱胁迫下CK信号传导增强有关，同时乙烯受体基因在干旱胁迫环境下的表达下调，从激素间相互关系的角度更好地印证了上述推测；与拟南芥细胞分裂素受体基因(AHK2、AHK3和CRE1)序列相似的磷酸感应激酶基因HK5和HK3在干旱胁迫下表达上调，与拟南芥中不依赖细胞分裂素的AHK5序列接近的HK6则表达下调，进一步验证上述推测；干旱胁迫下抗旱能力不同的水稻株系其TCS基因表达谱没有明显差异，推测TCS基因差异表达可能源于对干旱胁迫反应，而其表达对抗旱能力的增强还有待进一步研究。

关键词: 双组分信号系统, 干旱胁迫, 表达谱, 水稻

Abstract:

In order to explore the temporal and spatial expression patterns of rice two component system (TCS) genes under drought stress and the relationship between expression of TCS genes and drought resistance ability, a whole rice genome microarray was used to analyze the expression profile of rice TCS genes under drought in different organs at different developmental stages and among rice lines with different drought resistance abilities. Results showed that the TCS genes were expressed in a temporal-spatial specific manner under drought stress in rice, behaved with great difference among the expression patterns of different rice organs and quite similar patterns within same tissues; type-A response regulator (RR) genes which may act as negative regulator of cytokinin signaling were mostly repressed by drought, while type-B RR genes which may play a role in positive regulation of cytokinin signaling were mostly induced by drought, these changes were supposed to be related with the enhancement of CK signaling under drought stress, this suppose was confirmed by the down regulation of ethylene receptor genes under drought from cross-talk of different plant hormones signaling; the HisKinase genes (HK5 and HK3) which is homolog with CK receptor genes (AHK2, AHK3, and CRE1) in Arabidopsis were induced by drought, while HK6 which is homolog with AHK5 (cytokinin-independent 2, CKI2)was drought repressed, these results provided a further confirmation of above suppose. The analysis of TCS genes expression profiling in drought resistant introgression lines and IR64 under drought stress did not find significant difference among the expression patterns of different rice lines, this maybe indicates that the TCS genes were related to drought responsiveness, but their effect to the enhancement of drought resistance still need further research.

Key words: Two component signaling components, Drought, Expression profile, Rice

[1] 田甜, 陈丽娟, 何华勤. 基于Meta-QTL和RNA-seq的整合分析挖掘水稻抗稻瘟病候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1372-1388.
[2] 郑崇珂, 周冠华, 牛淑琳, 和亚男, 孙伟, 谢先芝. 水稻早衰突变体esl-H5的表型鉴定与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1389-1400.
[3] 周文期, 强晓霞, 王森, 江静雯, 卫万荣. 水稻OsLPL2/PIR基因抗旱耐盐机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1401-1415.
[4] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[5] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[6] 杨建昌, 李超卿, 江贻. 稻米氨基酸含量和组分及其调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1037-1050.
[7] 杨德卫, 王勋, 郑星星, 项信权, 崔海涛, 李生平, 唐定中. OsSAMS1在水稻稻瘟病抗性中的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1119-1128.
[8] 朱峥, 王田幸子, 陈悦, 刘玉晴, 燕高伟, 徐珊, 马金姣, 窦世娟, 李莉云, 刘国振. 水稻转录因子WRKY68在Xa21介导的抗白叶枯病反应中发挥正调控作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1129-1140.
[9] 王小雷, 李炜星, 欧阳林娟, 徐杰, 陈小荣, 边建民, 胡丽芳, 彭小松, 贺晓鹏, 傅军如, 周大虎, 贺浩华, 孙晓棠, 朱昌兰. 基于染色体片段置换系群体检测水稻株型性状QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1141-1151.
[10] 王霞, 尹晓雨, 于晓明, 刘晓丹. 干旱锻炼对B73自交后代当代干旱胁迫记忆基因表达及其启动子区DNA甲基化的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1191-1198.
[11] 王泽, 周钦阳, 刘聪, 穆悦, 郭威, 丁艳锋, 二宫正士. 基于无人机和地面图像的田间水稻冠层参数估测与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1248-1261.
[12] 陈悦, 孙明哲, 贾博为, 冷月, 孙晓丽. 水稻AP2/ERF转录因子参与逆境胁迫应答的分子机制研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 781-790.
[13] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[14] 巫燕飞, 胡琴, 周棋, 杜雪竹, 盛锋. 水稻延伸因子复合体家族基因鉴定及非生物胁迫诱导表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 644-655.
[15] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2